You are a Christian, then!   

This isn't surprising. Think of taxes. People don't like taxes, but they like how government uses taxes even less. And think of the big real estate crash in 2008. It left many people homeless. True, it was the fault of many of these people and not the government, but the people had thought that the government had things covered for their protection. They found out differently.

The drone attacks against Pakistan haven't gone away even though much of the news about them seems to have. People don't trust that their own government wouldn't use drones on them, especially in the light of all the police brutality, lately.

There are lots of other things that are wearing on government trust.

Actually, Youtube search "Graham Hancock" to see that people's brains back 12,5000 years ago were better developed than ours are. Some of us have devolved to the point that we, in our pride, think that we are better than people thousands of years ago.

It is reasons like this that make the government's own conspiracy theory to be one of the least plausible ideas on the planet.

People want security. They will often believe the conspiracy theory that is best suited to their feelings of security. When the truth about any conspiracy starts to come out, the people will tend to believe the truth.

Regarding 9/11 conspiracies, Google "percent people believe the official 9/11 story."

That's because Islam is a religion with two major goals:
1. Converting the world to Islam;
2. Getting the tax money.

There are often many differences in the way we die. Many of us feel it coming. To others it is a surprising shock... for a few minutes maybe. But we all die.

Serenity, Origin of the Reavers. Pills don't work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4

The only reason America has a thing that is similar to a Democracy is, we as individual people have forgotten how to implement our common law, a thing that is allowed directly by the 7th and 9th Amendments to the Constitution (in the Bill of Rights), and is pointed at by the Preamble and the 6th Amendment.

Nowhere in any of this writing (Preamble, Constitution, Bill of Rights) is there a place that says that people are required to follow anything that is in the Constitution, or that flows out of it. Again, this is evidenced by the Preamble to the Constitution, and the 6th, 7th, and 9th Amendments.

The United Kingdom (Britain and the nations that are part of her), Canada, and Australia are similar. All of these nations, including America, base their law for everyday living of their non-government people, formally if not practically, on the Magna Carta (Note, there is not only one Magna Carta. It was made over several times.), and other great documents that essentially say: The people are free in every way except when they harm other people, damage the property of other people, or break a contract that harms or injures other people.

The 12 person jury is the body that has complete authority in any trial, for judging the law as effective or not, for judging the guilt or innocence of both the plaintiff and/or defendant, and for passing sentence. Don't let a judge tell you any different.



EDIT: If a judge holds a jury in contempt, the jury has the right and duty to call the judge's contempt issuance an error of the court, and then to hold the judge in contempt.

EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twn96nj0jfw&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D&index=10

Note that in the diagram, below, humans are almost exactly the same as frugivores. This match is Biblically correct. In the Beginning, God commanded people to eat fruit (tomatoes are fruit). He didn't seem to say anything about vegetables or animals. Yet, after the Great Flood of Noah's day, God told Noah that people can eat animals, as well.

Presently, people's digestive systems are designed to digest fruit or meat best. We can, and should eat various forms of vegetables, grasses, and herbs in small quantities, according to what our individual systems can handle, mostly as digestive tract stimulants, but also for phytonutrients and some trace minerals.

Definitely, if we can find a source of extremely healthy fruits and vegetables, where we don't need the special nutritional help that we get from eating meat, this would be best.

Warning to meat eaters. Eating excessive amounts of meats can be habit forming, and can cause bad health if fruit and vegetables are not consumed, or only consumed in very small quantities. Older adults should be especially wary about consuming large amounts of processed milk.

Jesus saves.

See more detail at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1199604.msg12610202#msg12610202.

The basic idea of transcendentalism is probably true. This is that we DO have knowledge or feeling beyond our 5 basic senses. God says in the Bible that we should not seek this because we will get caught up in contact with evil spirits. Rather, we should meditate on His Law day and night.


Jesus is 100% God and 100% man.

The Father is 100% God.

The Holy Spirit is 100% God.

Combined as 3 together, or in any combination of two together, is 100% God.

We do not have three Gods. We have one 100% God, yet 3 completely individual Persons in that God, who are all individually 100% God.

God is called the Trinity in Christianity. "Trinity" is a word that describes the 3 parts as being One and, at the same time, remaining 3. this is difficult or impossible for the human mind to conceive of.

Any religion that does not recognize the Trinity, either has the wrong God, or is very mistaken. God, Himself, will judge where the dividing line exists between people who have a false god, and people who are truly people of God but simply have a mistaken idea about God.

