Like i said in the post right above yours: at this point, it's to late... The transaction is confirmed, so there is no way to cancel it out anymore...
If you want to learn how to do this for future reference, i must tell you that it's a rather difficult, technical process.

What you would need to do to create a double spending tx in bitcoin core:
- export the private keys belonging to at least one of the unspent outputs you want to double spend
- open bitcoin core, either from the cli, or open the debug window
- type "importprivkey [the key you exported"
- wait untill the rescan is finished
- you can try to use coin controll features, if you're lucky the unspent output you need to double spend is in the list of selectable outputs... In this case, use this output to create a new transaction (but with a higher fee)
- if the unspent output isn't in the coin controll's list of selectable unspent outputs, you need to create a raw transaction yourself from the cli or debug window: createrawtransaction [{"txid":"txid in which you received the unspent output you want to double spend","vout":n}] {"yourchangeaddress":amountminusfee}
the vout:n is the vout (basically the counter that counts to the n'th output
- after you created the raw transaction, you need to sign it using: signrawtransaction "hexstring"
- after you signed the tx, you need to broadcast it using: sendrawtransaction "hexstring"

I hope you now realise what i meanth if i was saying it was rather technical and timeconsuming.
If you want to try this out yourself, i'd recommand you'd do this on the testnet...

I bought my gekkoscience compaq from bitshopper. He also sells the 2pac:
https://www.bitshopper.de/shop/sha-256-miner-en/gekkoscience-2pac/?lang=en

HOWEVER: please note that the chance you'll ROI using an usb miner is rather small...

I've ran a best case scenario simulation for you:
https://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/bitcoin-mining-calculator/?h=25&p=2&pc=0.10&pf=1&d=888171856257.32100000&r=12.50000000&er=4650.10170000&hc=0.00

IF the diff stays the same (witch won't happen)
IF the BTC price stays this high (witch nobody knows)
AS long as the block reward doesn't halve (the reward will halve in a couple of years)
IF you keep this baby running 24/7 (good luck)
IF it runs at 25 Gh/s (good luck)
IF it only uses 2 Watt (this is the mimumum power draw indicated @bitshopper.de, it's probably when you seriously underclock such a stick and don't count the power draw of your controller)
IF you only pay 10 cents/Kwu (i pay 27 cents/kwu myself)

You'll make $12/year in BTC, so it'll probably take +7 years to pay back the stick + S&H IF everything stays status-quo...

Sure you can, but the process will require you to get your hands on (export) the private keys belonging to one (or more) of the following addresses: 1PKnAWi354pBAGsvHtcUo8StVzEKF5oUPF,1KhFbcBj2sAFUnnTtjMLyC948CRBaZM7KY, 127q3WFPJ8gFLc7QYfsQYAkvqphCAyaA7c
Then, you can import these private keys in a different wallet. Like DannyHamilton already said: bitcoin core is the easyest, since it will allow you to easily create and sign raw transactions cherrypicking any unspent output you want, leaving the exact fee you want... However, bitcoin core takes a long time to sync, and requires a lot of diskspace (even if you prune the database, it requires several Gb).

The other wallets i've succesfully used in the past are an offline version of coinb.in and electrum.

EDIT: OP: you can now close and lock this topic. While i was writing this post, your transaction got confirmed, so there is nothing you can do anymore...

So, let your case be a cautionary tale for everybody that practically guaranteed you that the transaction would never confirm, and that you needed to do nothing and just wait it out: there are no guarantees, a miner can pick whatever transaction he wants and put it in the block he's currently trying to solve...

Not really, my answer is completely to the point... I'm advising him to double spend the unconfirmed inputs in a new transaction, which would be the only technical sollution to op's problem, next to waiting and hoping that no miner adds the tx to a block before most nodes drop the tx.

In this case your only option would be to manually create a new transaction, using at least one input from the tx you want to cancel, with a much higher fee than the tx you wanted to cancel. Then broadcast this new tx as widely as possible and hope a miner decides to put it in the block hes working on ( and gets lucky).

This is technically difficult, timeconsuming and a longshot, there is a big chance it wint work anyways.  

On the other hand, with a 6 sat/byte fee, there is a big chance no miner would accept this tx anyways, in which case it'lk probably be dropped from most nodes' mempool in ~3 days even if you do nothing (no guarantee either)

Offcourse it can fail, and offcourse it has a certain lifetime... Every piece of hardware breaks in the end... I haven't looked up the number of uses a trezor or a ledger have, but you can rest assured that after x thousand uses, these hardware wallets will fail.
Fixing this problem is one of the many uses of the recovery seed...

First of all, move this thread to the support thread of the alternative client you're using (the main tech support thread is for the core client). Secondly, don't put ???russian??? words in your question or most people won't understand your question...

As for your question, if you only have the passphrase used to encode your wallet, the name of the wallet and the address, there is little to no chance of restoring your wallet.

In order for you to restore your wallet, you either need the seed phrase (or any other sort of recovery phrase generated by your wallet), a list of private keys or at least a part of the wallet file...
Sorry to bring you the bad news.

If you wallet helt a significant amount of BTC, i'd personally shut down the phone and take it to somebody who knows how to scan the phone's storage for deleted files... Maybe you get lucky and find the wallet file, but don't get your hopes up.

I agree with most of your post, however, having unconfirmed inputs in a regular size does not prove they were mixed by chipmixer at all... I could easily use some of my unspent outputs in a transaction that generates new outputs with the exact same value as chipmixer's chips...
The proof is the letter chipmixer can give you, signed by them... However, as it has been discussed before, it's not completely sure a judge will allow a signed letter by an anonymous mixer as valid proof.... I know the courts in my country are very bureaucratic and not tech-savvy at all...

