Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 11:00:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 »
361  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 12, 2014, 11:19:33 AM
You can give neutral feedback instead. Thats why its there.

I didn't want to leave neutral feedback. Like I said earlier, when leaving negative feedback it states.

Quote
Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.

I'm using the system as intended.

I am not defending you or der_troll. Personally, I feel you've a vested interest, but I don't have conviction or the power to influence anything.

It would be an interesting case to see how the trust system works.
362  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 12, 2014, 11:16:44 AM
The trust should be removed in my opinion for a number of reasons.

First and foremost, his trust is a conflict of interest. If he owns shares of a competing cloud mining service then his trust will result in potential customers to not want to invest in the competition which will result in them buying the shares of the service he owns. This will result in his shares becoming more valuable. If he has a valid reason these users/companies should have negative trust then he should present evidence to someone else without this conflict.


Quote
der_troll -6: -1 / +0(0)   2014-12-11   0.00000000   Reference
Abuses Trust system by giving negative trust to all cloud mining services while promoting AMHash.

His trust is a conflict of interest. If he owns shares of a competing cloud mining service then his trust will result in potential customers to not want to invest in the competition which will result in them buying the shares of the service he owns. This will result in his shares becoming more valuable. If he has a valid reason these users/companies should have negative trust then he should present evidence to someone else without this conflict.


Quote
November 20, 2014, 06:04:19 AM - malaimult - password changed

I would sell it for the right price, couple of bitcoins would do I guess Smiley


I would urge you to use the seclog tool with caution. Its extremely useful as a warning, but you shouldn't use it to try and connect anybody who has some opinion.
363  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 12, 2014, 11:08:26 AM
It was a throwaway comment. He shouldn't be judged on the basis of that.

More importantly, his password hasn't changed after he made that comment so he hasn't sold it yet even if his intending to do so.

You have public evidence to support this, apart from their word?

https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php

regardless of it being in offtopic, it reads like he was willing to sell his account for the right price, being a couple of bitcoins.

Accounts in default trust get sold all the time. For instance https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=890434.0
364  Economy / Services / Re: [PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting on: December 12, 2014, 11:01:31 AM
Any new updates on the topic?
I think they were gonna start within a week.
:/
Sorry for being crtical but you guys should stick to what you say.

Also, why dont you guys start paying 0points for off topic board? That would be a great service to the forum.

This is how PrimeDice always does things. I would guess they would start it in the new year.
365  Economy / Services / Re: BitDice.me - Signature Campaign! [STARTED][ESCROWED] on: December 12, 2014, 11:00:07 AM
Do we really have to enroll again,  already 5 days last from the next period.

If OP don't want me to continue please pay me for those 5 days and remove me from the list.

I don't know what was my post count 5 days ago.

Kind regards.

If you didn't want any more part in this campaign you could've removed your signature after 8th. You've been complaining for the past few days so why did you keep on carrying the signature?

He also paid you 0.01 BTC as a bonus so that should cover for the two days extra you kept your signature for before you started complaining.
366  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 12, 2014, 10:54:32 AM
This is just stupid, I was posting this in Off-topic and this account is still mine. I did not sell it or it was offered for sale, it was stupid off topic post...seems Canary did not bother to take a look where and why it was posted.

As a member that was on default trust, comment of selling your account should be taken seriously and with consequences, i doubt many would trust you after writing something so stupid.

It was a throwaway comment. He shouldn't be judged on the basis of that.

More importantly, his password hasn't changed after he made that comment so he hasn't sold it yet even if his intending to do so.
367  Other / Meta / Re: ask a question? what does WTB stand for? on: December 12, 2014, 10:47:26 AM
WTG=Want To Giveaway

Not allowed by forum rules. Reported Angry

Tongue (joking)
368  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 12, 2014, 10:46:38 AM
Mabsark negative trusting exclusively rivals does look as serving his own interest.

CanaryInTheMine is active and have taken action by removing der_troll and putting a new trust on Mabsark. Now the responsibility lies with him. If it feels to the other trusted members or Theymos that Mabsark is abusing his privilege then CanaryInTheMine will be held responsible and would likely lose his status.

I think the trust system works fine, would like to monitor this and see how it ends.

Everyone serves their own interests. That doesn't mean they can't serve the interests of others as well though. Stopping scams before they can rip people off is in the best interests of the whole community I'd say. Wouldn't you? Those companies I left negative feedback on are not rivals. They're scams. If they're not scams, then they'd be able to provide some form of evidence of legitimacy. They've been asked many times by many people and simply refuse to do so. If they do so, I will remove the feedback like I said. AMHashs's rivals are CEX.io, Hashnest, KNC Cloud and PetaMine. Do you see me leaving any negative feedback for those services?

