Sorry. Not concentrated enough. In the distant past, the earth was so healthy, and the plants were abounding with so much nutrition, that people were healthy enough to live for hundreds of years.

That's the problem with atheism. Atheism tends to look in the wrong places for answers.

Look to God, because God provided for people in the earth in every way that we need. He will provide in the future, and has provided for future provisions even though we don't see it.

Atheists can't do this... look to God. They don't understand What and Who God is for them.

The first thing you need to do is stop believing the fear tactics of the over-population propagandists, who for political reasons are trying to scare the whole world into believing their BS so that they can take control much more easily.

If you are expressing that there isn't enough food, then consider this. If we stop using fertilizers and pesticides and herbicides, then we stop poisoning the land.

If we start using humic acids, especially fulvic acid, humic acid creating bio-organisms, and things like gibberellic acid in the soil, we have a chance to reclaim the lands for food production... 10 to 100 times the food production that is being produced today.


We don't need to cut our consumption rate down. All we need for greater production is the info listed in my above part of this comment post.

All we need for waste is plasma arc waste recycling. Google the words "plasma arc waste recycling" to find many articles about this plentiful method for cleaning up the environment with plasma arc recycling, while at the same time making abundant, clean energy for any use.



Wrong! Look at Neal Adams' findings at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ. When we need a larger earth because the lands are far too small, the earth will provide.

Hate is an extreme emotion. In fact it is so extreme that it becomes something greater than simply emotion. How close are you to wanting to destroy yourself because your hate is directed at the same kind of thing that you, by your own admission, are?

Part of string theory suggests that nobody is any distance from anyone else. Likewise, nothing is any distance from anything else. The thing we call distance is really energy relationships between the objects.

When we move away from something, what we are actually doing is increasing the energy relationship  between ourselves and the other object. When we move toward the other object, we are shrinking the energy relationship. The interesting thing is that the energy relationships are all curved. Thus, we get a flat everything that appears curved because of string energy relationships, even though all things are flat.

Do the math. There is so much room for people to expand on the earth that it is mind boggling.

Sure, even one person can destroy lots of the earth. Think of the one match that sets a gigantic forest ablaze. yet with healthy, proper controls, the earth is designed to easily accommodate a thousand times the population that we presently have.

The idea that the present population of the earth is rapidly reaching a point of unsustainability, is simply selfish nonsense propaganda.

Since you made reference to the bolded part above, does that mean that you think that some people SHOULD hate religion? Or were you only stating that you believe it is impractical to think that the world could ever exist without some people hating religion?

A person who hates religion has a religion of hate against religion. This means that he hates himself or his own beliefs, though probably he doesn't realize it.

It's not. Phytonutrients. We need them, if only in miniscule amounts. They come from salads and other sources.

One of the problems keeping us from living an exceedingly long, healthy life is that we don't get enough varieties of phytonutrients. There are millions of "varieties" of phytonutrients in the world. There are probably many forms that have been lost off the planet as plant species die off and are lost. Each of these is different, and each contributes to health in its own way. None is unnecessary. Sure, the body has work-arounds. But eventually we die, partly because of the lack of certain phytonutrients from green plants... salads.

The problem isn't the so-called uselessness of salads. The problem is the lack of higher quantities of the nutrients in the salads to make up for the phytonutrients that have been lost due to plants becoming extinct.

One company called AIM International (http://www.theaimcompanies.com/) sells a product they call BarleyLife. This product essentially is barley grass juice that has been dehydrated in such a way that the phyto- and other nutrients remain active.

There are other companies that are using this process with all kinds of food plants. Another is VEDEN (http://www.veden.com/). Their flagship product, VEDEN, is a combination of all kinds of plant foods, salad plants included, reduced to concentrated powder form.

It isn't that salad foods are not good for us. The problem is the lack of varieties, which can be made up somewhat by consuming much more of what is available.

Flat-earthers are simply one group of people who are beginning to see through the screwy politics that the behind-the-scenes leaders of the earth are trying to get us all to believe.

If the truth were known, the earth might NOT be flat, but the picture that standard science gives us wouldn't be anywhere near the truth either.

Seems to me that the assumption is that homosexuality is natural. The question was, Is this nature's way of controlling the herd?... in other words, the population of the planet.

When you look at all the vast reaches of the earth --- the whole population of the United States could be easily settled in comfortable apartments on 6,000 square miles, leaving well over 3 million square miles for whatever --- we are not even close to starting to reach the population limits of the earth.

Homosexualism is caused by things that some people do to the health of themselves and other people, so that people like corruption.

God is letting things happen as they do because He is giving people freedom. When we condemn Him for giving us our freedom, we forget that in 6 days He made the Heavens and the Earth, and all the starry hosts. Is there anything that people can even think of doing that would overcome the least of the strength of God, for Him to change it into something else? This is why death is something important.

If a person while he is living, has a certain attitude about God, the person can change his attitude back and forth, over and over again. The person can decide today, for certain reasons, that God is good. He can change his opinion about God tomorrow to be just the opposite, for certain reasons. He can change his opinion back the next day for still other reasons. God has given people time to do this.

When you die, however, you are locked into the opinion that you have at the time of death. You can't change your opinion about anything anymore. When God comes to renew all things - His power is easily great enough renew all things - what will He see in your opinion? After all, He may not give you the ability to change your opinion any more. If your opinion about God is good, He is your Best Buddy. If it is bad, you are His enemy.

