|
R3 has not abandoned Ethereum.
|
|
|
|
Back in 2014 I actually thought it would be a project worthy of investing, However the project seems to have frozen in time and few or close to no development was made. It seems that the project was abandoned
Oh quit fudding. |
|
|
|
|
With more and more banks and multinational organisations jumping on the ETH smart contracts Blockchain it is only correct and fair that they pay a token value to all ETH hodlers. Not sure how it could be implemented though.
|
|
|
|
|
ETH is definitely the future gents. Gud to see so many new gud folks getting into it. The price is cheap right now.
|
|
|
|
Rumour is youre a fucking retard if you can't figure out how to download a wallet and import your keys.
I think that's a bit below the belt. |
|
|
|
Use Kraken. However I wish Kraken had an app that allowed you to buy with debit/credit card. Much easier than bank transfer. |
|
|
|
|
Rumour is it's a scam site and people have lost wallets.
|
|
|
|
Seriously how is it NOT "Support" selling coins on Poloniex ? Like what the fuck ?  I really don't think that is a stretch and i am just reaching to dredge up a bad angle on ETH guys. I have been hammering away at the scene for ages to TRY and avoid supporting shitcoins. When SCRYPT cloning took off in popularity all people did was chant.. well, i only dump them for profits. Nothing has changed.. Only this time it's the golden little angels that do no wrong over at the ETH Foundation. This proves yet again they are greedy scammy pieces of shit. Why else would Butters admit to dumping ETH coins too ? Recall him saying he dumped about 25% of his "Holdings" ? Well quadruple that then.. that is what they claim.. 1 million dumped of 4 million in coins total they claim. But i dispute the price he got for them and i think it ended up being far higher in value. The shills here claimed he dumped them back when ETH was cheap which is pure bullshit ! That fraud never did stick his neck out here and tell us why he did it either. So.. these stupid scammy ICO frauds not only dumped ETC but ETH as well. Fuck ETH and their scammy ass DAO fucktards. Fuck all their scammy ass ICO shenanigans. Time after time these scammy douche bags are counting their ROI's at Poloniex. "Gud" for them  I know you're only trolling as all Spoetniktard sockies are want but just for the other kind readers selling, i.e. dumping, an asset into the market is not giving it support as you're flooding it with liquidity thus lowering demand by increased supply. Supporting the market is withodling it, in turn reducing supply, increasing demand and price. This is year 1 basic economics. Not hard stuff. |
|
|
|
|
Gud to know that they liquidated their position, removing any support for the Criminal Coin.
|
|
|
|
There is nothing wrong with someone becoming rich from a successful endeavour. However when a project gets hacked and peoples investment stolen then you have to ask whether it is ethical for someone to profit off said project.
Nothing was hacked. Someone played smarter by the smart contract rules than the rest of the gullible and greedy participants, rules which were different than what the DAO creators claimed about the rules, but those that hadn't understood the rules that way, decided to deny this person his gains, and decided to turn back the clock so that his transactions were denied. That was the end of the concept of smart contract: in the end, people vote over whether the contract should follow its rules, or whether you are denied your transactions when they don't like the outcome. A small part of the chain continued to play by the rules (ETC), but most ETH users preferred visibly the "vote contract" over the "smart contract". This put somewhat of a bummer on the ultimate Turing Complete Unstoppable Smart Contract platform, which Ethereum pretended, one day, to be, because it was shown that in the end, a few people vote over whether you can keep the outcome of a contract or not depending on whether they thought that it was "just" or not. So in the end, this actually signed the end of the very concept of smart, unstoppable contract of which the first big application was simply stopped and turned out not to be smart. You're nothing more than a criminal apologist. The DAO wasn't set for it to be exploited as it was by the thief. And you know that. What?  ETC or ETH, I don't really care what a user decides to buy. There is no evidence whatsoever of deliberate wrongdoing by Ethereum Foundation. None. If you participate in smart contracts, you have to take on board risk. There are no guarantees (though you may find another smart contract that will underwrite your risk). A hacker exploited an oversight in the code and ran off with contract participants' money. If you participate in a contract, thems the risks. I hated the DAO. I still hate it. It stole too much attention from Ethereum. I'm glad it's over. People are much more security conscious now. People are much more wary about where they send their tokens to. Ethereum is now stronger than ever. Classic is an increasing irrelevance - they have fallen far behind development and if it wasn't for the DAO "opportunity" ETC wouldn't exist. Classic is full of nutters too. It's a useful skip for Ethereum to blame ETC or associate people they don't like with Classic. My rant wasn't directed at your gud self. |
|
|
|
There is nothing wrong with someone becoming rich from a successful endeavour. However when a project gets hacked and peoples investment stolen then you have to ask whether it is ethical for someone to profit off said project.
