Two questions:
1. Anyone running a staking wallet and a Gorillabands wallet with the same number of coins in to see which is doing better in terms of takings?
2. Does it help with Gorillabands to have many inputs as well? or is that just for staking?
The underlying question is - I have an address with just over 5000 coins with about 1200 input because I spent a couple of hours transferring them over in tiny chunks (good thing I like music)....shall I set up a masternode or keep staking?
I was presuming that other people might have better stuff to do than transfer coins around in blocks of 5 so I might be staking more than most - seems to give me a reward about every hour (1-9 coins), sounds like maybe the master nodes are better at the moment?
I was going to grab another 5000 & compare myself but then the price jumped from 6000 to 24000...
Thanks
GorillaBands, when setup, move all the coins to the collateral address in one chunk, destroying all your split times  |
|
|
|
|
Tonight I'm going to take a few minutes and write up a little explanation of the way stake rewards are calculated since we do not use a yearly stake rate
|
|
|
|
|
Go into debug and spam
sendtoaddress address amount
That's what I do sometimes if I'm lazy
You can use sendmany, too, if you want
|
|
|
|
Thank you, that was the fastest and smoothest swap ever Matthias  . No problem, now put me in some ATM's  |
|
|
|
Masternodes get 50% of rewards from normal users.
Does this means that users get 50% of reward and the other 50% goes to masternodes ?
Correct. GBands do other services for the network that are important, rather than stake, and must be paid for their work, as well That's clear. I will set up a masternode, the more ppl are staking the more interesting it gets. Now if I only get my crash solved... Yep, they are both essential parts to have this coin working properly |
|
|
|
Masternodes get 50% of rewards from normal users.
Does this means that users get 50% of reward and the other 50% goes to masternodes ?
Correct. GBands do other services for the network that are important, rather than stake, and must be paid for their work, as well |
|
|
|
Of course I wouldn't stake them, they aren't my coins to stake Thanks for noticing, though |
|
|
|
|
If you do set it up for BUCKS, you should write down your steps and I'll format it like the guide I have now
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure theres guides on there on it already
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, use Create instead of Create Local, but that's a process I won't be doing a walkthrough for now or be helping with
|
|
|
|
|
All caught up on swap coins again
|
|
|
|
So I have two bands that have been connected for ~7hrs... 24.154.55.93:11839/11840 but only one seems to be getting paid. Anyone else have ne thin similar ? Edit: Just got another payment to band 2...    Click start all or remove and recreate |
|
|
|
|
Then the conflicted is just your wallet not right
-salvagewallet will clean it up
|
|
|
|
The reason you see them in a row like that is because they are really all one deposit trying to stake and orphaning a few times in a row, then being accepted and they stop It's really all one transaction trying to stake, then finally being accepted |
|
|
|
|
Just orphans. The network is super packed right now, they are bound to happen for a little while until it smooths out
|
|
|
|
|
The bottom one is not a valid transaction
|
|
|
|
Most of those commands you posted are for mining or servers, which are not needed here, either, so it would just be forcing your client to run less lightweight and be more of a resource hog than it needs to be
Remember, some people are running a bunch of masternodes on one machine, so usage is important to keep low
Yes no config works better. Any time to see why I loose my stakinging credits? If Gorrillabands get 50% of them I see full debits of credits. I have some time now for issues like this, please copy paste an example and I'll take a look |
|
|
|
|
All caught up on swaps again. Everyone should have all their coins now
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
