The crypto market has single rule i.e. whenever Bitcoin is up the alts are up too and whenever Bitcoin is down the alts are down too. You can invest in alts to diversify your portfolio but you will get good return only once Bitcoin goes up. So its up to you whether you want to invest in Bitcoin alone or want to add alts in your portfolio too. To me Bitcoin is sole driver of the crypto market and has the ability to go up on its own. No alt has the capability to go up on its own.
Altcoins also rely on market hype. When Bitcoin rises, all altcoins will automatically follow the upward movement. We have often seen in the market that altcoins do not completely stand alone, so I say that altcoins are more sensitive to how market sentiment occurs. diversifying on altcoins? That's not a good way ' this is my own opinion' altcoins always fall uncontrollably so I don't have altcoins in my portfolio anymore, currently only bitcoin is the best just like your belief in bitcoin so far, if you see altcoin profits are bigger then bitcoin will be able to surpass more than altcoins. Although altcoins are typically depended to Bitcoin prices, it's important to include them in your portfolio. Some are worthless, but grouping them together is oversimplified. Even though Bitcoin is well-known, its important to look past the hype and think about the possibilities of some altcoins. Putting all your eggs in one basket is risky. You may think cryptocurrencies cant be stopped when they collapse, but several have risen and kept stable independent of Bitcoin. Bitcoin is important, but market fluctuations and crashes can happen. Diversification is a practical approach for reducing risk and increasing profits. Believing there is a single bitcoin investment strategy is not really ideal. |
|
|
|
|
Always doubt, pal. Everybody has a hypothesis, pattern, or secret, dont they? A chart cant tell you everything, especially if its from someone else
I'll tell you what I do believe in - my own analysis. I analyze and draw my own judgments after looking closely. I ignore the noises of opinions on the internet. Why? Because everyone's got a motive, and its rarely in your best interest
Do your own research, be skeptical of online projections, and arm yourself with facts in a world of misinformation. Maintain an open mind, healthy skepticism, and choice freedom. And chart reading is not that hard, so spend some time to learn them
|
|
|
|
But not all poor can grab the opportunity because there are people that don't have an access to the Internet let alone technology that can access bitcoin, maybe those above the poverty line and those that can afford to put in a little bit of money in bitcoin and have the devices that can afford to navigate the platforms where they can buy bitcoin. I feel bad though that the opportunity of a lifetime still doesn't reaches everyone but what can I do? It's not like I put them there or have any way to help them out, I'm just a lowly salaryman that lives paycheck to paycheck.
That's one of the factor that affects poor people to attain that benefits Bitcoin have. Cause nowadays in our technology which is the internet, from there you could gain knowledge by just simply surfing the web which you could find a lot of money sources, what more if they could do investment and trading as well. They can't escape that life of being poor if they doesn't have the knowledge how they can improved their life. But to be honest, do we consider those native people who live in the mountain as poor? I just think that rich and poor are just labeled in a community, cause from those native people who's contented by just living and doing things as their survival. And also I think poor wouldn't waste their time to understand thing that they think is really complicated Web browsing is a great way for people to learn, but what about those without access to the internet? Due to the gap in technology by places, many people are unaware of options like as Bitcoin and other investments. Many people still dont know about the digital financial world, which is a sad fact that has little to do with disinterest. The intricacy and scarcity of easily available knowledge further distance individuals who are already marginalized. Ignoring it’s a serious issue that will only make things worse. |
|
|
|
We share similar experiences. It has been eight years since the invention of Bitcoin, and that's when I first received my very first piece of Bitcoin. I don't consider myself an early adopter, but like you, I used or spent it without realizing its potential. I also feel regretful about not holding onto more Bitcoin from my early days. However, the important thing is that I now recognize its potential and can make better-informed decisions about how to manage my cryptocurrency holdings moving forward. We should use our past actions as learning opportunities.
For me, it's never too late to start accumulating and holding onto Bitcoin because I believe in the long-term.
