There is a plan for development of mobile version of the exchange? For example android
Yes, although the alpha doesn't support it right now, a mobile version is in development. An app is another matter, with those you need to take into account that there is an additional security issue with fake apps on iOS and Android  |
|
|
|
Thank you for your effort to answer my question. I think I will read more a lot of STeX whitepaper first in order for me to gather some info's about their ICO. I totally missed out the updates in STeX, so I've been too late for the news of this project.
No problem Reading the whitepaper and DYOR is always advised. Remember, it's always good if you check those points before investing: - Do I understand how the investment works?
- What are your goals?
- What are the risks of this investment?
- What level of involvement is required?
- How much do you expect to earn on this investment (ROI)?
- How long do you plan to invest? Is this a short-, medium- or long-term investment?
- What are the costs to buy, hold and sell the investment?
- Is there a clear exit strategy?
If there are questions left after reading everything, just ask here or in the chat. |
|
|
|
Like @TMAN, I also think your numbers are a little off, but in a different direction. It takes 10 merit to be a member and that gets you 15 base stakes, while it takes 100 merit to be a full member but that only gets you 30 base stakes. If the idea is to not unduly reward people who attained their rank by merely registering earlier and (shit or not) posting frequently then a better approach would be to increase the bonus from awarded merit as you go up in rank. NB - I was contemplating a similar idea, but you beat me to the punch and, well, I can admit you did a better job of presenting your idea than I would have done. So you win by default, without even knowing there was a match on!  The distribution of BaseStakes per Rank is just an example. You could also do something like: Jr. Members: 2 Stakes Members: 5 Stakes Full Members: 10 Stakes Sr. Members: 20 Stakes Hero/Legendary: 30 Stakes Taken from a campaign that is running right now. It's only to illustrate the way Rank & Merit can go hand in hand when it comes to the calculation of stakes. I'm looking for an easy way to incorporate the use of Merit while no completely changing the way campaigns work as it's not that easy to change things that are established. Another reason is that the current system is the reference for bounty managers, meaning if you change it too drastically they have no data to rely on and it's harder for them to plan the campaign. If your idea is similar, maybe they complement each other as mine is just a suggestion and I don't know if it works until someone tries it |
|
|
|
I laughed so hard, very well done, thank you! You had me until: Virtue
This is an upright, God-fearing community which will suffer no witchcraft ...
Have a nice weekend  |
|
|
|
I would change the part about merit and encourage signatures managers to check out the merit background of their users, as well as their last 20 publications. This is really easy to detect here on the forum merit-farmers if you take a look of their profiles and check out their merit, for they are usually shameless and give merits from an account to another almost every day.
Checking the post history of a single account is much easier than cross-referencing multiple accounts in order to spot Merit-related issues, but I agree, I would be the better solution. Many of those who do this are also already tagged for Merit cheating. |
|
|
|
paying less to members with no merits will create a market to buy merits to get more in a campaign.
You are aware that this already is the case, right? You only rank up with enough Merit and the higher the rank the more stakes. My suggestion aims towards a more constant reward for continuously posting quality, as this is something that now isn't rewarded directly and creates the situation that members see no benefit* in posting really good posts as the gap between ranks (in terms of Merit) can be so high that they might never rank up. It's all about incentive. (*I'm aware some will argue that those members shouldn't be here in the first place, but that's not the point here)I wish that bounty manager could also award merits for every member at the end of the campaign, base of course also in stakes like at least we could get one or two merit at the end of the ICO hahaha no need to modified the forum rules.
This would totally defeat the purpose of Merit modified version
stake = ( (merit x B) / (number of post) )+ B
B = to stake based on rank, only merit and number of post is not constant.
this was it can easily be done using spreadsheet/excel.
let say
B =
Jr. member - 2
member - 4
full member - 6
senior - 10
hero/legendary - 12
let say 1 merit and 5 post
Jr member
stake = (1x2) /5 +2 = 2.4 stakes
hero
stake = (1x12)/5 +12 =14.4 stakes
That sounds interesting. So you'd also use the Merit earned since the start of the campaign in order to calculate it? The problem I see with this is that a Member could 'easily' get more stakes than a Hero Member: B = Member - 4 Hero/Legendary - 12 let say: Member: 15 Merit and 5 posts Hero: 1 Merit and 5 posts Member stake = (15x4) /5 +4 = 16 stakes Hero stake = (1x12)/5 +12 =14.4 stakes The problem here is that a Hero/Legendary Signature is much more worth in terms of ad space, even if he never even gets Merit but makes his posts. I think that getting more stakes as someone 1 rank higher than you should be doable, but 2 ranks higher should be only possible in the rarest of cases as their Signature is much more worth for a campaign. |
|
|
|
[...] and the merit system is designed to reward those who can arrange words in the best manner possible.
