Please see reason and do not fall for the mob mentality.
Other than ibminer, and RGB, nobody tagged you until theymos posted. As for my legitimacy, I invite anyone to Skype me when I return from college today, and I will prove that I am who I say I am.
I usually see ibminer as a good candidate for reviewing evidence, but I'm pretty sure he won't be willing to go for this one. @ib  |
|
|
|
Upon investigation, alia == favours via IP evidence and a now-deleted mistaken bump of one of alia's threads. Info in favours' posts disproves alia's claimed identity. Ouch. Good work, tagged. favours sent rating: Lauda 2017-05-12 0.00000000 Helpful guy with a good sense of judgement
Interesting.. |
|
|
|
~
I don't see how the deal with aTriz is related to the other stuff. Why are you writing using the 'he' pronoun here "he shows no evidence.."?
Wait a minute Lauda. Something is very fishy here. alia all of sudden decided to close this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2966705.0 because "she has found big investors"(on Feb. 25.) and after that she opened new(self-moderated) thread(on Feb. 26) offering winning script and aTriz confirmed that it is winning script: Was given a vouch copy of the method by op and played around with in with funds from the faucet.
In my limited experience if it, I profited and worked perfectly. Would recommend.
I made an extremely good ROI, and I’m sure that others who buy the method will experience similar results. Thanks, Alia!
How someone with 7+ trust rate can say such stupid thing in such thread? It is EV- game, such script DOESN'T exist. Also he is recommending something which he has tried from faucet? He said he made extremely good ROI? From faucet? That is just fucked up. Besides, Selling winning scripts is equal to scamming people, and whoever offered such script in past was bashed by everyone  Interesting. I was not aware of any gambling/scripts or reviews. I assume he just isn't very familiar with such things; gambling isn't my area of interest either. Just wait until he posts. Already did. |
|
|
|
I wonder how the user will address this after they 'wake up'.
Oh, now she is a "user" and not anymore "alia"? Just admit that you were wrong! Are you really that stupid or are you just trying hard? aTriz is not related to whatever the user alia did/is doing/will do. aTriz is you though isn't he? Surely he can't be you in Europe, him in Australia and this Dorris in Asia all at once? You forgot The Pharmacist in the US, nullius wherever he may be and occasionally a few others. They are all Lauda. You shall soon become a Lauda too. |
|
|
|
I wonder how the user will address this after they 'wake up'.
Oh, now she is a "user" and not anymore "alia"? Just admit that you were wrong! Are you really that stupid or are you just trying hard? aTriz is not related to whatever the user alia did/is doing/will do. |
|
|
|
Posting the name publicly like that when requesting something shady for yourself (such as a ID forgery) is very odd.  I might not have even considered accepting this post if it were not for the fact that it was posted a week before the account was created here, if it was posted after the account was created, that's a different story... the fact that it was done a week before this account was created, and has since been deleted, is too odd for me. Regardless, it is good that you've found it. I haven't had time for stuff like this the past few days. I wonder how the user will address this after they 'wake up'. I'm hoping theymos responds to a PM so I can ensure his verification is not better than what I am seeing.
You will need quite some luck for that. |
|
|
|
Posting the name publicly like that when requesting something shady for yourself (such as a ID forgery) is very odd. |
|
|
|
You are garbage. /thread My point was that it was a necro award though, and I think that merits should be awarded to new, or at least fairly recent posts or threads.
I disagree. Old posts can be just as valuable as new ones. This. |
|
|
|
No. With status you implicate someone well-known, which is what usually I hear in *accusations against someone with status* (legendaries, DT members, staff, etc.). You absolutely make no case against aTriz here.
Look how you describe "aTriz".  What makes you think I wrote that? Other than the 'long time member' (which is relative and debatable), the rest is a prettified history lesson. The longer this thread continues, the more that it seems that there are some very questionable motives behind it. |
|
|
|
It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.
Therefore, I believe that he is involved in the method scam. For me, that's trust farming, because he abuses his status to support a potential scammer. The deal is legitimate. Unless they are alts, there is no trust farming. Also "what status"? He's not DT or anything else, and is a relatively new member (given the age of the forum). With this sentence you implicate that only DT members have a high status, which is actually wrong! I think you are aware of that and you just want to distract. No. With status you implicate someone well-known, which is what usually I hear in *accusations against someone with status* (legendaries, DT members, staff, etc.). You absolutely make no case against aTriz here. |
|
|
|
It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.
