I cant wait for this years christmas. Oculus rift: watching porn with your wife means you will have a threesome+?  No. An orgy. I don't get how 300 billion lives will be saved in a decade. The current population of the world is about 7.5 billion. Am I not abstract enough? Or are we talking about pets, and people becoming vegetarians, and insects, as well?  |
|
|
|
... the only way to a joyful and glorious eternal life. |
|
|
|
Pretty cool. Wonder if this is the beginning to the cyborg race. Wonder whatelse they can make it do. Wonder if they could rase IQs in the stupid people.
yes you need one because you cannot spell raise.. RASE you said .. So stop trying to be a smart ass ..RASE IQ ha ha ha.. so make sure you save up to buy one to RASE YOUR IQ  dumb ass.. RAISE Come, on, popcorn1. Show a little mercy to a woman. Anybody can make a typo. I haven't jumped on you when you wrote "your" when you should have written "you're." Be a little honorable, especially with such a gracious woman as Lenore... please. |
|
|
|
Gun control?
You should use 2 hands.
Well that is true. That's how you control a gun xD One in each hand. |
|
|
|
But it's a sad and rather tragic thing with these perverted monster control freaks (anti-gun politicians) try to focus their control freakness on firearms. Seems like that always turns out badly. Except pretty much everywhere in the developed world outside of America. Except that you are missing the greatest point of all in this. And it isn't really your fault. Because around the world, in countries that have gun control, and the common people who love the gun control, because they have relative peace, have missed it as well. Here it is in a simple nutshell. The only reason peace abounds in many nations with gun control is, there isn't much gun control in the United States. To say it more bluntly, it is the gun freedom in the U.S. that is causing the peace around the world, and even in nations that have gun control. How does this work? Like this. If the governments of gun control nations moved their militaries in and made literal slaves of their nations, the people of the U.S. would find out, and the people of the gun control nations that remained free would see it as well. Everybody would realize that gun control meant slavery, and that gun freedom was the best thing for the people. When this happened, the people of the United States would implement more guns among themselves and friends and relatives than they have now. The U.S. government would NEVER have a chance at gun control outside of a full, militarized take-over... which might even fail. In addition, the people of the gun control countries would follow the lead, and soon everyone around the world would be swimming in guns. Anti-freedom nations would fall over night. Free nations would become even freer. Peace would abound. The gun control crowd - which is really the slave-making, one-world government crowd - Would have lost any chance that they had to take over the world. So you see? It is American gun freedom that is keeping the world free! A few questions about your story... As I said above. It really isn't your fault that you don't understand, unless, of course, you are being paid and you don't really care. WHY would a military just randomly "arrest" the entire country? Is it a coup? Was it shoddy leadership and they want to topple the incumbent? Who said anything about a military randomly arresting a country? You missed the greatest reason why a military does anything. A military does what it is ordered to do by whoever is in control. In almost all cases, people in government are there because they like to be in control. Many of these people are control freaks. Usually, they own the military... at least as far as being able to command the military. Control freaks often like more money, usually so that they can get more control. What do they want to control? The people, of course. Why? So that they can tax the people for more money, of course. If the people don't have guns and the military does, government leaders who control the military can take control whenever they want, via their military. Why don't many of the governments of the world make literal slaves of their nations? Because everybody sees that American gun freedom works. Push the people too hard, and they will get guns, and you will be dead. At the very least, you will lose control. How would they keep their morale above water, knowing that their own families are affected the same way? What? You never heard of on-base family life? When you say slavery, what would they make the people DO? Work harder? Wouldn't they have to market it as some kind of utopia first? Taxation is slavery. It is part of the reason that Americans are making and buying more guns than ever. Even Americans have been lulled by propaganda. Slavery might work for decades. But it eventually fails when the people find a way to rebel. American gun freedom makes it much harder for slavery to exist. Take a look at lower Morocco, Western Sahara, Mauritania, and the whole Northwestern area of Africa. slavery abounds there, even though there are laws all over the place that say that slavery is illegal. Two major things that make the slavery possible are, lack of communications so that the people don't understand freedom and how available it is to them, and guns in the hands of the common people. There have been plenty of coup d'etat over the years, so what stopped all the amazing freedom from happening? Is it just that none of them sent a clear enough message that the nation turned to shit precisely *because* of the population being unarmed, and had nothing to do with the charismatic psycho cult leader?
