Whatever changes to be implemented, I believe it will not be good to make any investment decisions just based on the ranking of CMC. I welcome whatever changes the new management will be bringing up still it should be used only as a references for getting ourselves educating what are coins available in markets and where they are being listed and other related information but definitely not for finalizing our investments.

But there are a lot of possibilities that they are going to bring up new changes which will be convincing us to make investment decisions based on their ranking or any other similar indicators. I mean all the big corporate are working hard for that reason and binance and coinmarketcap tie up will definitely do that as well.

Definitely ETH 2.0 will not hit us in 2020 which means ETH cannot be a coin for 2020 . But when ETH will include staking feature, I guess it will find easy routes to moon for sure. Because, ETH is one of the few coin which is having a real world application and when adding an additional feature which will definitely encouraging it towards a new ATH.

A wrong suggestion IMHO. Do you really know that how easier to cover all 50 coins? I guess it will be possible if you buy only one coin/token of each of top 50 (except BTC) then you may able to cover all top 50 coins. But, it will not be affordable for most of average investors. Moreover, most of the coins in coinmarketcap are manipulated to have top ranks. Do not get yourself deceived.

HODL? I mean is there really any better strategy than just holding? I personally would rather see my coins get valuable more and more every single day instead of keep trading them when they go up and down. Maybe the price of bitcoin could go down, but do not forget that they are still getting more valuable each day.

There is some shmuck who forgets his password, or someone who sends money to wrong place, or someone who gets it locked and can't reach it, or loses his usb hardware wallet somewhere. Basically there is less and less bitcoin every day, plus the miners are now mining a lot less as well. So every single day bitcoin gets more scarce and more valuable, even if the price goes down. That is why I believe holding is the best strategy ever.

There are lots of reasons as to why a project is likely to fail. There are lots of scam projects, and it's true that it might have affected ICOs in some ways. Another thing that can lead to the failure of an ICO is when the project fails to reach its milestone. There are times when the organizers fail to do the right thing. Some of them fail to register their websites and accounts, and thus may lead to hackers taking over their website in future and leading to them losing a lot of coins in future, which will in turn lead to the end of the project.

This way bad projects are just becoming part of this crypto space and it is individual's responsibility to take care against those bad projects and no one could do anything else. Just doing all the due diligence may save an individual investor. This the reason I have stopped contributing to ICO some long time back itself and never touched any IEOs as well.

You could get in touch with the current team that is running it? I mean if the team is basically given up on the coin and it is dead, you could basically take over the whole team. But, the better version is not to go with the dead ones but the alive ones that have small pulse.

In those ones you could talk with the team, tell them you have some ideas that you want to do and tell them you are expecting nothing but just putting your effort, which is free considering you are not spending money but valuable considering your time could otherwise worth money if you spend somewhere else. That way you get into a team, do something to revive, and if you are good you will be asked to continue and that will worth money and you will get a bigger influence in that team eventually if you keep making the coin better and they will be afraid to lose you because without you they were almost dead.

But I would say cashing out to fiat is a bit more secure, if you cash out to usdt or any other stablecoin there is still a risk, your money still be gone. Not just that it could be hacked or anything which is a viable threat actually, but also tether could come out tomorrow and say they are gone and exit scam and you will be left hanging with worthless tokens. Hence the perfect way to fully cash out is to cash out to fiat itself.

It is not something we would want, I want to stay at bitcoin no matter what happens, I want to stay here when the price is 3k and I want to stay here when its 20k, but if I really want to cash out I will use fiat itself instead of something that represents fiat. Or maybe that's just me, maybe I am being a bit too paranoid about it who knows.

Someone notified on another similar topic about continuous learning and I agree about it because I too believe only with knowledge anyone can become a successful trader. At the same time, knowledge alone will not help anyone to be successful all the times in trading when they are failing to make use of their experience. Experience must be more critical factor in deciding the level of success in trading. So in summary, both learning and making use of experience will make anyone a successful trader.

This is the reason why people are not recommending to go for copy- trading or buying signals. Because when you are not capable of generating required signals for your trading purposes then you cannot make timely decisions based on market fluctuations. Signals (copy-trading) along will not help you in being successful but timely decisions.

Investing for future is a perfect idea in crypto world, it is a new system even if its ten years old these days, all other stuff have been around for hundreds of years, so crypto is considerably new compared to other stuff and in 20-30-40 years it will always be something a lot more profitable, definitely amazing.

But at the same time, we are talking about not having the patience to wait for 40 years when the coin we bought is basically non-existing right now, some things you invest in like bitcoin and ethereum could survive for tens of years, whereas some small ones can go so little that you would basically want to get out, look at Nano for these examples, it used to be over 30 dollars, now its under 1 dollars. So do the long term thing, but pick carefully.

Lol , that caption really got me laughing so hard. Like who writes that kind of bullsh*t? How can they tell that you're trying to claim for the second time? If this is truly legit as they claimed then anyone can make use of different addresses to claim as much as they want and they wouldn't be caught. So, this is a pure scam. And the funniest part of this all is that even the op is one of them.

The group claims to be Steve Wozniak or whatever it is they call themselves, and the op's name is SteveWozniakStaff lol. Stop fooling around man, and this is an old type of scam. Respect yourself man. Hope nobody so far have not fallen to this scam because OP is providing extra advertisement by posting here (It is doing both awareness and promotions at the same time).

Having patience is the key. I don't really check all these things about celebrities saying they are interested or whatever, I just simply have this faith that Bitcoin will grow and the other cryptocurrency markets will grow with it. Even if she doesn't say she's interested in Bitcoin, there are already a lot of people that are aware of Bitcoin and a lot of them keep joining every day.