Exactly, it is not too late to start investing in Bitcoin because I believe it will continue to increase, it is time to buy it and hold it for long term, in the past some of my friends that I will grow with, they had an idea about Bitcoin and used to buy it and keep it in their wellet, if the price just increase small their will sell it, i think they don't want to keep it for long term. Later on, they told me about it, and I told them I'm not interested since I don't want to loose my money because I'm scared. In the next 4 to 5 years, Bitcoin is expected to increase, and people are beginning to enjoy people who invest in it for the long term, so I became interested in it, and a friend gave me a link to learn about Bitcoin at learnmeabitcoin.com and I have now begun to achieve my goals in Bitcoin. The conspiracies that large banks are actively discouraging individuals from investing in Bitcoin. Its a story about the wealthy getting richer while shutting out the rest of society. But dont be too excited. Its time to cut through the distraction and look at the facts, the data, the trends. We must be wise and serious. Knowledge is and always will be everything. You're doing the right thing by reading up on Bitcoin at learnmeabitcoin.com. But remain skeptical. Never stop asking questions and looking for alternatives viewpoints and sources. Take into account the fact that not all price increases are long-lasting and that not all price decreases are terrible. Only knowledge can save you in this world |
|
|
|
I understand. I too think this way sometimes. But it's not a scientific way of thinking, right? Whether we lose or win doesn't depend on what happened to us before. We can win right away after a big win, and we can lose and lose again after a long losing streak.
But of course you are right, reckless gambling doesn't' necessarily start after a win round.
The factor of your old loss will not affect your current win or Los.But logically,if the gambler had started to learn from all the old loss,the old loss may indirectly cause for the new win.When the gambler learn from the gambling,he should take a short note on the winning methods.Some gambler will lose the entire winning money by this way.After making the big win,they never worry about the loss in the gambling.This feeling will be survive to the gamblers till losing the entire winning money.After the winning money,the first dollar itself make the gambler to worry about the loss.This only recover after the next big win. Your past losses may not be on the books, but they are in your thoughts. Should we expect gamblers' choices to be unaffected by past failures? Gamblers who dont review their mistakes set themselves up for failure. It involves understanding why you lost and avoiding the same mistakes, not merely taking notes on winning tactics. Dont even mention money-wasting gamblers. They appear to have been brainwashed to believe they are unstoppable, only to fall further each time. This isnt a game. This is real life, and it has serious consequences. |
|
|
|
To be honest I mostly play luck based games and rarely play strategic games. So there was nothing that prevented a big win for me.
There were times when the bet I was in had a huge return but I cashed out very early and hence did not win big.
I have investigate one thing over and over in gambling. When I go ahead with a bet for a big win I withdraw the money from that bet or have to withdraw for any other reason. Although many would call it an emotional affair, I have experienced the biggest hindrance in my big wins. But in the small wins there was no apparent problem. But here I was suggested by a few gamblers that I could not take the risk. Because of which I can't convert such bets to win in the end. I don't agree with them on this but I was more excited when I lost several times from winning ports. Gambling establishments arent built on winners, remember that. These huge casinos and online platforms? They thrive when players lose. So when you speak of challenges with big wins, Im not surprised. Its how the system is designed! Sure, they'll let you enjoy the small wins to keep you hooked, but the real money? Thats a different game altogether. Those gamblers advising you might have their own interests in mind, maybe even aligned with the house's interests. Always question their motives. The game is deeper than you think. Stay sharp. |
|
|
|
But the danger in this deal is you might be connected to the match-fixing syndicate which will jeopardize your integrity since you KYC already on the casino if you are betting a significant amount like me. The worst is you might be flagged as a money launderer once you connect with them and accept money as payment. I have a very bad experience in regards to being connected to a launderer due to P2P on the exchange so I decided to create this warning thread for the fellow gambler. Never share your casino account to anyone here especially those so-called whale bettors because you might be connected to whatever shit they are doing illegally.
