Hi guys,
I am holding some BCH at an exchange and would like to transfer them to a wallet, preferably a desktop wallet.
What is the best and safest wallet to store my BCH in?
Thanks
The recycle bin works well it comes free with Windows very helpful, great I do not think the recycle bin is a good place to store bitcoin cash trezor works better IMO |
|
|
|
The recent malicious news has given BCH some price drops. In fact, I'd like to see a sharp drop as my position is really low
you will need to verify your account by verifying email and phone number
You need to verify your email and phone number yea ok more like you want to harvest email and phone numbers to hack 2fa on exchanges. <<<<+1+1  |
|
|
|
Bitcoin whitepaper : A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdfTHE CAKE IS REAL   A SPECIAL SURPRISE PRESENT TO GO ALONG WITH THE CAKE https://news.bitcoin.com/gavin-andresen-drops-a-new-concept-on-github-for-bitcoin-cash/ The Developer Who Was Given the BTC Codebase Permissions from Satoshi Offers an Idea for BCH Network Gavin Andresen Drops A New Concept On Github for Bitcoin CashGavin Andresen has been lurking around Github for the past twenty-seven days, and on the second day of the new year, the developer contributed an idea for the BCH network. The concept Andresen called “Half-baked thoughts exploring a different way of implementing a fully-validating BCH node,” is an idea on shifting the storage of full transaction data to wallets. The developer explains the concept is to let every node in the new network store a bit-vector for every block which can be highly compressible even for gigabyte-sized blocks. The bitcoin cash community seems elated that Andresen has contributed a new idea for the BCH network. On enthusiast on the /r/btc Reddit forum writes, “ this is the first official confirmation that Gavin is building for BCH, unless I’m mistaken.” Many BCH supporters recollected the Tweet Andresen published this past November stating; Bitcoin Cash is what I started working on in 2010: a store of value AND means of exchangeProof: Dev bases decentralized the attack on bitcoin happened within the first 8 years. Now it is over. The weakness has revealed itself to be at the area between the keyboard and the chair. And now the proof of decentralized dev bases is present we can avoid this scenario from happening again I hope. |
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADVIHIpo0XM&feature=youtu.be&t=1h31m49sPlease watch and share this excellent video Vin Armani Streamed live 15 hours ago This week, we are pleased to welcome Jeff Berwick back to The Vin Armani Show. Jeff Berwick is an anarcho-capitalist entrepreneur and activist. He is the founder of The Dollar Vigilante and host of Anarchast. Thx , I love these dudes! Check out these other hot shots speaking about the CASH / CURRENCY part of crypto https://youtu.be/1JMH6pgHLjcTim Draper: why should I cash out in fiat? I is like going back from gold into shells! So selling BCH for BTC sounds exactly same. I love it! friction-less, no corruption, ... for now redeeming BTC for BCH is like applying for remedy in the court of public opinion  in 1792 with the 2nd judiciary act the courts knew 99% of the people would be satisfied with a check and any check would be redeemable at a bank regulated invariably by the legislative branch thus negating their ability to be a separate but equal branch. |
|
|
|
Is this the thread about Bcash?
..this might help |
|
|
|
It's not possible to have a real discussion here about why Bitcoin Cash would increase ? Because for now it only increases passivly thanks to bitcoin
bitcoin p2p electronic cash increases at a steady, advertised rate each block. Since it is bitcoin it does not need any other coin or permission to operate. There are many years of proven function. |
|
|
|
People still believe in this ? It has no reason to increase in a near future
haha yet another bitcoin whisperer ^^^ |
|
|
|
Fine. So if you would have posted something akin to: Take a look at this : Roger Ver “I think insider trading is a non-crime,”then that would have been a legitimate attribution. Instead, you essentially claimed that Roger said what Friedman said. Whereas instead, he quoted Friedman. Dumbass. And indeed, insider trading -- while illegal in some jurisdictions -- is a non-crime from the standpoint of not initiating violence or fraud against others. Perfectly defensible position on libertarian philosophical grounds. Dumbass. Incidentally, insider trading being illegal is a relatively recent invention. Just one more tool of statist control. This is true Martha Stewart was jailed for something that others do each day on the same land mass. But since there was a contractual agreement n place to not engage in the specified activity the action was a jail-able offense. And worse in Martha's case she was punished after speaking out her political views publicly which were against the current president in USA. The security law of 1934 was a direct response to the watering down of the cash and like cash instruments that circulated at par on exchange in 1933. It represents a protectionist measure using the arbitrary power of gov to influence where markets would, could or should not go. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin was made especially for: |
|
|
|
The specifications already are finalised and being used on the real chain
And no you cannot just close and double spend because when you closed the final balance is settled not the one you opened
Say I open for 1BTC with you and then send you 0.5BTC over LN and then close the channel we both then get 0.5BTC settled back into our wallets this is not double spending you are closing the channel in its current state not the state it was opened with
Tek , you always leave out important details. The whole point to the LN scams is the Time Locking as the whole thing is unsafe without. They might allow that in the testing trials, but don't expect it to be in the released version. You do realize you are giving out the exact opposite information of the LN Devs, which have always claimed the channels would be opened for weeks or months, claiming what you are claiming shows you are misinformed of what the final release will be like. Which is why there is no reason to speculate on it as that quick disable channel feature will be removed before public release. So until your vapor ware is released to the public and on the regular chain for normal use, quit the bs.