The Halving has taken place, I know some people will be rushing now and buying out of FOMO, which is not right. It's always best to have plans for a long term and then you can invest and have patience till when you have planned to hold. I guess with an upcoming rally, bitcoin can easily break the big barrier of $10,000 levels and you can expect prices to hold above $10k levels here after forever.

Mbappe just worths way too much right now, he is one of those players you would prefer not to sell in any situation, sure sometimes people are forced to sell players because of financial and other reasons but at the same time who are you going to buy that will be better than mbappe? Nobody. So, PSG will try to keep him as long as possible, without question he is their best player right now (ok maybe neymar ).

But if he has to go, real Madrid could be a good decision because they are getting older and building a new team around mbappe would be ideal for them, get haaland on top of that and you are done at offensive situation, start focusing on defense, someone instead of aging ramos. Juve already has a good offense, doubt they will spend that much on mbappe.

It is a casino after all which means they will basically be the place that will make the money thanks to house edge. Certainly there will be times that even the house gets unlucky and lose but think of the average how much they could make, game is designed to make the casino win.

So, after a big loss it makes sense that there will some sort of bigger increase in the profits eventually since the loss can't continue forever. That is literally the reason why people are investing into casinos because they know that as much as there is a chance that people could win time to time eventually gamblers will lose because of the house edge. I would personally expect even a bigger return in the near future because the people who won will keep on gambling and eventually lose more.

There is also a reality that bitcoin price has increased as well, I know it is not 10x increase but it increased like 2x so I could understand the drop a bit because right now the house is paying a lot more compared to what they used to give to people. However one thing is for sure, people do care about how much they win, you see that some people gamble as much as they can and when it starts to become too useless to gamble because they are gambling way more than what they are going to earn they start to stop.

So, people do care about what they gamble and how much they gamble, just a bit loose and not so strictly. I think it would take a bit time to actually make a person to stop, like you should be giving out 0.03 and they should be over 0.1 loss, even more in order for them to stop, there is a limit when they will stop, but it is not really strict and changes from person to person, but we still can't say there is really no limit and they would play forever until they can win.

I am not saying that they should be attacked or scammed or anything, I am saying that if you want to stay hidden you should basically not be considered in the wagering competition at all, because you wanted to be out and you do not want to be part of it, and you do not want your name to be shown, so stay hidden, do not give your name anyone, and do not be considered in a competition as well.

This was of course just one part of it, makes no sense because you are losing out on all players who want to wager and make money and join the competition and that means less money and less profits for the casino, why would any casino do anything like that so I agreed that the idea I suggested wasn't really that great and gave a better idea as well for it.

If you're going to be talking about transactions, then you will be wrong because there are lots of other payment methods that are being used at this time more than people are using cryptocurrency. Just like PayPal and Cash App, and I don't think you can say that cryptocurrency is being used more than those. So I am not really counting transactions as part of it, because that's the least.

There are other ways that not really cryptocurrency, but the community has been able to contribute and help in this time of Coronavirus pandemic. You can take for example: when miners started supporting in the search for the cure of covid-19 and how few gambling houses already started helping with some percentage of house-edge to needy people in lockdown.

Some people have said that Bitcoin price will fall after the Halving due to the rewards for miners being cut half. But from what I have seen, there has been a lot of hype surrounding this Bitcoin Halving starting from last year.

So, the way I'm seeing it, this might attract more new investors to the Bitcoin market who will then start investing lots of money because they believe the price will rise soon. And in turn this will cause the price to rise, and when the price starts to rise, it will lead to a FOMO which will cause many people to start buying and the price will pump even more. I'm just making an assumption, but this might end up being the case.

For sure if bitcoin is banned in China and the miners quit it is going to affect the Bitcoin market. But that wouldn't mean the end for the Bitcoin ecosystem, there is just going to be a decline in price and as time goes on the remaining mining farms will be able to upgrade and catch up and things will get back to normal and that's it.

Although I don't really believe that the Chinese government will ban Bitcoin mining. They have tried to do that once but it didn't work and they left the miners to continue with their business. The only thing might be able to do is to ban the people from making use of Bitcoin and maybe miners will be affected in some ways.

No need to count this 4000 LTC as a big thing; Just because it is from one investor, it is getting lots of attention but when 10 or 100 of investors collectively invest same 4000 LTC, we will just move-on but both will have same level of impact on other investors' share in the bankroll. So, it is worthy a news for this community like some whales contributed to yolo investment program and nothing more.

Yes, we can expect multi-fold money to in-flow in coming days from whales and others by considering the reputation of yolo and how attractive their investment program still persists. The early we do invest, we can enjoy relatively big profits and I am sure, it is not late as whales yet to start investing as per recent halving and as per crypto market scenarios.

No, preev shows like mammoth $174,600. (http://preev.com/ltc/usd)

Not that it doesn't make sense to join, but you will be basically deciding if you want to join or not yourself. Nobody forces anyone to join at all, just make it "top 10 people who wagered and didn't want their names hidden" and you would basically have people either declining to put their usernames there and that way you would have people who want to keep hidden will hide themselves and decide to not join. However that is not really ideal for wagering situation, as a casino you would want everyone to gamble hence I think the second option makes more sense as well.

However the first one would be a lot more lucrative for marketing purposes, so you have to decide with a competition do you plan on marketing purposes or increasing wagering purposes? That will make the decision easier.

I have been seeing similar news like this and some people have dismissed this as another conspiracy theory and they are calling it fake. Though there are things that are making me quite confused about this situation. Before now there has been a book that talked about a situation like this happening in the future. So I always feel like people that are saying this was created in a lab are saying it because of those books.

I really don't know what to believe in this situation, if this is really true, then it might be that they already have the cure and pretending that they don't have it yet. Or was it created and got out from the lab by mistake? Whatever it is, I just want this situation to come to an end.