Why did you put this discussion topic into the discussion section of Bitcoin? I think it should be transferred to the market discussion It's not a discussion about the state of the market but exchanges as part of the general system. We need exchanges for Bitcoin to function properly, especially that in most places you can't pay your electricity bills in bitcoin, so mining is impossible without exchanging some of your coins into fiat, which makes exchanges an integral part of bitcoin. I believe that we need many exchanges to have a choice. There's no free market without choices and competition and this is what we are trying to build here.
|
|
|
This is why I avoid bitfinex exchange! This exchange, Tether USDT and the new the LEO coin, everything seems suspicious to me! To avoid the recent USDT pressure they asked crowdfunding! I don't know who invested there 1 Billion USD where this exchange is doing suspicious things and has a very low volume! However, it is good that people are moving forward to Binance, Binance is the exchange everyone should care!
I've also been steering away from it since they were exposed for lying about USDt 1:1 backing. Once a liar always a liar. Of course, I'm not saying that you should avoid bitfinex. You can still use it and it's a rather fast and reliable exchange, but try not to hold money there. This is a rule for all exchanges but when one is caught lying the rule gains on importance.
|
|
|
its pointless to discuss as if you are one of the mentioned groups you just want to troll around against humanist communism and socialism.
you dont want to publicly admit that you are antihuman. as nobody would then trust you or you would have to associate yourselves with the likes of you (satanist club) in which you are being then killed by each other.
thats why the likey of you always mixes with socialists/communists. because he doesnt feel safe with the likes of him
A communist calls other people antihuman and claims that communists are humanists. The world is turning upside down. I'd like to remind you that no communist government has managed to survive or even come to power without executing people, starting with the Bolsheviks and ending with the Kims of North Korea. Bolsheviks were cutting people's throats with sickles, Stalinists were shooting people in the back of the head or poisoning them, Che Guevara personally executed people, including women, Kim Dzong Un is feeding people to starving packs of dogs, even his own family members... Such humanism, such love for live and mutual friendship. There's no bigger humanist than a communist! The more I read your posts the more I'm certain that you are writing this on drugs.
|
|
|
The downloading part is what I would be more concerned about. It's really cheap to get enough storage space to hold your own copy, but it can take weeks for your core client to download it. It can take days with a high speed connection, but the majority of the world doesn't have access to it. For many of us 50 or 100 megabit connection is nothing to brag about, but in many countries 2 is all that you will get. Getting a node to run in such conditions, especially with the client messing up the database from time to time, requires a huge effort.
I have 50 Mbps and syncing takes forever, it feels like my connection is not being fully utilized and also peer discovery is slow. Sadly I was too lazy too investigate this issue to find a solution, and eventually I gave up on running a full node altogether. So, even now running a full node is kinda problematic. I had the same problem. With 100 Mb/s I needed about 3 or 4 days to download the blockchain with my qt client and syncing was taking at least 10 minutes if I remembered to start it up every day. When I went somewhere for the weekend and forgot, I had to wait like 30 min the next time I started the client. To top it off it was all happening more than a year back. Right now it must be much worse. I still have my outdated qt client but not running it anymore. Not everyone needs to run a full node; my stand is that if you aren't capable of running a full node, just use a SPV client.
For those who are able to run a node, the internet connection is probably not the main issue. With the current state of Bitcoin, the downloading won't take that long with the simultaneous downloading from the connected nodes. The main limiting factor is probably with the disk speed and the CPU verification speed. In the long term, the disk space is probably the main constraints that we will face. Memory density isn't growing all that fast and the memory space is still fairly expensive.
Yes, not everyone has to do it, but what will be the incentive in the near future? If every year it takes longer to download the blockchain and you need a better computer to run a node, why would you? Surely there will always be enthusiasts willing to do it but as years pass by there will be less and less of them. There should be either a way to make it easier and cheaper or a way for the node owners to profit from it. IMO disk space is still very cheap compared to the cost of electricity and the other components you will need to run a node. You can get a 3tb drive for $50. Isn't this cheap? It will probably die a natural death before blockchain outgrows it.
|
|
|
I've never used credit cards for investments and not only for that. I've actually never used a credit card in my life and never owned one. My investment money come from my day job, my signature campaign money and my profits from gambling. I also had some profits from trading and I have invested some money that I had saved many years ago. That's basically it. Different sources, one target.
|
|
|
Inflation does have a good intentions so printing or "production" of money can be seen alright as long as our politicians do everything according to how it should be. The sad part is in almost all countries on earth the politicians are corrupt, they are not liked by anyone and doesn't matter who runs the country, everyone at every stage gets a trouble.