Nothing was hacked. Someone played smarter by the smart contract rules than the rest of the gullible and greedy participants, rules which were different than what the DAO creators claimed about the rules, but those that hadn't understood the rules that way, decided to deny this person his gains, and decided to turn back the clock so that his transactions were denied. That was the end of the concept of smart contract: in the end, people vote over whether the contract should follow its rules, or whether you are denied your transactions when they don't like the outcome. A small part of the chain continued to play by the rules (ETC), but most ETH users preferred visibly the "vote contract" over the "smart contract". This put somewhat of a bummer on the ultimate Turing Complete Unstoppable Smart Contract platform, which Ethereum pretended, one day, to be, because it was shown that in the end, a few people vote over whether you can keep the outcome of a contract or not depending on whether they thought that it was "just" or not. So in the end, this actually signed the end of the very concept of smart, unstoppable contract of which the first big application was simply stopped and turned out not to be smart. You're nothing more than a criminal apologist. The DAO wasn't set for it to be exploited as it was by the thief. And you know that. |
|
|
|
if they didn't get rich from it  How dare anyone prosper! If I can't have it, nobody can! There is nothing wrong with someone becoming rich from a successful endeavour. However when a project gets hacked and peoples investment stolen then you have to ask whether it is ethical for someone to profit off said project. ETH wasn't hacked. The ETC CRIMINAL COIN are doing just that, profiting off the hard work of the original ETH. |
|
|
|
Price keeps dropping and dropping. I still think it will turn around at some point. Watching the ETH chart.
The price trend is going high now. Hopefully there can be such as bitcoin, I am still optimistic that the price Etherium could go up again, current mining etherium also more difficult, and the second largest marketcap after bitcoin. Maybe the price of etherium will soon be improved within a few months. I still hold and will not hurry to sell. There does some to be some improvement alright. Don't get too carried away though. It's still very delicate. A small hedge on Ethereum's success is a good judgement in my view. And at these current prices it's a steal and worth a punt. |
|
|
|
The banks are really scared of all this, "Their in a horse and cart and they dont realise a jet has been built" For what ever you believe about Craig wright i have to say this was an awesome quote........  I'm pretty sure he said 'they're' not 'their'. |
|
|
|
An ounce of gold is an arbitrary measurement, 1 BTC is not
The total amount of gold stock mined is not arbitrary. Neither is the total amount of Bitcoin mined
I invite everyone reading to make their own minds up about the conclusion
It's very clear from the article that the author is talking exclusively about price parity and how Bitcoin has achieved what no other currency throughout history has nor could. Your overt semantics over unit measurement are simply designed to muddy the water and downplay this achievement. For what agenda I know not. Every other reader of the article and respondee to this thread comprehends this. |
|
|
|
It doesn't affect the ETH network, you can see the ETH chart and he got a pump right now, which mean the age of ETH will be so long. But The FUDers will attack. It was personal hack and The ETH network was running for well, there is no problem with it. Yes and you can see the ETH chart and he got a dump and trend down right now. What is future for coin that has bad network? Nothing but i don't think that the devs and the team will not make any movement to see the price of eth is down, maybe they are make a quiet movement and want to give the member a surprise in the new year so the member can get more benefit while they have many eth in their wallet. so better we wait for the next news from the devs and the team behind of eth. Yea you are right, we will soon see the release of a new blockchain development tentatively called Ethereum Enterprise. Ethereum enterprise is other innovation of Dev ETH, It is new news about blockchain ethereum enterprise http://www.coindesk.com/enterprise-ethereum-details-emerge-secret-blockchain-project/The way I see it is we will have Standard Ethereum and Enterprise Ethereum running different apps off the same Blockchain. Much like Microsoft, a major ETH backer, uses different versions for its software. |
|
|
|
Is behaving well we will see if it is more than a rebound
[imx]http://fs5.directupload.net/images/170104/yuzsosle.png[/img]
@DIXAre you nuts ? LOL I see a loooooooong massive spike into the dirt.  Meaningless FUD from the Spoetniktard with the trust level of a snake oil salesman. You could reproduce that chart over an extended period for BTC between 2014 - 2016. |
|
|
|
My comment was that it's a meaningless observation, which I qualified. Did you read what I wrote? Didn't think so
My comment, and even the article authors comment, was that it isn't a meaningless observation, however your retort is. Again, did you even bother to read what the author wrote? Nope, didn't think so. |
|
|
|
|
This is rumour so that they can talk the price down and bag more cheap coins. It's time to fill your bags as we are on the S curve to the moon.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
