Aether causes the pressure in the case of a vacuum.
Æther does not exist. According to ancient and medieval science, aether (Greek: αἰθήρ aithēr), also spelled æther or ether, also called quintessence, is the material that fills the region of the universe above the terrestrial sphere. The concept of aether was used in several theories to explain several natural phenomena, such as the traveling of light and gravity. In the late 19th century, physicists postulated that aether permeated all throughout space, providing a medium through which light could travel in a vacuum, but evidence for the presence of such a medium was not found in the Michelson–Morley experiment, and this result has been interpreted as meaning that no such luminiferous aether existshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element) The Sgnac experiment proves the aether and the Michelson–Morley experiment proves the Earth is motionless.
|
|
|
Well I claim that the proven and established science of buoyancy and density cause this acceleration.
This is incompatible with Newtonian Physics. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fleeraito.com%2Fimages%2Fsayitdontsprayit.png&t=663&c=AAsm9jnHiAnt1A) Your statements carry little to no weight.
|
|
|
I've got empirical evidence ...
... that the hardware you are using is shit, and not sensitive enough to measure movement of the Earth's inertial frame. Well, they prove flat earth with a device that using gravity for measurement but they deny the exisetence of gravity. Need anything else? My claims use the gyroscope, the linear accelerometer measures acceleration and you claim that the unproven theory of gravity cases this acceleration? Well I claim that the proven and established science of buoyancy and density cause this acceleration. Prove me wrong, oh wait you can't because gravity is just a shitty theory to support the heliocentric lie. My accelerometer shows 9,81 m/s^2 acceleration downwards (to the centre to the earth). Why is that? If I'd put it into vacuum it would still show 9,81 m/s^2. If I put it in a paper and I hold it by it's edges, it will still show 9,81, but the paper's density is less than my phones. Is my phone hacked by NASA? Aether causes the pressure in the case of a vacuum. You're paper question is retarded and you can look into tensile forces if you're too stupid to understand why. Finally if you're installing software from NASA on your phone then probably yes.
|
|
|
I've got empirical evidence ...
... that the hardware you are using is shit, and not sensitive enough to measure movement of the Earth's inertial frame. Well, they prove flat earth with a device that using gravity for measurement but they deny the exisetence of gravity. Need anything else? My claims use the three (3) highly sensitive gyroscopes included on the MPU-6000, the linear accelerometer measures acceleration and you claim that the unproven theory of gravity cases this acceleration? Well I claim that the proven and established science of buoyancy and density cause this acceleration. Prove me wrong, oh wait you can't because gravity is just a shitty theory to support the heliocentric lie. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.android4ar.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F03%2FSamsung-Galaxy-S7-Edge-1024x679.jpg&t=663&c=qLW98x1hQcC2Tw)
|
|
|
Oh-oh guys, What things have I never heard before, that as it turned out the Earth became flat or was it flat? I do not even know what to say about this, but I still express my opinion that the Earth is still round and there is much evidence for this. The first is even that what a jet plane translated and flew around the Earth, flew off the dental point and landed at the same point.
I've got empirical evidence in the form of the output of an MPU-6000 over a 24 hour period that proves the Earth is not in motion. You claim to have evidence that contradicts this direct measurement? Well lets see it! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.invensense.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F12%2Fchip-burst-10-axis.png&t=663&c=rdRWsZmQv-G4Pg)
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIfXvq5s.jpg&t=663&c=tt1TQyMHAw7Zog) If a rotating restaurant (e.g. Seattle Space Needle) is set on a 24 hour cycle and a Samsung phone is placed next to a good window seat will the output of the android gyroscope application log a change in angle from the rotation?
|
|
|
The accelerometer in your phone is an advanced highly sensitive device, you're totally full of it.
Again, not "sensative" enough for scientific purposes. Seems my phone isn't sensitive enough to catch my spelling errors. However your claim that the sensors on board can't be used for scientific purposes is full of shit. A quick look at the specs of these chips and you're down the fucking river without a paddle buddy.
|
|
|
... so you're resorting to dirty tactics.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQONVIyz.gif&t=663&c=BnpAuFN556hSpQ) FYI the accelerometer in your phone can prove the Earth is motionless. Yet another one for the pile, the amount of proof available that we're being lied to and the Earth is a flat motionless plane is overwhelming at this point.
