Well.. Then magic internet did not let my magic connection through  Did you even bother trying to connect to pool.mn? I am now looking at the server logs and I will post here the IPs that actually tried to connect. I tried to connect to lizarde.pool.mn - yes .. but just from my landline, as i was not setting up a pool for this the connection simply timed out.. while it worked for hashlink for example.. but they reported 0 blocks Finally got a connection after a while from them, but ended up deleting the wallet. This coin sounds too shady for us. Guys, you should really stop with these accusations, it just makes no sense. Pool.mn is not trying to scam anyone and very often we have some issues as well, last example was yesterday's icebergcoin. You all know that if dedicatedpool comes it will take all the hashrate and what we are doing here is disservice to each other by making these stupid accusations that have no grounds. It just makes the case for people to use dedicated more appealing. Regarding server logs - I cannot provide IPs that were trying to connect to 51234 port as these logs were not turned on on the server. I can show you the firewall settings if you think this will help show that we were not blocking any incoming connections. Daemon settings were provided above. |
|
|
|
Such pool,Such fails,again.
fkn dickhead not a single pool is up but scampool.mn guess why Why other pools are not up I have no idea, whose fault is that? I thought you guys were done with false accuses after you launched couple of pools that were mining from block 2 or 3. Pool.mn's first block has been found 2 minutes AFTER the dev made the post about the source: http://lizarde.pool.mn/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=67&prev=1Should I post here the topics where suchpool was mining and finding blocks before the source was published? It happened we found the source on github, like you guys seems to have just had this time heh ? How come nobody can't sync except you guys? You are having way too much of a reputation for this to be a simple coincidence again I don't understand why others were not able to sync. The nodes are in the source and we synced with those nodes: https://github.com/lizarde/lizarde/blob/master/src/net.cpp#L1157This is a separate issue why other pools were not able to sync and why pool.mn and some other pools were able simple question: why don't you allow connections to your wallet ? and for the rest: just stfu Connections to our wallet were allowed, what makes you think that connections were not allowed? Here is the config that was used: # Required settings
daemon=1
server=1
gen=0
listen=1
testnet=0
maxconnections=500
# Staking
enableaccounts=1
staking=0
# P2P port
port=51234
# RPC settings
rpcport=7743 Well.. Then magic internet did not let my magic connection through Did you even bother trying to connect to pool.mn? I am now looking at the server logs and I will post here the IPs that actually tried to connect. |
|
|
|
Such pool,Such fails,again.
fkn dickhead not a single pool is up but scampool.mn guess why Why other pools are not up I have no idea, whose fault is that? I thought you guys were done with false accuses after you launched couple of pools that were mining from block 2 or 3. Pool.mn's first block has been found 2 minutes AFTER the dev made the post about the source: http://lizarde.pool.mn/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=67&prev=1Should I post here the topics where suchpool was mining and finding blocks before the source was published? It happened we found the source on github, like you guys seems to have just had this time heh ? How come nobody can't sync except you guys? You are having way too much of a reputation for this to be a simple coincidence again I don't understand why others were not able to sync. The nodes are in the source and we synced with those nodes: https://github.com/lizarde/lizarde/blob/master/src/net.cpp#L1157This is a separate issue why other pools were not able to sync and why pool.mn and some other pools were able simple question: why don't you allow connections to your wallet ? and for the rest: just stfu Connections to our wallet were allowed, what makes you think that connections were not allowed? Here is the config that was used: # Required settings
daemon=1
server=1
gen=0
listen=1
testnet=0
maxconnections=500
# Staking
enableaccounts=1
staking=0
# P2P port
port=51234
# RPC settings
rpcport=7743 |
|
|
|
Such pool,Such fails,again.
fkn dickhead not a single pool is up but scampool.mn guess why Why other pools are not up I have no idea, whose fault is that? I thought you guys were done with false accuses after you launched couple of pools that were mining from block 2 or 3. Pool.mn's first block has been found 2 minutes AFTER the dev made the post about the source: http://lizarde.pool.mn/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=67&prev=1Should I post here the topics where suchpool was mining and finding blocks before the source was published? It happened we found the source on github, like you guys seems to have just had this time heh ? How come nobody can't sync except you guys? You are having way too much of a reputation for this to be a simple coincidence again I don't understand why others were not able to sync. The nodes are in the source and we synced with those nodes: https://github.com/lizarde/lizarde/blob/master/src/net.cpp#L1157This is a separate issue why other pools were not able to sync and why pool.mn and some other pools were able |
|
|
|
Could be that pool.mn just connected to another node of their own and build the first block without the developer knowing
the dev and scam.mn are most likely the same person ;-) ^^ And you are here, hello Please, stop this FUD. I have no idea who is the dev. aahaha .. i like you ;-) EDIT: its getting too obvious with all that recent launches .. don't you think ? What recent launches? Do you really believe that pool.mn knows these devs. I can make the same accuses about the pools that you are setting up but what is the point? Do you really like to make unsubstantiated accuses? It is just becoming ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Could be that pool.mn just connected to another node of their own and build the first block without the developer knowing
the dev and scam.mn are most likely the same person ;-) ^^ And you are here, hello Please, stop this FUD. I have no idea who is the dev. |
|
|
|
Such pool,Such fails,again.