Receiving a surprise message from unknown users offering something should always be ignored especially if it's about a partnership deal that involves sharing our personal accounts. It's been widely a usual practice in Telegram groups not just about gambling but also on other offers as well. Aside from that, our personal gambling account should only be controlled by us as that's a personal account anymore if someone gets access to it. Either it's about profit sharing or they promise us to give us good profit in return, we should always look at realistic thing to happened. They can just actually created an account by themselves and used that instead but still chosen to use someone account. That part is already a red flagged to me. Do you think its just a coincidence that these kinds of posts keep showing up in Telegram groups? Its a well-thought-out plan. Unknown people take advantage of people who are too trusting and lure them into a trap by making them think they have a good deal. And accounts for gambling? Protect them like you would your house keys. There is something bad about why they dont just make their own accounts. Its not being lazy. Its a trick. The way they act is a clear sign that they want to do harm, so everyone should be on high watch. Always watch out |
|
|
|
Gambling responsibly I believe will definitely have positive effects on anyone who does it. Gambling responsibly mustn't mean that one gambles once in a blue moon but whenever he feels is right for him and also gambles with his disposable income and not basic income or even borrowing to gamble like gambling addicts do. I think anyone who gambles responsibly wouldn't see gambling as a primary source of income so he'll not be too worried when he lose his stakes but will enjoy every bit of his winnings.
Also being responsible in gambling is not to keep trying when you keep losing, at least give a break to try again later but if you keep gambling and chasing back loses it definitely means the gambler has lost control and he is playing out of his desire and wish but not how he is suppose to embark on it. Therefore, there is a relationship between having your emotion intact and losing your emotion as you gamble. You need control while you gamble. A responsible gambler never sees responsibility in the game they know how to control themselves so they are successful and know how to properly control the profit and loss in betting. Since the demand is at a level where it is difficult to stop oneself but the responsible gambler tries to prepare himself well by understanding the various harmful aspects of gambling addiction, most of the time addicts do not want to think about them or do not remember them. Instead of this habit he knows how to prepare himself by analyzing the causes of harmful effects. People always talk about "responsible gamblers" as if they were a different kind of person who could handle the risks of the game. Lets be clear: there is a secret gambling world that many people either choose to ignore or fail to see. Sure, a "responsible" gambler is aware of his boundaries, but arent casinos and betting sites designed for someone of this caliber? Or are they more likely to exploit the vulnerabilities of the many and drag everyone down into the depths of addiction? Its a risky game in which the house always triumphs. Many more get pulled under the waves than those who can swim against the tide. Although "understanding" the negative effects of addiction is beneficial, the fundamental query is why these risks exist in the first place. Who actually gains from them? |
|
|
|
Xavi basically has a deal for his contract.
He will extend for 1 more year until the end of 2025 with an option for 1 more year to 2026.
Im very worried about what will happen with Xavi's deal. I thought he would get a longer contract, given how well he has rebuilt Barcelona's image in La Liga. Sure, he has a job until 2025, but why does he only have a possible job until 2026? He has done a great job with the team and has helped many players from the La Masia school move up. Plus, his good friendship with Laporta seems to be a big reason why Barcelona makes many of the decisions it does. They want to win the La Liga prize, and I think they can if Xavi keeps playing well. So why are they being so careful about his contract? Do they doubt that he can see the big picture? |
|
|
|
Real Madrid have the possibilities to hits harder this season, it's always a great game to watch them perform, they're on different levels when it comes to performance on the pitch. Real Madrid have ultimate priorities to achieved this season, it's quite amazing to watch their new signing making positive impact on Santiago Bernabeu ground. He's experienced and confident, he's a prominent player for the club and Carlo Ancelotti align him to be on his starting XI. Jude Bellingham is good replacement for Luka Modric and Toni Kroos. He served different purpose and he's present infront of goals.
Jude Bellingham replace well with Luka Modric and Toni Kroos position but both senior player still get more minutes playing with Real Madrid in this season although Modric have to play more as holding midfielder. Jude Bellingham answered all Real Madrid fans trust because he has consistency on the top level and scoring goals on every matches not only in domestic league but also he scored one goal for Real Madrid in first Champion League match. Current situation with many well replacement in midfielder position, Madrid mustn't worry when Luka Modric and Toni Kroos leaving the team because he has Jude Bellingham, Camavinga, Falverde and Aurélien Tchouaméni have playing well as holding midfielder. Madrid's reliance on Bellingham to replace Modric and Kroos worries me. Jude Bellingham has shown promise, scoring even in Champions League matches, but giving him so much responsibility could be dangerous. I feel Madrid's seniors, especially Modric and Kroos, stabilize the team. Without them, could Camavinga, Valverde, or Tchouameni perform as well? I doubt it! Tchouameni failed in Madrid's match against Union Berlin. What if Bellingham gets hurt? This is risky, and Madrid may be playing with fire |
|
|
|
In as much as I've always been an advocate of not underrating small teams, I still can't help but agree with you, Manchester city's performance in all their games this season have made them almost unbeatable by any team in this current season in the EPL, though being an Arsenal fan and my happiness is seeing Arsenal win all their games, but when it comes to beating Manchester city, it's almost impossible..
