I managed to send some Nav from Bittrex to my new wallet, but i Cant send back to Bittrex? It asks for password and then does nothing.....

my balance doesn't go down and it does recognise it as a valid nav address but just does nothing when i try to send locked or unlocked....

Any ideas?

EDIT: A restart after receiving fixes it, but it doesn't let you send after a receive without a restart...

this one can deceive us in first sight you might think that the coins are the same but looking closer you will notice one character that differ the two project I hope dev can give us more insight about it as we are moving forward for this promising coin to succeed.

Aphrodite isn't for the market, but for the GUIv2, the new redesigned version of the Wallet.

Sorry to crush your dreams

Yeah people often (maybe knowingly) keep saying that coin number somehow affects things that is simply doesnt. market cap is the only valuation a coin really needs to judge value. At present the market cap of Loyyal/Ribbets is around $500,000 which seems pretty damn cheap for a project of this obvious quality and potential. I personally plan to hold until it at least gets to a few million in market cap....at the very least.

Price wise we may also have some undervalue from the fact many released coins were supposedly lost by Cryptsy......not sure on facts of this though.

I can't see how the number of coins can make any difference unless you are thinking purely in terms of market price per coin?
The only exception would be a large proportion controlled by few or one persons - this can have a bearing on market speculation.

current available supply: 400,000 000 

Total supply: 1 BILLION

Source: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ribbitrewards/

The next DBIC DBIC was also trading at 200sats and suddenly bang.

I like the idea. I already have the coins and signature too.
1BTC very tempting 

Update:

This certainly is the way to go imo and more importantly it should seriously help with adoption, regardless of what the market name ends up being.

Its just going to be so much easier to market.  At the moment its just too hard to introduce new people to crypto in general and every coin has the same problem.  Its too complicated for most and they don't know what a wallet is let alone want to install one.  And why would they install a wallet anyway, without a market there is no reason.  That's why the market should come first in adoption.

You could introduce new people to the project by just pointing them to the "marketname".site and from there they can "install market" which I think is much more likely to happen by not mentioning wallet.  We don't need to mention blockchains, crypto-currency or anything technical at this point.  Once they have the market up and running they then can be slowly introduced into the messaging and payment side of things.  Its not going to remove all the hurdles for the new user but rearranging them in a way that they are more likely to start jumping them.

It has to be a lot easier than explaining to people what a cryptocurrency is.  They already know what a market is, just point them there and not a lot of explaining to do.

My market name picks: Haven and FreeMarket

I have used Lavapit and it works quite well. I have not used Nicehash with it (I used miningrigrentals.com), but I think the idea is still same.

stratum: stratum+tcp://lavapit.lavajumper.com
port: 6666
username: EVIL address
password: x

Does this not work?

Thank you once again for believing in EVIL. It looks like some people have been mining on lavapit... good to see!

In my opinion "Shadow Market" is just fine. It is based on the name of our coin, and selling out to politically correct forces is pure BS. At least in the USA we supposedly still have free speech. I think even that is becoming questionable if you look at the way people are being persecuted by the liberal leaning media and special interests. A little controversy is a good thing, and illegal intentions are only perpetrated by individuals. They always have, and always will be. Although I have started to question police and government control of many things I feel are protected by our disintegrating Constitution.

So my vote is don't sell out! Hope we see the marketplace in action soon!   

​
Community Discussion: Marketplace Name?

We've had lots of comments that the usage of the word 'shadow' gives us a negative connotation, that it is makes it seem that our project is only aimed at offering illegal services for darknet markets. The truth is far from the fallacy many seem to perpetuate. In fact we're hoping that everyone uses our platform responsably. It is up to the users themselves to make sure that the goods that they purchase is legal in their country. The world needs technology that is censorship resistant yet one thing remains true with all technological advances: it has its good and bad uses.
​
That is why we decided to invite the community to a serious discussion about the name of the marketplace.
​
Here is a list of the suggested names in alphabetical order:
​

• Aegis
• Anchor
• Dispatch
• Disrupt
• Enigma
• Haven
• Hydra
• Sekreta
• Trade-off
• Umbra

​