I have seen a lot of such regretted public around me when I actually entered the Bitcoin or cryptocurrency world as I am still brand new so I have many senior persons who have been familiar with Bitcoin for a long time but they did not invest and now they feel this regret. As such I think most people will feel this kind of regret but I think it is foolish to remember the events of the past and feel regret, I think the time is not over yet even though it may not be possible to hold the same amount of bitcoins as before, but even if now a good strategy can may take you to a successful position in near future.
So I think it would be wise to take advantage of this opportunity now. By doing a proper dca management you strategize for long term and wait patiently as before bitcoin price was low I think bitcoin price is still much lower than that future price.
Arent we all caught in this cycle of should-haves and could-haves, especially with Bitcoin? Your remorse story is tired and frequent among seasoned observers. Retrospective review is educational, therefore calling it “foolish” is unfair. Investors look ahead, but they also learn from the past. Now, your current strategy's somewhat blind loyalty to Bitcoin's future success creates an artificial issue: its compulsive clinging to its once-glorious past as a forecast of future performance. Using DCA excessively and waiting for an upswing is a gamble masquerading as strategy. Remember: Bitcoin is affected by global economic, technological, and regulatory changes. Broadening the investment horizon beyond a single, volatile organization may be the “wise” choice. |
|
|
|
Of course, Satoshi will be happy if he is alive and sees Bitcoin. He wants people to be away from the bank and centralized system and Bitcoin is decentralised up to date. You said Bitcoin is centralized over time yeah it is true but still, bitcoin is decentralized as people run their own full nodes and participate in the network and many projects are working to reduce centralization like the lighting network. Bitcoin is still a new technology and is under construction and it has the potential to revolutionize the Financial system.
Satoshi did his job, now it's on us  that how we treat with the bitcoin? Whenever a person does something new, he is not aware of his results, the same thing happens with Satoshi, I think he knew about the bitcoin, but the bitcoin at a stage today, I confidently say, he wouldn't know about it. Of course, bitcoin is believed as decentralized, and the making of nodes has an impact on all of these. The banking system should be a way for it if we think differently. Bitcoin has now evolved all over the world and it has gained so much potential in the previous few years, Satoshi must be proud of his work, maybe if he was at this stage, he would do many more things like bitcoin, so we could also take benefits from it. Great people have always some great thinking about new things. Isnt it odd, if not foolish, that Satoshi may not have imagined Bitcoin's success? Satoshi methodically created Bitcoin, and while its tidal waves of development and adoption may exceed initial projections, its unlikely he overlooked its potential. Bitcoin's decentralization is basic, necessary, and Satoshi's aim. Should we assume Satoshi didnt realize his creation's potential scope and impact? Your suggestion to involve the financial system in Bitcoin's decentralized utopia seems to contradict its core values. Bitcoin resists traditional banking systems, right? Didnt Satoshi carefully instill that principle in its DNA? The pseudo-problem may be: How do we balance Bitcoin's revolutionary, decentralized nature with a need to integrate it with established banking systems without compromising its essential principles? |
|
|
|
Of course that is a good thing because before we are in bitcoin we must know in advance what bitcoin is and how bitcoin works so that we can be sure that what we are doing is not wrong and put what strategies are suitable when in bitcoin.
Nothing is 100 per cent in knowledge because knowledge will continue to be updated and when we learn something everything will definitely be lacking and have to learn every day but that's not the point, we learn bitcoin first is not intended to know up to 100 percent about bitcoin because it will not be done and it could be that you will not be in bitcoin if you want to learn the knowledge to 100 percent (because bitcoin will also be upgraded every day and the knowledge will also definitely increase) but do learning until you can really believe that bitcoin is one of the investments that can be used as our guide in investing because when we already know the basics and what bitcoin is, we can invest while continuing to learn bitcoin.