Even though this is the reality, in my opinion, so far the only clubs in the Premier League that still have potential and can provide a tight game can be said to be Arsenal and Liverpool. As far as I know, these two clubs are quite stable and at certain times Manchester City is not always in favorable conditions. So, if you look at Arsenal's growth in a more positive direction, it doesn't rule out the possibility that the meeting between Manchester City and Arsenal will be a match worth paying attention to for all Gunner fans. Last season, Manchester City and Arsenal were pretty much the only teams that could win. Liverpool added some spice, but they didnt show up often enough. Its interesting how you've brought up Arsenal's promise this season, especially when you think about the problems Manchester City could have. Im not sure that Nottingham Forest is going to be a big problem for City this weekend. But what makes me both happy and worried is how City has changed. They dont depend on KDB as much as they used to, which shows how flexible they are. Arsenal has to do better. Also, I have to laugh a little bit. Some deals, like Havertz, are questionable, but I wouldnt be too harsh. |
|
|
|
What affects our relationship is not gambling, but the addiction in it, ..
If addiction has a negative effect, then the impact on our relationship is also negative. But let's look at it from another perspective. Why do we always assume that when a person is addicted to gambling, they are losing more money than they can afford to lose? What if it's the other way around? What if a person is addicted because they are winning and have achieved financial freedom through gambling? Isn't it considered an addiction as well when you keep gambling because you are winning? This is because gambling addicts only want to gamble and they tend to find it difficult to stop gambling before their money runs out. But that may not happen, especially since we are not gambling addicts. Everything is possible and it will depend on each gambler and gambling addicts can win and achieve financial freedom through gambling. But it seems that it will not be easy because continuing to gamble means we are willing to accept all the risks that can occur in gambling. But the impact of gambling addiction may be more dangerous than we think, and the difference may lie in self-control. The casino's interests come first in the design of the gambling system, not the players'. Casinos are huge, luxurious buildings for a reason, and it has nothing to do with how generously they pay out. Its honestly stupid of you to think that gambling addiction can lead to financial independence. Self-control? Yes, that is necessary. However, self-control may not be sufficient if the system is biased against you. Are we prepared to allow ourselves to be exploited by a sector of the economy that profits from our failures? We must consider this more carefully and carefully. |
|
|
|
I gamble with a low frequency and I do not think I am addicted to gambling. However, despite taking every piece of advice, if I had difficulty quitting gambling or reducing the frequency of my gambling, I would seek professional support. Psychologists or psychiatrists can help people with gambling addiction. If people with addiction cannot control themselves, they may experience social, financial and psychological problems. Getting help from professionals can help them get their life back. Remember that nothing is initiate suddenly more serious but initiate stage is normal after which everything get worse. If a person is saying that he is just using little money and gamble for fun then it can be assumed that he will be accurately do this but not all the time because little addiction can be altered into worse addiction after the time flows steadily. If you set into mind that you will quite gambling because it is not a good thing and imagine its bad characteristics then you can forget it easily. But if you are trying again and again in the hope to be successful one day then this thing in my opinion is better in other fields but not in gambling. Parents should keep check on their children's activities and if they find their involvement in such things then from start they have to stop them. Addiction is a big problem psychologically and physically, we don't want it to happen to us. But can be possible when we lose control of our gambling habits especially if we are desperate to win and if we are chasing our losses, it causes trouble in our mind and affects our mental capability to determine whether our action is right or wrong. It needs someone who is professional in that situation to help because this is not a casual situation that is easy to manage on our own. The only way to help ourselves from getting into addiction is to know our limits. I know it was hard because we are in the internet era where it is easy to gain access to online gambling but if we really have to control ourselves earlier, I'd see no problem. The industry doesnt want you to have control. They gain from your carelessness. Its no accident that the number of online gambling sites has increased in the digital age, preying on our weaknesses. You are correct in saying that it is now easier than ever to become addicted in the age of the internet. Most people fall into this evil loop unconsciously; its like a trap set for the foolish. However, if you're alert and aware of the threats, you can defend yourself. Recognize the significance of establishing limits. That is the initial action. Avoid letting the industry's siren song pull you farther in. A strong will and awareness are the first steps in the fight against addiction. |
|
|
|
Anything about PSG is still remain unsafe until PSG would able to create huge point gaps to the competitors. There are still some clubs like newcastle and acmilan that would be the main threats for PSG.
