It seems like I managed to climb 15 points in a week ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
|
|
|
Hoje estava dando uma olhada nos banners de campanhas que circulam aqui na no nossa da aba e fiquei na dúvida sincera. As campanhas de mixers voltaram a ser aceitas no bitcointalk? até dei uma olhada no tópico da campanha da jambler e parece que voltou com um modelo diferente de negocio mas que na pratica ainda é Mixer. Năo entendi ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Before making such statements, you should probably delve into the details first.
|
|
|
Friends, I suggest we all get together and protest! Since Trofo, being a co-organizer of this pool, will soon award himself a free bet! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Ed: Oh.. it seems my provocation was unsuccessful as I see that another guy has become the leader of this game week. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
This: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2FYki0q.png&t=663&c=rkx6VdUVsg-L-w) It seems your humorous nature needs a more aggressive avatar! But so be it, I will trust your choice)
|
|
|
Friends, new avatars are available. Please indicate your preferred options here (first come first served). BlackHatCoiner Cygan dkbit98 Pmalek NeuroticFish Lucius ranochigo Stompix pooya87 NotATether TryNinja seek3r joker_josue Charles-Tim WhyFhy
|
|
|
Jambler has completed maintenance. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
yep which is why I don't try too manage a campaign. So my merits are not tied with my handing peoples cash.
What exactly do you say “yes” to?
|
|
|
In reality, both support and criticism have no effect on who the admin assigns as a merit source. The admin personally told me to create an application for the reason that when he assigns new merit sources, he does not consider users individually, but looks for relevant threads in the meta using keywords. that leader got 256 merits.
number 2 merit reception was only 97 number 3 merit reception was only 82. [...]
It seems that the difference between first and second place is 159 merits, and one can assume that my favorite author is GazetaBitcoin. I should probably mention that you also have a favorite author, since the difference between the first and second place of those you sent merits to is 177. Although in reality you probably should have looked at the other panel which says that I submitted 3267 merit 2180 times, to 471 profiles (not being the merit source). Btw, you sent 8790 merit 4496 times, to 1259 profiles (being a merit source). To be honest, I have no idea how all these discussions regarding conflicts of interest relate to my appointment. But I am sincerely grateful to everyone who participates in the discussion, regardless of your opinion, since active discussion allows this thread to continuously remain at the top of the meta section.
|
|
|
Heyyy!!!!!!!! Haaland scored only 1 goal!
|
|
|
Is that the case with the other Jambler partners as well?
Man, the answer is literally in the previous post.
|
|
|
Show in public? ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) And can this be replaced with some other alternative body parts as proof of ownership?? It seems we need a suitable abbreviation for such things) NSFW?
|
|
|
So. The votes have been counted! I think that within a week we will make an announcement. It's funny, but BitcoinGirl.Club took 3rd place in the Miss Bitkintalk category, and since the winners of this category need to confirm their claims to the title, someone will have to show their tits. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 34 week are on their way. [Exchange rate: 52,100] ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ➥ Friends, feel free to translate the BC thread into local languages as klarki did. ➥ Welcome! ➥ Which style of avatars do you like better... like mine or these ones?
|
|
|
Da li neko zna, video, procitao negde utiske osobe koja je investirala u Jambler? Na stranici nisam uspio nać neki dio gdje su korisnici, partneri ili investitora ostavljali svoje komentare ili utiske. Od društvenih mreža, imaju link za Telegram grupu gdje imaš nešto komentara i upita na engleskom a nešto na ruskom. Tu su još GitHub i Reddit ali nisam uspio ni tamo naći utiske korisnika. [/quote]Any questions regarding investing in the telegram chat are processed very quickly (there is a small crowd of 120 people, most of whom are regular investors).
|
|
|
Avatars production is slightly delayed / Payments for 41 week are on their way. [Exchange rate: 52,100]
|
|
|
Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 23 week are on their way. [Exchange rate: 52,100] ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Welcome!
|
|
|
Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 26 week are on their way. [Exchange rate: 52,240]It seems this audio track should help you if you want to recharge yourself with good energy for the whole week. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Thanks everyone for a great week / Payments for 7 week are on their way. [Exchange rate: 52,200] ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) [...] We're only talking about cases like this Bob [participates in campaign X]: Alice, I recommend using wallet A, B, C - Not ethical Bob [participates in campaign X]: Alice, I recommend using wallet A, B, C, X - Ethical Of course, this does not apply to cases where, for example, wallet X does not have any specification that Alice is asking about. Then recommendation A, B, C is ok. In general, no one should even think about this, since what I am talking about implies that good ethics should be at the level of instincts among campaigners. Just look at the names on the spreadsheet next to you and you'll see what I mean.
|
|
|
I am interested in one thing, maybe you can give me the correct information. When Jambler is under planned maintenance, does this affect all their partners? Or the service is functional in the background?
First, because Jambler resells to them the coins it receives through short-term user deposits, thus providing them with liquidity. Why is it profitable for me to use [banned mixer] for investment?
Firstly, we have a stable demand for transactions from stock exchanges for which we are ready to pay a bounty. [banned mixer] constantly purchases output transactions from Bitcoin stock exchanges and provides a bonus of 1% for that. An average time of return on investment is 12 hours. Secondly, our business model is transparent. It demonstrates clearly from which funds [banned mixer] pays commission fees to sellers/investors.
To eliminate risks of getting a cryptocurrency of questionable origin, all investor Bitcoins are checked by the platform scoring system, including blockchain analysis. Transactions which have passed the check, get into the system and transaction which have failed the check, are returned to a customer from the same wallet. This stage makes it possible to terminate attempts of unfair investors to use an investment admittance as a mixer in order to clear their money and gain profit at the same time. [banned mixer] does not capitalize on return of cryptocoins which haven’t passed the scoring check, it is a necessary security measure.
|
|
|
Getting Mo Salah right this game week doesn't seem logical to me, especially given the fact they have blank week for the next round [..]
When choosing players, I took into account the empty game week. Me and cryptofrka (as he said earlier) are not even in the top 5 and the gap from first place is about 90 points, and the inclusion of Salah and his appointment as captain was logical. At first, I planned to attract Salah for -4 and make him a triple captain (by selling the injured TAA in favor of Bradley). But the news that P'Porro will miss the match and the fact that Kelleher will replace Alisson during DGW forced me to activate the WC. Yes, I couldn't use my TC but I reformed my team by getting rid of very expensive defense (P'Porro, TAA, Ederson) and brought in Haaland, Salah, Toney. If I had not activated the wild card, I would have had to think about how to fit 5 players on the bench + goalkeeper. Another plus is that I found a balance between the rotation of goalkeepers. Kelleher/Neto complement each other well, and even if Alisson returns, Bournemouth has a good enough schedule after the double game week that I won't have to think about replacing Kelleher. I'm also prepared for an empty game week, and 2 free transfers will allow me to be more flexible. Almost all the players have favorable matches, and on the bench are Salah, Kelleher, Bradley who will meet Nott'm Forest in a week. Doughty will of course wait for DGW since he has good attacking potential. So for me this is the most logical strategy to move forward in our league.
|
|
|
|