The most important thing is basic knowledge after which it can be run simultaneously with the investment that is started, if you want to understand all the ways bitcoin works then it will be difficult without practicing it - let's call it while investing over time you will understand it. Yaahh it's impossible to have to understand the science of bitcoin 100%, at least they know how to invest accordingly, how to run investments as long as they are able and how strong they hold while still accumulating, basically we expect profits so we have to understand from that side first. Thankfully if you understand to the technical bitcoin to get deeper, but for now my own personal to keep learning about learning bitcoin while doing DCA every week. What must be understood here is that we don't have to be perfect first to start something, especially when discussing the latest technology, where every day there are always new things to learn. When we try to be perfect first in learning in bitcoin but do not take any action forever we will not be able to enter bitcoin because to what extent you learn to understand, still not all knowledge can be obtained only by learning to see theory. You must try to take action in this case to invest directly as a form of your effort in doing what you want to achieve. Because we also have to realise that when we only grapple with theory without doing even 1 time practice it will only be empty knowledge. Not that it's useless, because everything is definitely useful, it's just that it will be bland because you don't have any experience as a form of your reference for proving the theory you learnt. If one thinks that one can learn everything before making an attempt to put the knowledge into practice, then that person is making a mistake. Everything can't end. As Bitcoin is growing gradually, we can't learn everything about Bitcoin. However, new things come every day, so if we learned little, we should practise the little we have learned. When we are talking about technical things, we don't have to depend on only the theory, one also needs practical. Gaining knowledge without doing it is a waste. If we learn about Bitcoin on this forum, and we don't put the knowledge into practice on our own, then we are not learning anything, rather than just come to the forum and have some fun at the end. But when we think about learning and also putting it into practice by investing in Bitcoin, it shows that we are serious about learning. What a simple perspective of knowledge and its practical use! Your point about jumping into practice without understanding Bitcoin and its complex ecosystem is somewhat true. Learning is an ongoing process, especially in the dynamic bitcoin market. Unfortunately, its a narrow perspective. Before investing or trading, one must comprehend blockchain technology, cryptography, and economic ideas behind Bitcoin. Are we undervaluing theoretical knowledge because we want to act now? Bitcoin is rooted in technical and economic theory, thus buying cheap and selling high is not enough. We must also comprehend market trends, regulatory settings, and security processes. Practice is important, but viewing it as an endless circle without practical outcomes is risky. |
|
|
|
|
How about trust and Bitcoin? Thats kind of like the final test for investors in relationships. Getting Bitcoin for 60K... Thats a pretty big move. That being said, Bitcoin has been such a wild ride, right? Going up and down, making us laugh and scream at the same time. Its been staying in the 20–30 band for a while now. Could it go down even more? Who knows for sure? The crypto game is so hard to guess!
The real issue is how to sleep at night when there is so much doubt? You have to pick between coffee and tea. You have to trust your gut and drink what you think is right sometimes. Dont forget that buying is all about the long term; short-term bumps are just part of the ride.
|
|
|
|
|
Your detailed description reflects the Bitcoin market's complexities and these "big whales."' strategy. Its fascinating, right? The whale-short-term investor dance reflects power relations in other economic sectors. With their immense power, these whales may affect markets and mood. Isnt it human for regular people to get caught in hype and emotions?
You made some good comments, especially about DYOR. A pseudo-problem: What if these whales impact our research sources? Some platforms, news outlets, and influencer-led discourses are prejudiced. I's complicated, but you're right: knowledge, temper, and a long-term perspective are the best defenses. Stay safe in crypto's crazy world.
|
|
|
|
|
You've explored the hodling vs. trading debate, which is timeless. Hodling may seem like a more relaxed way to try your luck, but it requires discipline and patience. Like stating, "I believe in this, and I'll ride out the storms." But would the market have liquidity if everyone hodled? Would traders' beloved fluctuations exist?
As you noted, trading requires strategy, attention, and adaptation. You must catch short-term waves and hope you read them correctly. What if your timing's off? You may overlook hodlers' long-term gains. A balance, right? A patience-action dance. Some thrive in trading's fast pace, while others like hodling. Your rhythm?
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to your Bitcoin trip. Exciting, right? You want to know how Bitcoin prices move, which many beginners find puzzling. I have an idea: Prices rise when people buy and fall when they sell because of supply and demand. Buyers express desire. When demand is high and supply is low, prices soar.