Is this your personal opinion, or is there a source to back this claim up? Personally, i like the ledger native UI better than trezor's, altough they offer similar functions. As for security: are there unpatched security flaws on the trezor???

Like HCP already said: it would be best if you contacted walletrecoveryservices on this forum.

If, for some reason, he cannot help you, i can always take a swing at cracking the password... However, i would only be willing to do this if you had a reasonable idear what your password look like (length, which characters have been used, likely candidates,...), cause otherwise i would just burn cpu cycles with allmost 0 chance of getting the job done.

This thread should satisfy your curiosity: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1014202

If you found it TL;DR, here's the bottom line:
A member put 1 BTC onto an addres whose private key was bip38 encrypted, he posted the encrypted private key + the fact that the password was only 6 letters. Later on he even gave a couple of clues about the password.
Two years later, he closed the contest and disclosed the password to be "zLwMiR", the price remained unclaimed (nobody succesfully bruteforced the password in 2 years, even with the prior knowledge the password was only 6 letters long).

So, if you pick a reasonably strong, completely random password, you should be relatively secure... Offcourse, if you're going to load your paper wallet with 1000's of BTC, you're giving a brute forcer a very big incentive to crack your passphrase...

Just click on the orange button in the right bottom corner and manually select a different server.

The fee has nothing to do with the monetary value of the output, only with the size in bytes of the transaction.

The op payed 175 sat/byte. This is way to low since the optimal fee has been +500 say/byte all day today

@op: you can try viabtc's txaccellerator.

De fee heeft te maken met de grootte van de tx (in bytes), en heeft dus idd niks te maken met het getransfereerde bedrag. Hetgeen wat je gemist hebt is dat de optimale fee constant veranderd. Vandaag kan 500 sat/byte noodzakelijk zijn, terwijl volgende week 250 sat/byte meer dan voldoende is... Heeft te maken met de fee van de andere unconfirmed tx's in de huidige mempool...

Als de top 3-5 Mb tx's in de mempool een gemiddelde fee hebben van 500 sat/byte, zal je dus 501 sat/byte moeten gebruiken om een redelijke kans te hebben op een snelle confirmatie.



Ik heb momenteel een tx met >450 sat/byte unconfirmed... Deze heeft dus veel meer prioriteit dan die van jou...

Waarom denk je dat het niet aan de fee kan liggen? Je hebt een fee van 157 sat/byte gebruikt terwijl op dit moment 510 sat/byte nodig is om 95% kans om in een van de volgende 3 blokken te zitten te garanderen...

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Je bent wel correct bezig wat betreft viabtc... Gewoon blijven proberen tot er een plaatsje vrij is in hun queu

if you're talking about the bitmain or viabtc accelerator: they are legit

viabtc and bitmain have a large mining pool (they own a reasonable percentage of the network's hashrate). They both created a web service in which a bitcoin user can make a request to prioritise their transaction on the pool's mining node.

With a higher priority, there is a larger chance the user's transaction will be added to the block either viabtc or bitmain is currently trying to solve. If their transaction is in a block, and either of these pools find a hash that is lower than the current diff, the user's transaction is confirmed.

If you're talking about other services (like transaction accelerator services offered on this forum), i guess at least 90% of them are using either viabtc or bitmain (or both).

However, there are a couple users like Quickseller and macbook-air that have push privileges to other pools, so if they offer a transaction accelerator service, they're also legit, but they don't use the free tools offered by viabtc or bitmain.

That was fast
A tip isn't really necessary, but always appreciated, my tipping address can be found in my user profile: 1MocACiWLM8bYn8pCrYjy6uHq4U3CkxLaa

In case you want to tip NeuroticFish, his tipping address seems to be: 1FiSh48zo6PNaxBGEmqfuDB3XezxaXwbXQ

you have 2 unconfirmed transactions, the first has a very low fee of ~11 sat/byte, you used the change from this unconfirmed, low fee, transaction to create a new transaction (also having a very low fee of ~15 sat/byte).

You can solve this problem by submitting the parent transaction (11 sat/byte) to viabtc's txaccelerator (like i told you in my previous post)... wait untill viabtc puts your tx in a block and succesfully mines it, then re-broadcast the child transaction (15 sat/byte). Once it's rebroadcasted, also add it to viabtc's txaccelerator.

This procedure will probably take several hours, but it has a *reasonable* chance of succeeding, since both your fees were > 10 sat/byte (which is the minimum fee to get accepted by viabtc).

glad you got it fixed, however, your old multibit did pick a fee of < 15 sat/byte, while at the time of writing a fee of 510 sat/byte would be recommanded if you wanted to have a 95% chance of getting into one of the next 3 blocks (source: https://bitcoinfees.21.co/)

You can be lucky and see your transaction end up in a block in several hours/days, but don't be supprised if it stays in the node's mempool untill they decide to drop it...

I'd personally recommend to use the viabtc txaccelerator: https://pool.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ (read their full FAQ/TOS before using them, or you will probably won't be able to submit your tx due to the fact they only accept a certain amount of tx's per hour)

I really fail to see the point here... Why would it be better to trade with, for example 8 LTC than to trade with 0.1 BTC? They're both worth ~$400 when i would trade them against FIAT... They both have the potential to rise/fall in value,...
The only difference would be that at this exact time, the miners fee you would pay to create, broadcast and confirm an equally large transaction on the BTC and LTC network would be much smaller in FIAT terms when transaction on the LTC chain compared to the BTC chain.

Bitcoin isn't something physical... It's perfectly fine to own 0.001 BTC, you don't have to own a full BTC in order to be able to use it...