*That's* what I call the "Wag the Dog" moment of this particular election. Within a week I'd expect there to be a knock out moment one way or the other that'll decide it for me as to who will win. |
|
|
|
Jokes too. Speaking from my own experience, he become very hostile towards me because I responded to him in sarcastic way, since then he used every single opportunity he could to shit on me. Before that, we were pretty good "forum buddies", at least I thought so. I don't know, maybe some brain issues lately  Who is kidding whom here?   Perhaps marlboroza should practice what they preach. |
|
|
|
I think Kanye West must need a special program to help him get through the presidential election because the opponent of Kanye West is an important and smart person to strategize, Kanye West is a rap singer and will find it difficult to do that
I would have thought with less than 40 days until the day of the election that the nominations had closed and ballot papers printed etc. I can't help but wonder if leaving it this late is so KW can then go on to say " well, at least I tried... kind of..." |
|
|
|
Well thats also true that is why some are gambling to make money and perhaps some are just doing both, they travel to places to gamble there like going to Las Vegas?
If there isn't a Pandemic right now, many of those people who had earned an amount by trading crypto is likely going to also gamble for some time to experience not just online. Not me though I still don't have the kind of addiction.
How many times have some of those Casinos closed their doors, opened them and then had to re-close them again? People who want to gamble will no doubt be prepared to travel to where the Casinos are open (in-spite the risk to themselves, or others) |
|
|
|
Great I'll be keeping track on your analysis I hope I could use your analysis to see which candidate I'll bet with. By the way this supposed to be in Gambling discussion isn't?
I heard overnight Kanye West has nominated himself for this years' Presidential Race. Given how many Postal Votes have already been cast, how does it work with a new candidate? Write their name in? Anyone offering odds on the new candidate? |
|
|
|
Good grief, this thread has been inactive for this long? Well, I updated my PGP key on short notice so I want to ensure that everyone knows that nothing fishy is going on. The new public key is also available on my site for anyone who wants to grab it. Also, the I mistakenly wrote September as Septermber in the signed messages. (LOL!) Not worth the time to fix the spelling error. PGP key: 520A E7DD 0C2F DB5C 4783 8A35 1C3D 1D19 C8E8 B6D8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
This is NotATether from bitcointalk.org
Today is Wednesday Septermber 30, 2020
Due to the extreme complexity with managing two keys,
I am retiring both of my PGP keys. My new PGP key is
520A E7DD 0C2F DB5C 4783 8A35 1C3D 1D19 C8E8 B6D8
This key can be used anywhere by me. It may be used
by any purpose and is not subject to any of the
restrictions I put on my old keys.
Please see the associated signed message from the
named key above for confirmation.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=JL63
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
This is NotATether from bitcointalk.org
Today is Wednesday Septermber 30, 2020
Due to the extreme complexity with managing two keys,
I am retiring both of my PGP keys. My new PGP key is
520A E7DD 0C2F DB5C 4783 8A35 1C3D 1D19 C8E8 B6D8
This key can be used anywhere by me. It may be used
by any purpose and is not subject to any of the
restrictions I put on my old keys.
This is the confirmation message I was referring
to in my other signature.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=RBUA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Message Quoted and Archived [ 1a], [ 1b] for future reference. |
|
|
|
I've just had a look at the (locked) thread, the Google Spread Sheet link returns this:  the last post in the thread reads:  So people will just have to wait until they come across a UID with the signature and ask them directly.
I actually missed this drama at the time - can anyone give an Ultra Short break down of what occurred please? *edit* Livecoin Manager sent Livecoin one merit last year: https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=LiveCoin%20Manager&to=LiveCoin which is a tut-tut offense IIRC |
|
|
|
|
I much prefer to play Texas Hold Em online with other players. You can spot the ones who are playing multiple games simultaneously because they lag in calling or raising during the turn or, the river.
|
|
|
|
If you are the owner or an employee of this casino why not create an ANN thread instead of this weak attempt to promote it?