Thank you, I'm in bed with a cold but this made me laugh I think campaigns--and especially these altcoin bounty-campaigns that tend to have managers of questionable judgement--should only be able to accept members who've proven they can earn merits.
I totally agree that Bounty Campaigns should incorporate Merit (as I suggested in ' RANK & MERIT-BASED Signature Campaigns'), but a problem is that it can't be too restrictive as Bounty Campaigns aim to get as many participants as possible (that post a lot) as this means more visibility. If Merit would be a requirement, most Campaigns wouldn't have enough participants. It would be very nice if the admins would require campaigns to increase their standards.
Enforcing this through mods and admins would require a lot of overhead and I think we need a more 'natural' way that it doesn't need to be enforced but that everyone benefits from the way things are handled. |
|
|
|
I'm reading some abysmal things here. Please be aware that your personal data is one of the most valuable things you can own/have control over. Let me make an analogy here: We all know spam mails, right? We all more or less find them annoying and would really really gladly get rid of them, but we have also adapted to it. E.g. some use temporary email addresses others create extra email addresses in order to use them for the more shadier sites or just to avoid some of the spam. Nearly everyone has one or more addresses that they share only with the more important people like friends and family. At least I hope that this is the case. There are countless of services that offer spare addresses just for this purpose. So people make all those efforts for the 'protection' of their email address but as soon as an airdrop or an exchange comes along and uses the three magic letters K Y C, people give freely their names, ids, and photos. I don't get it. Don't ever give someone your personal data unless you absolutely understand the risk involved. Identity theft already is a huge problem. If you don't believe me, have a look what can happen:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPjgRKW_JmkSo please, don't give away your data carelessly, not for an airdrop, not for any random exchange or other so-called 'company'. |
|
|
|
this is an interesting project, looking out of the roadmap, which I think is very neat and potentially to succeed in the future, I'm interested in seeing the progress of this thread, and not a bad idea to invest, may be a successful project
Stop. Just stop. This is the third or fourth username you’ve made to say that EXACT same thing in every thread SteX has had. Just stop. When people see that your a brand new member with THAT being your very first post then they don’t take anything you say with any weight. Its insulting to the community and embarrassing. We don’t need potential investors seeing those kind of posts over and over from the same person creating new usernames. It makes the project look cheap and unable to thrive on its own. So you’re hurting the project more than helping. K. Thanks. Good find, as this is a self-moderated thread, the STeX team now can have a look at these posts and may delete them What he is doing is also against the forum rules and his (all accounts) account can get tagged for that. Let's again focus on the project as the alpha launched stage 4 so we can start trading between BTC, ETH, LTC, DASH, BTG, BCH, and TRX. I love this new transparency of the team and that everything gets communicated. |
|
|
|
Okay! Its better to understand the difference of the two coins because I want to assure that soon, my STE tokens have value.
Now, STeX runs two different coins in complement. So, does the two coins have different token sale also? I hope STeX can manage it properly.
As A2A is the 'new' token, it wasn't in a sale. Here is how it'll work:  In addition, in the upcoming STE ICO, the maximum supply will be limited to 30,000,000 STE tokens to be sold, including STE tokens, sold at presale and ICO Stage 1. The rest will be frozen on a separate ETH address till the end of the ICO, then transferred back to the STE ICO smart contract and burned. In case of any amount of unsold tokens left at the end of the ICO within the limit of 30,000,000 STE, it will be transferred to the separate smart-contract known as STE-SHOP, to be distributed on demand at any moment in the future. |
|
|
|
Hallo
suche ein Tool mit dem ich ein Kauf Order setzen die Höher ist als der aktuelle Kurs.
Als Beispiel.
