Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 04:17:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 ... 590 »
3461  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: How safe is blockchain online wallet? on: April 15, 2017, 04:09:02 PM
I'd like to take advantage of this topic and ask from someone who knows (expert) I want to run Core wallet in my home laptop like a lite wallet/ electrum without the need to download the whole block chain and becoming a full node, please guide me on this matter.
You can't. You can enable pruning which means that as the blockchain is being downloaded, once the blockchain reaches a certain size (which you set), Core will begin deleting old blocks in order to maintain that size. However you will still end up consuming the bandwidth and time required to download and verify the entire blockchain.

To enable pruning, just add
Code:
prune=550
to your bitcoin.conf file.
3462  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Can’t connect to bitcoind from web server on: April 15, 2017, 04:05:01 PM
Make sure that digital ocean itself is letting you receive traffic to port 8332. I know that with AWS that you need to configure some security settings of the VPS itself outside of its OS to allow traffic to certain ports.
3463  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: How safe is blockchain online wallet? on: April 15, 2017, 01:49:17 AM
Blockchain.info's wallet can be extremely buggy and is poorly written. If you truly want your Bitcoin to be safe and to use a legitimate properly written wallet software, you should use a desktop wallet like Electrum or Bitcoin Core.

Your Bitcoin cannot simply disappear without there being a transaction sending it away from your wallet. If it is "disappearing" then there is probably an issue with your wallet software.

As for Bitcoin being sent to the wrong address, there are malware that will replace any address you copy with the address of an attacker so you end up sending Bitcoin to the wrong place. You should make sure that your computer does not have a virus.
3464  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: problems upgrading from 0.93.3 to 0.95.1 (stuck on Scanning transaction history) on: April 14, 2017, 11:14:13 PM
The invalid header size error is not related to the block parsing. Rather that is because you are probably using Bitcoin Core 0.14.0 which is incompatible with Armory 0.95.1. If you are using Bitcoin Core 0.14.0, you should downgrade to 0.13.2. Once you do that, try rebuilding the Armory databases as well (although it shouldn't matter). If it still fails after that, you may need to redownload the blockchain.
3465  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Wallet stuck on: April 14, 2017, 11:10:13 PM
Go to File > Settings and uncheck "Let Armory run Bitcoin Core in the background". Stop Armory. Start Bitcoin Core. Start Armory again.
3466  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: What is with blockr.io? on: April 14, 2017, 09:38:46 PM
blockr.io constantly has issues like this. It is probably due to some error on their node. This happens quite frequently. I would suggest that you use a different block explorer.
3467  Other / Meta / Re: BitCoinTalk tale of woe!!! on: April 14, 2017, 09:36:38 PM
Just wait a little longer. The admins are the only ones who can unlock accounts and it takes a considerable amount of time to ensure that the person trying to recover an account is in fact the owner of that account.

I have been here over 3 years and never noticed it.
That change was added in May 2015 after the forum was hacked.
3468  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.95 is out on: April 14, 2017, 09:31:32 PM
Anyways, should've done some more research than just searching forum and reading through this thread, apologies! Looking at dbLog.txt there seems to be a problem with some blocks. You can not use bitcoind >0.13.1 with 0.95.1 right? Will make an own thread if I'm still curious, Thank You!
You can't use greater than 0.14.0 with 0.95.1. You should make your own thread about this and post the armorylog.txt and dbLog.txt files.
3469  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Looks like Bitcoin will remain as it is for life on: April 14, 2017, 05:18:19 PM
Core needs to either increase the block size
Segwit is a block size increase. The size of the "block" p2p message can be larger than 1 MB after segwit activates.

, or miners (acting in their own economic interest) will start using an alternative client, and they'll become irrelevant. Its really that simple
No it isn't. The miners can't just activate any arbitrary consensus rule unless all users follow them and use that alternative client. Given that right now most full nodes are running some version of Bitcoin Core, if miners start using an alternative client supports a block size increase through a hard fork, they will be mining on a chain that few people use.
3470  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Versions of bitcoin core? on: April 14, 2017, 05:12:33 PM
The hashes were the ones I posted.
Then there is no problem and you can ignore the warning and tell your antivirus that it is a false positive.
3471  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: What happens when a node goes offline for a while? on: April 14, 2017, 05:10:57 PM
A node can use the mempool message to request the txids of all of the transactions in another node's mempools. It can then ask the node for all of those transactions. Bitcoin Core 0.14.0+ will also save the mempool to the disk before it shuts down so it will populate its mempool from the saved data.
3472  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: how many addresses from a single private key on: April 14, 2017, 05:08:14 PM
If we look at the first transaction of the bitcoin history (it should be a Pay2PubKey transaction)  this is the script:

Code:
0496b538e853519c726a2c91e61ec11600ae1390813a627c66fb8be7947be63c52da7589379515d4e0a604f8141781e62294721166bf621e73a82cbf2342c858ee OP_CHECKSIG

and this is the abstraction-address: 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX

How can I distinguish between this address and an address that is related to a Pay2PubKeyHash?

The wallets convert those addresses into scripts.