Therefore, I believe that he is involved in the method scam. For me, that's trust farming, because he abuses his status to support a potential scammer. The deal is legitimate. Unless they are alts, there is no trust farming. Also "what status"? He's not DT or anything else, and is a relatively new member (given the age of the forum). |
|
|
|
I noticed that the User "aTriz" (u=135920) has submitted a positive rating. But now comes the hook. The User "aTriz" has a three-year contract with alia. ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3017111.msg31023940#msg31023940) Who signs a three year contract with a newbie? Even with other people, a three-year contract is very daring, which is why I think it should only serve to generate trust. He shows no evidence that the method works and abuses his status to sell the method as functional. I therefore ask a DT (not Lauda or the others from the "entourage") to watch aTriz, because what is going on there is very fishy. I believe that both are involved in this scam. -snip- I'm only going to address the quoted part: a) The deal was shown to me when it was still being discussed. I wouldn't have done it myself, but it was a deal solely between the two parties. b) There is no entourage of any kind. If you think that there is, you need a health checkup.
I don't see how the deal with aTriz is related to the other stuff. Why are you writing using the 'he' pronoun here " he shows no evidence.."?
I am very certain that aTriz is not involved with alia in whatever alleged scam(s) you're referring to. Then again, we were certain that Quicksy wasn't a mentally-deranged escrow scammer and didn't use alts to play the forum once.¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
Dear bounty manager, I have been taking part in this company almost from the very beginning, and I have been doing my job on twitter abd facebook bounty, but in recent weeks
I began to notice that in the table I and many other participants began to show a score in the last week instead of Y -"too many tweets"?
Explain, please, why nowhere are there any restrictions in the company bounty on the total number of tweets that I should do?
There is no issue other than you not reading the campaign rules, and thus trying to cheat the campaign. I am still contemplating whether to neg. rate attempted abusers or not. The rule can be found here: Rules
Rounds end at 7-8am Wednesday UTC time.
Account must be made before September 2017
-snip-
Twitter accounts must not have more than 10k total tweets.
It was announced before it went into effect.
I see in OP that Credito campaign will run for 6 weeks, but also i see now is actually Week 13. Is it last week?
Can you tell us how long it will be going this campaign, it makes sense to participate now.
thanks
Update OP with that information will be gratefully
I've asked the team about that. Watch this post for updates as I will add their response. According to the Credito team, the current week will be the *final* before a 2-3 week break. After that the bounty will resume for a few more weeks along with a signature campaign. I hope that answers your question. |
|
|
|
...and not listening to arguments of those that say he is wrong.
Que  I believe a reasonable, neutral person would see this as fairly clear evidence that lauda is leaving negative trust only on certain "sold accounts" in order to help his own account selling business.
In preponderance of evidence, and some other-unrelated stuff, Lauda is guilty of this. Yeah, yeah we know your trolling drill already. Once a pest, always a pest. |
|
|
|
It shouldn't be difficult to verify this information yourself.....unless of course there is another reason why you don't want to leave these accounts negative trust I am going to do pro bono work for you because ...? Cute little rodent. 0. Add self to trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts.
1. ? ? ?
2. Profit!
Sounds plausible. |
|
|
|
I have left him a negative feedback for now.
Are you sure you tagged him? I don't see any feedback from you. |
|
|
|
|
So are they going to get banned or are we going to tag them?
|
|
|
|
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I suppose that leaves one question: What the heck was your dastardly scheme supposed to achieve for you? Would somebody please enlighten us poor fools who lack the Brainpower to understand this plan for Lauda to TAKE OVER THE WORLD by adding herself to the trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts? I've been thinking about it, and I need enlightening too. I couldn't come up with any (not even a small) benefit in adding yourself to the trust list of random (apparently) purchased alt accounts. Maybe I just forgot because of the alleged pills, which were previously proven by the undeniable words of a friend of a friend reliable unidentified source. -snip-
Nice picture. I remember that. |
|
|
|
I would also point out that none of these purchased accounts have a negative rating from lauda, even after seeing they are all purchased. Most (all?) of the accounts have neutral ratings from others indicating the accounts have been sold with references/proof.
I will not tag anything on your request given that you have zero credibility, and are a known liar and scammer. You can forget about it. I suggest asking Shorena to do your bidding. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