If there's already an [ANN] thread, then this user can't start a second - IIRC there can only be one thread per site, so this thread scrapes under the line by not actually being an [ANN] thread. |
|
|
|
Hope you are successful in the local boards - you might want to look in on this post of mine (and the proceeding page) - there's a handful of UID's that evidence would suggest are alts who have on their profile pages they are Bangladeshi and so might hit you up for more merits. |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the update information, I have a new suggestion for the Firefox/Chrome add-on:
Above or below the trust feedback scores (which are shown as the users' DT settings) a second set of scores which are the scores if no modifications had been made.
Thanks for reading.
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't have mentioned setting some sort of account age requirement if I didn't see it. I don't want to make assumptions, but it is disturbing, however not at all surprising that people are trying to take advantage of my generous offer. That is one thing this forum's membership excels at.
I believe your good nature in this undertaking has been abused right from the start: Post 04 02 February 2018, 16:01:39 Date Registered: erikoy Post 06 02 February 2018, 18:22:58 Date Registered: jademaxsuy As with the others mentioned, these two also use the: Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0) in their signatures.
To put things into perspective: Post 04 02 February 2018, 16:01:39 Date Registered: erikoy
Post 06 02 February 2018, 18:22:58 Date Registered: jademaxsuy
Post 60 26 January 2020, 01:57:59 Date Registered: Lordrift
Post 82 28 January 2020, 00:08:48 Date Registered: Light onuoha
Post 88 19 February 2020, 16:06:37 Date Registered: kakamrul - Bhurungamari, Kurigram, Bangladesh (male)
Post 107 11 May 2020, 23:51:00 Date Registered: Alucard1
Post 21 26 July 2020, 23:05:04 Date Registered: Dragonfund
Post 93 02 September 2020, 00:52:44 Date Registered: suparigach - Bangladesh (male)
Post 87 02 September 2020, 02:39:50 Date Registered: kokilpakhi - Bangladesh (Female)
Thread begins 11 September 2020, 17:04:23
Post 46 15 September 2020, 21:51:37 Date Registered: KingsGambet19
Post 78 21 September 2020, 23:25:43 Date Registered: Hyperguru
Post 78 25 September 2020, 15:34:48 Last Active: Hyperguru
Post 46 27 September 2020, 21:51:14 Last Active: KingsGambet19
Post 87 29 September 2020, 03:10:05 Last Active: kokilpakhi
Post 21 29 September 2020, 19:39:06 Last Active: Dragonfund
Post 97 30 September 2020, 00:07:50 Date Registered: BorisXY
Post 96 30 September 2020, 00:10:46 Date Registered: Lyte
Post 60 30 September 2020, 00:18:03 Last Active: Lordrift
Post 95 30 September 2020, 00:34:59 Date Registered: The Author
Post 93 30 September 2020, 22:11:38 Last Active: suparigach
Post 82 Today at 03:06:26 Last Active: Light onuoha
Post 88 Today at 04:34:01 Last Active: kakamrul
post 04 Today at 08:15:50 Last Active: erikoy
Post 95 Today at 08:25:51 Last Active: The Author
post 06 Today at 08:36:49 Last Active: jademaxsuy
Post 97 Today at 09:05:27 Last Active: BorisXY
Post 107 Today at 10:06:17 Last Active: Alucard1
Post 96 Today at 10:11:51 Last Active: LyteAlthough all of these accounts that used the Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0) in their signatures, nearly all that have been active this morning my time (GMT +10) haven't posted, just logged in. |
|
|
|
...
@SiNeReiNZzz - please use the Submission Form that is contained in the OP. If we all work towards having standardised colouring, fonts and the like then new users (and old alike) will be able to see at a glance the same information instead of having to decipher each-other's colour coding. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Technically, if @andulolika were to lock the thread, the flag becomes invalid (not the least of which because the thread wasn't started by the one who first flew the flag) |
|
|
|
Seriously if a casino offers that kind of odds today on a Trump win then I guarantee you something is wrong with their odds provider, the odds of him winning should not be that high and today it would make more sense if it was around @1.7 or something.
But to my understanding these were bets on the 2016 presidential election which was a different playing field, Trump was sort of a dark horse in the election and nobody really expected him to win at all.
