At first I thought it was Jack Dorsey and began to think about the reason for that, but Jack Sweeney? What is this strange reason? The subject of buying an Elon Mask has received a lot of analysis, most of which will be useless, it's a big deal but it's a bargain in a sea of deals. Let's see how Twitter will result in continuity as a profitable company and how it will maintain the numbers of active users are the measures of success. Until we get there, the deal still takes several months to complete.
|
|
|
Changing monetary policy will not be abnormal, but rather gradual, as interest rates will witness a change in the long term. We may witness 5 interest rate hikes during this year, although I am skeptical about that due to the impact on oil prices.
As for the impact on cryptocurrencies, the matter needs a lot of details, as we see that the price of 40k is still very low, and we see that some are still betting on the possibility of increasing the price above 50k.
|
|
|
-snip- خطر ببالي سؤال: هل الحصول على ترخيص من أبوظبي يعني أن المنصة بامكانها استعمال الامارة لتركيز احدى مقرات المنصة أو ان سكان أبو ظبي صار بامكانهم استعمال المنصة؟
على حد علمي، الحصول على ترخيص كامل من سوف أبوظبي العالمي يعني أن المنصة سوف تكون قادرة على تقديم خدماتها في الامارات، و ربما حتى بعض دول الخليج المجاورة. جميع التراخيص التي تم ذكرها تتعلق بالمناطق الحرة او سوق الاسهم التي تنظمها الدولة الامر اشبة بامكانية ادراج الشركات في بورصة ناسداك وغيرها فقد سمحت المنطقة الحرة في الامارات بالتداول في العملات الرقمية ومن ثم يجب علي المناطق الحرة في كل امارة وضع ترخيص قانوني لذلك. اما عن كلام المنصة عن موضوع دول باقي مجلس التعاون الخليجي او دول الشرق الاوسط وشمال افريقيا فنجاح التجربة في دبي قد يمهد المال للاسواق في السعودية, مصر, الكويت, عمان بذلك لكن الامر لا يعدو الحصول علي ترخيص وبالتالي ستعمل تلك المنصات في المنطقة العربية, سيكون لها حساب بنكي يمكن ان يتم استخدامه لشراء وبيع العملات الرقمية. بمعني يمكنك ان تودع اموال من حسابك البنكي لحساب بيناس وتشتري بيتكوين او العكس. اما عن اللوائح التنظيمية فحسب ما اعرف اغلب الدول العربية تحظر العملات الرقمية وحتى الامارات فالبنك المركزي يحذر من ذلك وبالتالي ما لم تقم الحكومات بتغيير هذه السياسات فان الامر لا يعدو من امكانية شراء وبيع البيتكوين باستعمال تلك المنصات في الدول التي لا تحظر البيتكوين.
|
|
|
any way Ripple (XRP) generally have lowest fees and have good trading volumes followed by Litecoin and Dogecoin.
While those are definitely good and cheap options, XLM is still much cheaper (afaik) to withdraw from Gate than any of those, while having a good volume on Coinbase. I still think that XLM trading volumes are low and therefore you will notice a difference in the exchange rate when you send it to another platform. You're lucky, I was trying to send two merits but one of my friends cat hit 1 button, so you got 21 Future reference: I want to send 2 Merits here
|
|
|
It seems that Cloning Chipmixer is making a good profit, so attempts to attack the site have become frequent. Just clicking on the site will increase their chances because I believe that the goal of such sites is to obtain information more than fraud. when .com is down, users will try to search on Google to find that site. As for the address that does not match, they may not want to be tracked and will change it every once in a while. .com website is still there with your signature. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
I did not understand what your system is trying to do, you did not talk about how to determine the trend and made the order for the user and therefore all you provide is a managed trading bot, if that is the case, what are the characteristics of this bot? General, explain how to determine the trend would be good? Will it be within the system or separate?charts or analysis?
|
|
|
My bet here is: Some guys could make a community to donate to this address and the first one that collects it will be the rewarded, its like a burn BTC address but instead it will reward any random individual worldwide. it could be a powerfull entertainment.
Most of the people who publicly post the private key are scammers who program high-speed bots that withdraw money once deposited, but this scam activity is in altcoins. The idea is simple is to put an amount of tokens, for example, 500 USDT and put the ether address in addition to the private key. - You are now asking the person to send $20 to that address and send him the private key as a guarantee. - Once the person makes the deposit, you have a high-speed bot that automatically withdraws that money to another address you own. In Bitcoin, it's different What you are trying to do is compete with who will broadcast the transaction first from that address and by doing some computation and a bit of luck you will be able to broadcast the transaction first regardless of how quickly the private key is accessed. In general, do not try cases of quick or guaranteed profit because it may be an indirect scam.
|
|
|
Unless there is a breach of 47k price, we will remain in the price range at its top about 44k and the bottom at 38k, and therefore we are at this bottom, the price tends to rise at the beginning of the month, so I would likely witness a new test of the 47k, if we do not succeed in breaking it, perhaps We are back to 32K levels.
There are no options currently available, all of them depend on the strong psychological barrier at 47 thousand and the $1 trillion barrier, the rest of the levels are to make the price move within a certain price range.
|
|
|
As you mentioned, the altcoin have not been subjected to a real spam test, and therefore the current fees are not considered efficient in managing fees. They are all either centralized models and therefore affected by a DDoS attack, or they will be very expensive or require multiple confirmations (more than 50) to ensure that double spending does not occur.
In bitcoin you need one confirmation.
