Bitcoin Forum
September 28, 2024, 07:30:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 ... 405 »
3461  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: fuck on: September 13, 2012, 03:22:32 PM
What about a feedback system next to names and people can at least see transactions done and for amounts, usually give you a good sign if theirs going to be potential issues, beside just the amount of posts.
*Looks at sig*

Of course, I don't think theymos wants to integrate a feedback system directly into the forum (I believe that possibility has been discussed and shot down before), but I was thinking about writing up a greasemonkey script that would auto-insert the feedback stats next to/under people's names as they are browsing the forum.
3462  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer Tags- Pirate Pass Through operators ? on: September 13, 2012, 03:15:47 PM
Payb.tc, I don't understand why you're even giving this thread attention.  It's ridiculous to think that you're responsible for Pirate's nonsense.  After all it was clearly stated in your OP that if Pirate defaults then that's the risk all the investors take.  Never did you guarantee anything in any shape form or way.  The fact that you're a scam is, in my opinion, completely ridiculous.  It's obvious by this thread that money clearly clouds peoples judgement and intelligence.  
I thought the same thing at first, but...

If someone robs a supermarket, and you help them out in doing so, are you at fault?
If someone sets fire to a house, and you help them out in doing so, are you at fault?
If someone steals a bunch of people's money in a ponzi, and you help them out in doing so, are you at fault?
3463  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cold storage security on: September 13, 2012, 03:07:40 PM
I believe I was understanding. I was suggesting you are not too paranoid, that rather it might merely be that you had avoided being a target so far due to not yet holding enough coins to make yourself a target; that once you hold enough coins you well might be a target thus you are not being paranoid you are wisely thinking ahead.

Joel, his problem is he insists on revealing how much he holds.

Presumably he has to actually prove it, so even if he proves it only to individuals and only to the extent of how much of that individual's money he holds, anyone capturing such an individual would be able to see for sure that he holds at least the amount he has proven to that individual he holds...

-MarkM-
Ok, that makes more sense then.

I have to show all of my addresses to the world for the service to work.  So yeah, anyone and everyone could figure out (with a little work) how much I was holding.

I suppose there's always the option of doing multiple withdrawals/day to limit exposure as well.
3464  Other / Off-topic / Re: BFL ASIC Shipment Plan on: September 13, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
I feel kinda screwed about having to wait a couple months while people are bringing up the threat level because they just got in early. Thus destroying the reason I bought the machine. To make money.  It's just greedy. It's a pre-order. All units should be shipped at the same time. I'm paying just as much money as everyone else. This is utter BS.  If it was weeks I'd understand. But we're talking months.  This is bad for anyone who has ordered within the last month or so. Again, utter B-S
LOL, then you should have ordered earlier, eh?

Life isn't fair.  Deal with it.
3465  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cold storage security on: September 13, 2012, 06:16:33 AM
But here's the problem:  People know where I live (or could easily find out, as I make little effort at hiding my offline identity).  If I have thousands of Bitcoins on hand, and people know that, then I fear I would be making myself a target for home invasion.

So how many visitors have you had, demanding you log in to your bank and transfer money to them?

Or demanding you drive them to an ATM and get them cash?

Or open the lock to your safe?
Point taken.  Perhaps I am just too paranoid.  Wink

Depends... has it already been public knowledge for quite a while that you hold as many bitcoins as this business you are planning will hold?

Will you still hold that many of your own when you start also holding those of the business?

Maybe it merely has not yet seemed worthwhile to target you yet due to your not being known yet to hold enough to make it seem worthwhile to try?

-MarkM-

No, you're still not understanding.

I hold like 70 bitcoins to my name.  I am not a worthwhile target, and I doubt I ever will be just by my own wealth.

If the service became popular, then I could see me holding up to somewhere in the tens of thousands of bitcoins before offloading them each day.
3466  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cold storage security on: September 13, 2012, 06:06:12 AM
Problem is, this particular service does require the holding of ~15,000 different private keys.  I can't just remember those in my head.  Wink

I do not think that is the real problem.

The real problem seems to me to be your desire/need to brag about how many coins you hold.

If the amount was not bragged about / published / known then you could have magic words/commands that retrieve 15,000 keys but retrieve decoy keys instead of real keys given the wrong magic words/commands.

But bragging about how many coins you hold makes it necessary for any decoy to hold as many coins as the real target, which kind of spoils the usefulness of the decoy.

Fort Knox brags about having lots of wealth on the premises, maybe the service you have in mind would be more suitable for them to offer than for you to offer...

