Well, without digging in completely, at first sight it looks like a problem that can be solved either by your host (by making sure all dependancies for your script are met), or by you (by rewriting the script so it doesn't use unmet dependancies).

As for your question: i'm afraid i have my hands full with my daytime job and some paying projects, so i don't really have the time to rewrite a script.

If you post the txid, we can have a look...
Alternative, you can use my tool to check the fee yourself: https://www.mocacinno.com/page/feechecker

most of these errors are either pretty self-explanatory, or real easy to lookup on google...
For example, if i didn't already know the problem, i could have searched "PHP Fatal error:  Call to undefined method mysqli_stmt::get_result()" on google, and the first hit would have been: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8321096/call-to-undefined-method-mysqli-stmtget-result

So, if you're running on a dedicated box/VPN you can fix the problem, if not you can ask your shared host to fix the problem for you (but there's no guarantee he'll be willing to help you out).

You can also rewrite order_status.php

if you look at the sourcecode of that page, you see it uses create.php?invoice_id=9001 and order_status.php?invoice_id=9001 to create an order, or to fetch the status.

however, if you try to load these pages ( http://sexkarta.net/receive_payment_php_demo/create.php?invoice_id=9001 or http://sexkarta.net/receive_payment_php_demo/order_status.php?invoice_id=9001 )
you get a 500 error... I guess you'll have to dive into your apache/nginx/lighthttpd/websphere/... error.log and see what's going wrong.

And there are electrum nodes running as a hidden service on tor

https://blockchair.com/search?q=1PzLpAxMLdCTkSXEWJ9yhgij5o3McztKTc

All unspent outputs controlled by the owner of 1PzLpAxMLdCTkSXEWJ9yhgij5o3McztKTc were spent before the fork. There are no more unspent outputs on either chain
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1PzLpAxMLdCTkSXEWJ9yhgij5o3McztKTc
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/address/1PzLpAxMLdCTkSXEWJ9yhgij5o3McztKTc

In other words: there was some balance, but everything was spent before the fork happened...

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/address/1GwnwtC3XLCYHiSynthWm3iNnTg4rS3jXt

So, according to this block explorer, there is no transaction whose output can be spent by the wallet controlling 1GwnwtC3XLCYHiSynthWm3iNnTg4rS3jXt

Compare this, for example to my address.. There were unspent outputs that could have been spent by me at the time of the fork:
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/address/1MocACiWLM8bYn8pCrYjy6uHq4U3CkxLaa

So, to summarise, there are no funding transactions for this address... Not on the bitcoin blockchain, not on the bitcoincash blockchain...

Have you tried looking at the deposit address on a BCC block explorer to confirm there actually is an input?

If you don't care for your anonimity, it might be a good idear to post the address in this thread, so we can have a look

I haven't looked into BCC myself (yet), but it should be possible to export the private key belonging to the BCC withdraw address from your BTC electrum, and import it in your BCC electrum...
This way, the BCC electrum *should* be able to generate the public key and the address, and the BCC node you're connected to should be able to send you the unspent outputs that can be controlled by the private key...

Be carefull tough.. Once you import the private key from BTC electrum into BCC electrum, you should realise you're importing a private key into a piece of very new (potentially untrusted) software!!!

That's not completely true... The hashrate has had drops in the past... In this case the diff was adjusted downwards.

To answer your question: for most miners, if they cannot make a profit, they'll shut down their gear... Hashrate drops, diff drops at the next adjustment, the leftover miners can mine at a lower diff (making more profit)...

Never heared about that one, are you sure it's legit?
No contact details, made with a free website builder, using a contact form to send an escrow request... Lots of warnings signs...

It's very hard to understand your question to be honest...

If you're asking if you should request a loan in order to buy miners, it's actually a very simple economic calculation:

If the principal plus the intrest of the loan is smaller than the fiat equivalent of BTC (or altcoin) you'll mine in a timeframe you're confortable with, it might be a good idear to request a loan... If not, you shouldn't request one.

It all stands or falls with following parameters:
- how much income will your mining operation produce (mostly dependant on your power cost)
- how much risk are you willing to take ( a longer ROI means bigger risks)
- do you have collateral? You can live in a country where you only pay 0.001 cent/Kwu for power, if you don't have collateral, nobody is going to lend you sufficient funds to setup a decent mining operation. If you're going to go to the bank, the collateral might be physical. If you want a loan from this forum, you should read the "no collateral, no loan" guideline Vod once wrote...

you can always try to run
https://github.com/btcsuite/btcwallet

It needs https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd
It's a bit harder to setup than your usual wallet (it's basically an alternative full node, and a cli wallet written in GO that uses json-rpc to connect to this node), but i've tried it in the past, and found it was able to handle big workloads...

Usefull stuff... I'll defenately follow your developments when i'm back at the office.

I quickly browsed part of your code
 At first sight, i couldn't detect any backdoors, just some really clean implementation of the bitwasp librarys

Indeed.. I'm actually waiting to mix, and chipmixer seems like one of the best options since bitmixer dissapeared

1.6 = mocacinno

You are talking about cloud mining... In this case, yes, 99% of the cloud mining companies are scams. The rest sell you all their risk for a small part of the profits...

Actual mining is completely different: if you do all calculations and risk assesements beforehand, you're reasonably safe

If you would know the share diff set by the pool, technically you should be able to calculate the average time between two shares (based on said share diff and your hashrate).

Since the share diff is not shown on your screenshot, i can't help you with this average

Im not really an expert on altcoin mining, but everything on that screenshot looks fine to me...

Everything is initialised, you're connected to the pool's statum proxy,  you seem to be hashing, you just didnt find a share yet

Je kan wel een aantal dingen afleiden: begint het adres met 1 (P2pkh) of met 3 (p2sh). Begint het adres met nog een andere letter/cyfer: geen btc adres.

De kans is groot dat een adres dat met een 3 begint aan een of andere service toebehoort.