What good intentions are those? Inflation is a side effect, it doesn't have intentions on its own. It's a process, just like a bull market in stocks. A bull market doesn't have intentions. It's just there. Normally, inflation should be a thing then the government should print money to cover the difference, then that money should be spent for governmental stuff like helping out farmers, education, health and so forth and make people spend less on those things, which means a regular citizen even without getting one dollar help directly will spend less on food because of help farmers got, will spend less for education and will not spend money on hospitals even if got sick, which means that person got a lot of help even if not directly. Yet our politicians give that money to rich and tell them to help the poor which never happens.
Inflation is a thing BECAUSE the money is being printed. Money printing is not the solution to inflation, it's the cause!
|
|
|
You have some friends, or people you know and live around. You are the tallest and strongest of all of them and there's no police, you live in a remote village. Do you start attacking them one by one and taking their stuff because you have those superior qualities? Normal people don't like to make enemies and US as any other country consists of people. If you make too many enemies they will come to your house when you sleep and kick your ass. You'll never know when to expect an attack and who will hold a grudge. It's a really simple example but this is how the world works. The US might be the strongest but there are many pretenders to the title and all of them together would easily starve the US.
|
|
|
Wonder what would the world prefer
A centralized coin that cost you really nothing to transfer or decentralized crypto with 20c/tx A centralized coin where you can ask for a chargeback or a decentralized coin where you send they are gone!! A centralized coin that is accepted everywhere or a decentralized coin that has 1% of the shops online. A centralized coin that has some support department out there or a decentralized coin where you don't get help from sig spammers.
The average person, what is he going to choose? The average Joe is not concerned that facebook knows he has bought cat food 2 hours ago, he is not concerned that facebook knows he has only used a toothbrush in the last 7 years, he is concerned about how much a product cost and how safe he can be without putting too much effort in it.
Unfortunately, this has always been a problem with the society and with the rise of democracy it's even more visible. The average joe is an idiot but he's asked for his expert opinion on politics, finances, medicine and other aspects of the modern world. How? Indirectly through voting. Even when he's not literally in the booth he's voting in the Internet, choosing products and services, voting in the store for what has the most appealing package. If FB coin really launches it will be a success, just as the overpriced Iphones are, even though there are better and cheaper phones on the market.
|
|
|
The anti vaccination movement is based on some unfortunate accidents that actually took place. In fact, some were more of abuse cases than accidents. For instance this use of expired vaccines in China: https://www.voanews.com/a/use-of-expired-vaccine-in-jiangsu-sparks-public-scare-in-china/4745123.htmlSome vaccines were proven to cause Encephalitis that lead to brain damage. There are many more severe side effects, but they happen to maybe 1% of the vaccinated children. It's still a high enough percentage to make some people consider taking the natural way. I don't support it, but I can understand those who do.
|
|
|
Yes and no, and you assume that "everyone" will start pruning. I will tell you that not everyone will start pruning, although archive nodes will decrease as costs of storing the whole blockchain increases.
It centralizes the source of the blockchain for the initial sync, but it's debatable if it centralizes the network, because all full nodes validate.
I mean, I can imagine a dystopian scenario where there's like a dozen of archival nodes left, they are owned by big companies and they charge a fee for downloading the blockchain, and they can even refuse for political reasons. But this can only happen in big block scenario, if Bitcoin will keep the same blocksize and will only make small increases in the far future, enthusiasts will still be able to run archival nodes. The downloading part is what I would be more concerned about. It's really cheap to get enough storage space to hold your own copy, but it can take weeks for your core client to download it. It can take days with a high speed connection, but the majority of the world doesn't have access to it. For many of us 50 or 100 megabit connection is nothing to brag about, but in many countries 2 is all that you will get. Getting a node to run in such conditions, especially with the client messing up the database from time to time, requires a huge effort.
|
|
|
You are either high or trolling. On a second thought, you could be both.
ok then explain me why a currency should be based on a race of installing pointless computation power? I know answering with a question might be rude, but why does a sr. member with 6000 posts (3 times more than me) want me to explain the basics of cryptocurrency? How can computation power be pointless if it enables us to transact? Do you know how much power bank mainframes used to consume? Many banks still depend on them instead of switching to more efficient servers.
|
|
|
It's not that massive as what you think it is. It was just a $500 drop and you say massive? I don't think Bitcoin reaching $10k by this month but hopefully the current drop will be recovered.