World nation leaders will play on every advantage that they can to take and keep control. People always want freedom, but they want freedom from their mistakes as well. The thing that the people often don't realize is that their leader control-freaks are simply shrewdies who are out to get whatever they can in any way that they can. This dulls them to the notion that they should keep personal armament around, because their leaders seem so peaceful. You might be honest in the extreme. If you are, you may not understand what it is like to be just the opposite. How does a leader get to be such without violence? By being very shrewd, giving the people the peace and freedom that they want, until just the right moment when he can pounce. What keeps him from pouncing? Guns among the people, and the knowledge that they will use them if necessary. |
|
|
|
But it's a sad and rather tragic thing with these perverted monster control freaks (anti-gun politicians) try to focus their control freakness on firearms. Seems like that always turns out badly. Except pretty much everywhere in the developed world outside of America. Except that you are missing the greatest point of all in this. And it isn't really your fault. Because around the world, in countries that have gun control, and the common people who love the gun control, because they have relative peace, have missed it as well. Here it is in a simple nutshell. The only reason peace abounds in many nations with gun control is, there isn't much gun control in the United States. To say it more bluntly, it is the gun freedom in the U.S. that is causing the peace around the world, and even in nations that have gun control. How does this work? Like this. If the governments of gun control nations moved their militaries in and made literal slaves of their nations, the people of the U.S. would find out, and the people of the gun control nations that remained free would see it as well. Everybody would realize that gun control meant slavery, and that gun freedom was the best thing for the people. When this happened, the people of the United States would implement more guns among themselves and friends and relatives than they have now. The U.S. government would NEVER have a chance at gun control outside of a full, militarized take-over... which might even fail. In addition, the people of the gun control countries would follow the lead, and soon everyone around the world would be swimming in guns. Anti-freedom nations would fall over night. Free nations would become even freer. Peace would abound. The gun control crowd - which is really the slave-making, one-world government crowd - Would have lost any chance that they had to take over the world. So you see? It is American gun freedom that is keeping the world free! |
|
|
|
I heard about last monday they found liquid water on mars
But a given when they found ice on mars anyways liquid water
Means source of life high chance of dicovering fossils and microbes
In mars.
If life microbes or fossils are there on Mars, the life came from earth. The Bible talks about how everything in space was sent there from earth, including the material the stars are made from. It's in the creation story, right in the beginning of the Bible. But you will need to think about what you read to see it. In addition, look at the pictures inside the Temple of Hathor in Egypt. The pillars are imperfect replications of the exterior of rockets from an ancient civilization on earth, one that far predates ancient Egypt. This civilization placed their rocket engines at the top of their rockets, probably for rocket stability, so that the center of gravity would be below the propelling force. The Egyptians revered the people from this civilization as gods. And Hathor was the goddess of the sky. That's why you don't see this kind of pillar much of anywhere else in Egypt. The sky goddess was the keeper of the knowledge of the sky. See the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8-WWVlk_3E, and start watching about 5 or 6 minutes in, for Hathor. The prehistoric ancients probably had a space program that was greater than ours, even though their science was probably different... focused in other areas of science than ours is. They probably went all over the solar system. However, they were probably plagued by funding problems just as we are. Not everyone wants to travel all over the universe. If you are incredulous regarding the fact of an advanced civilization in the far distant past, watch these videos - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CwwrwFyTFs - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuwQi91KQgk. Do you really believe in shit you just said? I was looking for shit in what I said, and I couldn't find it. Please elaborate, if you wish. Science doesn't have many answers to the past beyond about 4,500 years. Even the answers they have regarding the age of things older than, say, 2,000 years, is often hypothetical. They don't know, and they say that they don't really know. At the same time, they firmly hang onto their beliefs regarding the age of things in the distant past. Probably the firmest direct knowledge of things in the distant past comes down to in the writings of the Bible. These are things of witness. Other ancient writings, be they in books, or on scrolls, or on the walls of ancient temples like in Egypt, give us many good points. But even the Sumerian writings are NOT written in a direct, straight-forward manner as the Bible is, NOR are they backed up by the historical traditions of a stubborn nation like Israel, which traditionally has backed up the things of the Old Testament as being