Stay away from coinbase. I had issues with then which are sorta resolved, but the issue that I have is there customer support sucks. They probably have 8-10 guys going through hundreds of thousands support tickets.
|
|
|
Past 2 weeks I was bearish, but now I'm bullish.
|
|
|
It's so pathetic that someone has as much time as you do.
|
|
|
Not any more. There customer service is terrible. If you have a problem your shit outta luck
|
|
|
Hmm I put up all my btc as a loan at an unfavorable interest rate and it was scooped up within an hour Incoming crash ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
With regards to ActM, I've been proven right time and time again
How is the Labcoin to ActM flipping business going Mr Always Right! It's time for you to go back on that long break you were on. Don't come back here and try to pull your old crap about understanding anything to do with any of these businesses. In other news I'll be visiting Ken in less than 25 Days, Happy Holidays. Great news! Pack warm it's freezing up where he is
|
|
|
I apologize for breaking up the useless banter with relevant discussion. ActM shareholders, please consider and comment: It seems Chromawallet (colored coin) development is progressing very well. I'm wondering if it would be best to skip listing on crypto-trade.com and avoid the inevitable issues that arise with trading securities on centralized exchanges. I for one, would rather not be exposed to the risk of another exchange operator "having wallet issues" — (I'm looking at you Ukyo) or simply getting bullied by the SEC. Centralized bitcoin security exchanges inevitably fail for technical or legal reasons with few exceptions. Given chromawallet's progress we may be able to use a decentralized solution by the end of January and avoid the rather significant counter-party risk crypto-trade.com represents. Perhaps Killerstorm (chromawallet developer) would provide Ken with some listing support as ActM trading on ChromaWallet might go a long way to increasing ChromaWallet's usage for decentralized stock exchange. I totally agree, but I believe this is just a temporary home until colored coins come into play. A lot of the shareholders want an exchange like yesterday. Additionally I don't have much faith in CT. I had a withdrawal go missing and I have about 5 support tickets in with NO response. Neotrix hasn't responded to any pm either.
|
|
|
Can't you guys go on irc and feud there? This is getting out of hand
|
|
|
here's something fun to discuss: (oops if it's off topic) and copy and paste "I've done a bit of blockchain exploring. The block in question where all the bitcoin days were destroyed is this one: https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000048445e1220a78e53de15c74160ffbe4dad0b52099560e045fAbout 120,000 btc were moved. There are many transactions in this block in the 4,500-5,000 btc range. I followed the source addresses back in time. The ones I've looked at all trace their heritage to this monstrous transaction from 27 January 2011: https://blockchain.info/tx/8f8210694d3631a88ff410c573d80caf57db1d8af397bd47687aa4e4c1802464A single transaction moved 400,000 btc to a single address; this one: https://blockchain.info/address/1AYtnRppWM7tWQaVLpm7TvcHKrjKxgCRvXSo whoever made the transaction yesterday had 400,000 btc in a single address in 2011. If it isn't Satoshi, who the hell is it? Note that that 1AY... address had some transactions on 26 November this year; shortly before the ATH on 28 November. A huge whale, perhaps the biggest single holder of btc in existence, is stirring. The question is, why? EDIT: 400,000 btc in early 2011 was almost 10% of all btc in existence. In a single address. Wow." I saw that earlier and my first thought was satoshi as well.
|
|
|
Most people will be with there families. Great time to dump.
|
|
|
Have the funds been withdrawn from your bank?
|
|
|
It's like a hibernating bear at woke up.
Maybe he got some early insider info.
|
|
|
I must be one of the few who really isn't to concerned about his shares
|
|
|
I just logged into my other account and 4:1 leverage is gone?
Damiano when the volatility is high the 4:1 is deactivated. Have a good day Giancarlo Bitfinex Team Fair enough, but why was it removed yesterday and not during the beginning of the week? That's when it was most volitile
|
|
|
Ok guys I am on to something. I'm doing the opposite of my first instinct which is getting good results.
An hour ago I thought about going long, so I went short instead
|
|
|
I am tired of trying to catch the tops and lows ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) , I am all back in BTC, I lost 10% of my stash, but I made allot of profit the last couple of weeks, I am going to stop trading and hold and will not risk again so I wont lose all the profit I made so far. I was thinking about to cash but then "again" decided to buy back and with for the long term. Catching top and bottom is pure luck which in sure you know.
|
|
|
$300-450 is a good price for china not being able to buy coins.
No offense to India, but I have a handful of friends that live there and I have been told that majority of that country is very poor with a small middle class and a handful of the wealthy. I don't think the majority would put to much into bitcoins.
|
|
|
Someone in stamp is slowly dumping his coins that it is not affecting the market.
If so... he is dumping his "coin", not "coins" because... no volume. Unless they are trying to not cause panic just yet ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|