As for the price, it depends on the demand. If the demand continues to grow, the price will increase.
|
|
|
The rule in dealing with all phone applications is to consider them as impossible unless proven otherwise, and therefore I should avoid downloading any application unless you are 100% sure that it is real. You can download an app that offers a good service, but giving permissions to those apps puts your data at risk.
@OP please break the link
|
|
|
You must not forget two important rules:
- Learn how to look for loopholes that might make you suspect a scam site. - Being able to verify all the information: All platforms can lie about the information above, so unless you can verify the information, it is useless.
Therefore, even if you verify all these points, the project may turn into scam, and if it does not turn into scam, it may not be a good investment.
In short, Dont invest in any altcoin or any project if you didn't really know what to do or you studied the site from all sides.
|
|
|
You could ONLY send and receive TONCOIN on the app. And you could also buy bitcoin on the app through the "wallet" section on there. Users now could send and receive toncoin and could also buy bitcoin on the app. Another breakthrough in the slow but gradual process of bitcoin adoption worldwide.
It's the first time I hear about this service, in fact I haven't used Telegram in a while, so maybe I will reinstall it later and try it. Has any of you actually tried it? Any advice you can give me? Is it just a wallet or a service that enables you to buy bitcoins? Is it sent to your address directly? how to pay?
|
|
|
I think you did not differentiate between the first two terms "tool" and the second "indicator".
When we talk about a trading tool, I mean the software tool with which trading takes place, whether it is manual trading in the platform or using trading bots and with different bots, programming language, execution speed and other variables.
But when we talk about indicators, we are talking about moving averages, support and resistance points, and others, which are necessary if the appropriate tools are used.
|
|
|
The drawback is if the unwanted and preferred UTXO are tied to the same address, you can't select them individually.
Electrum Android wallet loses a lot of necessary features and I think it is appropriate to use it for broadcasting transactions only, or for those who want security without privacy. So there is no perfect solution to guarantee that you can spend from a specific address (coin control feature,) so why not try alternatives such as Samourai Wallet.
|
|
|
Most sad stories are caused by drifting after emotion, listening to wrong analyzes, not doing enough research, rushing, unthoughtful investing, and trying to get rich quickly.
In general, they are all related to investing in the green side and not holding those currencies for long periods. If someone keeps the currencies for a long time, he will not achieve real losses. In general, when you learn from your mistakes, you have not lost anything, the money goes and comes back.
|
|
|
After the listing of Coinbase's shares on the stock exchange, we saw more transparency, although it is not a good thing, but the central platforms get a lot of information and may contribute to the manipulation that sometimes occurs. If we compare Binance and coinbase in listing policies, Coinbase is better, But does anyone know any information about the assets that will be listed? It's the first time I've heard all of them.
|
|
|
Do you know why?
Mostly because of the boards in which the number of posts is not counted for your total posts, but this number is not always accurate, I remember that a recount occurred a previous time. you can read more here - There are a few rare mod/admin actions which change your real number of posts but neglect to update your post count. - Errors can occur which can cause it to drift from the real value. - If your account is fairly old, then previous post-count recounts will have counted your MOVED: redirection topics, even though these are not counted when you make them. I fixed it this time so that these topics are not counted, undoing the previous erroneous recounts.
and example for recount: I did a global recount of user posts starting yesterday. Your post count had been inaccurate.
Other than signature campaigns, nobody cares about your total post count.
|
|
|
Let's simplify things, signature campaign members are looking for the best way to get paied, while the campaign manager is trying to keep expenses as minimum as possible.
Now to the idea of tickets, will members earn more money? Absolutely not, as you mentioned, the campaign owner did not pay directly because he wants to reduce expenses, and therefore paying using tickets means that the user
- will not receive fixed payments. - needs to be lucky to get the money. - Amounts will always be less than the fixed payment.
The best thing you can do is pay 90% of the money directly and think of some creative way for the remaining 10%.
|
|
|
People say "Don’t invest in Bitcoin, it is too volatile!" but is this saying true? I will quote you some parts of this article in which the volatility of Bitcoin was compared with some stocks. Source ---> https://ecoinometrics.substack.com/p/ecoinometrics-bitcoin-is-too-volatile?s=rBefore start lets define: - A drawdown is the correction period that happens between two consecutive all-time high. - The size of a drawdown is the distance in percentage between the all-time high and the lowest point of the correction. - The duration of a drawdown is the number of days it took for the asset to make a new all-time high. Honestly the patterns aren’t so different. Yes, for shorter durations Bitcoin tends to see larger dips (the orange points tend to be below the blue points). But that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Basically that tells us that Bitcoin can recover faster from those kind of drops.
And how many times have commentators declared Bitcoin dead after a -70% correction? Well a stock like Netflix has a bunch of these too. Still they survived until now (that’s 20 years). Damn! In its long history Apple has had a bunch of very significant drawdowns often taking longer than Bitcoin to recover from dips of similar size. Source and Readmore ----> https://ecoinometrics.substack.com/p/ecoinometrics-bitcoin-is-too-volatile?s=r
|
|
|
To accelerate financial inclusion, Kraken has lowered the withdrawal fee for #bitcoin over Lightning to zero.
Thank you for your feedback! Source ---> https://twitter.com/pierre_rochard/status/1519788223718903808they still have low on-chain withdrawal fees which is about $19.40 or 0.0005 BTC compared to AVERAGE $18.20 or 0.0004691 BTC What do you think of the impact of this decision on the Lightning Network adoption (if many platforms follow the same approach) and on altcoins that have low withdrawal rates or blockchain with low fees.
|
|
|
|