2244
wwzsocki

OP I wish you a lot of success in marketing this "cryptocurrency gaming bot integrated right into Discord" but I don't think there will be many members interested in this contest taking into consideration how high reward amounts are and compared them to requirements.

Additionally, contest number 2 has 150+ times high wagering in a service that nobody knows advertised from an account with almost no creditability.

The best way for you to convince a couple of high ranked and established members from this forum to test your bot is to give them free money to play with in return for honest reviews.
This is what always worked the best and promotions like this with low payouts and high wagering requirements rather end up in the abyss  .

Username: wwzsockiw

Nie dokońca rozumiem co ty tutaj oferujesz? Serwis do wyboru masternodów?

Chyba tak, bo podałeś swój Telegram, więc, jeżeli jest to jakaś oferta, to fajnie jak byś sprecyzował co zawiera i ile kosztuje?

Z Twoich postów wynika, że nie jesteś polskojęzyczny, więc tylko dodam, że jeżeli jest to wątek o masternodach, to aktualnie w sekcji, jest już kilka i to o wiele lepszych, które praktycznie wyczerpały temat, ale oczywiście serdecznie zapraszam do czytania i dyskusji.

Masternody - czyli jak dużo zarobić, a się nie narobić
Co to jest węzeł, pełny węzeł, masternode? Jak taki ustawić i na tym zarobić?
Co to jest wydobycie PoW i PoS? Wprowadzenie do masternodów.

I am also sorry that I jumped on you so quickly without second thinking or checking properly .  

I see in your post MTNC 4.1.0.0 wallet screen:


And can't understand how this is possible because my 4.1.0.0 wallet looks like this:



Is something wrong here or maybe this is only another skin for Russish language or something?

I am very happy that you referred to the topic of money, and more specifically payments to employees dealing with confidential data in your post, because this is a very important, if not fundamental factor, which in fact can affect the security of the entire KYC operation, also for an external rented service for this purpose.


Such an external KYC company/service was already a couple of times responsible for the documents leaks, the best example will be the latest Binance leak. Here link: https://www.binance.com/en/blog/365766157488967680/Statement-on-False-KYC-Leak. No matter if this example is 100% accurate just look at the big picture.

It only happened because some external service has just been rented to conduct KYC for Binance. Everything would be good if such services would pay its employees, in particular, those who have access and deal with confidential data. Instead, the majority of them are created from employees hired in the cheapest areas on earth. Sometimes such services are fully online and nobody from employees never sees each other life. So we all have to agree that the hall security of such an online KYC verifier is so strong as a single-computer from a third country guy who was lucky to get the spot.

I know and there are legit services but we have to take into consideration that in begin of this all KYC helping services and true verifiers there was and for sure still is a lot of scam going on.
I was (not once) interviewed by a woman during KYC from countries like ... I don't want to hurt anyone so I just say 3rd countries. This woman even doesn't pronounce English on an acceptable level to do this process smooth and fast which also only costs more money.

In my opinion, full KYC is the best way to lose all your personal data at a single click these days and we really should do it only if is needed and with reputable companies.

It looks like Brave just shot himself in the foot with this latest update.

I have also been using Brave for some time now on one of my computers to keep up to date and to have a full understanding of what is happening in the browser market.
It is not without significance that Brave is considered to be the safest browser available today, so even more, I am not surprised to see all those comments from disgusted and surprised users who are accustomed to the complete lack of ads and exactly such popups in Brave, which additionally were blocked by default until a couple of days ago. This, not quite well thought out update, opened the gate needed for hackers.

I am curious is this a coincident or intentional action (for example, some bad actors) because it is hard to believe that Brave developers did not foresee such a finale for this update?

I have never seen you before in this thread or any other discussion about the Investa project and Ibitt exchange.
You are talking about lying by the team when Investa is the only ICO I participated so far, which delivered all products long before the ICO end and scheduled date.

Of course like in any other startup in the blockchain niche there were some problems with the integration of the INV token to the Ibitt exchange but the team already resolved all security issues and INV is already listed on Ibitt and everybody is free to trade it. Additionally is listed on other exchange and Joint partnership with Bittrex.

It would be enough to read a couple of my posts above to have a better understanding of how many products I am talking about and what Investa project is.

