|
Thats just awful. Would it ever even do any good? I cant imagine the JS hasrates to be any good...
|
|
|
|
|
Why does this matter? Wouldnt the previous block hash still be different?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure the client only opens 8 connections normally?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, both are running 2 threads. Running either 3 or 4 on the i5 doesn't seem to get any increase.
|
|
|
|
|
What up with retries when disconnected? At my work our wifi is very unstable, and this seems to mean that the miner always never runs. Is there some sort of exponential backoff?
I get the "Error 80072ee2: Operation timed out" a lot. What are the timeouts set at?
|
|
|
|
|
I have a new laptop, and an older laptop. What surprised me was the old laptop being a tad faster. Its specs are:
Inte Mobile Core 2 Duo (Penryn) T9300 @ 2.5Ghz (~5,7Mh/s)
New one is
Inte Core i5 M430 @ 2.27 Ghz (~5,4Mh/s)
Sure, the i5 is lower clocked but I thought it would easily be faster than the core 2.
|
|
|
|
With that being said, DarkPools will always exist "off the exchange", and that is fine. Why is that fine? Having them off-exchange is also "elitism", just another form of it, you'll need some time and knowledge instead. |
|
|
|
Would you like some serious BTC for your development ? Read this thread http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1812.0Make an android client (not a remote rpc client, thats been done), include some QR codes, B.u.m.p. like functionailty to make it easy for people to transfer coins from phone to phone, and the unfulfilled pledges in that thread could be yours. Heh, I know about _that_ project. Way too big for me, atm. But I will think about it  |
|
|
|
|
Well, I thought modern compilers just took that as a hint, and they don't always respect it. I could be wrong though.
|
|
|
|
|
I do some android development in my spare time, both for fun and for money. I am a full-time java developer, too, if that matters.
I would like to try make some BTC from Android development. Anything goes basically, but I will be less likely to take on big projects since I would like to be able to finish them properly.
I would personally prefer hour-based billing, but that is a mess for the buyer, so I can do an estimate for your ideas and give a price in BTC. This is also why I don't like "too large chunks", its a risk for me if I underestimate the time to completion.
|
|
|
|
I'm in the attractive position of having ties with a 3rd world country which has to date not really attracted the attention of Western governments Cant stop laughing. |
|
|
|
To open an account PM me and I'll let you in.
Ill be taking a bitcent for every 10 BTC you deposit, and I'll take a bitnickel if you try to smartass your way out of it.
Loans will be available soon.
Worst. Deal. Ever. |
|
|
|
We are in a "x-mas tree" pattern
aaah, come on, now you're just making stuff up. I think it's the shape of italy's west coast.  Note that time might reverse when we hit Genova. BTC still on track even then  (S3052, don't take this the wrong way, plz) This post would have you earned you a tip from if this was witcoin! Love it. |
|
|
|
In b4 $9...
Why do people think this way? Trends can be sustained, but often they're not. By waiting with buying, you will be buying expensively! |
|
|
|
|
I had the impression someone was working on the client, albeit slowly. The problem seems to be the blockchain and RAM usage.
|
|
|
|
It really needs a GUI though.
Yeah, I am a developer and I was put off by the complexity of getting it up and running! |
|
|
|
The fee could have been for converting it from euro to krona (the Swedish currency)
I'm not quite sure
May I ask what bank you have? Swedbank? |
|
|
|
Here's an idea that might be dismissed as stupid-simple, but sometimes stupid-simple ideas work really well.
How about: The maximum block size equals the higher of: (a) the current hard-coded maximum block size, and (b) 'difficulty' bytes.
I was just thinking that block-size should depend on some measurement of how much it taxes the network, just like difficulty is measuring how fast blocks can be found and corrects that rate. I have a hard time seeing how to objectively measure block-size impact (which is global!) in a similar way as mining? |
|
|
|
|
I don't see how the block size could ever be unlimited, I would think this is what actually costs money, big blocks? Transaction fees will naturally strive to optimize the block-size as a side-effect.
Millions of spam transactions today is no different from millions of legit transactions tomorrow. If the blockchain cannot handle spam today, how could it handle large transaction flows?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
