Actually, government doesn't care about anything. Does government have a brain that it can think? Does government have emotions that it can love or hate or care about anything? No two people in government ever think 100% alike. And even if they are close, there are many others in government who think both the opposite, and in a whole lot of other directions.

Isn't it about time that people quit talking about government, and start talking about the human being(s) who is(are) harming them through supposed governmental action?

Why is it that government human beings seem to have rights above the rest of the people? After all, the government people will still have guns when the rest of the people do not! If they didn't, they couldn't enforce government peoples' agendas onto others.

The 6th, 7th, and 9th Amendments to the Constitution (Articles of the Bill of Rights) limit everything that government humans want to do to any other humans. But people can't begin to use these Amendments to protect themselves properly if they don't even know what these amendments are.

This is true about love. Love is most important. However, this life is very short when compared with the thousands of years that people have been in existence.

The thing that matters is the after-life. The after-life is more important than love in this life, even though it might be love that determines one's position in the after-life.

That's why we must get down to basics. Only PEOPLE have rights. All governments and other organizations, when acting as organizations, only have duties, and privileges... which are subservient to rights. This is why the American system of government has the 7th Amendment, 12-person jury. If the jury is exercised in its basic, common law form, with regard to the case at hand, the common law jury can rule any way it wants: declare the "defendant" innocent or guilty; declare the "plaintiff" innocent or guilty; declare the law null and void in this case; determine the sentence; and anything else it wants in the case at hand.

This keeps government from going nuts, and taking rights away from the people.

Read the 7th Amendment. If you are ever a defendant for anything, require a 7th Article of the Bill of Rights, common law jury trial. Ask if the judgment will be able to be appealed. If it can be appealed, it is not a 7th Amendment common law jury trial.

Cars and airplanes kill way more people than guns do... at least in America.

That's precisely what political science is all about... the thing that Beliathon is doing. In the face of any and all obstacles, continue to shout, "I'm right, I'm right, I'm right; you're wrong, you're wrong, you're wrong," even if it doesn't make any sense.

Once we have determined that we and our whole existence is a simulation, then we need to find out 2 more things:

1. How many simulations are there within other simulations - imbedded simulations;

2. How extremely complex (perhaps beyond understanding) is the primary, base simulation.

If we ever expect to understand this, we are going to need to calculate the combined effects of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity in general.

Sounds they are out to rid the world of us ungodly rabble rousers, so they can make it over into something new for themselves.

Lots of people and governments have done this throughout history. I don't like the prospect of dying any more than anyone, but we all die... even the wealthy. But if they have found a way to live forever, all that means is that they will have a greater condemnation from God in the Judgment.

We also need real justice. You hurt someone by breaking his arm... your arm is broken, plus you need to pay to make him well. You kill someone... you are executed, after you have been forced to pay off his family.

This doesn't include accidents that are truly accidents. These would be handled differently.

A theater shooter would act differently if he knew he was going to become a literal slave to pay off anyone he killed or harmed, before the same thing was done to him that he did to others.

Gun control is the way governments assure themselves that they have control over the people to keep the people in slavery.

Legal doesn't have much to do with anything except controlling the masses who readily obey all this legal stuff, and wouldn't hurt anyone anyway.

Legal doesn't mean anything if you are a crook and know you can get away with it.

Right. When everyone is dead, who is going to buy their food products, even if they make them whole again?

People are used to acting without guns. In order for there to be safety, things need to be changed gradually. People need to be required to wear guns when off their personal property. But it hast to be made to happen slowly so that folks get used to it.

Places like theaters need lock boxes where weapons are required to be locked in for folks to gain entry.

Anti-gun laws don't take guns away from anyone except the law abiding people, who wouldn't have shot anyone in a theater anyway.

Watch this first.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAEEDluI_s0


RT's Monsanto coverage featured on the The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAwpJYJY9DE

Even the children have squirt guns.   

Gun control has to do with turning your guns on everyone who has a different opinion about your idea of gun control.

 

Why do you ask these questions? The answers are in the posts you quoted, so you have the answers already. Are you calling those guys liars? Are you calling them incompetent reporters? Or are you only trying to steer the rest of us into believing that Islam is a religion of peace when it definitely is not.

Except that in this case the religion is a nation, as well. It is a nation within every nation that it has members in, all using whatever methods necessary (often violence), to conquer that nation. Essentially, they are out there like every other nation and religion, to conquer the world. Most nations simply give up at attempting this. Being a religion as well, Islam can sneak in through a back door to conquer the nations.

While in simple terms this is true, odds are that you ave volunteered in. Volunteering out has to do with showing the IRS that you are not volunteering. Generally they won't bother with you if you have never signed any of their forms.

If you ever signed a personal tax return, a W-4 form, a W-8 form, or almost any other IRS form, the IRS understands that you have volunteered in, even if you don't understand it this way. There are ways to sign the forms that show that you don't volunteer in. But if you don't sign that way, the IRS is accepting that you know what you are doing and have volunteered to become part of their tax paying system.

If they come at you through the courts, you need to know how to tell them you have volunteered out, or never volunteered in, in the first place. Since they want your money, they will not make it easy on you.

If you have never signed any of their forms, the best thing you can do is don't start signing now... unless you want to volunteer in, that is.

If you have signed a W-4 or W-8, and you want to start showing them that you are volunteering out, do a new one, signing your name, non-assumpsit, and n/a on any appropriate box, and "EXEMPT" on any exempt line. Non-assumpsit essentially means "no contract." Since the income tax is voluntary, show them that you are not making an agreement with them, even though you are signing their paperwork.

Why might you sign their paperwork at all? Your employer might require, say, a W-4 so that you can get a job. Even though the paperwork is between you and the IRS, your employer has made himself into an IRS agent to an extent, and he has to collect paperwork for them. When you sign "no contract," you are showing both the IRS and the employer that you have volunteered out. Your employer is not supposed to withhold if you file EXEMPT on the no-contract form.

And alcohol breaks families faster than Marijuana.   

What you mean is that you are not a formal, recognized religion believer. Your belief is your religion. If you truly believe that you have no religion, you are deceiving yourself. If you believe in the mind of man, then you are part of the Humanist religion.