Investa aims to be like a crypto bank that bridges the gap between FIAT and crypto in LATAM with innovative services and products to which INV token will be fully integrated and we are talking here about: exchange, cards, ATMs, etc. Here quote from Investa Telegram group:

https://t.me/investaco

PS
I did my best to answer all your concerns, despite, I have a strong filling that you are posting here only to max out the post count for the signature. I hope, I am wrong and that is why I haven't IGNORED you in the first place (like many other members before) and provided the best answer possible. Please feel free to ask any other questions, but I advise you to read about the Investa project first because is pretty obvious that you don't know much about it. Remember, many projects have members like me, who are managing their threads for years and know all ICO, bounty participants, many investors, and frequent members active in the discussion. Finally, such members will catch you on spamming, when you will try to max out the 20 post requirement every day with nothing to say or no time for. Remember, this is no free money anymore like many bounty hunters still think. You will only ruin your account and the possibility to get later a spot in a lot better campaign when you behave like this.

Blacklists from other Yahoo campaigns and negative feedback for what if I can ask?

I decided to participate in this campaign, mainly because Yahoo started working as a quality checker - "manager". Additionally, I always posted a lot (even without any signature) and very often, I literally stopped myself from publishing even more. Of course, after recent problems with the Livecoin campaign, in which I participated, before I decided to apply to this campaign, I checked everything very carefully.

First of all, we don't advertise the Yobit exchange, only the Cryptotalk.org forum. There is no visible link between Yobit exchange and Cryptotalk.org forum. There is no trace or reference to the Yobit exchange in the signature. What's more, the Cryptotalk.org forum itself has no visible connection with the Yobit exchange, no advertising, special section dedicated to Yobit or even a single link on the first page to Yobit exchange.



In fact, if someone does not know that Cryptotalk.org belongs to Yobit, then even when reading the forum and being active, it is hard to guess that there is any link between these two instances.
So far, Yobit is doing nothing that could indicate that infact they want to advertise the exchange through this campaign, not the forum itself.


I do not understand why Yahoo would do it in particular when it comes to participants who do not break any rules?

Of course, the decision belongs to Yahoo, but as I mentioned earlier, I decided to participate in this campaign primarily because of Yahoo involvement, which guaranteed good quality control and relative safety. I would be very surprised and it is really hard to believe that there is a possibility that I would be banned from all his campaigns, for that reason.


Let me ask you one more time: but why, for what this negative feedback? Of course, I want to remind that I am talking about decent participants, who have never broken any rules.

I think you can understand that I start sweating when a user of your rank and reputation asks for negative feedback, campaigns blacklists for all participants from the campaign I'm currently enrolled in and I would like to know exactly why? What have we done wrong and what am I missing?

This is exactly the same information I have heard about this game and further nothing. That is why I asked questions here in this thread because members who are posting here very frequently know everything about Minexcoin. Unfortunately, as you can see from the answers above they already lost all hope and call Minexcoin openly a pure scam and don't believe in any statements from the team. I am not surprised at all by their negative attitude after all the lies that Minexcoin project leaders gave us. However, in spite of everything, I was hoping to receive answers to questions related to this game or the latest news about further development, and it was not important to me whether it was lies or not. To be honest I keep searching on Minexcoin social media channels for contact and info but as for now with no success. If by any chance you will find answers please don't forget about me and just use my username in a post to notify me. I am using Maggiordomo bot which notifies me when somebody quotes my posts, uses my username or @username.

I didn't know that such a possibility exists in Google Chrome and when I saw this post started to figure out how to set up a passphrase in google account to encrypt my passwords.

It took me a while but finally, I managed to do this and here is the full set up.



I think this could be useful for other members who will be interested in protecting their passwords with encryption in the Google Chrome browser.

After I have read the OP and later all comments in this thread my first thought about the proper section for such a detailed article was the Economics board.

There are already a couple of threads about Bakkt just like this one quoted above. I am sure this very detailed article is too overwhelming for beginners and even more, advanced traders have to read it a couple of times to understand the BTC futures subject correctly. One has to have already a lot of trading experience with multiple BTC products to understand all these technical details.

I just want to add that this is the best explanation of BTC futures I have read on Bitcointalk so far. I really have a lot of respect for the author's knowledge.