It's caused by milan and newcastle potentially to finish at the first and second place. This is just the first match day. There will be more to come soon. PSG needs to well prepared to face acmilan and newcastle caused by these clubs are far strongers compared with dortmnud at this moment.
Psg may also lose points when the club was facing those clubs. I hope that if enrique would have learned a lot from the previous match.
I agree with you, all teams have just played one match of course we can't conclude who is better and we have to wait until the 3-4 match PSG indeed started with a good start but it was a home match to prove that they are one of the best, they must be able to win away games Its way too soon to draw conclusions after just one game. Even though PSG looked good at home, they will really be put to the test when they play away. When we think back to last season, when Barcelona lost to Inter Milan in a way that nobody expected, its a stark warning that a top league like the UCL is anything but predictable. Im really worried about PSG's games coming up, especially against Newcastle and AC Milan. No matter how much we praise Mbappe's hard work, depending too much on one player can be bad. I really hope that Enrique comes up with a plan that doesnt rely too much on him. So much is at risk |
|
|
|
|
The passion with which emerging nations have embraced cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, is not by chance. You ever wonder why? These nations are susceptible to inflation and economic instability because the global financial system has frequently been rigged against them. However, Bitcoin appears, upending the existing quo and giving the "underdogs" more influence. Online transactions are simply one aspect of the uprising against a broken system. Many in the West applaud Bitcoin's decentralized nature, but in nations like India and parts of Africa, its more than just decentralization; its a lifeline. It provides a means of escaping a historically unjust economic structure. The ruling class wont admit it because they like to maintain power. But the reality is that people are deciding their own economic futures, and Bitcoin is the tool they are employing.
|
|
|
|
There is a saying that it doesn't matter how long you live a life but matters is how well you lived, we no that death is inevitable but the question we should ask ourselves is that what foundation or legacy have you establish to your family? So in times of having only one source of income is not wise, so to me I cannot put only Bitcoin as my only source of wealth perhaps I could only invest half of my money on Bitcoin and channel other ones to different kind of investment because there is a proverb in my country that says that never put all your eggs in one basket because if you do, and the basket falls all the eggs you have gathered for many years will be broken, so this means that we shouldn't rely on one channel of investment so that of something happens you will have were to fall into.
Wealth and assets of the wealthy and influential have been diversified for centuries. Why? due to the fact that they are well aware of the dangers of a single point of failure. What would happen if you invested everything in Bitcoin and there was a market crash or some large corporations decided to manipulate the market? Your situation will be hopeless. You're referring to universal information that the wealthy have been using for many years, not just ancient knowledge from your own nation. Do not contribute to their larger plan by becoming another pawn. Act appropriately by being aware of the game. |
|
|
|
To me DCA method is very nice especially the beginners because as a beginner investing on Bitcoin you could get overwhelmed and start investing aggressively without knowing you could run out of funds and as such making you to sell some of your investment to attend or sorts your needs but with DCA method your mindset of accumulating will change were as you will be guided on how to accumulate with a little funds but more consistent and plans for reserve funds or rather emergency funds that would take care of any needs that arise and keeps you consistently accumulating, so DCA may have other loopholes but is actually good for the beginners for risk management were as they feels more relaxed and rest of mind but it will take a long time to accumulate enough using DCA.
