I have not encountered NULS prior to reading this post. And so it is impossible for me to get impressed by this project or whatever technology or innovation they are putting on the table. However, it is highly untimely to talk of an altcoin's potential right now when the market is clearly siding with Bitcoin. Even top altcoins have not yet recovered from their losses. Although Bitcoin's dominance is going down below 70%, the altcoin market is not yet recovering and is still facing a more bullish Bitcoin in the weeks to come.

But to be fair, when I did a quick check on NULS, it is showing pretty nice figures.

NULS ROI            323.24%
Market Rank   #115

Let's see how it turns out in the months to come.

That is at most wishful thinking. Even Bitcoin halving does not guarantee a price increase, let alone a quick one. Adoption is always the key. It means demand. And so with the maximum supply finally reached, and the demand is increasing due to the wider adoption, it is expected that the price will move accordingly. Mining would still continue but there will be no more block rewards. Miners will be dependent on transaction fees.

The default ranking of CMC is by marketcap, from the name of the site itself. It is primarily showing rankings based on how much a certain project is valued. Other details are also shown though. Market cap is basically computed as price per coin in circulation times the total circulating supply.

The prices of coins do not matter that much in terms of ranking because of their circulating supply. Even if a certain coin is valued at 1 cent only if it has a much larger circulating supply than the coin which is valued at 1 USD, it will still have a higher market cap. If a coin is valued at 1,000 USD and has only 10 circulating supply, it will still remain at the bottom.

When crypto trading was introduced to me, I was too excited to try. It was more of a bullish season but since I was too eager to try despite the warnings of those who taught me, they allowed me to buy a good amount to start with. I was happy because I've made gains. Little did I know that it was primarily because the market was green all over. The bear season came and I was losing big time. That made me realize how hard it actually was to trade. I started hodling after that.

Another mistake would be chasing prices. If possible avoid that. Stick to your price and do the order.

The third mistake is sticking it out with some coins. That has made some damages to my portfolio. Follow the development. If there is almost zero, sell and make money with other coins.

Nope. These scam projects are not enough to kill the ideas of cryptocurrency. The most that they can do is to give crypto a bad name.

Do you think that Bitcoin will die if all altcoins will end up shitcoins? I don't think so. Bitcoin will continue thriving. And before these scam projects will significantly damage the reputation of some great projects such as Bitcoin itself and a handful of altcoins, they are already dead.

Think twice, mate. Red season is buying season, not selling. Wait for the green days before deciding to sell. DOGE is falling but so are almost all altcoins. I am more than sure that DOGE is going to make a rise when Bitcoin dominance will fall down. At the current dominance, which is at least 70%, you cannot expect altcoins to fare well. That includes DOGE even if it is holding on to the top 30.

#Proof of Participation
Campaign Joined: Signature
Bitcointalk Username: Hallmader
Bitcointalk Profile Url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=698356

Yes, they should be doing that. And since the spreadsheet as well as the checking of individual participants are not yet done, this entails a huge task. This will therefore take a long time.

As a matter of fact, their rule is that:


And yet if you look at the participants, I can see a lot of red. The bounty manager seems to be sleeping.

The bounty has been taking almost a year now. This is the longest that I have encountered. If I am not mistaken, it will end on September. So there are still 2 months left before it ends, provided there will be no more extension and postponement. And then, the information is that the distribution will take at least 6 weeks. So provided everything has no delays, it will finally be distributed in November. That is gonna be more than a year since it started.

Are you guys real supporters of this project? And in what way?

I'm sorry but it appears to me that you are paid for doing this. And sad to say, both of you have red trusts.


Would you care to explicate more on this "same enthusiasm and community managers?"

I've never been rude. That is not my personality. That is why I expect people not to be rude to me as well.

I only asked him through DM to avoid appearing a spam in the main bounty thread. I politely raised my concern with a thanks at the end. That has always been me. He interpreted it as a disturbance and proceeded to threat me with a ban. I wonder how a staff assigned to manage people treat a legitimate performance coming from one of them as a disturbance.

I took offense of course and leave, but not without a wish of success in the end. I was thinking this project could go nowhere if that is how a supporter is being treated.

I am extremely disappointed by this project.

I used to be carrying their signature and avatar but then I removed both of them when a rude staff of theirs showed intolerance and extreme hubris for a simple yet legitimate concern coming from someone who tried to help promote their project.

A threat for a ban is not the best way to respond to questions raised.

There was a time when china's stance against Bitcoin is on the negative. ICOs, cryptocurrency exchanges, and even mining were once made illegal there. So this is really a great improvement in terms of how the country is treating Bitcoin. This is going to have a nice effect on Bitcoin's value as soon as it is absorbed by the huge chinese populace.

The countries where Bitcoin is legal is rising by the numbers. And it is undeniable that this huge step by these countries will be a basis for other countries to consider the same. By and by, after one country after another legalizes Bitcoin, those which remain against Bitcoin will be finally convinced. The adoption of Bitcoin is the acceptance of new technologies that will push the walls of the playing field farther, giving the people an alternative mode of payment as a result.

Never join an airdrop that asks anything from you. That is not an airdrop anymore. By design, airdrops should be completely free. If in exchange for a dime of their worthless coins, you are asked to deposit a certain amount to prove your ownership, or provide your private keys and other private information, or even asks for your personal information, disregard it immediately. That is pure bullshit. As much as possible, you even stay away from airdrops.

It is always a battle of brilliance and skills and knowledge online. The two companies that you mentioned should be ahead of this battle because they have the resources to hire the cream of the crop when it comes to security maintenance. There are individuals who are really brilliant in their field that they can break security protections made my a number or team of people. This is a huge call to these companies to step up or get compromised once more in the future.

The more the better. I am still in agreement with this as far as the rise of new projects in the altcoin market is concerned. This is good because this will weed out the shitty ones. The tighter the competition the better for the market. Those that are high quality will prevail over those poorly done. The price is moving according to how solid the project is. It follows such line of argument.

No, the government should not interfere. They are responsible for them to pay their honest-to-goodness tax dues, to make sure that the employees are well compensated and protected, to see to it that the business declares everything openly, to propagate healthy competition despite bullish growth of some, and so on. The government is not even good at managing their very own backyard, they should not muddle with other private affairs.

I normally do not choose projects according to this basis. But if I were to look back at the projects that I truly supported, I guess the majority of them are already existing projects whose coins have already hit the exchanges and are doing very well. I know I have supported a lot of new projects as well but I can still remember a number of them that ended up at the bottom even if they seem to have the good product. It is safe to say that good old projects are more secure in terms of investment rather than the new ones.

Here in my place, there is an over-the-counter transaction for purchasing large volumes of BTC. But I prefer a peer-to-peer transaction. That would be the best choice. That would be much safer in terms of protecting your identity. I guess you are avoiding doing the purchase through exchanges for the same purpose. 

Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=53.0. This is the section where you might want to post your terms and offer.