You can give neutral feedback instead. Thats why its there.

My comment was more on the trust system. I am not aware of the details of cloud mining to reliable judge your actions. CanaryInTheMine has taken his stance so now its his responsibility.
369  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BEWARE OF Raveldoni/SamTseudo on: December 12, 2014, 10:40:34 AM
Funny, a scammer reporting a scammer.

It takes one to know one.
370  Economy / Lending / Re: Offering Loans [No Collateral] on: December 12, 2014, 10:38:59 AM
Loan amount - .25 btc
return - .45
timeline - 14 days
btc address 13djLdTRAhDXraJj1Pbi3jVvtBPKWazcs4
Collateral - i have 8 origin accounts that i will put up as collateral.

Its up to the OP, but origin accounts are not easily cashable.
371  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: FS:: legendary account, on: December 12, 2014, 10:17:22 AM
Anybody willing to buy a legendary, default trusted account will be doing so to scam.

To any potential buyers, there is a good chance that you will be easily caught so be careful.
372  Other / Meta / Re: Communist style censorship on btc talk forum on: December 12, 2014, 10:09:05 AM
This is what they do to they when you confront the powers that be:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=890205.0

They discredit you, defame you, insult you and destroy you.

Watch out people.


What are you so angry about? That your scheme fell apart and you were unable to con anybody?

Long back I had posted in one of your selling threads that buyers should be aware that the selling accounts might be hacked. The way you jumped on it and started complaining showed that I had hit a nerve.
373  Other / Meta / Re: WHO must WE TRUST ? on: December 12, 2014, 10:06:57 AM
Imo the list for DefaultTrust should be occasionally reviewed to add/remove people who are trustworthy or gone to the dark side.

There is a normal check and balance process involved. CanaryInTheMine has now removed der_troll's trust, so if it later turns out that his judgement was wrong he will lose his status. Being on the default trust is a responsibility.

There has been cases recently where members have been removed from the default trust list.
374  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 12, 2014, 10:05:02 AM
Mabsark negative trusting exclusively rivals does look as serving his own interest.

CanaryInTheMine is active and have taken action by removing der_troll and putting a new trust on Mabsark. Now the responsibility lies with him. If it feels to the other trusted members or Theymos that Mabsark is abusing his privilege then CanaryInTheMine will be held responsible and would likely lose his status.

I think the trust system works fine, would like to monitor this and see how it ends.
375  Economy / Services / Re: BitDice.me - Signature Campaign! [STARTED][ESCROWED] on: December 12, 2014, 10:00:56 AM
Received 0.05 BTC + 0.01 BTC. Thanks!
Enrolling again for next period.

Posts (including this): 221
Rank (upgraded): Sr. Member
Address (same): 1CoDQxpfFRjkgCgYD9fCz3YeTsTcas4LdG
376  Economy / Services / Re: BitDice.me - Signature Campaign! [STARTED][ESCROWED] on: December 11, 2014, 12:18:42 PM
Sorry guys, with those jet lags I completely forgot about it Sad I will add small tip to everyone for this mistake.

You told sorry and still no payment.

This is already 4rd day of delay in which payment should be in my wallet.



He has always paid, give him some time.

Considering the vacations and trips he has been taking, I guess business has been doing well Smiley
377  Economy / Services / Re: BitDice.me - Signature Campaign! [STARTED][ESCROWED] on: December 09, 2014, 07:45:54 AM
Waiting for the payment. Would like to know too if the campaign is continuing.
378  Other / New forum software / Re: Any timeframe on the new forum software? on: December 08, 2014, 08:23:52 AM
Congrats! Proved me wrong. Enjoy your extra earnings from the higher ranked account Smiley

He is past that account now, no use in claiming it back. Maybe he can request it to be merged, though there was one request here which was denied.
379  Other / New forum software / Re: Any timeframe on the new forum software? on: December 07, 2014, 01:20:39 PM
I'm excited. I hope you can change your profile picture again then. Also I'd love it if theymos would recover my hacked account...that would be more important.

What is your hacked account? Must have been hacked long back seeing as this one is a Sr. Member.

According to his username and trust feedback, I think the hacked account is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=118045 . It has good trust feedback but it is FM.

   ~~MZ~~

I see that the account LOBSTER is active. Does this mean the account was restored?

If not marcotheminer should be informed as it is earning in his campaign.
380  Other / Meta / Re: Inactive accounts from 2009/2010/2011? What happened to them? on: December 07, 2014, 01:18:14 PM
Some would have sold hundreds and thousands for pennies when they thought they were making a killing. I can imagine they will be too disillusioned to come back to Bitcoin now.

Then there are those who may have forgotten their password, or created another account.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!