For some reason my eyes glossed over this the first time. This is wrong at every level. Nobody's gonna stop to tell him that all 3 accounts enrolled before the great 2017 bull run? Because that is what initially attracted attention to the CM campaign in the first place. It was only after that when competition got much stiffer. Unsurprisingly, there's still a lot of accounts grandfathered in from that era who, in my opinion, probably wouldn't make the cut today if applying for the first time.

Sorry eddie but I'm not going to stop busting account farms over fear of having my posting ability judged by you.

Well the mods didn't agree that was plagiarism, but he's back at it again with a new account:


This is lifted near entirely from popup text found here: https://simplecash.live/



This is what I wrote in the report:


Please report this post for plagiarism. Thanks.

Going by this guy's writing style, I'm pretty sure this account still belongs to FOMA.

I had a few extra minutes this morning so I found an ETH address he posted:


which sent all its USDT to this address:


At around the same time, that address (0x8c6...) also received coins from this address:


The two transactions happened mere minutes apart and are not purchases -- it's a single person consolidating wallets. So on top of everything else, he's also been cheating in bounties, which isn't really surprising.

Interestingly, lovesmayfamilis had connected deodivine1 to other accounts in 2019.

---

This is correct -- for the sake of clarifying how "proof" should be counted or not counted, signing a Bitcoin address isn't proof that you don't have other accounts on the forum (this would be almost impossible to "prove" one way or the other).

You're asking us to trust your word, which is not how proof works as far as forum-related matters are concerned.

This year I'm doing something a bit different and waiting until minutes before kickoff to place a bet.

Hearing some sad news about Andy Reid's son who is also one of their defensive coaches, involved in a drunk driving accident yesterday? Don't know if its true or not.

My guess was that a bunch of money is gonna come in on KC @ -3 right before kickoff, but who knows now given this new intangible.

Most of the "pros" I've listened to on podcasts and youtube think KC will cover; however, they also don't like the idea of betting against Brady -- neither do I.

For fun I'm putting in a small wager but I won't know for sure until the numbers start to move next to the bet. I'm gonna chase whatever direction its moving in.

For prop bets I liked total penalties under 10 and KC to score passing TD over 18.5 yards. Unfortunately I got to them a bit late and they're too lopsided for me to bet on now.

Yep. Full disclosure: I had talked the possibility over with marlboroza back then but as he mentioned there wasn't enough proof to move forward. So I shelved the whole thing for almost a year, until this came up.


OK good.


If you say so.


I didn't see people being pissy at all. I saw a lot of people who commented on the implications of this, and then a few people expanded on the findings, and then you came in judging people in an almost strawman-type fashion, for whatever reason. Which just seems bizarre to me given that you said this the previous week:


It sounded like you thought bounty managers that hire alts should be actively punished while higher paying sig campaign managers should look the other way when it comes to rulebreakers, but you've since clarified that's not what you believe. I think that's why I found some of your input to be problematic, LOL. First time I've ever used that word.

Speaking of trust list changes, did you ever notice this fun little tidbit?


Usually that kind of thing doesn't get by you. Maybe you saw it and didn't think much of it.

That's not true. Zoroastrianism has been in practice for over 3,000 years.

All Hail Zarathustra!

Wipeout2097 was sold/hacked in May 2017, there's a huge posting gap between 2014 and 2017 for this user, and they come back knowing next to nothing about bitcoin. But I don't see the actual connection between Wipeout2097 and exstasie.


Doesn't matter. If one account can be connected to another through social media links, or even better the blockchain, they are for the purposes of this forum the same person. If you buy an account and it gets banned for plagiarism you didn't commit, the account should stay banned. Same goes for any type of scammer tags -- they should be copied to all connected accounts.

Most of the time its just bounty hunters who need multiple accounts, but sometimes people need them to rebroadcast shitty opinions by echoing them across two accounts in the same thread.

yeah yeah have a wonderful night sweetheart.

Well, it's been a few months now and a few Craig-related things have happened.

This came across my eye today and thought it was worth posting here. It's Square's pushback to a letter sent by Craig's lawyers demanding they remove a hosted copy of the white paper. Their response is that the basis of the claim is not factually represented and have a well-thought list of questions that Satoshi could answer, if Craig were indeed Satoshi:




I doubt they'll respond, of course, but they're pretty legit questions nontheless.