Gosh, bragging has a downside? Who'd'a thunk?

-MarkM-

EDIT: Hey waitasec, did I just basically imply there is some security to be found in obscurity?
It's not about wanting to brag.  With this particular business, the knowledge of exactly how many coins I was holding would HAVE to be public information.  There is no way around that.

Also, anyone who says there is no security through obscurity is an idiot.  PASSWORDS are security through obscurity.

Apologies in advance for the large quote. Isn't the threat of being coerced a fundamental problem of being publicly rich?
Absolutely, point taken.  I just suppose it feels different when it is me being responsible for other people's coins, vs me being responsible for my own.

You could do what I do. Run your business out of a small public storage unit. Get a wireless internet card and work as long as your laptop battery lasts. If you really need additional power take the light bulb out of the unit and replace with a light/power tap and store your inventory there as well. Get a P.O. Box to accept the mail for the business and once a day make a run to the P.O. Box. Most multi-floor storage buildings also have included on-site security if someone follows you they will not get by security. This has worked for me for years.

Oh, make sure you associate the business with another name. Don’t let it be known that you are the one running the business. If anyone suspects it's you tell them you wish you had a business like that. In other words, "play dumb." This has worked for me for years.
Interesting idea, thanks.  I think I'd still prefer the deposit box route, but a storage unit WOULD accomplish the same thing.  Worth consideration, at least.

But here's the problem:  People know where I live (or could easily find out, as I make little effort at hiding my offline identity).  If I have thousands of Bitcoins on hand, and people know that, then I fear I would be making myself a target for home invasion.

So how many visitors have you had, demanding you log in to your bank and transfer money to them?

Or demanding you drive them to an ATM and get them cash?

Or open the lock to your safe?
Point taken.  Perhaps I am just too paranoid.  Wink
3467  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: SALE! 21GB Lifetime Dropbox Accounts for 0.25 BTC! on: September 13, 2012, 05:43:22 AM
Left you feedback at bitcoinfeedback.com!
http://www.bitcoinfeedback.com/viewuser.php?id=622

But smooth transaction, no problems, thank you!
3468  Other / Politics & Society / Re: 9/11 is the Litmus Test on: September 13, 2012, 05:40:42 AM
Ok, dropbox link for the video instead:  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/76051207/9_11_Conspiracy.avi

It should let you stream.
3469  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cold storage security on: September 13, 2012, 02:44:08 AM
Just use a brainwallet. That way your bitcoins are not stored "offline"... they aren't stored anywhere at all. There would be no reason why people would come to your house looking for bitcoins, there would be no point. The only way to get them would be coerce you to give up the passphrase. I can go into more details about this (it's a pretty simple system -> you still use an offline computer to sign transactions, but the offline computer never stores the private key).
Why do you say there is no reason why people would come to my house looking for bitcoins?

As I said in the OP, my name and street address are fairly easily associable with my online identities.  Couple that with the fact that I would be running a business where anyone could see the exact amount of Bitcoins I am holding at any given time, and that number of Bitcoins may increase to a significant number (thousands or tens of thousands of BTC), and I can see very good reason for people wanting to "pay me a visit".

I don't understand. What would they stand to gain from paying you a visit? There is nothing to steal at your physical location.
They could threaten or coerce me, steal family members, etc, is what I was thinking.

This thread confuses me. You don't need to have wallets stored anywhere at all to use Bitcoins. You don't need an online service, you don't need an offline wallet. All you need to do is remember (somehow) your private key. If it was publicly known that I had a million bitcoins, and everyone knew my physical address, thieves could come and steal everything in my house and all of my computers... it wouldn't do them any good.

Obviously, if I was tortured I might give up my Bitcoins, but I don't see how any scheme can protect you against torture or other forms of coercion.
Problem is, this particular service does require the holding of ~15,000 different private keys.  I can't just remember those in my head.  Wink
3470  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How are private keys created/randomized? on: September 12, 2012, 10:36:10 PM
Last time I checked, Bitcoin used:
- Microsecond time.
- GUI events
- /dev/urandom if available
- HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA on Windows
Excellent, thank you.
3471  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cold storage security on: September 12, 2012, 10:10:40 PM
I don't want to deal with a second person

Will these customers be informed that the entire amount of funds they've entrusted with you are then one heartbeat away from being lost forever?
Sorry, I should clarify.  Certainly, there would be multiple contingency plans in the event of my unfortunate departure from this world.  I just mean that I don't want to have to deal with gathering information from a second person on a day-to-day basis just to get some transactions signed.
3472  Economy / Gambling / Re: Let's play a game on: September 12, 2012, 09:59:00 PM
Epic thread is epic.  If I was a gambling man, I'd be all over this.  Epic fun.
3473  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cold storage security on: September 12, 2012, 09:51:06 PM
As I said in the OP, my name and street address are fairly easily associable with my online identities.  Couple that with the fact that I would be running a business where anyone could see the exact amount of Bitcoins I am holding at any given time, and that number of Bitcoins may increase to a significant number (thousands or tens of thousands of BTC), and I can see very good reason for people wanting to "pay me a visit".

