Everything looks good for me, can you specify whats the problem?

@Holiday indicated that parity with gold was reached earlier.
Gold is now just 10 cents higher than BTC all time high.

I love it when people get it 

Name:   coinjedi
Posts:   184
Activity:   184
Position:   Full Member
Date Registered:   May 27, 2011, 01:37:11 PM
Last Active:   September 04, 2013, 03:27:22 AM

yBitcoin introduces Bitcoin’s story and its most reputable companies to discerning readers worldwide.

A free quarterly publication showcasing the best of the Bitcoin Universe, yBitcoin eloquently demystifies the most disruptive innovation since the internet.

Yup, everyone watching CSPAN that wasn:t already invested in bitcoin (maybe 10 people...?  )
learned about it just in time to come online and witness the market crash. Or correction.
Whatever you want to call it. I:m sure they:ll be real motivated to invest their hard earned money in it now  

So Tunstall just said "we" several times speaking about Ripple.

#bitcoin https://twitter.com/jerrybrito/status/402918026968039425

That would explain a lot.  This is why she was saying Bitcoin needs to do things which are impossible.  It was simply a way to advocate for Ripple the centralized alternative.

Sometimes "hacking" pays even more.

Whenever a sufficiently anonymous service is entrusted with bitcoins without sufficient collateral,
and the amount thus entrusted is large compared to the profitability of the service,
that service will cease to exist when the ratio of coins coming in to the coins going out turns negative.

Forgot username, and have been trying to e-mail admin... please respond so I can access my account

Hmm...

---

---

---

First, I have used BetsOfBitcoin for a couple of years. I REALLY enjoyed bets of bitcoin.  

That said, I would very strongly recommend against trusting them your money.



Here is why:


Coinjedi, the owner and developer of BetsOfBitcoin is (AFAICT) anonymous.

Depositing money to BetsOfBitcoin is exactly equivalent to "sending cash to a stranger on the internet".

This is a bad, problematic, entirely not acceptable state of affairs.




Coinjedi could run away with all the money entrusted to the site, at any time.

There wouldn't be any obvious way for users of the site to even reach him.


For example: If he "forgets" to renew the domain registration, he could just take the deposited money, and...

well... on second thought... he wouldn't even need to do anything,  other than forget to pay the bill.

That would be the end of it.



Those moneys have already been given to him, and the users of the site have no choice but to blindly trust that he will return them, according to his rules.

Now, when dealing in bitcoin... This trust model.... How do I put this...


History teaches that it often seems to work flawlessly for a time, a long time, until it one day catastrophically stops working with little or no warning.

The website in question mysteriously ceases to exist, citing "technical difficulties", followed by promises of "be back soon", followed by... radio silence forever.

And your money would be gone. And you would be sad. And there would be nothing you could do to get them back.


As for warning signs: The owner has not responded to users on BitcoinTalk for a month... The site seems to have fallen into disuse and disrepair as of late. SSL cert expiry, and so on...


So... yeah...

Does that answer your question?

I was thinking about the merits of having a forum category aimed at and for female bitcoiners to use.

That would be problematic, need to vet every poster that posts there, on a forum where people tend to value their anonymity?