Personally, I don't want God as an enemy.

One question regarding NK and the U.S. is, How close to maximum war production output are both countries running, percentage-wise, if they decided to dive as a whole country into making war?

Remember. To accurately think along these lines regarding Colorado and Washington, it is still federally illegal there, with the feds doing something about it at times.

Nobody should hate religion. Religious folks should respect atheism for what it is, a religion. Atheists should not condemn those other religions that are trying to save them; they should welcome and respect those who want to save people, even if their method is misinformed.

Atheists are people living their religion. Their religion might be vastly different than some other religions. The reason they live their religion as they do is, they think their religion is right. If they didn't think their religion was right, they would live their life in some other way, according to some other religion.

If the particular form of religious atheism some atheists live, happens to suggest that they don't care enough about other people, so that they feel that other people can live their life with the religion of THEIR choice, however foolish that choice of religion might seem, perhaps those atheists simply aren't very caring in an area of their lives that some others would deem an important way to care about people of other religions.

If the religious atheism of some atheists allows or demands that they openly ridicule, laugh at, or scorn people of other religions, they are acting similar to the way some people of other religions act toward them about their atheism religion.

Nobody but a vegetable lives in a religious vacuum... and maybe not even they.

Did Beliathon state such somewhere in this forum? Where?

Personally, I think that the ancients that had the rocket program were ancient even to the ancient Egyptians. The Egyptians used some of their knowledge in constructing the pyramids and such, but the ancients had way more knowledge than even the best of the Egyptians could begin to correlate into their lives.

Thanks, for your reply.

What?! You didn't see the rocket engines in the headdresses adorning the heads/faces atop the pillar rockets? Well... thanks for your post anyway.

Of course the whole pillar rocket is going to be different than a real rocket would be. The ancient Egyptians who built the temple were only imitating the rocket builders, who were ancient even to them. They were imitating, like a small child imitates his father, as he plays with his little toy tool bench, attempting to get each of the wooden imitation tools into its proper hole in the bench.

Look up at the bottom of the headdresses. Notice how they are more or less round at their bottoms. The real ones would have been perfectly round. There would have been indentations in the sides of the rocket below the engines, so that the effect of the blast of the engines would have flowed smoothly. The indentations would have been lined with some form of heat-resistant material.

Why aren't the rocket engine indentations shown? For the same reason that the bottoms of the headdresses don't curl in a perfect circle. The headdress has been changed over time by the various rulers of Egypt, who were only mimicking the rockets of the ancients. Some distant ancestors of the Egyptians had seen the rockets, handed down what they saw, and over time it was all changed into a head on top of the body (rocket body/ruler body), but the basic picture has been handed down over the millennia rather well.

Look down the side of the rocket pillars, several feet below the head. Notice the carved ring that circumnavigates the exterior of the rocket pillar. There are windows built into that ring. It's where the rocket passengers sat, below the engines.

In the real rockets, the pilot probably sat at a somewhat conical point above the heads, in a crystal dome of some sort. The dome isn't seen because the pillars are built to hold up the roof of the temple, which has been carved and painted with images of the constellations... the sky where the rockets of the age-old ancients blasted off to, with far more ease than we stumble around through the heavens with our silly bottom-blast rockets.

In this new era of the telephone and TV, many stunts were done. The stunt of the cellphone in the pics was probably organized by Charlie Chaplin as some kind of promotional gimmick. Did Chaplin suspect that someday we would actually have things like walkie talkies? Who knows? There may have been some instances of short-range radio even back then.

Other than that, if there is practical time travel, why not make the cellphone radio waves travel over time to the cell towers of today?

I haven't read "Crash Go the Chariots," by Clifford Wilson in decades. Since it was written, some (many?) of the things that both, von Daniken and Wilson wrote have been debunked. I wasn't basing the things I suggested on "Chariots of the Gods." I was simply basing them on the fact of ancient civilizations with high technology, and the appearance of the temple columns, combined with the ceiling full of stars.

One of the things that wasn't clearly known back at the time of von Daniken is that there was a great, worldwide, trading civilization back long - possibly many thousands of years - before the ancient Egyptians existed. Officially human-kind were simple hunter-gatherers before about 10,000 years ago (and this is still the official story)... not smart enough to develop the ancient civilizations that we are finding existed back then.

One place you can go to see that this is so, is to Google "Bosnia pyramids." Other than that, you can Youtube search Graham Hancock and watch his videos. Then follow him up with other archaeologists who understand what he does.

Thanks for the response.

Oh good! Time machines. Maybe we can find out what really happened at 9/11.

 

Hey! Look at the rocket engines at the top of the ancient rockets that existed long before ancient Egypt. Makes sense.

Part of the problem with our rockets is that they must balance on the engines to work. We had many rocket launch failures before we could perfectly balance our rockets atop their engines.

The ancients from long before ancient Egyptian times --- who the Egyptians copied in their temple pillar designs in at least one temple, though they probably didn't know what they were copying --- built their engines at the top of their rockets so that the center of balance was below the driving force. This made balancing the rockets far less critical than in our modern rocket counterparts. They probably used a form of tungsten in their rocket skins to resist the high temperatures product by the rocket thrust exhaust.

Watch this 10 and a half minute video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8-WWVlk_3E. Start at about 6 and a half minutes, and watch through minute 8 to see what I mean. It's all there, the rockets with their engines, pointed to the skies above.

What do you think?