Limited Bitcoin supply and low mining returns raise the question of what will happen when we reach that limit. How would that affect prices and miners' motivation? That sparks ideas. Will supply and demand hold when block payments, miners' main motivation, become less important?
|
|
|
|
When we gamble what we are looking after or expecting is money which is [profit] and when buy bitcoin and invest what we are looking after is [profit] and when you so many people they skip bitcoin investment to gamble and some uses very big amount of money to gamble whereas the same amount of money will achieve some fraction in bitcoin investment. So I come with this question to know the thing between this option or words I presented the one that done you more harm, if bitcoin has done you more harm during the times you invested in bitcoin you can tell the public and if gambling has done you more harm by losing in gambling frequently you can also tell the public.
But for me I think gambling is the one that done people more harm than bitcoins investment, because almost every day people gamble with different platforms but its few of people that invest in a day or weekly, I will like us to discuss these.
A person is wrong, in the first place, if they are expecting to earn money from gambling, and they are wrong again if they skip investing in Bitcoin only to use that money for gambling with the same expectation again, to earn money. People really need to get one thing straight: gambling is not a way to earn money, it's not an investment option but it's a luck-based thing where you use your money and play some games and if you are lucky, you might manage to win some money but what history shows us and what we see every day, it's pretty clear that you are most likely going to lose money in it. On the other hand, Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency, it is also considered an investment asset because of its volatility and since it goes up and down in value, it can be a way to earn money for someone if they know the right time to buy and sell and for which they will need to gather knowledge and experience before getting involved. Yes, you're right, but lets analyze it. Gambling's temptation of quick cash is based on luck, and many have fallen for its seemingly simple attraction. Bitcoin isn't without its own gamble, is it? Predicting market fluctuations isnt easy, is it? You said gathering information and experience before trading Bitcoin. In a market that may change on a tweet, where do you draw the line between informed investing and gambling? Bitcoin, the first blockchain tech innovation, changed our view of cash, value, and data integrity. The decentralized nature makes transactions transparent, secure, and tamper-proof. Despite these technical details, volatility is unavoidable. Isnt there some gambling, albeit informed? |
|
|
|
`
I think that any addiction, regardless of whether it is a casino crypt or not, will be harmful, it can degenerate any relationship, whether it is a couple alone or the family relationship that is involved, practically when it is the father of the family who is at fault. We tend to generalize things a lot, we can say or intuit that when things are about how to avoid things, it is better not to do them, but others say doing them because there is a tendency not to make it become an addiction. , this depends on the personality of the person, obviously anyone who happens to be one of the best can give a well-defined way of achieving good management within a casino, we cannot only manage to make inconvenient and invented bets, for example. It may work at one point, but then everything goes to waste, and I think that a person like that is addicted to money and loses control and gets carried away by impulses, and this is something that if the person doesn't He has willpower, because if he does nothing, things go out of control and everything is lost. When a person is sad, sometimes the signs are obvious, they occur all at once, because they begin to see certain things that are needed, if there is a family, they realize that a need was not covered, when the reason is not sought, well If it begins to intrude because one did not eat this or those, and that is where the problems begin, in the beginning one can survive, with thus failures that are indicative, but with time and if it is not corrected quickly a person is capable of losing your family, because when you are the head of the household you should always be clear about your responsibility, you cannot invent that, we can be irresponsible alone, when there is no family or person in charge of us, but after a responsibility is acquired Socsas cannot be taken lightly, things have to be done very well and fulfill the family, the family comes first, the priority. Yes, any addiction, especially gambling, can cause a chain of negative effects. These activities typically hurt relationships, right? Gambling, especially in a real or crypto casino, deserves further discussion. When the family breadwinner becomes addicted, the family suffers. Family comes first, but how can we cling to it? Do you gamble in casinos to recover from financial and emotional losses when your favorite soccer team loses? How often do emotions and personal events obscure judgment and lead to hazardous behavior? I agree that when we lose, especially as a family, we must stay calm and avoid detrimental coping techniques like gambling. We should combine intelligence and self-control for ourselves and our families. |
|
|
|
`
