Musisz tez miec razem nabite cztery godziny online.

I want one

Is the account only in INR or does it also pay 9% for other currencies? INR loses in value a lot (inflation rate is 6% (WPI) to 11% (CPI) and the EER is in the 80s.

It will be long before we can expect people to use Bitcoin for groceries, but setting this aside, given precautions I mentioned few posts above the risk becomes largely mitigated and acceptable for low-value transactions (I can be struck by a lightning any time I am outside, does that mean I shouldn't leave my room?)


I wasn't clear enough, discussion, sure, but do you really believe it's worth to design & build an ASIC for scrypt in the foreseeable future?


Gold is used widely in the world and people still use it despite the fact that only a few can afford to mine it themselves (nothing stops people from buying it). Bitcoin will someday (hopefully) become widely used like paypal but already now people who use Bitcoin actually buy it (or offer goods/services for BTC) because not everyone wants to bother/can afford/has time/is technically knowledgeable enough with setting up a mining operation (like with gold). Bitcoin, like gold, is used due to its advantages over fiat, not because ''it's a money-making machine''. The ''money'' part is only there to secure the network, Bitcoin is about financial independence from the state and middlemen.

Not sure where you are from but reading doesn't hurt For low-value transactions no waiting is necessary.


Are you sure it's worth it? I like scrypt but it is still relatively new and I wouldn't be surprised if someone found a flaw in it that would render it less safe, after all it is as old as Bitcoin (created in 2009) and also created by only 1 guy (although Satoshi did use some other peoples' ideas and consulted them). If the flaw requires a change of an algorithm in Litecoin, all those expensive ASICs will become useless.

It will be a long before it will be worth to invest so much money to design & manufacture an ASIC for scrypt.


+1
As Bitcoin gained in popularity the barrier for 'an average Joe' became too high already without any ASICs. Until recent price increases a lot of people wouldn't have been able to afford to mine with their electricity costs and often hardware costs (in US GPUs are cheap, especially 2nd hand). Difficulty is growing and when it stabilizes with price, only those with the best economies of scale will remain in business with profit margins decreasing.

It should take 10 minutes with a transaction fee that isn't too low and with a few measures* instant 0-confirmation transaction can be relatively safe and used for transactions of, say, less than $1000 (given the resources required to double-spend if appropriate precautions were taken by the merchant, accepting 0-confirmation transaction for low-value goods can be safe).

*connections only to previously whitelisted and known honest nodes, no outgoing connections (UPnP off), etc.

All this show of force was unnecessary because one policeman would have been enough to arrest him.
The guy wasn't even found by the police but a random guy found him in his boat.

'Crimes' would be solved but I doubt there would be justice. With so much power and influence they would have the monopoly for committing crimes themselves and for fabricating evidence to 'solve the crimes' that are committed by members of society that are not affliated with the police force..

http://www.magicmushroomskit.com/faq/


Ever heard of a tracking number?

I think you could substract electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths other than 380-740 nm and sound as these two are also are also as heat are ways that energy is emitted in.

I would be glad if someone more knowledgable confirmed whether I'm right or bullshitting, though.


Are you sure it is going to be worth to run mine the GPUs with the added cost of electricity for cooling them? Have you checked how much do you have to pay for the electricity (+ costs of transmission/distribution + taxes)? It might be OK for now, but expect for the difficulty to increase 5-10x in a year or so if BFL delivers and Avalon continues to deliver.

Nie korzystalem, ale z tego co czytam to tylko konto mieli w Polsce, wlascicielem byl Niemiec, a firma byla angielska.

You have paid in Bitcoins and it is the value of BTC after the price increase?

As it was mentioned few posts back - day trading doesn't differ much from gambling. The market is very unpredictable... but its inefficiencies can offer some guidance and hints on how the price may change.

A rather long list is to be found here:

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Trade

I don't like your regulatory-intervenionist tendencies.

How will you decide which currency is the most important? If it's due to liquidity USD you are limiting yourself to the US, you might not know it, but Bitcoin is also known and used in Europe and on other continents too (not sure about Antarctica though). Why not change the numbers of coins issued on something more reliable than fiat (precious metals)? How will you decide which exchanges should be taken into consideration? Why them? What if a new exchange with a lot of trading going on pops out? Will you adjust the algorithm to that? Who is to do it? How will you convince others to use the new protocol?

If you want such radical, unsafe and nonsensical changes I suggest you start your own coin.


And get them use other exchanges, so that (ideally) no single exchange is a single point of failure, has monopoly on 80% of BTC exchange, and where its deficiencies have an influence on price (laaags)

Why would I do that?    If you read my post I think you can see that my impression of BitcoinMillionaire's system is less than favourable.

I am the last of the three people who received a free copy to review.

The guide is 2277 words long and has 3 pictures in it. A lot about the guide has been already mentioned so I'll keep it very short.

Although I'm not sure I like the fact that someone send TradeFortress the guide, a lot that has already been said by others and him is unfortunately true (to be honest I didn't expect anything more than greyhattery but I'm trying to remain objective nonetheless).

The guide may work. BitcoinMillionaire is aware that AdSense can ban people and he proposes a solution to this but I am not sure if the end justifies the means, especially given the costs if it is to be done more than once (because I don't see why google wouldn't be against practices outlined in the guide and keep banning the accounts, in the long run only serving valuable content and helping advertisers get actual sales will be profitable but of course it takes much more effort and time).

I think the guide is worth less than 1 BTC. (1 BTC is around $70-150 these days) It doesn't look very professional (but better than his font size 9000 posts on the 1st page) and it could be written in 3h. If I had to pay for it I would be willing to pay $5 provided that I had zero knowledge and familiarity with Internet marketing, AdSense, etc. The product BitcoinMillionaire is offering is real and I'm quite positive he won't run away with your money once you pay. What I am uncertain about is the quality of the product, especially given the steep price.

There is a reason why BitcoinMillionaire would want to sell it to a limited number of people, you can understand it once you read through his guide - this is to limit competition for current and new users (but they already have a lot).

Things to change:

- show better proof of earnings than easily-editable and 4 month old screenshots
- stop looking so 'scammy', e.g. big fonts, too much red colours
- provide a better product, if I were to spend $100 I would expect a detailed few hundred page book not 5 pages

I confirm that I have received the copy, I will have the time to read it somewhere in the evening (UTC +2) and I will give my review today or tomorrow.

Quoting for future reference, only changing the font size so it doesn't take up so much space:


I have over a thousand posts and have done a few trades in 2011 and 2012 on bitcointalk (previously known as forum.bitcoin.org) you could also try PMing one of the Global Moderators. If you want I can try your product and write a review here.

No, most warranties do not cover overclocking, read up if you are not sure. Yes, very often manufacturers ''advertise'' overclocking and provide tools to do so, at the same time exempting themselves from providing warranty for products that result in malfunctioning due to overclocking. Depending on who gives you a warranty (merchant or manufacturer) and who performs the checking on what's wrong with the card it may or may not be found that the card was overclocked (there are ways of finding it out if the overclocking is what resulted in breaking the card).