Bitcoin Forum
July 31, 2024, 09:54:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 ... 317 »
3461  Other / Meta / Re: A new rule is needed for bounty managers. Please share your opinions. on: March 22, 2018, 03:35:05 AM
Now you have a good excuse to change your email address.
3462  Other / Meta / Re: Anatomy of an BitcoinTalk.org account purchase SCAM. on: March 22, 2018, 02:15:00 AM
The only lesson I have learned with your experience is that even there are idiots in Malibu. I have a hero rank account, it belongs to my brother. it has been inactive for 5 months. if you don't know what to do with your money, you could buy it for $2000. pay me $500 and pay the forum $1500.

I told him to stop posting because he was asking me what to say. facking lol. he was also using my laptop and IP to login.
After you have made your $1500 transaction to my donation to the forum address and paid me $500. I will give you the account.
3463  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: ICO - KYC Sanctions buster! on: March 21, 2018, 11:59:55 PM
Pls rack up your shitty signature posts in another thread dummy.  You made your point,

You calling me dummy and say pls. you have a shitty signature yourself. I'm not trying to scam people, you are. made my point.

people can evaluate the risks themselves without the constant nag of a beggar on their shoulder.

Exactly on point. whatever you call me, I have already called myself. your insults are not offensive for me.

What if at this point I vouch for myself?

I would say: hey dummy, you can't vouch for yourself. who is the dummy now? facking lol.

Do you have any proof that the 2-3 newbie accounts were in fact, me? No, you don't. On the contrary, I have proof of their transactions on the blockchain.

What are you saying? transactions on blockchain are not proof of anything other than the transfer of coins.

3464  Other / Meta / Re: Is this a drawback? ChipMixer!! on: March 21, 2018, 10:39:27 PM
First let me say that I'm not the OP here, I would say whatever it is with this account. if you see a merit source sending merits to a post of a Chipmixer participant in a thread where other meritorious posts exist, if the amount of merit is significant and if there is a pattern for them repeating the same thing. Post your evidence.

Do you see any considerable amount of merits given to a post, while other posts deserved those merits? post links. as a merit source, I have decided not giving any merits from my source merit to any campaign manager and any of the members enrolled in the same campaign with me. just to avoid the same thing happening here.
3465  Other / Meta / Re: Created a BitcoinTalk sMerit Comic for you all. on: March 20, 2018, 02:53:31 PM
Just to lol more, I think OP's version of Satoshi is a rapist (look at his hands behind the OP). bubbles with no body to be attached to, are the farmers and scammers. they have their opinions heard, never show their faces.
3466  Other / Meta / Re: Created a BitcoinTalk sMerit Comic for you all. on: March 20, 2018, 01:38:29 PM
I created my own version. enjoy and thanks before loling.
3467  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN] | 🔥 Coinpayments.net Signature Campaign 🔥 | 100% SegWit | on: March 20, 2018, 01:19:00 PM
I will keep the sig on at least for a week, I have been short on a few weeks of campaign, like 1-3 posts, as well as being long with 1-3 posts for a week. I have noticed what you have done for me Lauda. if it is possible to let this week slight with me not reaching the minimum. I'm going to the new year's party with my family of beggars, there is free food. we are invited to go to my aunt's house to be together for the Iranian's new year.

I could have posted 2-3 times by now, but my head is not with the forum right now.

I would like to thank you Coinpayments.net and Lauda for the opportunity, I have bought a laptop and a galaxy S8+ with the payments of this campaign. only participating with a single account.

Hopefully Coinpayments could find the effectiveness of this campaign after at least 1-2 weeks with no AD campaign and might come back with a new one. though I don't know if any of us would be eligible to join if merit requirement stays as is now.
3468  Economy / Services / Re: Rent account for Bounty without full access on: March 20, 2018, 08:15:16 AM
How much would you pay me if you were interested in renting my account a.k.a merit source, reputable, extremely trustable, without my sMerits (source or my own)? I would let you write down dozens of constructive and well thought out essays, then you could give them to me to post them as my own. you should pay me $10 per essay. (I know right? you write and pay, I get everything, you get nothing).

I'm in a dire need to rent a vagina for a duration of 5 minutes, for the holiest of all the purposes a.k.a jumping on them several times with a rhythm.
A new idea, how would you like to control my hands remotely on the keyboard? manage to keep me from getting banned for 5 minutes and  pay me $50. manage to keep me(yourself)from sending merits to your alts and pay me $50.
3469  Other / Meta / Re: [List] Suspected users that are abusing merit 3.0 on: March 20, 2018, 06:56:34 AM
Are you awarded finding those merit abusing users? Sorry but I'm just curious, you guys are so hard work. lol

Not always, you shouldn't expect a reward every time you are doing something good. as a generous merit source, I would reward merits to anybody with successful reports of merit abuse, more specifically gang bangers and rapists of merits. upon action from the admin, staffs. I will choke you with my(what was that? do you think that a rapist and a pervert could've made it to being a source? if not then why did you assumed that I was going to say something vulgar?)sMerits. lol exponentially and come undone.