fkn dickhead not a single pool is up but scampool.mn guess why Why other pools are not up I have no idea, whose fault is that? I thought you guys were done with false accuses after you launched couple of pools that were mining from block 2 or 3. Pool.mn's first block has been found 2 minutes AFTER the dev made the post about the source: http://lizarde.pool.mn/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=67&prev=1Should I post here the topics where suchpool was mining and finding blocks before the source was published? |
|
|
|
what about the coins in pool.mn? The database has been restored from the backup and the pool is back online. Please, withdraw your coins. |
|
|
|
If you are planning on mining on the http://wacc.pool.mn/, they charge a .1 Fee to transfer coins out. Being rewards are so low, if you transfer 1 WACG out they are going to take 10% WD fee!! This is not true, the fee is zero and has been zero for quite some time now. |
|
|
|
|
POOL.MN is shutting down the pool due to this change. All the previous blocks that we've found are now invalid due to this change.
|
|
|
|
 Up and running!0.99% fees Powerful dedicated server DDOS Protection Friendly support via email, jabber or support forums Skilled admin Please, join usall shares Rejected ... Are you using the correct miner settings? This is qubit algo check the big miners, they are the one using the incorrect one, the efficiency of your pool is non-existing There is one miner who is submitting invalid shares, he will be banned soon. |
|
|
|
I grabbed 8 (non-orphan) blocks which I'll be sending your way once they mature because you know I'm using your ccminer fork and your wallet build  Thanks! thanks. For those running on pool with sgminer you have to use --difficulty-multiplier 256 (I don't think there is a problem with ccminer) Thankz mate!! This solved the 100% Rejected shares issue for me, to add this switch in the configuration file: "difficulty-multiplier" : "256", Happy mining now Only a bit too late for the semi-ninja launch... dev should add this info in the OP  Here are the settings: http://cdt.pool.mn/index.php?page=gettingstartedThanks djm34 |
|
|
|
|
Guys, I see that a lot of you are not using qubit algo. Make sure that in your sgminer settings you set your kernel to qubit
|
|
|
|
Up and running!0.99% fees Powerful dedicated server DDOS Protection Friendly support via email, jabber or support forums Skilled admin Please, join us all shares Rejected ... Are you using the correct miner settings? This is qubit algo |
|
|
|
Up and running!0.99% fees Powerful dedicated server DDOS Protection Friendly support via email, jabber or support forums Skilled admin Please, join us
|
|
|
|
Yeah I think they were stealing coins or screwing with distribution, I had found 32 blocks 3 mill worth of coins but had only received 1.2 mill through distribution. Things didn't add up.
When you find a block you share it with other miners who are also mining, so it could happen that you find more blocks than what you are rewarded for. If you don't like that this can happen, then maybe pool mining is not the best option for you and you should consider solomining. I'm aware of how it works. I've just never had such a huge disparity between blocks found and actual earned rewards. The total earned rewards are less than half of actual produced results. It still remains fishy to me. Typically if something walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and looks like a duck; it is a duck. I agree, although possible, it is not really likely to have such an outcome. I am looking into it now. I'm on the same situation, found 9 blocks on the pool (for a total of 892,857 BDC), and got paid around 180,000 BDC. It's strange that such a huge differential is happening, maybe there are some found blocks that weren't paid (happened on other pool I was mining) I am now looking at the average statistics - there are some miners who were paid on average more than 200k coins per found block and some were paid less than 50k coins per found block (you were one of the least (most) lucky miners as you were paid on average 20k per found block). Whether you will be in the group of most/least lucky miners is a matter of luck and that is why pool mining is smoothing these differences. Wait a minute, how can anyone earn more than double the block reward per block on average? At most they should be able to earn the entire block reward on average, not an average of two times the total block reward. Is this per found block per user or total across the pool? Suppose we have two miners A and B with the exactly same hashrate. Both are submitting shares and trying to solve for the block and suppose that during 24 hours both have submitted 100 shares. However miner A was lucky and he found 50 blocks where miner B wasn't lucky and he only found 10 blocks. The pool has a total of 60 blocks found by miners A and B and because both were submitting equal number of shares both are rewarded by the same number of coins, i.e. A and B each will receive the equivalent of 30 blocks in coins minus the pool fees. As a result miner A has found 50 blocks but has only received 30 blocks worth of coins whereas B has found 10 blocks and has received also 30 blocks worth of coins. Therefore, average coins received per found block for miner A is 30/50 = 60% of the block reward, whereas for miner B is 30/10 = 300% of the block reward. The math lesson wasn't necessary, you could have just said you were using the per block per user average as opposed to the whole pool average. Since realistically it is mathematically impossible to earn a higher average than the block reward unless you are only calculating the average against the blocks that only the user found as opposed to the average calculated against all blocks found. I was using per block per user average as this is what you were saying at the very beginning that your miner found N blocks and was rewarded only for 30% of N. I didn't have any intentions to teach anyone anything, I was just trying to be clear. |
|
|
|
Thanks for looking into it.