---

Something particularly weird I noticed is that BSV transactions have dwindled tremendously and are much less volatile than before. What's extra weird is that around the same time BSV transactions were ramping down, BCH transactions were ramping up:



BSV had these huge swings in the number of ongoing transactions whereas BCH is relatively stable. But sometime around the end of the year transactions dropped off significantly and are now almost neck-and-neck with BCH.

The orange line is what organic transaction volumes look like:



The other two lines, c'mon, what are you telling me? There was a huge customer exodus from BSV into BCH? Highly unlikely. My theory is that whatever service BSV was employing to boost their transaction load is now working on BCH, for whatever reason. The shift happened during January and now all 3 coins have around the same daily tx volumes, oddly enough.

Finally, I took a look at the hash rates and both BSV and BCH declined starting late Oct., right when BTC was picking up in price.



So BCH's hash rate is going down but its "usage" is up -- way up -- like 10x up this year. Doesn't make sense.

How's this for double standards?

You've taken to literally conferring with an actual scammer, because he's the only person who will talk to you. If that's not scam facilitation, I don't know what is.

From one of your Reddit links:


It's likely representative of what happened to most people who had their funds stolen. In a lot of reviews you posted, others chime in that it is most likely they exposed their credentials to malware. I didn't see one of them claim what you claim happened to you.

I've been using them for 6 years and never had a problem.

Well, the current pump is well outside its fundamentals, but I'd say DOGE has more uses than most coins, which can be demonstrated by its relatively high number of transactions. It has a strong, dedicated community. It's cheap to send, cheap to buy and easy to denominate. A lot of casinos accept it as payment. I wouldn't be surprised if all this newfound attention invigorates it kind of like it invigorated GameStop as a company.

Part of what got decided was to use BIP 8 instead BIP 9 -- I tried to understand what the advantage was and I guess its because they don't want a repeat of the activation controversy brought on by segwit? I'd be grateful if somebody could explain the difference between the two as I think I'm missing the significance. Thanks in advance.

You're thinking of DreamBlob, he's different.

How much money did all this cost you? I mean the money for your "incurable" diagnoses, the wellness seminars and the special herbal remedy that I'm sure is all-healing?

LOL. That's hilarious.

I'd be perfectly happy if presidents never tweeted again.

Can you sign a message from your staked address?

Since you're the second person who said this, it means I probably didn't clarify what I meant well enough. I wasn't referring to "as they say" as the odd phrase. The odd phrase is "The trend is your friend until it ends." What's odd about it is the "until it ends" part.

For example, doing a forum search for "the trend is your friend" yields 160 results; whereas searching for "the trend is your friend until it ends" yields 2 results: figmentofmyass and exstasie.


I would because gentlemand posts using a certain style of poetry that is not easily imitated, or rather can't be imitated. Somebody who is more easy to imitate and hasn't come back is 1Referee, who stopped posting after his last week in CM as well.

Let's do this. I kind of want Tampa Bay to win, but its gonna be a close one.

1)  Coin toss?  Tails
2)  Which team will win the coin toss?  TB
3)  1st Quarter total score 13?  Under
4)  Will KC cover the -3 point spread?  No

5)  Will Patrick Mahomes throw an interception?  No
6)  Will Patrick Mahomes score a rushing TD?  Yes
7)  Patrick Mahomes 2.5 passing TDs?  Under

 Will Tom Brady throw an interception?  No
9)  Will Tom Brady score a rushing TD?  No
10) Tom Brady 2.5 passing TDs?  Over

11)  Who will have more passing yards?  Brady  
12)  Will either team score 3 straight times?  No
13)  Will there be a Defensive or Special Teams TD scored by either team?  No
14)  Will either team score in the first 6.5 minutes of the game?  No
15)  Will both teams score offensive TDs on their opening drive?  No
16)  Will both teams makes 33 yard or longer field goals?  No

17)  Will there be a failed extra point?  No
18)  Will there be a 2-point conversion attempt?  Yes
19)  Will a player from either team be ejected from the game?  No

20)  Team to score first?  TB
21)  Team to use Coach’s Challenge first?  KC
22)  Team to call timeout first?  TB
23)  Most penalty yards?  TB
24)  Which team will record the most sacks?  KC
25)  Team to score last?  KC