I missed this moment because my withdrawal was delayed my mistake when choosing BTC as deposit method while the match will start in 5 minutes I didn't realize that Dogecoin was available on Sportsbet ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) What are you talking about?? Sporsbet has instant deposit for BTC, no confirmation needed. I get my money inside 15 seconds of clicking send no matter how much I pay for tx. Just be careful you can't withdraw before your tx gets confirmed so you need to pay at least something. That is one of the best features Sportsbet has and one I have used many times since I don't like having large amounts of money out of my wallet. yes thats right, i always get btc credited instantly, its the best feature for me personally, cuz i sometimes deposit few mins before game , and i cant name another book that instantly credits btc With range 5 minutes before the game starts it still will be credited directly. If he deposits before that of course it will be instantly credited to his account, just don't do it 2 minutes or 1 minute before the match starts.
|
|
|
1. QPR - Over 2. Fulham - Over 3. Bristol City - Under 4. Blackburn - Over 5. Draw - Under 6. Hull - Under 7. Middlesbrough - Under 8. Luton - Over 9. Draw - Under 10. Draw - Over 11. Swansea - Over 12. Bournemouth - Over
SB Username : mitchr
|
|
|
1) Who will receive the ball first? Cardinals 2) Will the Cardinals cover the -6 point spread? Yes 3) Game total 51? Over 4) Highest scoring Quarter? 3rd 5) Packers total points? Odd 6) Cardinals total points? Odd 7) Aaron Rodgers to throw for 240 yards? Over ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) Kyler Murray to throw for 240 yards? Under 9) Davante Adams to score a TD? Yes 10) DeAndre Hopkins to score a TD? Yes Final Score prediction 32-24 Cardinals
|
|
|
Game 1: 8' 3 - 1 Leicester Game 2: 8' 2 - 1 Watford
|
|
|
Money line half and full time for Liverpool is too risky I think. Failed to win in several matches in the EPL Man United does not mean will lose again in this big game.
I did think it was risky, but I counted on a strong and fast start, which is what we got. Not so keen on Konate playing so far, he looks like he's finding Ronaldo and Rashford a bit too hot to play against but anyway, survive and got some clinical finishing in (from Keita of all people) and then a stretched leg poke from Jota (but Milner would have gotten to it anyway) so we're in a good lead -- even without our best players playing all that well. Might be imagining it but surprised we're focusing attacks from the left -- maybe we don't want to expose TAA too much. Millie injured himself but we're probably even more dangerous with Curtis Jones on anyway, just not sure about defending heh... Salah also scored the 3rd goal already, Ronaldo got himself carded (could even have been a red!) so now I just need to sweat on 5 corners (damn my corner selection) plus also avoiding they score 4 goals... would be a shame to lose this bet on a lack of corners though heh. Great so far at HT, since other Sunday game results not good for me. Only have myself to blame for believing in Brentford, worse for believing in Spurs. Very emotional game. I admit Manchester United deserved to lose for their rough game. I also didn't expect Ronaldo to only get a yellow card after kicking Salah's body on purpose, the red card was something he deserved. I think Salah and Keita were influential players in Liverpool's victory. Btw, too bad your bet lost on corners.
|
|
|
Great news about Innovation Lab. Could be interesting to see cutting-edge stuff come out of that. Big, big day today with Utd Liverpool and El Clasico and while I will be putting money down on the Spanish teams all eyes at Old Trafford. Superboost active so take full advantage, gentlemen. Feel free to follow my surefire Betbuilder heh heh. Money line half and full time for Liverpool is too risky I think. Failed to win in several matches in the EPL Man United does not mean will lose again in this big game.
|
|
|
You have a site with a pretty good interface, simple and complete in one box. Starting from ratings, reviews and bonuses from the gambling site.
|
|
|
So, we all knew Norwich are poor, but pity the guy who'd have put in 6-0 and still not get an exact score on this. Everybody wins with Chelsea on 1 single point, but really Norwich, do you have to go and gift 7 goals to Chelski? That's them cementing top spot with 20 GD. Not that I'm unhappy Mount got his hattrick -- who last bagged 3 goals against Bolton in 2019, when he was loaned out to Derby.