That's why I often advise my brother to teach their children carefully. Yes, today's children are different because they can easily surf the internet by looking at their parents using a smartphone. They easily borrow their parents' smartphones and then use them. For other things, they tend to master them quickly just from watching videos on YouTube. That is why children now need to be paid more attention. I worry about if they accidentally watch a video about slot games and visit a casino. That will make them return, but hopefully, that doesn't happen to the young people. But it's better for them to be supervised when using their smartphones so they don't see things that aren't appropriate for them. We, as guardians, mentors, parents, and older siblings, owe it to the young minds to guide them judiciously. Children are curious; they explore, they learn, they mimic, and indeed, they master technology sometimes even better than us, dont they? Here’s a dilemma, though: Is it ethical to limit their exposure and potentially stifle their tech-savvy capabilities? As a healthy gambling expert, I’ve seen how initial innocent encounters can lead to harmful habits. The issue isnt merely about them possibly stumbling upon a casino game; its about them getting entangled in a web of potentially destructive digital environments. We need to nurture their curiosity, yes, but also safeguard them. Perhaps, its time for all of us to ponder upon ways in which we can supervise without suffocating, guide without governing, and protect without prohibiting |
|
|
|
Hahaha SER! You can't merely just approach/talk to people, then make an introduction that you made wagers that totalled $65 million in two different casinos/sports-betting sites. Because even though you truly have wagered $65 million, I believe it would actually look more credible if you simply asked the casino how much their highest betting limits currently are for more serious punters.  To be frank, a serious punter might not want their total amount wagered be known by many people, especially in forums. You are only telling the truth. When people are richer, they care more about their privacy and it is true not only for whales in gambling but in Bitcoin investment or any area in life. I would like to add one more. Privacy can not be regained after you lost it. Like in forums, data will be archived by forum operators and even third party data scrapers can scrap data, posts and archive those information too. I agree with your about importance of don't publicly share information about wealth in any forum. People share it can be are not aware about privacy, don't care about privacy or just want to show their wealth to satisfy their ego but later they will regret because as said, Privacy can not be regained after leaking and losing it on Internet. People adore showing off their winnings, based on what I've observed in the online gaming community and elsewhere. They fail to realize that every time they boast, they are putting themselves forward. They seem to be saying, "Hey, check me out! I am quite wealthy." And we all know that kind of thing draws the wrong kind of attention. You're true; it goes beyond simply flaunting their money or lacking a sense of privacy. Its all about the rush of satisfaction they experience when they are validated. "Oh, look, someone liked my post!" . Why is flaunting ourselves so important to us? Is it the fault of the internet, or is it just the way we're wired? |
|
|
|
`
Every gambling site definitely has prohibited jurisdiction and all gamblers can find out which countries are not allowed to use the site by reading everything in the Tos or FAQ which is available on the first page at the bottom when accessing the site. By knowing all the prohibited jurisdictions we can choose which casinos we can use freely and easily complete the required verification. We gamble using the amount of money we get from work or business so don't use the wrong casino because it could risk the opportunity of losing the amount of money we have deposited. But it seems that there are also some gamblers who live in one of the prohibited countries but they still access with VPN and use fake identities for verification. Even though this is prohibited quite a few gamblers have done it. Any gambling adventure requires careful study of the ToS and FAQ! Anyone entering the exhilarating world of online gambling should start there. You are right about checking authorized jurisdictions, which is essential for legal and ethical compliance. Some gamblers deliberately break those rules with VPNs and fake identities. They're ethically wrong and legally vulnerable. Although many choose this path, purposeful lying is a serious gamble with one's ethics and legality. Let us remember that honesty is vital in ethical gambling discussions, especially in virtual environments where we may feel invisible. For the survival of our cherished hobby, we must build a community that actively discourages deception. |
|
|
|
Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw Every few casinos can say they don't do this especially when you are a winner you will definitely be hit by the so called random check... This might sound a bit shady, but it's all within their legal rights. To lure in gamblers, some sites might even boast about offering anonymous gambling. But if you really read through the Terms of Service (TOS), you'll see all those legal rules, including KYC, are pretty much spelled out. So, honestly, it shouldn't come as a surprise. These days, you can't really expect to enjoy completely anonymous gambling anymore. Always have KYC in the back of your mind – it's like a checkpoint just waiting to be enforced, especially when you start racking up those wins. How legal is it to deceive people from telling that they don't need to submit KYC for playing on their casino? This is deceiving and not ethical actions made if they ask KYC later on especially when trying to withdraw our winnings since its like they lie to us and just want to play on their casino. If I see that casino putting a No KYC compliance on the title of their thread I immediately turn them down and erase thoughts of playing on them since for sure they use that word only for marketing. For making thing legal and casino complying on legal matters especially on licensing expect that KYC will be ask so we make sure to play only on the best known casino exist so that this scam casino cannot fool us on their shady statements or even offers. When casinos claim there is no KYC need and then request it afterwards, particularly when withdrawal, it is blatantly deceptive. Being open and honest about KYC requirements is not just morally right but also legally required in many places. Its a warning sign, dont you think, if they're not honest about it? Not only are these strategies dishonest, but they also hurt players that respect openness and truthfulness, like us. Always exercise caution, please. It is wise to place your trust in well-known casinos because they typically have a strong reputation to maintain. We must always conduct research before playing. In this manner, those dishonest casinos and their dubious activities might be avoided. As an aside, have you noticed that these phony casinos frequently have eye-catching promotions that look too good to be true? Like a carrot being dangled, theres always a catch! |
|
|
|
- Playing in reputable and trusted casinos is a good base for gamblers here in the crypto space, to be honest. Because when it becomes our habit, for sure you will not experience anything bad on these gambling platforms. And we should also know what the reputable crypto casinos are in this field.
It's difficult because the new crypto gambling in this industry will just randomly try it; maybe later you will be like others who suddenly block their accounts when they get a big win on the gambling platform. In which in the end they will complain here in the forum platform. As other always did most of the time.
Choosing a reputable and trusted casino is a must for every gambler to avoid various problems that could arise. The problem that often arises is when he wants to withdraw his winnings, where many casinos will ask him to do KYC before being able to process the withdrawal of his winnings. Only by researching can we find a reputable and trusted casino so that we don't make the wrong choice. We can search on this forum for choices because many casinos already have a good reputation and are also trusted by many gamblers here. But be careful of new casinos that you get from sites outside of this forum because the new casino has not yet earned its reputation and still has to prove it to everyone. If the new casino can provide the best for its members and not cause problems, maybe slowly the new casino will gain the trust of its members and people. Asking for KYC after you win money doesn't justify facts that the casino is a scam casino, why are people so hated KYC this much? Someone in his right state of mind should understand that KYC is very compulsory for a functioning casino, you win money and they ask you to pass KYC is very normal, if you aren't going to pass KYC do not gamble on any online casinos because every casinos are entitled to ask their customers for KYC verification. The best approach with casinos is choosing the ones with well built reputation, the popular the casino is the more reviews you will find online about them, problems mostly rises from new online casinos, they might be lacking money and you wont know, when you win some it will be hard for them to pay you, also they have less to none reputation available, that's why this forum is a good source for picking your next online gambling platform. Using this forum put you at a halfway journey about doing research on casinos or choosing the good casinos out of the legions of bad online casinos, mind you even casinos on this forum mostly ask for KYC verification too, gamblers can't escape KYC verification just like that because it's included by the law for casinos to ask KYC information from all their customers. KYC is required but bad. In a gambler's mind, imagine being on a winning streak, on cloud nine, and then bang! The KYC hits. Isnt it like being asked for ID at a party's peak? But you're right. KYC is required by all legitimate casinos. Also for our safety. A perspective: KYC goes beyond identity verification. Responsible gambling is involved. Casinos want to guarantee players are of legal age, not laundering money, and not gambling away their life savings. Like a double-check for the casino and player. Isnt it strange if a casino only requests KYC after a win? Why not verify upfront? A two-way street, right? All about trust. As players, we trust casinos with our money; they should verify our credentials immediately. |
|
|
|
Gambling doesn't require any knowledge from a gambler, while the very first thing about trading is the knowledge that you need and then trading capital. So, it's true that you can't achieve anything through trading if you lack that.
