If you get the "Sorry, this IP address has been blocked." message it means you have triggered our abuse detections systems. They think that the way you use the faucet indicates you may be either using a bot or multi-accounting so either your account and/or IP has been blocked.

Listen.


Where did I say it was easy to fake a transaction?

Giving a link to block explorer showing a transaction doesn't prove your snake oil system makes money.

Even if you did win a bit it doesn't mean that wasn't down to luck.

You're like a broken record just repeating the same shit.

You are so dumb. A withdrawal doesn't mean you didn't just deposit it to withdraw it.

Verify don't trust. I don't trust anything you say.

It could easily be.

Or you might just be getting lucky. That's how gambling really works. Some people get lucky and win. Systems don't help.

My PMs are open to Newbies.


Have a look at my trust page and click the link to see untrusted feedback.

User wetsuit (the OP of this thread and owner of freebitco.in) has left his endorsement there.

Please PM me the details in the confirmation email we would have sent you. If you have 2fa on and email notifications off then the tx id from your personal stats page will do.

I've just heard from wetsuit and I've asked him to have a look at this. My personal view and understanding is that sort of manipulation wouldn't work because there's a nonce on the client side. The argument that the server seed could be changed is negated by the fact you could easily implement a script that checked that before and after each roll. I'm sure there are enough sceptics out that have tried to catch sites out and have failed because they don't actually cheat. It really wouldn't be worth it, the site's reputation is worth far more than any individual bet.

But, but.... he's declared himself the winner of the debate twice already so it must be true. 

I've seen a lot of these idiots come and go over the years but this one's level of self-delusion and arrogance is right up there at the top.

I'll give you the same answer I gave Thirdspace:


I know he's going to start work on the rebrand soon which involves recoding the whole site from the ground up. That probably makes it a good time to discuss this. I have no idea why you feel the need to hide your identity but I really don't think you need to. We've got problem discussing suggested improvements.

I have no idea what you mean. Would you care to elaborate?

---

It means an email we sent you bounced back as undeliverable.

I had to go out so I didn't have time to deal with that brain fart of a previous post of yours. This conversation is about online dice betting and you use card counting as an example. If a deck isn't shuffled then the outcome isn't random so skill gives an advantage. It isn't relevant to this scenario in any way.

I have already told you this falls outside of my job description. If you weren't a wet behind the ears n00b with no clue you would know that I've been challenging people about their lack of understanding of probability and mathematics for 5 years here and only working for freebitco.in for under 2 months.


I'm an oldskool Bitcoiner so of course, the motto means something. Pretty crap looking T-Shirts though. That's why I don't trust your pony live stream. It doesn't verify anything. You could have already blown up a dozen accounts over the last year and just opened new ones. Explain what the system does and someone can verify the mathematics and probabilities.

I know you are a bit lacking in understanding but I've thought of an even easier way to explain the disadvantage of making more bets that even you might be able to understand (although I'm not hopeful).

For any given betting system there is a sequence of results that will result in them hitting their maximum loss. A small sample size is less likely to contain that sequence than a large sample. Surely even the village idiot can work that out, can't you?

Download it and try it the fools says.  Yeah because a sample size of one really verifies it. Not to mention, I'm not dumb enough to install software of unknown provenance.

To be honest I think there might be good reasons that the other sites haven't changed but I'm not really an expert in that field. It could be more about a matter of opinion as to which system is fairer. If you're concerned I'd suggest PMing wetsuit and having a chat about it. I know he hasn't logged on to the forum for a while, he's been away but should be back very soon. I think me getting in the middle of the debate would probably only confuse things.

So you really believe you're the first person in history to invent a betting system that can defeat a house edge over a large sample size of bets. I've done my best but arguing with a delusional fool is pointless.

I'll leave this here again but I doubt it will sink to you.

https://steemit.com/gambling/@seuntjie/why-botting-doesn-t-work-at-casinos

No, that's the probability that the result will be the expected value, ie. that you lost to the house edge. I only used the coin flip to explain in simple terms what convergence is in statistics because you don't seem to understand.

Ok, let's do it simply by going back to the coin flip.

If you flip a coin twice then there is a high probability that the result will deviate from the expected 50/50.

If you flip 10 times then the probability of 5 tails and 5 heads is higher than it was of 1 and 1.

If you flip 100 the probability gets closer to 50/50

If you flip 1 million times the variance from 50/50 will be very small.


What is so difficult to understand about that.

Download https://bot.seuntjie.com/ and use the stats windows and you can watch it in action. The longer you leave it running there nearer luck gets to 100%

Oh dear. http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Stochastic_convergence

No, I said many times before that making more bets will make the end result converge towards the expected value. The best way to win is to make as few bets as possible and get a higher variance of luck. If that luck is in your favour then you'll win.

That's something this guy understood. https://www.crypto-games.net/player/Correy972

You can't understand the first thing about probability to say that. However improbable a result is it still could happen the first time you try it. Like someone I know won their very first 9920x bet on another site.

Thinking that playing low odds makes it 'possible to push that inevitable loss into the future' is either deluded or just snake oil. I really can't tell which it is with you.

If you can fool people into using this then so be it but having a sensible debate with someone that comes out that nonsense isn't possible.

It is impossible you fool. You have no control over when the random losing streak comes. It could happen immediately.

You are not giving any advantage and anyone using this thing will lose.