basically this coin already dead , i dont know many people still hopefully for this coin , maybe somepeople hope Pump are coming , but i think this End . this fact
sorry
I know that you are hoping to get more cheap coins. sorry , already some month im not collect this coin , Im just say the fact . who dev ? any takeover ? if you still collect this , you have planning for this ? you wait some pumping ? then run out ? Same old story ........ |
|
|
|
basically this coin already dead , i dont know many people still hopefully for this coin , maybe somepeople hope Pump are coming , but i think this End . this fact
sorry
I know that you are hoping to get more cheap coins. |
|
|
|
so where dev ?
what's status DRZ now ??
We are still waiting, hopefully. |
|
|
|
damn... I will be bored holding and staking my bag of navajos before you guys will release anything  Been lurking on this thread for a while now but my original request still stands : to be taken seriously, Navajo's Anonymous feature will have to get an external audit from a respected and well-known crypto guy. only then the people will start to use nav with confidence, the developers will start to build on nav and the price will start to rise.btw, I appreciate that you are doing business with the NeosCoin developers. To me, it's a sign that you want to do business with honest people. It sure raises my level of confidence toward Navajos. so.... since the web wallet is now probably no more part of the june roadmap (from what I can read between the lines in shahim's last post), can you confirm that the decentralized anon tech as well as the makeover of navajos will still be seen in june 2015? and I hope you guys (nav devs) see that now when you hype your stuffs before their release, it doesn't even produce any kind of effects on the market anymore. People now want to see the things you have on your roadmap, not some pre-announcements of announcements over and over again. My thoughts exactly! Just like gnargnar said, one way to get an external audit from the ground is to: 1) Find and contact a respected and well-known crypto expert 2) Offer him an X amount of BTC (in NAV) to pay him with (the more money you offer, the more serious the audit job is taken) 3) Raise a community fundraiser to collect NAV (managed by a NAV team member or a trusted community member) 4.1) If NAV is 100% bullet-proof: publish the audit 4.2) If NAV is 'cracked': fix any security holes and then publish the audit 5) See trust, confidence and price rise As a great example, take a look at the crowd-funded code review/security audit of Dash (formerly Darkcoin) by Kristov Atlas: http://blog.anonymousbitcoinbook.com/2014/09/darkcoin-code-review-results/You guys want this coin to sell hot, so you should all be ready to FOOT THE ENTIRE BILL of the AUDIT JOB. |
|
|
|
Why post that here?
Go back to DROIDZ. Cypher made me lose a little bit of money. I am glad that I cashed out long ago. |
|
|
|
any news on the website Dev?
Today we decided to create a new website from the ground up. It will include rss feeds about CypherKey development, details about incoming Cypher VPN Beta and the Cypher Store. No release date for now. any 1 still waiting CYperkey  LOL  DEAD COIN? |
|
|
|
|
I still see some BIG BUY ORDERS at both of these exchanges - BITTREX and C-CEX.
C-CEX had some good trades yesterday.
C-CEX is better for price, but BITTREX sometimes attracts volume.
|
|
|
|
It is better to delist Bittrex.
And, do all the trades at CEX and use Yobit as a back up!
This is going to happen every 3-6 weeks at Bittrex.
They put, something like 50 different alt coins on delist notifications, yesterday!
Bittrex is a waste of time for any new alt coin.
328390.019 DRZ in sell orders could be lost if DROIDZ is delisted from BITTREX.
Anyway, it would be nice if these coins were lost, so that total available coinage is reduced and SCARCITY is INCREASED.
The owners of these coins need to decide - either withdraw your coins by Thursday, trade them or LOSE THEM. |
|
|
|
This coin is well below ICO PRICE, not because of BITTREX - the problem was also evident at YOBIT.
If you complain about BITTREX, what can you say about CRYPTSY?
Hey, I donated 0.09BTC to to the fund, which got Driodz listed at C-CEX. Because, it is where new alt coins can get good investors involved. Then, everyone moves their Driodz to Bittrex and they do all their trades on that exchange. Did you know, Bittrex actually put delisting notice on Vertcoin 8 weeks ago. It was farcical situation - one of biggest economic GPU coins was threatened by Bittrex with delisting TRUE, it is all about the mony. BITTREX is still my choice, though they need better criteria for delisting a coin. |
|
|
|
Do you relise that a well organised third party verification done properly and professionally will propell navajocoin into stardom.
probably not! Greedyjohn , so stop being greedy and defensive and so scared.
You know that the DEVs are not ready yet, they are still working on 100% decentralisation. This is a delicate issue. |
|
|
|
GREEDYJOHN !
My line started with the word "CONSIDER". Why you so defensive the volume is 0. So what are you scared of LOL. Also whats with the consipracy theories. Talk like a man openly on this thread. We all want the best for NavajoCoin. If you want to talk about consipracy and FUD. Why do you drag the developers away to work on other crpto coins. You should leave them to work on Navajocoin. So you should go away my friend and let them work 100% on Navajocoin. We can all see in everyones last comments posted what is happening. I get a million personal messages asking whats going on. No large posts and big fonts can hide that you are involved with many crypto currencies - so you may want to hide your tracks better. Everyone can see.