The word "Allah" is simply the English spelling of the Islamic word for God. Islamites generally will not accept the English word "God" when speaking English. They think that they need to hold onto the Arab word "Allah" to make things right.

Unfortunately, since most Islamites think that Jesus was only a prophet, they will not be saved... because they do not accept Jesus as being God. This is general New Testament teaching... Jesus is God. Yet, it is a thing only God can truthfully judge people for, on a personal basis. Why? Because only God sees the inner heart and mind of people... not even people themselves see their own inner mind and heart.

I just woke up, hadn't had my coffee yet.   

Incidentally, when you look up the definition of the word "taxes" in legal dictionaries, and then look up the definitions of all the words that define "taxes," and then look up the definitions of all the words in those definitions, etc., you either come to circular references, or you come to the word "fraud." Now don't you think that slavery is fraud upon the slaves?

And the sad thing about this is, they haven't come up with a pill that closes bullet holes. Of course, all bullet holes stop bleeding after a while.

What's vague when the sergeant orders the private, and the private carries out the order?


The president orders the military to do a lot of things, and they are done. What are you? just plain ignorant?


While you are correct in saying that no human being or group of humans is in control, still the military acts in a very orderly way. And it has objectives that it follows and accomplishes, even though there are often failures. So, how do they stay orderly and follow objectives? Is it by the aliens you talked about?

If people are not in control, who do you think makes you post your silly posts?


In case you haven't noticed, everybody has evil intent at times, mixed right in with the good.

You talk a lot like a troll, pointing out certain aspects of things, while hiding others that should be obvious to you.


Your theory is that my facts are theory.


Then you are intending to get your country to ordain gun freedom for all so that you folks can be the center of the universe along with us?


Now you are being simply silly. Many things have multiple words to describe them. Why do we need "blablahblah" when we already have "silly."



Folks, please pardon my picking on blablahblah. We can tell from the number of his/her/its posts that he/she/it talks a lot. But that's the way it is, isn't it? Those of us who talk a lot usually should be listening to what we say a little, right?

Ah. You were talking facetiously.   

This Could Kick-Start WW3

Fellow patriot,

Don't be fooled... WW3 won't be fought between nations like the first two. And definitely not between the USA and Russia. They know the stakes and they're not stupid enough to risk everything.

No matter how crazy Putin may try to act just to scare the West... he has so much to lose. He's the most powerful man in Russia and he doesn't want to lose that. He'll never go as far as self-destruction.

But small, elite groups of trained fanatics... are crazy enough to kick-start the next world war.

ISIS already set foot on American soil. The 3 jihadist arrested in Brooklyn for planning a bombing are part of a larger plot... According to the FBI there are ISIS members in every state of the Union... just waiting for a sign.

But the part that the feds leave out is these fanatics plan something far worse and much more dangerous than 9/11...

ISIS plots to put the entire American nation on our knees... using a revolutionary weapon that could cripple the whole country.

Make no mistake, ISIS isn't a rational actor like Russia... They have nothing to lose.

After they decapitated Americans and set people on fire... they burned all the bridges. They either die, or they destroy America.

They can't do it with brute, military force. We're too powerful for that... But we're defenseless against a "smart bomb" that's 1000 times more damaging than nuclear devices.

It's a weapon that can instantly end modern life in America by knocking out our power grid. Nothing that has electronic components will ever work again. Cars won't start, TVs, phones, the Internet will all be dead.

They're going to send us back to the middle ages... You'll have to make a fire to cook and use candles for light.

In fact... just seconds after this calamity hits, all social structures will be reversed... and the information I'm about to disclose will put you at the top of the "food chain".

There's nothing you and I can do to stop it... BUT there is an answer... And if you stick with me until the end of this presentation, you'll meet ONE weird professor who's uncovered a proven way to shield yourself, your loved ones, and even your community, from America's morbid coming mayhem.

But First, Who Am I To Make This Kind Of Dark Prophecy?

... read more (http://www.blackoutusa.org/tsl/) to find out what this secret weapon is that can demolish America so easily.

..........

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 5, 2015
Full contact info at end


Method for Stopping Shooting Rampages Emerges

by Alan Korwin
The Uninvited Ombudsman



Hard evidence -- not doctor theories, news commentary, conjecture, hyperbole, rumor, innuendo or any other proposals -- clearly shows that the only known way to actually stop spree murderers is to shoot them -- or scare them into shooting themselves. Time and again society has found this works.