The DCA approach may be the bitcoin industry's best-kept secret. Ever pondered why so many individuals rush in, make huge investments, and then lose everything? Perhaps because certain factors favor it that way. When beginners lose, someone else profits. By consistently investing with DCA, you're defying the unspoken "rules" set by the high and mighty of the finance realm. You're not their ideal client; you're too careful, too wise. Sure, it'll take time to build a significant stash, but isnt time on your side when you're not playing into their hands? |
|
|
|
✂✂✂✂
My point is that Bitcoin might not actually give the poor an opportunity, at least in this discussion's context.
There are many people who are very poor, not even able to eat 3 meals a day like you said, and investing with them is almost impossible. But in the future, if they can save a small amount of money and wish to change their lives by investing. It can be said that bitcoin is their choice, bitcoin gives them an opportunity because they can invest with their little capital. Unlike other investments that require more capital to start. So for me, bitcoin really does bring opportunity to everyone including the poor, although not everyone. I think for those who can't afford to eat three times a day, of course they won't think about investing and if they have met their food needs, they will of course be able to think about other things such as investing. Choosing to invest in Bitcoin, there are many things that need to be learned and it would be better to have someone accompanying you so that you can easily understand it and we can start with little capital. You are right that Bitcoin provides opportunities for everyone who wants to invest whatever capital we have, even with little capital, if we do it consistently then we will get a profit from the investment we make. Its really sad that in this day and age, people still go hungry at least three times a day. And as the wealthy discuss investments and Bitcoin, the less fortunate struggle to survive. Its a terrible and extreme discrepancy. However, Bitcoin? The elites would prefer that no one go too deeply into the subject, I see. They would rather that the general public ignore cryptocurrency's capacity for decentralization. In fact, Bitcoin has the potential to be an equalizer. Its true that there is a severe learning curve. Has the public ever been genuinely educated about the complexities of money by the financial masters, the banks, or the governments? I think not. Only if everyone is aware of and uses cryptocurrency's power can it pose a challenge to the centralization. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is known as the king of cryptocurrencies.
For me, Bitcoin is not only the father of all altcoins, bitcoin is also the king of the entire cryptocurrency industry and if the king cannot survive, the country's survival will also be very difficult to maintain. Up to now, we can see many new projects being born and always wanting to declare war on ETH and always wanting to become a replacement for ETH. But do we see any projects daring to challenge bitcoin's throne? I've never seen a project have the courage to claim that. That shows us the true power that bitcoin is dominating the market. Bitcoin is a revolution, not just a digital asset. Its inception set off a wave that altered our perspective on finance. While several cryptocurrencies strive to become the next Ethereum, none have the guts to compete with Bitcoin. How come? Power is the simple solution. It is impossible to dispute Bitcoin's enormous power. But where there is power, there is resistance, as history has demonstrated. Do not believe that Bitcoin's dominance is uncontested. Though they may not openly state their goals, there are actors in the background and hidden forces at work who are surely preparing their moves. We are merely onlookers as a silent game of chess is being played. |
|
|
|
Ignorant is a big disease, if anyone hates Bitcoin it's because they know nothing about it or they are in the governments office, making decisions that only benefits centralization, normal people living around me today have no knowledge about technology, when something like Bitcoin can give you money, they call it a scam or Ponzi, without them trying to figure out what Bitcoin truly is.
My message to such people is to keep hating, since I've knew about Bitcoin there are countless of hate speeches from people, even from popular figures in the world, but the smart ones later started buying Bitcoin and took their hate speech back, like seriously, you can't or shouldn't judge what you don't understand.
Some set of people lacks the courage to change their lives, when they see challenges or failure from anything online, to them, automatically everything online and the internet is a scam, they don't even bother to learn from their own mistakes, sadly there is no way to change their minds, the world will ways be full of such people.
Isnt it fascinating how the powerful fear the unknown? They dont know about Bitcoin because they fear losing control. Whatever disrupts the established quo, particularly Bitcoin, has always threatened central authority. To those who call it a fraud, I wonder if they've mindfully studied. How quickly they embrace hatred. Ironically, many skeptics buy Bitcoin privately. Its potential is hidden by pride or fear. The internet was once ridiculed too. Today, can we even imagine a world without it? Many avoid history, staying in their ignorance. How sad that misplaced worries kept them from progress. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