Gambling or betting on some team is profitable with respect to your luck. Let’s take the game of card, you have no control over the cards which is gonna come to you. So whatever you do with this game ultimately you depend on your luck. And the worse part is that there is no guarantee on your luck. If your luck is against you then you are out of the board. Where as trading in stock/commodity completely calculated risk with sort term horizon. Traders are fast to react. They pay attention to what the market is telling them and then act accordingly. Some gamblers feel they can beat the odds, but they are mistaken. They get thrilled about the possibility of a large win and get caught up in the glitz and glam of the casino, but the odd quickly work their way through their sums. Knowledge is both required for the both, because being ignorance will warrant to lose of wealth. You need to have idea of what you’re doing, it is not advisable to just put in money where you do not belong. I won’t say trading is gambling because it warrant close observation and analysis, of course, there is some luck in trading and investing, when trading earnings depend on how well you can do it. Gamble and trade require knowledge, right? Gambling knowledge reduces risk, whereas trading knowledge maximizes return. Playing your hand is more important at the poker table. You play, hope, and cross your fingers; sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. Its the game, right? Traders dont merely hope. You watch, learn, observe, analyze, and act. Luck helps, but knowing more prepares you. As you said, traders act quickly. They see, comprehend, act. Gamblers? They hope. A trader and a gambler enter a pub. Who orders the riskier drink? Remember to play safe and know your boundaries at the casino and stock market. |
|
|
|
You can risk your funds, losing them to these casino, because you don't understand how these games are played.
Is the concept of a casino game referring to the games offered, or is it the cunning maneuvers behind the scenes of the casino? If we focus on the games themselves, someone who cannot partake in casino games might simply be a newcomer to the world of gambling, and I presume they are not wagering large sums of money. That's perfectly fine as long as they are in the phase of assessing their chances of winning. Many seasoned gamblers undoubtedly possess extensive experience. Even those who have been indulging in their favorite games for years are well-versed in their pursuits and have a solid grasp of their odds of success. I rarely encounter a gambler who is incapable of playing at a casino, except for newcomers. When we talk about "casino games", are we actually referring to the cards, dice, and slots, or is it the behind-the-scenes magic (or manipulation) that makes it all work? For newcomers, the dazzle and allure of these games can be a bit overwhelming. They might jump in, not really knowing their odds, and perhaps thats where they falter. Many seasoned players, like you said, have that experience under their belt. They've seen it, done it, and, heck, they've probably lost a few along the way too. But isnt it funny how some of these "veterans" sometimes make newbie mistakes? Its like they forget the basics! As for newcomers, its essential for them to realize that gambling should be, first and foremost, about entertainment. Wagering more than you can afford, or chasing losses, isnt a good strategy |
|
|
|
yes, sometimes it's hard to verify who's right and who's wrong the forum gives us a good reputation system (I don't think a legendary member would risk losing their reputation over a false claim)
and you can always check what are the favorite/con reviews of the website (even though this can also be fabricated)
Whether who is right and wrong will come to light when both party presents their evidence. Mostly those who are accusing the casino are breaking TOS but they tell a story where they look like a victim of injustice. But the moment the casino states their side together with the case and proof why the player is grounded or account suspended the accusation is nullified, while if the player is telling the truth and after investigation of the casino finds out they are at fault, they certainly admit it and release the fund that is being withheld by the casino. A casino that build their reputation over many years will not tarnish their reputation in scamming single players or selective players. They are paying huge amount of money to advertise their service and obviously they won't make any action that will give them negative remarks. the old "he said, she said" dilemma, isnt it? The frequency with which these scenarios arise is fascinating. Players are shouting unfairness on the one hand, while the casino is dragging out their enormous book of TOS infractions on the other. Its like seeing a courtroom drama play out when they provide their side of the tale, isnt it? But let's face it: a trustworthy casino wont risk years of credibility in order to defraud gamers of their money. It seems as though they have a long-term connection with their reputation; why would they jeopardize it all for a short-term affair? Thought provoking, yet important stuff. This brings up a hypothetical issue: if casinos cherish their good name so much, should they maintain a stash of written regrets in case they make a mistake? Just something to ponder. In any case, people should constantly remember to gamble sensibly. Nobody wants to be the player that always calls foul. |
|
|
|