I totally agree. Some whales were setting their profit taking mark for 9k because they were logically expecting that the majority will dump att 10k anyway. It really was to be expected. Personally, I've been expecting a major dump from around 7k back to 6k and we had it. What I didn't expect is that we'll recover this fast and go to new yearly high just days later. Expecting 10k in such a short time is greedy as there are bound to be pullbacks along the way.
|
|
|
While I don't like how the Chinese are spying and remaking everything to be cheaper and less durable, Apple is a shit company as well. Many of Apple's products are faulty and most are overpriced and bought only for display, for the logo. Apple used to be innovative but now it's only trying to milk their customers, get them to pay more money for nothing. A great example of this milking is iphone 9 vs X. Just compare the specs and prices and you'll see that it's not worth the price tag, especially when compared to what the competition from China and Korea is offering.
|
|
|
I don't know why people are blaming bitcoin for the decisions of centralized entities. It really is pointless and stupid. If you get a ban somewhere it has nothing to do with bitcoin. You should be blaming the platform that banned you, which TOS you had to accept to begin trading/advertising. They have to register and comply with local laws and we can't expect them to remain decentralized in a centralized world. bitcoin is only damaging to people and to environment
You are either high or trolling. On a second thought, you could be both.
|
|
|
I also see this pattern of them being overly optimistic in a bull market and pessimistic in a bear market. You could see them being very negative and warning us about the possibility of a $1000 bitcoin just 2 months ago and slowly changing into bulls when that did not happen. You could also see permabulls like Max Keiser and Tom Lee doing their thing in the werly 2018. My advice to you all is: do your thing, have your own opinions. Don't invest as they are telling you to, do your own analysis. If the "experts" can change their opinions every few months it only shows that there are no experts. Everyone is clueless here.
|
|
|
I like boxing so I'll remind you all about the famous Tyson vs Holyfield match that dethroned the famous champion and basically ended his career. The odds were 25-1 against Holyfield. This wasn't the greatest underdog story, especially since Holyfield held a title before, so he wasn't a newbie, but still very impressive.
|
|
|
My first thought is a question: why do people like to seek help from the government and laws and try to force their views on others? Why are you a bigot OP?
When you don't like that people around me are catholic and go to church every Sunday, you don't fraternize with them, ignore them, or sell your property and move. You don't go around town telling them to stop believing and you don't write letters to the government to ban public display of religious views. It's the same about eating meat. You are a vegetarian, you're welcome to grill onions and carrots while I grill a steak. Those who call the police or write to the government because they don't like something are cowards and bigots.
|
|
|
I really didn't expect this to happen. If done by young people or productive age it might be. But is a 61-year-old grandmother? Cool or wow? Or something sad?
there isn't that much room for surprise in my opinion and not much "cool" thing about this news either. there are so many people who jump into things they don't understand just because someone hypes them up and the greed usually blinds them to the illegality of their actions (stealing electricity) so eventually they have to pay for their mistakes. Opportunity makes a thief. Do you know why this saying is true in her case? Electricity is basically unprotected. It's there, outside your home, available for anyone who knows how to connect 2 wires. She made a mistake and will face the consequences, but let's not make a criminal mastermind out of her. Millions of people steal electricity, it's not a big deal. In India it's as common as urinating on the pavement. I guess if she was planting weed or stealing electricity to do the laundry there wouldn't even be an article about her.
|
|
|
It's never too late... unless you buy a shitcoin. In other words, if the project has real value and real use cases, like Bitcoin, it's fine no matter when you invest. If you do it on top, there's still a very high probability that you will profit anyway. If the project is bad, like so many altcoins are, you can buy cheap, but you still won't profit, unless you catch a speculative pump. Something like that happened recently with SV. That said, I wouldn't bet my money on a random event.
|
|
|
Now there is no Soviet Union. We're talking about Russia!
Not really. You said that all countries would welcome a partnership with Russia and I said that the ones that were abused by the Soviet union, especially the countries that were "aligned" with them in 1950-90 would not welcome it. It doesn't matter that now it's called Russian federation, it's the same country under a different leadership. Why don't you tell me about the countries that have suffered from the United States? Why are we suddenly changing the topic to the US? Every time I see someone say something about Russia the retaliation is "and US did this or US did that" I don't care about the US, I told you my views on Russia vs Eastern Europe. I've never been to the US and we could jump from a country to a country because Japan killed a lot of Chinese, US nuked Japan, Germany and Italy did WW2 and Russians happily raped all the way to Berlin. do you know what capitalist views are? they are based upon the idea of some abusing others for their private gains.
soviet union wasnt more criminal than other state entities, in fact all that were even just similar in size including the usa also did their big scams.
Looks like this is a sensitive topic for the Russians, but there was a lot of abuse in communism. You can say what you want about capitalism, it's not perfect, but at least nobody shoots you in the back of the head and buries you in a mass grave.
|
|
|
|