Are you sure that all found blocks were paid?
I mean (pseudo-code), does #FoundBlocks * Reward = Sum(PaidToUser) for all users?
Yes, that is fine. |
|
|
|
Yeah I think they were stealing coins or screwing with distribution, I had found 32 blocks 3 mill worth of coins but had only received 1.2 mill through distribution. Things didn't add up.
When you find a block you share it with other miners who are also mining, so it could happen that you find more blocks than what you are rewarded for. If you don't like that this can happen, then maybe pool mining is not the best option for you and you should consider solomining. I'm aware of how it works. I've just never had such a huge disparity between blocks found and actual earned rewards. The total earned rewards are less than half of actual produced results. It still remains fishy to me. Typically if something walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and looks like a duck; it is a duck. I agree, although possible, it is not really likely to have such an outcome. I am looking into it now. I'm on the same situation, found 9 blocks on the pool (for a total of 892,857 BDC), and got paid around 180,000 BDC. It's strange that such a huge differential is happening, maybe there are some found blocks that weren't paid (happened on other pool I was mining) I am now looking at the average statistics - there are some miners who were paid on average more than 200k coins per found block and some were paid less than 50k coins per found block (you were one of the least (most) lucky miners as you were paid on average 20k per found block). Whether you will be in the group of most/least lucky miners is a matter of luck and that is why pool mining is smoothing these differences. Wait a minute, how can anyone earn more than double the block reward per block on average? At most they should be able to earn the entire block reward on average, not an average of two times the total block reward. Is this per found block per user or total across the pool? Suppose we have two miners A and B with the exactly same hashrate. Both are submitting shares and trying to solve for the block and suppose that during 24 hours both have submitted 100 shares. However miner A was lucky and he found 50 blocks whereas miner B wasn't lucky and he only found 10 blocks. The pool has a total of 60 blocks found by miners A and B and because both were submitting equal number of shares both are rewarded by the same number of coins, i.e. A and B each will receive the equivalent of 30 blocks in coins minus the pool fees. As a result miner A has found 50 blocks but has only received 30 blocks worth of coins whereas B has found 10 blocks and has received also 30 blocks worth of coins. Therefore, average coins received per found block for miner A is 30/50 = 60% of the block reward, whereas for miner B is 30/10 = 300% of the block reward. |
|
|
|
Yeah I think they were stealing coins or screwing with distribution, I had found 32 blocks 3 mill worth of coins but had only received 1.2 mill through distribution. Things didn't add up.
When you find a block you share it with other miners who are also mining, so it could happen that you find more blocks than what you are rewarded for. If you don't like that this can happen, then maybe pool mining is not the best option for you and you should consider solomining. I'm aware of how it works. I've just never had such a huge disparity between blocks found and actual earned rewards. The total earned rewards are less than half of actual produced results. It still remains fishy to me. Typically if something walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and looks like a duck; it is a duck. I agree, although possible, it is not really likely to have such an outcome. I am looking into it now. I'm on the same situation, found 9 blocks on the pool (for a total of 892,857 BDC), and got paid around 180,000 BDC. It's strange that such a huge differential is happening, maybe there are some found blocks that weren't paid (happened on other pool I was mining) I am now looking at the average statistics - there are some miners who were paid on average more than 200k coins per found block and some were paid less than 50k coins per found block (you were one of the least (most) lucky miners as you were paid on average 20k per found block). Whether you will be in the group of most/least lucky miners is a matter of luck and that is why pool mining is smoothing these differences. |
|
|
|
pool.mn down?  They removed it from their list without saying anything. bastards stole 100k from me by the looks of it. Yeah I think they were stealing coins or screwing with distribution, I had found 32 blocks 3 mill worth of coins but had only received 1.2 mill through distribution. Things didn't add up. When you find a block you share it with other miners who are also mining, so it could happen that you find more blocks than what you are rewarded for. If you don't like that this can happen, then maybe pool mining is not the best option for you and you should consider solomining. I'm aware of how it works. I've just never had such a huge disparity between blocks found and actual earned rewards. The total earned rewards are less than half of actual produced results. It still remains fishy to me. Typically if something walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and looks like a duck; it is a duck. I agree, although possible, it is not really likely to have such an outcome. I am looking into it now. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