Really!!! Please elaborate? I'm keen to find out why you think that the Earth would be accelerating in the first place. You know that rotation at a constant velocity involves acceleration right? How many fucking times do I need to beat this into your stupid, flattarded brain. The accelerometers and other such "sensing" gear in widely-available consumer form are not sensitive enough to measure our current gravitational or inertial reference frame. Learn it. Love it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimgtc.com%2Fi%2F8z8U7SF.jpg&t=663&c=HgDKLWBQ2NRyEg) Checkmate, flattards. The accelerometer in your phone is an advanced highly sensitive device, you're totally full of it. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F11agzdf.jpg&t=663&c=IU7ZbrpMAthwtw)
|
|
|
FYI the accelerometer in your phone can prove the Earth is motionless. Yet another one for the pile, the amount of proof available that we're being lied to and the Earth is a flat motionless plane is overwhelming at this point.
Really!!! Please elaborate? I'm keen to find out why you think that the Earth would be accelerating in the first place. You know that rotation at a constant velocity involves acceleration right?
|
|
|
FYI the accelerometer in your phone can prove the Earth is motionless. Yet another one for the pile, the amount of proof available that we're being lied to and the Earth is a flat motionless plane is overwhelming at this point.
|
|
|
we've stated
Who is "we" ? Anybody who isn't a statist fag and has taken the time to investigate the facts about where we live and the force that keeps us and everything else pressed to the ground. But anyone who takes the time to investigate the facts about where we live and the force that keeps us pressed to the ground, statist fag or not, will come to the conclusion that celestial mechanics is a thing, and flat, disc-shaped planets are a physical impossibility. Were not a disk floating in space, space is a lie and a hoax. Stop with the strawman arguments. The burden of proof is on you to prove we are not a disc floating in space, or that space is a lie and hoax. You're the one making strawman arguments. Not me. You're claiming people who know the earth is flat believe that we're accelerating upwards indefinitely and that we on a pancake floating in a vacuum. These are provably wrong"strawman" arguments that are set up to be knocked down and are idiotic on top of it. You can't prove we're on a ball because we're not so you're resorting to dirty tactics.
|
|
|
Go to the seaside. Look at the horizon. ?. Proved that earth is not flat! This is one of the dumbest conversations to have in 21st century lmao.
Look out over the ocean and the horizon is perfectly flat, what are you smoking dude? Then tell me where the Sun goes when it's under the horizon. Does it go underground or what? The Sun orbits in circle above us, it never goes "down". It sets due to perspective and the atmosphere.
|
|
|
we've stated
Who is "we" ? Anybody who isn't a statist fag and has taken the time to investigate the facts about where we live and the force that keeps us and everything else pressed to the ground. But anyone who takes the time to investigate the facts about where we live and the force that keeps us pressed to the ground, statist fag or not, will come to the conclusion that celestial mechanics is a thing, and flat, disc-shaped planets are a physical impossibility. Were not a disk floating in space, space is a lie and a hoax. Stop with the strawman arguments.
|
|
|
Go to the seaside. Look at the horizon. ?. Proved that earth is not flat! This is one of the dumbest conversations to have in 21st century lmao.
They don't even know what the horizon is. They say "it always rises to the eye level" and such bullshits. Even a simple sunset proves the Earth is not flat, but they just ignore the facts they don't like. The horizon does rise to eye level are you saying it doesn't? You also claim a sunset proves the Earth is a sphere, so show us.
|
|
|
Go to the seaside. Look at the horizon. ?. Proved that earth is not flat! This is one of the dumbest conversations to have in 21st century lmao.
Look out over the ocean and the horizon is perfectly flat, what are you smoking dude?
|
|
|
Just for fun, let's say everything you Flat Earthers say is true.
Some questions about the cover up:
1. Roughly how many people would have to be conspiring to cover this up? I would guess at least 10,000, probably closer to 1m+
2. What benefit would these people have from covering up such a massive fraud? Where's the motive in all this?
And a third bonus question:
3. If everything you say is true, flat plane, dome, spotlight moon and sun, ice wall, projected stars etc... Do you have any idea how it all came to be? I mean the religious guys will just say "God made it that way.", but how about you non-religious ones. How do you think everything came about?
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FtfHPbtk.jpg&t=663&c=Ih0e1QxBx0kGWw)
|
|
|
we've stated
Who is "we" ? Anybody who isn't a statist fag and has taken the time to investigate the facts about where we live and the force that keeps us and everything else pressed to the ground.
|
|
|
*plop* *plop*
You need to post proof we're on a spinning ball or STFU and GTFO. You need to post proof that we live on a flat Earth that is constantly moving upwards at 32 feet per second 2, or STFU and GTFO. The Flat Earth society is a controlled opposition group who promotes retarded strawman arguments like this on the internet. Also you know we've stated that it's density and buoyancy not the unproven theory of gravity.
|
|
|
*plop* *plop*
I'm sorry but you're full of shit, the folks at NASA are liars and boats don't sail over the curve. You need to post proof we're on a spinning ball or STFU and GTFO.
|
|
|
|