But all other models like Samsung S7, Samsung S8, Samsung S9 are, which is scary enough and for sure, if not already then in the near future S10 and other newer models will be hacked soon (if not already  ). It is of course very logical that all older models are already worked out, and newer ones are waiting in line. There is only a small percentage of new models compared to all models from recent years. It is much more profitable for hackers to work on older devices, because they have a lot more users, and thus potential victims and profits for them.

For some time now, I am thinking of buying a new phone, because we have such times that without a decent smartphone it is impossible to function normally.
I was looking for some really safe model for a long time and even set up threads in my local section, where I discussed with other Bitcointalk users this topic.
Unfortunately, today I still have my old phone, because there is no secure smartphone yet developed and this vulnerability only confirms my statement.

I start to hear very good news in the Ibitt Telegram group. The INV token integration into Investa products like ATMs or exchange is already ongoing at full speed.

This is really good to hear, especially, when I was screaming for the token integration for so long.

Here is a quoted message from Investa team on Telegram:

https://t.me/investaco

This is the only way to create organic demand for INV token. Without integration and real use case there is no need for the token in the first place.

So, fingers crossed and keep holding my INV bag further  .

Ze mną jest troszkę inaczej, bo ja często gram takie spadki i nie kupowałem miesiąc temu (chociaż kupowałem ale już dawno sprzedałem  ), tylko 6 dni temu po 15.33 USD.

Czemu kupiłem?

Bo po takim spadku często jest 5 do 10% odbicia (minimum) i nie raz już tak grałem.

Niestety tym razem, tylko pierdło o procent czy dwa i zdechło. Może jeszcze odbije dlatego siedzę i myślę.

Poustawiałem stop lossy, ale aż szkoda sprzedawać, jak czytam Twoje posty. Jest tyle czynników, które powinny (ciągle) pozytywnie wpływać na BNB, że praktycznie dziwne są jakiekolwiek duże spadki. Nie wiem, może to za wcześnie i te wszystkie produkty, palenia, IEO, itd. to i tak za mało? A jak, już mam sprzedać, to po co czekać na stop losa i tracić następne 1,5% czy 2%?

Dziwią mnie te niskie wolumeny BNB ($113,730,916), gdzie zasrany EOS ($1,332,835,128) czy BC ($1,219,589,989) mają 10cio krotnie wyższe.
 

c - wwzsocki

Jeżeli możemy wrócić na chwilę do tego screena klinu zniżkowego, który przypomina aktualny ruch ceny BNB.

Wiem, że starasz się trzymać z dala, ale rozumiem, że przewidujesz taką możliwość.

Trzymam dość pokaźną walizę BNB i cały czas drapie się po mojej pustej bańce i myślę czy aby nie sprzedać i kupić znowu niżej kiedy widzę kolejne dni na minusie.

Wszyscy powtarzają, żeby grać z trendem, a nie przeciwko. Według ceny BNB powinno być podobne wybicie nawet 30 - 40%, o którym marzę, ale może być tylko chwilowe i zaraz znowu spadnie, zgodnie z trendem.

Jestem ciekaw co myślisz? Chętnie też posłuchałbym opinii innych, jeżeli ktoś z Was handluje aktualnie BNB, bo zawsze co trzy głowy to nie jedna.

Boje się, że to będzie tylko chwilowe wybicie, a później spadnie 2 razy niżej i 2 razy szybciej. Oczywiście wszystko świadczy na korzyść BNB, ale jak wiemy zazwyczaj dzieje się zupełnie odwrotnie.

Wymagający dużo nerwów każdego trejdera jest moment W  . Z doświadczenia już nie staram się wyczuć ceny, sprzedać na topie W i później kupić niżej, bo to zazwyczaj kończy się stratą w porównaniu do trzymania. Teraz po prostu dokupuje jak najniżej, jeżeli trejd wygląda dobrze i wszystko się sprawdza. Ta strategia, jak na razie jest najlepsza.

This is the first time I hear about this, thanks for sharing.

I still can't get over when I hear similar stories or examples, how thoughtless people in mid-age are, because if they were children or teenagers they could be forgiven, but adults?

I wonder what happened further with all these documents which were sent to wrong emails in different departments?

Were they finally sent to the appropriate KYC department or no one did care and they ended up in bins or worse on the black market?

VIPGAME ID: kDHmD2tZAvrY
BTC in-game address: 36oCH6yGqnbwNRMwAWN5WzCWZN2XXTscbe
Telegram: emoneyabc

Username: wwzsockiw

thanks