I wouldn't want to be anywhere near a public bitcoin facility especially with a known high balance if it doesn't have adequate protection.  Even if you made it perfectly clear no private keys are available on location, some moron criminal is still going to attempt to steal some money.  They may even harm you as an example to future victims.  Bottom line - either don't make the address public or hire lots of security.
What do you mean by "a public bitcoin facility"?

This business wouldn't turn enough coin to hire "lots of security", so I am attempting to figure out a way to run it securely without resorting to such drastic measures.

EDIT:  Thanks for the answer on that Casascius.
3474  Other / Off-topic / Re: [Announcement] Butterfly Labs on: September 12, 2012, 09:30:34 PM
And know for something completely different...

BFL,

When you ship the ASIC's will you also have EasyMiner rev'd up so it can mine directly. I may be in the minority but I do not relish thought of poking around with compiling software and tweaking ini files trying to get the ASIC's to mine.  I am hoping that you will ship a complete "turn-Key" setup. Others can use what ever software they wish but I wanted to pass along my thoughts as many I have talked to, just want to invest in your solutions without spending an inordinate amount of time with setup. If not please help Bitminter get its client working with your new ASIC's before you ship  - For me plugging into a USB hub and hitting a big start button is sublime.

Just my 2 cents or my .226 BTC


I have 10 of your SC singles and 10 of Jalapeno's on order - I am looking forward to seeing them in action

Thanks,

David
Use Bitminter then.  It's pretty much "plugging into a USB hub and hitting a bit start button".

yes, I use it now  - great software - I was just mentioning it would be nice to have Easyminer also working for people who use other pools but want a turn key solution  - also It depends on BTC assisting Bitminter client software to be ready before the shipment of the ASICs, or have their own solution. It will be depressing to have a whole pile of ASICS and no quick and easy way to get them up and mining.
Both BFL and Bitminter have assured Bitminter support at the time of ASIC release.  I'm not worried about it.  BFL knows as well as we do that releasing their ASICs without support from the major existing mining softwares would be a customer service nightmare, and I am sure they will work towards preventing such a situation.
3475  Other / Off-topic / Re: Vlad "plots" aginst best freind scammer Matthew N. Wright on: September 12, 2012, 09:28:31 PM
Thanks D&T, that's exactly the sort of clarification I was looking for.
3476  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / How are private keys created/randomized? on: September 12, 2012, 09:27:02 PM
In the satoshi client... how are private keys created?  What is the randomization technique used to create them, and how is this randomization NOT reproducible?
3477  Other / Off-topic / Re: [Announcement] Butterfly Labs on: September 12, 2012, 09:24:15 PM
And know for something completely different...

BFL,

When you ship the ASIC's will you also have EasyMiner rev'd up so it can mine directly. I may be in the minority but I do not relish thought of poking around with compiling software and tweaking ini files trying to get the ASIC's to mine.  I am hoping that you will ship a complete "turn-Key" setup. Others can use what ever software they wish but I wanted to pass along my thoughts as many I have talked to, just want to invest in your solutions without spending an inordinate amount of time with setup. If not please help Bitminter get its client working with your new ASIC's before you ship  - For me plugging into a USB hub and hitting a big start button is sublime.

Just my 2 cents or my .226 BTC


I have 10 of your SC singles and 10 of Jalapeno's on order - I am looking forward to seeing them in action

Thanks,

David
Use Bitminter then.  It's pretty much "plugging into a USB hub and hitting a bit start button".
3478  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cold storage security on: September 12, 2012, 09:22:55 PM
Just use a brainwallet. That way your bitcoins are not stored "offline"... they aren't stored anywhere at all. There would be no reason why people would come to your house looking for bitcoins, there would be no point. The only way to get them would be coerce you to give up the passphrase. I can go into more details about this (it's a pretty simple system -> you still use an offline computer to sign transactions, but the offline computer never stores the private key).
Why do you say there is no reason why people would come to my house looking for bitcoins?