If you looked at the *why* Trump was elected last time it was a vote against H.Clinton in so far as people just did not want another career politician. It had nothing to do with gender. Just the "air" of "I am a politician where-as my opponent isn't" struck a raw nerve. The odds reflected that attitude instead of looking at the two candidates side-by-side, hence they lost out big time. I'm waiting for the "wag the dog" moment of this campaign - so far I haven't seen one. |
|
|
|
...
One now defunct online site was offering 7:1 for Trump to win. Some people cleaned up (sadly I wasn't one of them only due to a lack of BTC at the time to place a wager) - which is probably why that site ended up going downhill fairly quickly afterwards. |
|
|
|
Sorry, you got it wrong. These are not all one person accounts. My account name: suparigach. I am new to this thread. However, I know the rules of Bitcointalk fairly well. And I know what merit is. I live in Bangladesh and I saw from Bangla thread that merit is given to newcomers here. So I did the post.
If you "know the rules fairly well" you'd know quoting a whole post is kinda against the spirit if not the rules of the forum. Time will tell if I'm right or not. |
|
|
|
|
50% of the 1.3 Million postal votes already returned are from registered Democrats wile just 18% are from Republicans.
More than 63 Million postal vote forms have already been requested (which is more than the number that voted for Trump IIRC).
Just on those numbers I would say Biden is likely to win the election.
|
|
|
|
I also would hate to have to set an age bar to keep people from signing up multiple accounts just to claim some merit from this thread.
Just on this page the UID's who used the following: Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0) Registration Date:1/27/2020 2:08:48 PM (Active 1 hours ago) - Light onuoha Registration Date:9/1/2020 2:52:44 PM (Active 18 hours ago) - suparigach Registration Date:9/1/2020 4:39:50 PM (Active 43 hours ago) - kokilpakhi Registration Date:9/29/2020 2:07:50 PM (Active 1 hours ago) - BorisXY Registration Date:9/29/2020 2:10:46 PM (Active 10 hours ago) - Lyte Registration Date:9/29/2020 2:34:59 PM (Active 4 hours ago) - The Author
I might be the only one who can see it - hopefully you can too. |
|
|
|
I want to ask - what is the repercussions for red flagging a supposed alt for "ban evasion" if the supposed primary account is not actually banned?
What is the proof the two accounts you link to were banned? BPIP sheds no light on that subject. Neither has given the other merits, nore has either DT trusted the other. This link by @ anonymousminer is inconclusive in connecting Bla2kja2k to alamjob239 as "proof" (especially as the original post was deleted Nuked and there isn't any archives of the quote)
However,The closest to linking two of the three accounts is via their alts active via BPIP: (see below for acemax https://bpip.org/Profile?id=2760726 inclusion) Registration Date:10/1/2019 3:44:12 AM (Active 233 days ago) - alamjob239 Registration Date:2/2/2020 10:15:23 PM (Active 237 days ago) - Bla2kja2k then again: 2/2/2020 10:00:10 PM password reset via email - alamjob239 2/4/2020 8:59:06 PM Changed to Archived status Nuke user - Bla2kja2k 2/12/2020 12:37:20 PM password reset via email - alamjob239 2/12/2020 1:03:20 PM password reset via email - Bla2kja2k Registration Date:2/13/2020 9:26:27 PM (Active 221 days ago) - acemax 2/19/2020 7:10:31 PM password reset via email - Bla2kja2k 2/19/2020 7:14:34 PM password reset via email - alamjob239 2/20/2020 8:56:55 PM Changed to Archived status Autoban user - acemax
The carpet photos link alamjob239 to Rainbowsky whilst the activity times and dates link alamjob239 to the nuked user Bla2kja2k. So... maybe these three are alts after-all. If that's true, then it is ban evasion (if a mod wasn't just out on a Nuke Spree TM that happens from time to time) 
*edit* There is also a suggestion that the banned user acemax u=2760726 is also an alt of alamjob239 (with no real proof offered on their trust feedback page) however, their registration date / last active date also fits the above pattern: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2760726Date Registered: 14 February 2020, 07:26:27 Last Active: 21 February 2020, 07:40:46 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