According to the evidence, every mass murder in recent times has been halted, in the final analysis, by shooting the murderers, or threatening to shoot them, with guns. Members of the press corps continue to debate the subject, despite the evidence. Sources speaking privately say the media consciously reject this fact. In stark contrast, self-defense incidents using guns are suppressed, by news-media policy, and do not appear on the public stage.

An excellent write up about the censorship of firearms used in self defense appears here --
http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/usa-today-ad-campaign-features-armed-heroes

and here --
http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/09/since-usa-today-wont-publish-good-gun-news-author-alan-korwin-publishes-advertorial-of-good-gun-news

Multiple reports of self-defense, accomplished by shooting criminals, appear as paid space in USA Today, which otherwise censors such reports:
http://www.gunlaws.com/TheFirstRespondersReport.htm

Although knowledgeable commentators are still debating the merits of shooting murderers, the visible evidence clearly demonstrates that shooting the perpetrators does take care of the problem. No other solutions have worked.

The only problem identified is the relative slowness of this effective remedy, due mainly to the delay in getting guns to the scene where innocent victims are assaulted. The scenes have virtually always been in supposed "gun-free zones," with posted signs flatly rejected by the perpetrators.

President Barack Hussein Obama, whose middle name is not supposed to be used, went on national TV, twice in the past week, to propose other solutions, which he announced as "politicized." He promised to "continue talking."

Further analysis conducted by The Uninvited Ombudsman, has determined that background checks, or newly proposed additional background checks, recommended by Mr. Obama and others, would be pointless for people who already own guns, since they already own guns. The best estimates indicate this is about 100 million armed Americans.

And in other analysis conducted by The Uninvited Ombudsman, waiting periods have no meaning whatsoever for Americans who already own guns, when they go shopping for guns, since they already own guns. That is also 100 million Americans.

Waiting periods have one additional drawback overlooked in mainstream reports. They require the public to trust psychotic individuals who wait five days to get their first gun, to remain calm for the balance of their lives. Somehow, the five-day waiting period doesn't seem like a long enough "cooling off" period, but this has not made it into nightly "news" reports, or the President's commentaries, for reasons that were unclear at press time.

The murderer in Oregon who sparked the recent repetitive debates owned more than a dozen guns, according to early reports, all legally acquired. While Hillary, Mr. Obama and others are still calling for more background checks, they have apparently failed to notice these obvious errors in their plan.

Only new, or "virgin" gun buyers would be affected, most of whom would pass checks anyway, according to leading experts and past experience. The point of adding even more checks, when current checks are not used to take criminals off the streets, was not clear as this report was prepped for release.

"News" commentators have also failed to make this connection, so far, and have repeated the calls from politicians on both sides of the aisle, who are discussing background checks and waiting periods.

The role of ultra-violent body-rending video games, horrific grizzly blood and all gore movies on nightly TV and a debasement of popular American culture at every level has not figured prominently into the president's prolific pronouncements.

The public -- not some famous vilified "the gun lobby" -- rises up loudly to condemn the assault on their fundamental civil and human rights. This is the same 100 million armed Americans mentioned earlier. Some reports suggest it is "only" 80 million armed Americans. The NRA, often cited as "the gun lobby," has only 5 million members.


Counter-Intuitive Man Says:

Referring to murderers as "gun men" is offensive to men, a violation of journalism ethics, due to its biased and prejudicial nature, and sexist.

Calling murderers "gun men" is virtually propaganda against men and firearms.

It denigrates men, it is derogatory, defamatory and it is discriminatory.

What would media and pundits say if a woman was the criminal perpetrator?

The correct terms include murderer, killer, villain, criminal, assailant and perpetrator, without gratuitously singling out gender.

By using the propaganda term "gun man," the media vilifies a tool they frequently demonstrate hatred for, along with men, which agenda-driven political groups seek to demean or belittle. That's simply wrong, and unethical.

Murderers should be called murderers, not gun men. This would help remove the glorification many mass murderers seek, which encourages others to copy their behavior.

By encouraging such behavior, the media shares responsibility for these acts, according to leading national experts, who are speaking out against such behavior in increasing numbers.


Alan Korwin
The Uninvited Ombudsman
Author of ten books on gun law
Publisher, Bloomfield Press


P.S. My previous request to the President, to have him call me for common-sense solutions he is not getting from his side of the aisle, has gone unanswered so far. I patiently await. The ideas coming from the TV set are so off base it is hard to imagine they are actually on the air. Has anyone considered education in the schools yet? Schools are currently an empty hole of ignorance on the subject.

Yes, but a special kind of con artist, known as a Social Justice Warrior (SJW).   

The love of money is the root of all kinds of evil.