eye witness truth. Bible is witness. Most of science hypothesizing about the ancient past is guesses, or guestimations. Bible is still the best history book we have regarding ancient, prehistoric history. Regarding an ancient, worldwide civilization that existed long before ancient Egypt, THAT is fact, which is found in archaeology. Regarding their science being in advance of ours, some of it definitely was. One simple fact regarding this is, while our science could figure out ways to move some of the 300 to 1000 ton blocks of stone over distances of hundreds of miles (as did the ancients), we don't know for sure how we would do it, because we haven't done it. And while technically it might be viable, economically it isn't, so it might be impossible for us. Regarding the things about Hathor and the Temple of Hathor, much of what I wrote is speculation. But there is as much logic to it as there is to much of the standard garbage teachings of modern science and archaeology. Now don't get me wrong about science. Science at its core is extremely accurate. At its core, archaeological writings state that the archaeologists don't really know the facts about a lot of what they have found, or what they think about it. It's the political twisting of what the archaeologists say, that has turned much of modern archaeological writing into science fiction, and has us believing that we know more than a smattering about the distant past. Regarding the things that Graham Hancock says, note that he makes a distinction between the evidence, and his theories about the evidence. Again, the political element often dismisses his evidence right along with his theories, rather than expressing the evidence and alternate theories. You certainly are welcome to keep on believing the science fiction of standard archaeological teaching. I understand how hard it would be to throw away as much as 99% of the things that you have been taught and believe in about your ancient past, simply to look at the truth. |
|
|
|
Everything is based on strength. If the Catalonians are stronger legally, or sufficiently strong physically, there will be change. It will be based on compromise. The point is, governments are changing because the crooks in government are making mistakes that are harming the people. I foresee and expect a banking collapse, which will bring on a governmental collapse, worldwide. The face of the world will change. It won't only be Spain. Right now, there are States in the USA that are looking at the idea of secession. Texas is one of them. And it is built right into the contract Texas has with the U.S. They can legally pull out if they want. Government speeches, and the media, are full of propaganda designed to weaken the thinking of people who seem to be determined. |
|
|
|
Since science was made by God in His creation, and since mankind has only found out a smattering about science, science worshipers are really God worshipers, even though they don't know it. |
|
|
|
We have an inter-religious council in Russia and I can say with confidence – the coming statement of this body that unites Orthodox Christians, Muslims, Jews and Buddhists will support our state’s decision. The decision with which our state again assumes a special role in the Middle East and in particular in Syria,” Vsevolod Chaplin told reporters on Wednesday. and I can say with confidence – the coming statement of this body that unites Orthodox Christians, Muslims, Jews and Buddhists will support our state’s decision. The decision with which our state again assumes a special role in the Middle East and in particular in Syria,” Vsevolod Chaplin told reporters on Wednesday. We have an inter-religious council in Russia YOUR WORDS NOT MINE.. Buddhism is not a religion please stop calling it a religion its much better than religion www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfEEZvVUvKgFrom Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism: Buddhism /ˈbudɪzəm/[1][2] is a nontheistic religion[note 1][3] or philosophy (Sanskrit: dharma; Pali: धम्म dhamma) that encompasses a variety of traditions, beliefs and spiritual practices largely based on teachings attributed to Gautama Buddha, commonly known as the Buddha ("the awakened one"). Note the "Buddhism is a nontheistic religion..." part. |
|
|
|
well, if there IS water, and there IS life... even in bacteria form... DON'T BRING IT TO EARTH! there's no telling how it will react with our environment.
If there was life and they brought it back it would be contained. Probably kept in an environment close to where it came from. So they can study it without risking that life or us. But I don't think they would bring something back and not have an idea of what they are dealing with first. If there is life, it is probably a mutated form of some kind of bacteria/virus we accidentally sent there with one of our landers. |
|
|
|
Obama's Mass Murder Speech Contains Error
From gunlaws.comAdd contact Date Fri 06:17
HTMLText <- <<- -> []
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 2, 2015
Full contact info at end
Obama's Impassioned Mass-Murder Speech Includes Error
Alan Korwin, Author
Gun Laws of America
The President's impassioned Oregon speech, moving as it was, missed a key point that could lead to real progress on this terrible issue of mass murder.
The 16 black Americans shot and murdered in ghettos that same day, and the day before, tragically got no news coverage.
This is stunning, unmentioned -- and those lives matter.
That black-lives gunfire atrocity is repeated, daily. And will remain true tomorrow when another 16 are murdered, but get no "coverage" -- 6,000 per year.