I am only interested in navajocoin my friend.
Ask hashmaster1 , juglino , etc etc the list goes on asking what is happening. You can answer them
I am involved in a few coins, but I am not dragging anybody anywhere, and I do not need to hide my tracks, because my other coins survive on their own. I want NAV to succeed, but I also want to make money from other coins, just like many other investors. |
|
|
|
hope this goes futher and stabilizes
Hashforce is demanding THIRD PARTY VERIFICATION, when he knows fully well that DEV team is working on "decentralised" ANON. He is now talking like a FUDer, as if he does not know the hard work that these DEVs already do with little community support. This "TO THE MOON" guy is now becoming something else, a PROFESSIONAL FUDER. |
|
|
|
Will the Team consider third party verification of the encryption system and maybe you could protect the coding being used or revealed by some sort of agreement.
The Navajocoin volume should be running at around 20btc a day without the need of future projects. Maybe business that want privacy on their transfers need this statement to use the system.
We fully know during beta no transactions could be linked. The icing on the cake is a third party cryptography legitimatizing that truth.
Just to make things clear. Im not talking about POD. I'm taking about an audit by people outside of the main team saying with a professional statement that yes. This is diffently a very secure and private method of transfering BTC via Navajocoin - State of the Art Anonymous Network.
Also I want to make clear that im saying that this is on top of the current project plans.
Any way something to think about. They are hard decisions but you could research how other Crpto Currency have handled this delima.
See you guys on the Trading floor in a few weeks. Take care
In my personal opinion only I think a third party verification of the encryption system is worth more than all thats been done and all thats to come.
GO AWAY. You know that the DEVs are struggling because they get very little support, this is why this project move slower than expected. STOP SPREADING FUD, DEVs have given roadmap for DECENTRALISED ANON. YOU ARE SPREADING FUD SO THAT YOU CAN GET CHEAP COINS. WHEN DID YOU START TO BECOME A BUEAROCRAT? |
|
|
|
|
This coin is well below ICO PRICE, not because of BITTREX - the problem was also evident at YOBIT.
If you complain about BITTREX, what can you say about CRYPTSY?
|
|
|
|
This are the sad statistics, every new alt coin that has got listed at Bittrex has tanked.
Some of the new alt coins, only listed on CEX have done very well.
FCS (CEX only) many times over its' ICO price.
WOCX (CEX only) many times over its' ICO price.
Ambercoin (CEX only) just above its' ICO price.
Being exclusive to CEX is what Driodz needs, with Yobit as our backup exchange.
You're right. A lot of C-CEX coins are doing pretty well. BITTREX IS STILL VERY IMPORTANT, because it costs money to be listed on any exchange. |
|
|
|
|
BITTREX NOTIFICATION
This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on June 19th unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC.
What they really mean is that they need a total trade volume of at least 1.4BTC between June 12th and June 18th, or this coin will be delisted on Friday June 19th.
To be safe, we need a trade volume of at least 0.3 BTC everyday, from now till June 18th, or a HUGE BUY OR SELL ORDER of about 1.4 BTC.
|
|
|
|
The community still exists, I was buying Bee's off launch, And I'm still staking and watching this thread, always forgetting logins to this site but getting new ones....  I would be buying up more bees atm if i could through Allcoin but will have to wait, I'm also happy to donate for new directions and ideas. So this new wallet is right to set up on new comp and send over from old wallet or do both need to be updated? be a bugger to lose em after this long, just made bank on my Long lost MINT I expect to do the same on BEE V2. Keep up the good work this resurgence in Alts could be a slow ramp up to the good ole days  Are you an OLD NEW-BEE? |
|
|
|
|
All the FUD is for MARKET MANIPULATION.
A few months ago, they used FAKE SCREEN SHOTS.
Now they pretend that commited members are leaving the game.
IT IS ALL FAKE PRICE MANIPULATION!
TRUST NOBODY!
|
|
|
|
Possibly, but I did small investment in another crypto recently, which slumped to 132 Satoshis,
Then, the developer re-appeared with his promised innovation on a Masternode.
Now, that crypto is at 1500-2300 Satoshis.
As long as developer keeps their personal motivation to work on the innovations!
Then the bagholders for the Crypto will have achieved their goal of crowdfunding new innovations.
The problem is that we do not know that if the dev will appear again in the coins we bought. Dev is gonna return or there will be a competent person taking over. Either way, I think DRZ will be fine eventually. DRZ will be fine when the few remaining losers who are trading this coin for peanuts are finally eliminated by market forces  |
|
|
|
I can see everyone wants to ask one question...
"Did hashforce leave us because he knows something bad about navajo/scam etc?"
The answer is "no".
He has some personal reasons. Please let this issue now.Respect his decision and thank him for cooperation.
And ofc lets wait for coming projects!^^
Or it could be a TRICK to alter the market to get cheap coins after people panic dump. I DO NOT TRUST ANYBODY IN THIS INDUSTRY ANYMORE. If you decide to dump your coins, HASHFORCE might buy them under another username. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