Havertz, Werner, Pulisic, etc: look away.
chelsea destroys promoted and bottom of the table norwich 7-0 ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) all participants picks on chelsea but none of us could get 1.5 or even 3.0 points ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I picks 4-0 on this match because I think Chelsea will win very easily but seeing them make 7 goals without conceding it made my prediction far from my expectations.
|
|
|
I don't recommend playing against the house. When playing online poker I just worry about them manipulating the game. I'm safer playing with real people.
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355816Rank: Legendary Current post count (including this one): 2397 bech32 BTC Address: bc1q5kmyx25yf7dg7q68xah8euewwvucs8k7vlfmua Merit EARNED in the last 120 days: - Do you apply for a specific region/language? No. Telegram Handle (optional):
|
|
|
I am a regular user of https://sportsbet.io/, So far it's good. It's very trusted and deposits and withdrawals are very fast. They are also offering a lot of games. Without KYC am using this website, But I have read There KYC Policies, Privacy and Management of Personal Data. If your Deposit amount is so big they can be asked for a KYC document. If they asked, you need to submit those documents. If you don't agree, they can block your account. So before making any deposits first read KYC Policies, Privacy, and Management of Personal Data. Depositing a small amount of money will be the best for a gambler, whether the site uses KYC or not, use KYC because we can prevent something worst that can happen to us and our money. Besides that, it is about how we can prevent losing big money in any gambling games because we do not know if their rule will be the same as before or will change in the future and we do not know about that. Yes, reading the KYC Policies, Privacy, and Management of Personal Data will be important and that needs our concern to know. Sometimes gamblers are also stubborn, only understand about playing without thinking about their lots of money there. When they can't get their money out of the site, they report to the support service or as we can see in this forum many of them complain about it. Though it is their own fault for not reading the T&C properly of the site they are playing on.
|
|
|
Count me in ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Just sent you a PM with my payment trx.
|
|
|
Just created an account, here is my username: mitchr
Thank you
|
|
|
Check out the results from our latest $5000 Wolf Race ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) I am curious, what was your best result so far? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) From the pic, the 1st winner of race has wagered 79 btc which estimated he lose during that run was 0.79 btc (because of house edge on wolfbet is 1%). With prize of 0.04 btc, it's still 20 times lower than his estimated loss. I know it's not always we lose 1% from our wagered, but it's highly happened He has a higher wagered amount than the players below him. It seemed he was just playing as usual with no intention of participating in the race. So if only, chasing the main prize of the contest is not at all and for him it's just a game.
|
|
|
Look at people's reviews about the casino regarding whether they pay or not, fair or not and see if they have a trusted license. I also prefer gambling sites that have a comfortable view.
|
|
|
but they can afford to get their license outright, whereas, some casinos they will only get the license once they are already doing good in business. we will see later on if this is indeed a one-man team. i noticed also that the number of players increased dramatically. hope they are showing real stats/players on their site and not bots. and btw, they need to remove the sports betting because they don't have yet. just add it once they integrate sports betting.
The banner in the main thread says clearly "Sports betting" so we thought that this site already had that but it doesn't and currently only has 3 games available there. Maybe they are still preparing it. The new gambling site with 100 active players is great. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Yes, I agree, if you compare the games between Spain and Italy, I'm more sure that Italy has a bigger chance As I said before most of Spain's wins were in extra time and penalties so if spain can draw then the chance is 50:50
Yes, Spain benefited from extra time and penalties. The only goal they got was from the touch of a Swiss player and there was no pure goal from Spain. Honestly, I can't predict Spain will win against Italy because if we look at the match, Spain doesn't have a chance to going further.
|
|
|
The market for casino's has been stretch up by this incident since people cannot go outside and the only choice for them is to play online since they cannot go outside to have fun with other gamblers. And I do believe that online casinos will became more successful since imagine how big the prospects they get and for sure other who tried to play at their online casino will provably stay and compete with other player online.
Playing at the casino is the old style, online casino is the new style. Especially if we use Bitcoin or other crypto to play our identity will be disguised.
|
|
|
|