The "Graph of Death" Mr. Obama asked for is already available here:
http://www.gunlaws.com/GunshotDemographics.htm
(with gut-wrenching explanation)
By focusing on an isolated "newsworthy" tragedy in one place, Mr. Obama unknowingly obscures the real issue, and does indeed politicize it -- as he forthrightly admitted.
NOTE: Every action of this Oregon murderer is already 100% illegal -- legal scholars know the call for new laws is superfluous and disingenuous. It is a political agenda that weakens support and the true effort to solve the problem.
The President made a repeated and critical mistake: New laws affecting all Americans will not affect the lone psychotics who commit these atrocities --
The medical community stands as the greatest obstacle in getting to the psychotics.
And the biggest ignored issue of all is: The existing background checks have stopped two million people from buying guns because they are known criminals or mentally unfit -- and they are simply turned loose on the streets.
We have their names and addresses -- and our government just sets them free, right after they try to buy guns.*
Mr. President, do something about that if you're really serious.
Don't try to pass something else, that you know and admit Congress and the public will resist. Act now.
If you want more common-sense solutions, call me.
Alan Korwin
The Uninvited Ombudsman
Author of ten books on gun law
Alan Korwin, Publisher
Bloomfield Press
"We publish the gun laws."
4848 E. Cactus, #505-440
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
602-996-4020 Phone
602-494-0679 Fax
1-800-707-4020 Orders
http://www.gunlaws.com
alan@gunlaws.com
Get our full-color catalog free, right now--
http://www.gunlaws.com/pdf/BPCatalog2013.pdf
Call, write, fax or click for a free full-color catalog by mail
"Don't be a spectator in the struggle to preserve freedom."
*It's not completely clear that all two million people are actually guilty of anything, since their rights are denied but they are not brought to trial, indicted, convicted of anything, confronted by their accusers or even notified of what they are charged with, but these are separate issues. Certainly, seeking another background check system as the President requests, at great expense, before doing something with the background check we already have working, is a poor allocation of scarce funds and limited police resources. The news media should be aware of these things and bring these points out. Bloomfield Press has white papers and experts available that address these topics.----------
|
|
|
|
Obama's Impassioned Mass-Murder Speech Includes Error
Alan Korwin, Author
Gun Laws of America
The President's impassioned Oregon speech, moving as it was, missed a key point that could lead to real progress on this terrible issue of mass murder.
The 16 black Americans shot and murdered in ghettos that same day, and the day before, tragically got no news coverage.
This is stunning, unmentioned -- and those lives matter.
That black-lives gunfire atrocity is repeated, daily. And will remain true tomorrow when another 16 are murdered, but get no "coverage" -- 6,000 per year.
The "Graph of Death" Mr. Obama asked for is already available here:
http://www.gunlaws.com/GunshotDemographics.htm
(with gut-wrenching explanation)----------
|
|
|
|
im a muslim , i dont hate anyone so do the islam.is the united states full of killers : no just a little bit crazy ones ; so is the islam.so when speaking just think; do not repeat like a parrot what the goverment agents and some islam haters say.
You are a Muslim ? You don't like violence ? Weak Muslim ! After all, Quran says, from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888757.msg10381547#msg10381547: From http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.
Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."
Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.
Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').
Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.
Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"
Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."
Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-" This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).
Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?
Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"
Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.
Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."
Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah" Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."
Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."
Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."
Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."
Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."
Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had the power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.
Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.
Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war.
Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.
Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"
Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.
Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).
Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.
Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."
Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the Quran define a true believer?
Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."
Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).
Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)
Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"
Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.
Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.
Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.
Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"
Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.
Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not about treating everyone equally. There are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' in verse 16.
Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.
Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.
Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such. |
|
|
|
Just remember, we have found water on comets, as well. Yes Yes this is true. Also how do we know its really water. Whos to say its not liquid nitrogen or something similar. Not says exactly that but there are other liquids that it could possibly be. Some do mimic water. Especially if we can not get close enough to really find out. Dunno just a thought. Oh and Badeckr, guessing you like this section in the forum. Always see you in it. Oh Lenore, who are you? All these new names in the forum, and no way to know if somebody simply started a new handle, or if it really is someone new. |
|
|
|
we use alo here in our country.and there was the same story for 'alo' too.alo was said to be the initials of a woman's name who is the love of bell.some say salam aleikum.