Plus are you saving up the million of US Dollars needed to buy that banking license to run a LN HUB. LOL. ╥Aztek And you are going round trying to inform people with old outdated information outstanding issues from very early alpha releases things move on the releases that are in use on testnet are identical to what will be used on mainnet thats the whole idea of a test network to test final code. And are you still trying to spread the LN banking FUD it's quite pathetic that you actually believe what you say either that or you just hope what you say is true you may as well go the full distance and say mining will be regulated and require KYC too since you are processing transactions and being paid for it not supported by strict rules of evidence. the ln schema as I have seen it you would be directly involved. trusting math was not just a catch phrase. It meant actually trusting math. You just did not see the problem. |
|
|
|
The specifications already are finalised and being used on the real chain
And no you cannot just close and double spend because when you closed the final balance is settled not the one you opened
Say I open for 1BTC with you and then send you 0.5BTC over LN and then close the channel we both then get 0.5BTC settled back into our wallets this is not double spending you are closing the channel in its current state not the state it was opened with
Tek , you always leave out important details. The whole point to the LN scams is the Time Locking as the whole thing is unsafe without. They might allow that in the testing trials, but don't expect it to be in the released version. You do realize you are giving out the exact opposite information of the LN Devs, which have always claimed the channels would be opened for weeks or months, claiming what you are claiming shows you are misinformed of what the final release will be like. Which is why there is no reason to speculate on it as that quick disable channel feature will be removed before public release. So until your vapor ware is released to the public and on the regular chain for normal use, quit the bs.
Plus are you saving up the million of US Dollars needed to buy that banking license to run a LN HUB. LOL. or are you just going to jail as a Money Launder. ╥Aztek Yeah after the 2008 "event" the buy price to open a bank was increased a lot. The funny thing is that capital requirement is what was normally used to loan from. But banks have moved from this practice many, many years ago. And yes the irony is lost on people I assure you. These days it is just a barrier to entry into a profession engaged in illegality. I will just guess if you need to ask how much is the buy in then you do not have that much lol. In the past 5 people could pool a million. These days it is much more than this amt. For background since 2009 like zero new banks have opened in the USA. And now we are starting to see further de-regulation for the banking industry across state and national borders. Since heaven forbid there should be any competition barriers to the industry that services the government granted private credit monopoly under one roof.. |
|
|
|
I just find the name just so convenient. This Bitcoin copy is not created on its merits, it NEEDS the name Bitcoin in it to give it legs. Ver has insisted on this in his mindless clip and my God he shows absolutely zero professionalism...ZERO. If the coin was so good it could be called underpantsgnome coin or zip coin and survive on its own merits. It seems to now have served its purpose at the expense of others, but benefited the antagonists. Its only a matter of time it will sink back into obscurity and be the base of so many more memes, and if you had just used some individual name people would at least give the merit it deserves due to its individuality. With all the FUD coming out about this Bcash with Coinbase and CNBC, its digging its own grave. This all could have been avoided if an individual name was used, but now everyone can see the play on the name was deliberate, the collusion that then ensued as well, will end this clone. BTW i got dibs on the underpantsgome coin so dont steal that!!!  you assume that people understood bitcoin from a technical perspective. Actions of core at best show they do not.. |
|
|
|
This person is also known as, bitcointalk troll Lauda (short for laudable ) If maxwell is Lauda that explains a lot. What a grotesque loser. protectionist alliances/ measures are often seen after the downgrade in the quality of an issue. Does Lauda/ Maxwell even understand that hope for betterment quote? Sometimes hope that people understand the meaning behind the words they assemble is wasted too I guess.. ~ In the top jural societies of scale the "judiciary in rebellion" model seems to be the 'in vogue' pressure relief option though all of recorded history says the surest way to peace on earth is the other direction for the nation state. What is good for the nation-state is supposed to be good for the family of nations just like what is good for the man and woman and family unit is supposed to be good for the nation state. To see rebellion be embraced as a business model should be concerning.. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