As I said in the OP, my name and street address are fairly easily associable with my online identities.  Couple that with the fact that I would be running a business where anyone could see the exact amount of Bitcoins I am holding at any given time, and that number of Bitcoins may increase to a significant number (thousands or tens of thousands of BTC), and I can see very good reason for people wanting to "pay me a visit".
3479  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cold storage security on: September 12, 2012, 09:12:50 PM
Hmmm... now there's an idea.

I wonder if they would have a power plug in the same area where the deposit boxes are made available?  If not, I could always just take a battery with me.

Hanging out and doing any kind of work inside their vault is not something they're anticipating you'll do.  They expect you will come in, identify yourself, sign their logbook, and go in the vault accompanied with your key and they will insert their key (each box has two locks) and then you will either add things or take them out while they stand by.

Potentially, I could put cold storage on a netbook-type device (with paper and USB backup), then stop by the safety deposit box with a USB key to sign transactions as necessary.  If no power is available, I could simply take the battery home and charge it (assuming I had two of the same netbooks), then bring it with me to conduct the transactions.

A bit of a hassle, but doable.

I've never used a safety deposit box.  Are they typically available 24/7?  Can they fit a netbook inside?

A typical safety deposit box is small but LONG (unless you pay for more size).  A typical size is 3x5x22 (inches).  It will definitely fit a USB stick, or rolled-up documents.  But not a computer.  They are only accessible during banking hours.

Between me and the company I work for, we have several boxes of this size, specifically for contingency plans.  The boxes I use to hold Bitcoin private keys contain parts of m-of-n sets, and they are printed on paper in the form of QR codes.  When I visit the boxes, if I want 1 code, I will usually just scan it with my phone, or if I need several, I might just take part or all of a sheet out of the stapled-&-rolled-up stack.  I always assume that the bank personnel "could" access my box for any reason, so I never leave private keys in the box that would be useful by themselves.

For the sake of this argument, I'll trust the bank and its staff, but will still ensure that the contents of whatever I leave in the deposit box are encrypted.

Assume I rent a large enough box to fit a netbook in then... What about grabbing the netbook, going out to the lobby, conducting my transactions, then stowing it back away again?  Would it be unsafe to have the data "out in the open" in the lobby?

Or, would it be ridiculously slow to simply keep the private keys on a USB drive in the deposit box, then bring a netbook along with me to sign the transactions?  I don't know how having a wallet file on a USB device would affect the speed at which signing with Armory could occur.  And, of course, never actually bringing the netbook online while it is elsewhere, to ensure it truly remains uninfected cold storage.
3480  Other / Off-topic / Re: Vlad "plots" aginst best freind scammer Matthew N. Wright on: September 12, 2012, 09:03:09 PM
Bold on the Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย quote my emphasis. It is Bittalk Media Ltd, who is liable here. What we are talking about here is a corporation turning over some of its shares held in trust for one of its shareholders in exchange for some very questionable liabilities of the shareholder, without a right of offset, with multiple international jurisdictions involved and where the shareholder in question is at risk of bankruptcy! Talk about a legal hornets' nest. The legal fees to clean up this mess alone can easily bankrupt many a business start up.

I missed that but I still don't see how BitTalk is liable for anything.  If Matt choses to trade some of his liabilities for the equity in BitTalk that is his choice.  If he is insolvent (legal definition) and seeks bankruptcy then the tx could be voided but there is legal consequence.  BitTalk could take a loss (in theory) but the odds of all that happening are essentially nil.
Ok, so here's a question:

In the event of a MNW bankruptcy, and assuming he still held partial equity in Bitcoin Magazine, what would happen to that equity?  Would it be sold by the state at auction?  Would it be offered for buyout to the other shareholders at the highest bid price?  Would it be distributed to the creditors?

Also, are individuals treated the same as corporations when it comes to bankruptcy?  If a person is known to be bankrupt soon, then they shouldn't pay anyone, but save what they have to be distributed to the creditors evenly?  I've never heard of that happening in a personal bankruptcy case, so it just seems odd to me... I've never heard of anyone not being able to choose who they want to pay right up to the point that they make the official declaration of bankruptcy.

It would be up to the court and the bankruptcy trustee to sell or transfer that equity for the benefit of the creditors. There may be restrictions of the sale of the equity that would give the remaining shareholders first rights, options to purchase etc. This type of agreement is not uncommon in business startups. As for payments to a creditor by a debtor in anticipation of bankruptcy, these can be reversed in many cases by the other creditors.
To confirm, those payments can be reversed even in the case of personal bankruptcy?
Pages: « 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 ... 405 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!