Guessing there are a few places that have a different story. Its interesting really. "Hola" in Spanish doesn't even sound like "Hello." |
|
|
|
+ the united nation general assembly is a good place for people and dictators to speak (salute before dying)
+ the united nation security concil veto members only is a good place to avoid nuclear devastation
However
- as soon as the united nations wants to regulate how much time I can spend on the toilet it's goes beyond it's mandate
- as soon as the united nations is used by the corrupts people of the world to consolidate a 1 world gov to be imposed on the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA it becomes a target for the US ARMED FORCES (and other covert shady operations).
- people are different in the UNITED STATES the only law is the US CONSTITUTION AND BILLS OF RIGHTS, permitting to AMISH, MORONS, JEWS, CHRISTIANS, CAPITALISTS, DREAMERS, WHAT EVER to live in peace together, by wanting to rule to US CONSTITUTION international law is dangerous, and will be used by the most corrupt people of the world to enslave the WE THE PEOPLE ARE FREE.
The UN has been doing this since day 1. The reason that we don't realize it is, they are very, very, subtle. In addition, the 9th Amendment essentially says that any time any of us, individually or jointly, don't like what the laws that come out of the Constitution are doing to us, we have the complete right to throw those laws off, and to completely dismantle the government if we want. Read it and ponder. And don't listen to what the government people say about it. They weren't there when it was put in place. It stands on what it says. , they call it the marginal approach, or the incremental way, or the step by step... you know little innocent moves each day and then you wake up with nothing... like inflation . personnaly since recreational use is in place in very cool, beautiful and diverse and expanding states, I have 0 problem... but I will support my friends in the more flufy stuff , aka it's from a plant, not before me, but feel free. they underestimate the war marchine... when it will in motion against them... hahaha... I will laugh, watching them executed live on taken over cnn . So you have been watching the JADE HELM military actions in ours cities, as well. |
|
|
|
+ the united nation general assembly is a good place for people and dictators to speak (salute before dying)
+ the united nation security concil veto members only is a good place to avoid nuclear devastation
However
- as soon as the united nations wants to regulate how much time I can spend on the toilet it's goes beyond it's mandate
- as soon as the united nations is used by the corrupts people of the world to consolidate a 1 world gov to be imposed on the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA it becomes a target for the US ARMED FORCES (and other covert shady operations).
- people are different in the UNITED STATES the only law is the US CONSTITUTION AND BILLS OF RIGHTS, permitting to AMISH, MORONS, JEWS, CHRISTIANS, CAPITALISTS, DREAMERS, WHAT EVER to live in peace together, by wanting to rule to US CONSTITUTION international law is dangerous, and will be used by the most corrupt people of the world to enslave the WE THE PEOPLE ARE FREE.
The UN has been doing this since day 1. The reason that we don't realize it is, they are very, very, subtle. In addition, the 9th Amendment essentially says that any time any of us, individually or jointly, don't like what the laws that come out of the Constitution are doing to us, we have the complete right to throw those laws off, and to completely dismantle the government if we want. Read it and ponder. And don't listen to what the government people say about it. They weren't there when it was put in place. It stands on what it says. do you really think you have enough power to do that?disobeying the rules of government? That's the same thing I was going to ask the government agent when he tried to stop me from implementing the freedom the 9th Amendment gave me. |
|
|
|
Young people who have a favorite pet, really need to consider writing up a will, that if they die young like in a car accident or something, their favorite pet gets to eat their remains, just so it can be as close to them as it will ever get the chance to be.  In some cultures family eats there dead for the same reason. Some spiritual thing or something. Remember reading about it just don't remember all the specifics. And it gets even better if the life insurance is paid up. |
|
|
|
I guess Spain won be Spain any ore will it. Wonder who will take it over and what the new name will be?
Spain never was Spain. None of the other nations are what they are either. The governments are a handful of shrewd people, who take control, and for their own profit draw up the maps of the world, claiming the boundaries of their pet nation. If your house and land fall within the boundaries, then you are part of that nation whether you like it or not. You gotta pay taxes. When you go to the store, and you buy a product, you get a receipt that says, you paid xxx money for such and such a product. There isn't anything hazy about it. You know what you paid, and you know what you received in return. But it isn't like this with taxes. With taxes you never get a receipt that shows what your tax money paid for, and the precise benefit you personally received for your the xxx money of your tax payment. Government is a handful of people ripping you off! It's all about slavery. Government has made you a slave. Your nation has made you a slave within it. Watch "TheTinyDot" video by Larken Rose to see what I mean.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