Wallet Exchange : 100 Dollar
Kurs NEO: 50 Dollar
Order: Kaufe bei 54 Dollar
Hat einer eine Idee wie mann so etwas umsetzten kann
Hi, ich denke es ist hilfreich, wenn du zunächst ein wenig genauer beschreibst was du tun möchtest. Angefangen mit WO möchtest du eine Kauf-Order setzen  ? Es gibt einige Tools mit denen du so etwa sbewerkstelligen kannst, allerdings kommt es eben genau darauf an wo, was es im Zweifel kosten darf etc. Generell ist es so, dass viele Exchanges (Börsen) eine API nutzen, die von den diversen Programmen wie Bots und Seiten wie Tradingview und Coinigy angesprochen werden, damit dann ein Trade auf der jeweiligen Exchange ausgelöst wird. Eigentlich kannst du dies aber auch direkt auf der Exchange selbt tun, eine ganz normale Limit Order [dann steht sie im Order Book] oder eine Stop (Limit) Order [steht nicht im Order Book]. Es gibt sehr viele möglöichkeiten, wie man einen Trade wie von dir ebschrieben durchführen kann. Mehr Info würde wie gesagt helfen. |
|
|
|
You still decided to make a prediction on the wings platform, I thought you have changed your mind,in any case, this is very good news.
That's what I thought too. WOuld it be possible to edit OP and add such important information @STeX team? I'm afraid that the STeX project is one of the best projects I'm following but of those also the most confusing with a misinformed community. It lacks a source with every important (relevant) information in one spot. I know that this is a tough task but the project would benefit immensely imo. |
|
|
|
How do you know if it is a scam? Because I have encountered a bounty that let me finish all the translations first and didn't respond to me after I have passed it. I hope bounties will not be like this anymore because they demand and we did our part but they didn't do theirs. I hope you could answer my question.
Sorry to hear that. You might consider checking this thread 'Bounties the managers (spreadsheet)' from HakamuraA reputable Bounty Manager is no guarantee but the next thing to it |
|
|
|
Hi guys
I will be getting a hardware wallet in 2 weeks or so, will probably be going for the Nano as it supports more coins. However how can I know that the box hasnt been opened and re-sealed or anything before I got it ? I mean anything can happen in the warehouse from the online shop im buying from, or at airport customs.. etc..
To my understanding there is a piece of paper in there with my seed words, how can I know that nobody has those ?
The best thing would be to only buy from an official reseller or the original store, that makes you rather safe from supply-chain attacks. If you go for a ledger be aware that they had exactly this problem before the last firmware update. Someone could manipulate the ledger nano s (and blue) in that way that even the creation of a new seed wouldn't have helped, see here: https://www.ledger.fr/2018/03/20/firmware-1-4-deep-dive-security-fixes/Make a hard reset in any case and be sure that you've got Firmware 1.4.1 or higher. You can't be 100% safe tough, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
In short, the STE token is the old token and changed by the A2A token? If then, is it possible that STE will devaluate soon?
Now I see that A2A token is really differ from STE token and I think this is the first ever project I've seen that used 2 different tokens during token sale.
I want also to clarify this.
STE and A2A are two tokens that compliment each other. STE was not renamed to A2A. They are different tokens for different purposes. - STE is a dividend token
- A2A is a utility token (on the platform, like BNB)
So there is no devaluation of STE tokens, they coexist and serve different purposes. |
|
|
|
ICO schedule correction and welcoming bonus for traders. [/b][/color] As you may know, since the beginning of February we are in talks with legal advisers about A2A token legal status. However, the process took much longer time that we expected and we still do not have an issued legal leter, necessary to start marketing in some countries. The same time, a new Wings platform was released and there was no time for us to fit the schedule of launching WINGS forecast before our A2A ICO scheduled for April 5. The following changes was made to solve it: Main A2A tokens ICO will start on May 1, 2018 and will be closed on May 31,2018. Tokens become tradable right after the end of the ICO. All new users on STeX exchange will be receiving a 5% bonus from their deposit in the form of A2A bonus tokens, that can be used to pay comissions on STeX. All unused bonus tokens will expire at the beginning of the A2A ICO. Well, there is no guarantee that you'll have all legal stuff ready until May 1st, is there? Or is there an ETA for the required legal letters? As there already was a motion in regard to the postponed ICO and a vote happened, it would be appreciated if you could say a few words in regard to this situation and the new starting date of the ICO. |
|
|
|
Not sold tokens will be moved to STE shop, where they can be bought at an ever-increasing price. And for the time being, will this STE store be somehow limited, or will it be held until all tokens are sold 30 million pieces?
As no burning of the tokens was announced, I'd expect that they stay in the shop. It would be interesting to know though what will happen with the dividends allocated to the STE stuck in the store. |
|
|
|
Would seem more coins = less demand/supply, and so it would lower. but i heard it raisis? Which is it and why?  This totally depends on the structure of the ICO. Are there: - different bonus tiers?
- lockup periods, for founders, different tiers or stages?
- bounty hunters and if so is the bounty pool large?
- benefits for holding the token/coin?
- ...
The list goes on. There are so many factors that can have an impact on price. So, please be a bit more specific |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