Could we say that lotteries are made for the poor, so? As a poor man myself, maybe that's the reason I like to play this game from time to time  It seems that the question you asked is not quite right. Because basically everyone is free to gamble and everyone is also free to choose what type of game they will play, including lottery games. In gambling there are no boundaries, whether you are rich or poor, whether you are a businessman or an ordinary citizen, everyone can gamble as long as they have money to bet. It's just that because this type of gambling (Togel) doesn't require a lot of money to be able to place a bet, this type of gambling is often enjoyed by poor people, many of whom think that playing Togel can change their lives financially and become someone. suddenly rich. And I speculate that lottery gambling was created and intended for people who lack work, who spend their time doing useless analysis and constantly turning over numbers. Anyone can bet, regardless of wealth. Thats interesting, but lets think about something else. Games like Togel, which are cheap at initially, can give people a false sense of stability and hope. Gaming emphasizes choice, which is true. Do not dismiss its downside. Many believe they can win large and improve their lives immediately. Unfortunately, they often get locked in a cycle of chasing losses and hoping for a huge break. Do you desire freedom to choose when the consequences might be so bad for many? |
|
|
|
Well probably that is how you see a mature account but another person can also see mature account from another perspective. Yes when you have been in a casino for long period of time and you have been promoted to a higher rank like as you said, VIP gambler then your account has be listed or entered the mature account. Because at that time your account is no longer a beginner or new to the system. And every worker in the company would know your account. And the casinos you mentioned are renowned casinos in the forum, but bc game had been facing some challenges but might be they have solved the problem with the accusers. But they are good as well. And I believed not all the casinos have this VIP rank they are some casinos that have flat rank for all the gamblers. Op thanks for bringing your experience to the forum for people to know the worth of casinos. We believe others will also bring theirs so that we will know more so when we are using casinos, we will know were Tor which one to play with and this will also encourage other casinos to do well.
There is more to maturity in casino accounts than what you and I perceive. There are individuals who base their decisions on rankings and titles, while others may consider time invested or money invested. Does it make me "mature" or just "lucky" if I become VIP in a week because I've been having luck? Lets not overlook the human aspect of casinos and their systems while we're at it. A VIP status or membership recognition is meaningless if we dont engage in safe gaming. You know, its tempting to play more and get more benefits, but always, really always, remember to stand back and consider if you're still enjoying yourself or if you're just pursuing the latest and greatest thing. |
|
|
|
no one who gets into gambling knows they can get addicted because most people think that their control is that strong that they can easily quit but in reality, those that's more confident that they're not going to get addicted are the most likely people to get addicted.
No one would ever thought about been addicted to gambling from the start of it all, but if we are very sensitive enough, we will also know that there's an indications that is giving us the signal for strange habits or behaviors in gambling which we often don't take with serious till everything turns to what is now obvious and called addiction, therefore, we should be sensitive to how we gamble, the way we did it and the things that involves through the means at which we gamble so we can know if addiction is setting in or not and we must not be reluctant in taking a disciplinary action against any form of addiction. I think this one of the things that all the addictions have in common, all the people that struggle with it would have never thought before that it could come so far. Even if you have heard about addictions and how devastating they can be, it's hard for people to imagine that they could lose control over their life's to such an extent. The problem is that changes to our gambling habits happen slowly and we fail to recognize them. It's not like one person wakes up the next day and is addicted to gambling. One solution to the problem is to listen to friends and family when they are concerned about us. In my opinion it's much easier for others to notice changes in our behavior than for ourselves. It definitely helps to keep an eye on rapid changes in our mood and not to give in to quick decisions that we make from. Our stomach, better to stay rational and think before acting. Denial, especially in addiction, is prevalent and destructive. But lets dive deeper. What if our loved ones gamble frequently? They may unwittingly oppose our interests. When gambling biases obscure their judgment, the support feedback loop is unbalanced. To whom do we turn when others face comparable struggles? A neutral, third-party check-and-balance mechanism is essential; delicate. One that can objectively observe our routines and conduct. Even though our loved ones mean well, addiction management and recovery require professional help. Think people require a certified expert or support group to realize their tendencies and break free? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