Note, you would need to PM me with a link to your processed reports of merit abuse, though I myself would report such abuses like 50 merits sent to a generic topic starter with 3 posts and activity via the report to moderator. 10 hours from now, 80 Million terrorists are going to enter into a new year. I'm one of them, understand why it is hard for me to keep track of everything happening here.
3470  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: March 20, 2018, 12:55:37 AM
.

This is one of the best step by step tutorials on matrimonial intercourse. I'd bet that if you put a makeup on those hands and call her alia, you could even fool nullius with it.
Accounts connected;

Timelord2067. (totally disappointed in you, I don't know why I even bothered asking your opinion and trusting your judgment)

notbatman.

If you want to know how stupid somebody is, ask them if they believe in flat earth or not. these niggers used to tell us that the moon is a few thousands of miles away from the earth. now they are basing their comparisons of airplanes, ISS on the size of a fake projection of the moon.
3471  Economy / Services / Re: [FULL] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | 0.00075 BTC/post on: March 19, 2018, 09:46:56 PM
Don’t they want to receive payment for posts?

Most of the users participating in the campaign from what I have seen don't post to get paid AKA they're not exclusive bounty posters. For most of them signatures are a nice incentive to post not an obligation. Remember that one quality post can get you much more promotion than 100 shitty posts in those endless mega threads which no one apart from "bounty hunters" (oh god I hate that term, glorifies what is essentially shitposting) give two shits about.

Then don DarkStar_ should only pay nullius to wear the signature, let us watch what would happen. I see nothing wrong with one man participating with more than 1 account here, as long as they are contributing. even if their contribution is not denying that, because denying that, would be an insult.
3472  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Joe's Signatureless Challenge: Win $25 ($10 for 2nd) + 8 Merits every week! on: March 19, 2018, 04:53:04 PM
Either I'm being ignored or nobody could see my posts. I have merited the third winner. you could thank the head of the family a.k.a don DarkStar_ those 3 merits were meant for him. it means that I shouldn't be treated specially and differently just because I'm a merit source.

In the future I might need to join the family, however I will not merit any of the family members a.k.a Chipmixer's participants from my source merits, I would have wanted to be accepted and treated like a really trusted man. you might ask yourself, why would this beggar do this if doing it would probably get him nowhere? he might be playing a long game to earn the trust of the forum for hundreds of Bitcoins.

Not really. this is who I am, there has been no other cases in which somebody would invest a considerable amount of trust on me. this is the first time to be a merit source. bottom line, do not treat me differently, I'm not here to use the system for my own benefits. there is no benefits in 20 sMerits anyways right? in my arrogant and insignificant opinion, what you are doing Joe, is producing more spam. I mean what happens to 3 winners and 22 losers? would they delete their unqualified posts or they have just increased the amount of garbage posts?


Don DS, note that everything I've just said above, is an act, lies. we all know that I'm a lier, beggar who would do anything to earn money. I will merit 1 at a time and wont merit the family members in rows. like 1 merit to a random nigger, 1 merit to one of the gang members of the don DarkStar_leone.
Disclaimer: I need merits, where is my supervisor a.k.a mexxer-2 to give me merits in bulk? don't make me beg, I'm trying to build a character here. just a single lol.
3473  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Joe's Signatureless Challenge: Win $25 ($10 for 2nd) + 8 Merits every week! on: March 19, 2018, 05:30:06 AM
Come on Joe, announce the winners already. I was going to merit don DarkStar_ with 3 merits, since he is a campaign manager and I'm taking my job very seriously as a merit source, I have asked him to provide a username to me for 3 merits. he said: "beggar, if you insist, merit one of the little birdies of mine".
3474  Economy / Services / Re: 🔑 Safein 🔑 Signature & Avatar Campaign, Hero/Legendary, Up to 0.0275 weekly! on: March 19, 2018, 05:10:27 AM
Can you wait for me to apply with my alt? it looks everybody is doing the same. if you could pay the bonus to my alts, you'd have a generous merit source to abuse, verbally or sexually. now lol.
3475  Other / Meta / Re: theymos, monetize this forum ;) on: March 19, 2018, 04:45:44 AM
It could even increase it, because users that pay this fee would be forced to participate in campaigns all the time to not lose money.

How do you force somebody to join a campaign? even if you are paying $10 per month, you have paid it, whether you'd post or not, there will be no losing more than $10 per month.

Let's assume such a "signature wearing right" costs $10 per month. Most signature campaigns pay a bigger amount (~$100), so it's not a big deal for a campaign participant to pay this fee. A $100/month campaign, thus, de facto would become a $90 campaign.

Anything more than $0.5 per post is extortion, $0.5 should be the fixed maintenance fee. you are free to pay more.

