dex is shorthand for a Decentralized Exchange.
something called bitsquare is all the buzz this week. BTS, NXT, XCP, Blockshare ... all the 2.0s are all trying to build one ... but we need a Larimer to give it a smart definition.
|
|
|
the higher triangle ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FsB9UNum.png%3F2&t=663&c=rferIb74-baYVg) if you've got 100s of $millions to play with sure go big on BTC, ETH
|
|
|
There are many possible combinations of the technology, and I think only a few are useful: Localized, centralized, permissioned, tokenized: WoW gold Localized, centralized, permissionless, tokenless: Not really a ledger, but Wikipedia Distributed, centralized, permissionless, tokenized: Ripple, Stellar Distributed, centralized, permissioned, tokenless: financial application Distributed, decentralized, permissionless, tokenized: Bitcoin, etc https://medium.com/@arthurb/a-functional-nomenclature-of-cryptographic-ledgers-e836cb0e6864#.nh6u5tdgw
|
|
|
looks at vol. #numbers the bear is onto something ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
https://news.bitcoin.com/looting-fox-sabotage-shapeshift/Pays the same BoB, pays the same. ---- i have future visions of servers that can not have their hotwallets accessed by anyone man nor machine the only way to get at the funds is to send in funds (you could still hack the API feeds used to determine rates of exchange) so: BTC in LTC out UNO in XMR out the MASTER key would be payment from hardcoded address or just a signed message from that hardcoded address which empties the wallet to another hardcoded address (or same one / matter of security level)
|
|
|
ShapeShift appears to be a simple web service. It’s taken a lot of work by our engineers to keep up that appearance. Behind the scenes, the platform is complex. Over 1,400 direct asset trading pairs, integrations with half a dozen exchange API’s requiring real-time price information on all offered cryptocurrencies, low-latency service API’s to several dozen partners, the monitoring and calculation of constantly changing exchange rates and order book depth in some of the most volatile markets on Earth, and incorporation of what can only be described as alpha-level software in various states of disarray (coin daemons…bleh). https://news.bitcoin.com/looting-fox-sabotage-shapeshift/
|
|
|
the 30% 'extra' -gets known nodes up for at least 1 year that can continue to be crowd funded -a live list of addnodes
Cryptopia will publish a live list of addnodes too
cryptoID block explorer - also can continue to be crowd funded - demonstrates good taste imo - a live list of addnodes - ip geo map - richlist - overview << this is a great feature
|
|
|
bump www.bitnodes.net get 3 seednodes cryptopia listing is 500k DOTs (yobit is very suspect)
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FipCAdrT.png&t=663&c=jFeItg_2z31RvA) PHS stack the stones so that they stay around for some time ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Calling Lightning a Proof-of-Stake system is orthogonal to the concept usually labeled as PoS. Him having done so will just generate loads of confusion. What we usually describe as PoS is a mechanism to achieve distributed consensus among a network of participants. Staking there is providing updates to the whole network's state, where you earn fees for contributing to the validity and the security of the network. On the other hand, Lightning Network is a system of bilateral smartcontracts, where you may earn a fee by providing liquidity to other users. Nodes along a payment path don't provide any proof whatsoever, they merely forward a payment. There is no global consensus in Lightning, contracts are created, verified, and executed between two or a small number of participants. Any need to create consensus in the case of disagreement is provided by the proof-of-work of the Bitcoin network. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4g4q24/andreas_antonopoulos_blows_me_away_by_probably/d2eron4 PoS is a mechanism to achieve distributed consensus among a network of participants. Staking there is providing updates to the whole network's state, where you earn fees for contributing to the validity and the security of the network. Lightning Network is a system of bilateral smart contracts, where you may earn a fee by providing liquidity to other users.
|
|
|
Joe Rogan on Twitter: "I'm so woke I buy my weed with Bitcoin." https://twitter.com/joerogan/status/723679883944071169#imsowoke I buy my weed with #DOPE coin #imsowoke I buy my weed with #STV coin #imsowoke I buy my weed with #CANN coin #imsowoke I buy my weed with #BLZ coin etc. thank for the new meme Joe ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
@coaex nearing the time you ought have a coupon/asset that trades; been standing in good standing for some time ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) i like the idea of fixing X kg UNO = 1 gram AU coaex, could adjust the rate every 48hrs. just sayin That price fixing for 48hrs will only lead to a price manipulation by bulls and bears, nothing much. Either merchant (in this case, us) or customer would benefit from it (plus, we have a greater chance of benefit) and it's some kind of gambling. This may increase traded volume of UNO but we don't think it's a fair practice. By the way, CoinPayments API updates every 30 minutes. So a fixed price of X kg UNO = 1 gram AU coaex is valid for that time period. You can use your magical trading skills in that 30 minutes ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Fair enough. Appreciate the discussion. But as an investor i'd personally feel more comfortable holding coaex back bullion 'coupons'; basically receipts of payment deliverable on demand (terms and conditions). Use one of the 2.0 platforms. WAIT ... we still don't know the better 2.0 platform to use ... pick one that has cheap costs of trade ... just an idea for now ... BTS 'bitshares' seems to be the first mover in issuing a 'gold' token ... but backed by nothing. Coaex has physical in stock
|
|
|
found official def. What is ICO? An ICO, Initial Coin Offering, allows a new developers team to tap into a wide pool of potential investors to provide itself with capital for future growth, repayment of debt, or working capital. A company selling on ICO is never required to repay the capital to its public investors. Those investors must endure the unpredictable nature of the open market to price and trade their ICO coins. After the ICO, when coins trade freely in the open market, money passes between public investors. For early private investors who choose to sell shares as part of the ICO process, the ICO represents an opportunity to monetize their investment. After the ICO, once coins trade in the open market, investors holding large blocks of shares can either sell those shares piecemeal in the open market, or hold to see further development and growth potential in the project. This type of offering is not dilutive or inflational, since no new coins are being created. http://saldigi.info/info/ico
|
|
|
First we had a hype bubble, now we have a hype bubble of doubt.
In the end - Ethereum is still doing great for what it currently is.
Some cashing out has been done as even admitted by the dev team before it happened.
New investments have been made as past ones paid off.
well the band has arrived let's do the Math roughly $20 M created enough hype to generate a +$1000 M bubble "Some cashing out has been done as even admitted by the dev team before it happened." Yeah they are taking profits at the top and yet can NOT find a means to fund a forum the operation looks more like XPY the fanboy club will likely evaporate just quickly as the price supports pop testing market cap lows below that of LTC and XRP is more than likely
|
|
|
|