How do the wallets know if the address 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX should be converted in a Pay2PubKey script or in a Pay2PubKeyHash script?

There are no addresses for P2PK. Most wallets and block explorers will just show them as a normal P2PKH address because it is easy to make that address and sending to that address will still allow the owner of that public key to spend their Bitcoin. Since the address is based on the hash of the public key, you can't make a P2PK script with just an address, you need the full public key.
3473  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Versions of bitcoin core? on: April 14, 2017, 03:38:03 PM
Just got an alert from Antivirus that this malware Trojan:Win32Rundas.B was found inside the Bitcoin core bitcoind.

https://www.microsoft.com/security/portal/threat/encyclopedia/entry.aspx?name=Trojan%3aWin32%2fRundas.B&threatid=2147720787&enterprise=0
As long as you have verified the binary when you downloaded it from bitcoin.org, it is safe and legitimate. Antivirus software will often flag Bitcoin Core as a virus because it contains mining code (to allow you to mine on testnet and regtest) and looks for a wallet.dat file (that's the wallet file that Core uses and creates).
3474  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Transaction stuck after 15+ hours and 78 confirmations! Please help a novice out on: April 14, 2017, 03:23:55 PM
Thanks for the input. I was wondering why it said "confirmed" on the accelerator. I sent the coin to BitcoinBlender and it is still showing as "unconfirmed". I sent a message to support and am waiting to hear back. Any idea of anything I could do? Thanks again.
It may be possible that you were scammed. It seems that scam clones of Bitcoin blender were made so you need to make sure that you used the actual service and not a fake.
3475  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Transaction stuck after 15+ hours and 78 confirmations! Please help a novice out on: April 14, 2017, 03:15:17 PM
Your transaction is confirmed; it cannot have multiple confirmations and yet be unconfirmed, that's an oxymoron. You don't need to do anything like CPFP or RBF because that is not going to help, your transaction is already confirmed.

If you do not see your transaction in your wallet, that is a wallet issue, not anything to do with your transaction or the Bitcoin network. Your Bitcoin is fine even if your wallet does not show the transaction. Since it is already confirmed, you won't be losing any money.

The issue is with your wallet. What wallet software are you using?
3476  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCoin Core vs unlimited - what if on: April 14, 2017, 03:13:04 PM
http://bitfury.com/products#our-products I fail to see where their miners are. I found this: http://bitfury.com/products#16nm-asic
I think they only do things on request, not mass producing miners like Bitmain does.

Am i to DIY my miner at home? Good ol' PCB printing days.

You and everybody knows, bitmain is a monopoly in this mining business. Every mining farm out there is filled with Antminers.

If Wutang decides to make S11's without the segwit support, it will be all over. What then, back to GPU mining?
The mining hardware cannot be made to not support segwit. Segwit is a software thing, not hardware. The hardware does not care about the consensus rules and segwit does not change anything about the mining algorithm. Bitmain cannot just "make a miner without segwit support".

I suppose you are talking about asicboost, but you clearly don't understand how it works or what it does. Asicboost works even with segwit activated. The hardware aspect of asicboost does not care about segwit nor does it care about the overt or covert methods. The hardware circuitry is the same. What matters is the software, and software can be easily changed.
3477  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Can somebody tell me what happened to my Bitcoin Transaction? on: April 14, 2017, 02:42:15 PM
Whats with that Transaction HASH? i don't understand that at all Shocked

Can you explain me about that? if possible.

Thanks for the reply  Roll Eyes
A hash is a one-way mathematical function which converts arbitrary length data to a fixed length piece of data. Hashes are usually unique so they are used as identifiers and for indicating whether data has changed. The transaction hash is the hash of the transaction and is used as an identifier for that transaction; it is also called the transaction id (txid). The txid of your transaction is b29c456635c42d5f71054cefc8a61eae46685daae338c9788b355a60c77558ca. The link you provided is to a block explorer which displays the details for blocks and transactions.
3478  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCoin Core vs unlimited - what if on: April 14, 2017, 02:37:01 PM
So, if the biggest miner employer there is decides to be malicious to the system; we are fucked for all eternity?
No. A malicious miner cannot force a consensus rule change or violate any of the consensus rules.

There is a big problem with this. I don't even know if there is another ASIC miner producer other than bitmain. (there was KNC, but it is ded)
Bitfury does.

Bitmain releases products which don't even work with SEGWIT and he can do that legally without going to jail. How's that going to work?
Bitmain miners do work with segwit. Making hardware that wouldn't is not illegal by any laws. There are no laws governing the policies and protocols in Bitcoin.
3479  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Can somebody tell me what happened to my Bitcoin Transaction? on: April 14, 2017, 02:29:20 PM
The transaction is confirmed. If it does not appear in bitkong, then that is an issue with them. Contact their support.
3480  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Quantum computers to crack SHA256 - when will that become reality? on: April 14, 2017, 02:10:23 PM
This topic has been discussed multiple times already. Please use the search function or google and read up on the subject.

There are no known ways that quantum computers will break sha256.
Pages: « 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 ... 590 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!