But there is absolutely no incentive for this campaign participant to increase the quality of his posts. He would get his $90 if he posts in spam megathreads or if he contributes with high-quality posts.

Where is the incentive if you are paying a fee per post? what are we doing now other than posting on spam megathreads or contributing something useful?

Now let's assume the campaign ends. The user has to continue to pay the fee if he wants to wear signatures

Why would you keep wearing the signature after the campaign has ended?

Here staff should put up clear rules and ban managers that do not follow them.

What if there is no manager? there is nobody managing Bountyhive campaigns.

So those that lose are those that live a "normal forum life", contributing when they want to, and are using signature campaigns as a little "extra money", like it is intended. People that exclusively use the forum to win money can continue like now, and those are the people that are most likely to spam.

Are you talking about the same legendary members with 10-20 accounts? they would rather to contribute with alt-accounts since there is no incentive to earn merits for. if you are exclusively using forum to win money, you would continue with spam whether you are paying a fee or not. you would have incentive if what I have suggested is implemented. you either pay $0.5 per post or report any spam/garbage and post for free per accurate report. the money people would pay per post, should be given to top merited members as a reward.
3476  Other / Meta / Re: Merit Suggestion on: March 19, 2018, 12:59:01 AM
my suggestion is how about the high rank members like legendary and hero members monitors the constructive post and give that user a merit.

I'm one of them, you can call us heroes and legends or merit sources.

if this suggestion is implemented many user are very affected since they cannot participate campaigns if they diddnt get a single merit in a month.

How about me suggesting to implement a pay per post policy? you wouldn't be able to even post your application if that is implemented. not only preventing you from joining campaigns, but preventing you from ranking up if you are a garbage poster is the whole purpose of Merit on this forum.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3122415.0

That topic though. what I suggested before, no merits were given to those posts, but many were given because the author of the topic suggested that. do you see me bitching about it? this thread is trash worthy, I wont report it. because we all should have our opinions heard, one would have a stupid opinion, one would have something of value, latter would receive merits.
3477  Other / Meta / Re: theymos, monetize this forum ;) on: March 18, 2018, 02:36:20 PM
In my opinion, this is not the right solution for eradicating shitty posters.

Just your opinion, shitty posters are the same, they are just posting their opinions, nothing else. if this is not the right solution, what is in your opinion? giving more sMerits to low ranks or paying you money every time you post your opinion?

How silly to to put a fee on wearing signatures then later paid the one who wear it after advertising.

Forum is not paying you for advertising via your signature, unemployed and hungry people are. they are paying you to advertise for them and you are getting paid, they are getting money too, only one not getting anything other than garbage upon garbage to clean up is this forum.

Don't worry, me too. All of us join signature campaigns in order to earn money.

What happens if you are not in a signature campaign, would you post as usual or would you try finding a campaign? when my campaign ends, I will post and keep on being a merit source. you and garbage posters wont do anything if you are not getting paid.
3478  Other / Meta / Re: when my red trust removed? on: March 18, 2018, 12:22:25 PM
Lol. every time quickseller is selling an account to a garbage poster and Lauda tags them, we have the same topics with the same posts.
3479  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How to stay safe from bitcoin theives on: March 18, 2018, 11:59:11 AM
is it safe to keep money on MEW??

It is safer to use MEW offline.

One is to create a multisignature wallet.

Is this your idea on earning merits? you are not providing anything useful. if you want to earn merits, post a step by step tutorial on how to create a multi-signature wallet with pictures and then PM me.
3480  Other / Meta / Re: theymos, monetize this forum ;) on: March 18, 2018, 11:22:09 AM
Only user that have earned Merit (not default merits by virtue of rank)  in last 3 months are allowed to take part in sig campaign.

Rather only the members with less than 10-20 earned merits in the last 90 days should pay a fee per post with signature, paid or unpaid.

Check of merited post to verify that merit is not traded.

Only to check if they have been given merits by sources, otherwise it would be extremely time consuming to monitor who is who and who is doing what with their sMerits.

Campaign should not ask more than 14 post a week.

You don't get to decide how many posts people are allowed to submit. we have spam when you are posting with 10 accounts and 15 posts each to earn tokens after a few weeks or months, main cause of spam production. if you would have to pay $150 for 150 posts, you would never join a bounty if you are not getting paid at least every week. if a bounty campaign doesn't have a minimum of one week payment for their advertising campaign, what they are doing is using Bitcointalk to get money, when they see nobody is joining their crapcoin-token campaign, they would not launch an ICO every day.

As I have suggested a few hundred times already, if you don't want to pay per post, report accurately, and post for free for every valid report. people would spentd their time on finding merit abuse, garbage posts. we would have the current moderators with no need to hire more. members would help to moderate the forum if they would have to pay per post to earn money otherwise.

OP deserves some merits from me, if he had 30-50 posts more than activity.
Pages: « 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 ... 317 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!