Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 06:34:37 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 »
3621  Economy / Services / Re: XBTec ASICs. We pay for signature. Weekly payouts on: June 11, 2014, 10:29:10 PM
Looks like the list came out and no Senior/Hero members have joined.  If OP changes his mind and wants to try the larger ads associated with Senior members, let me know I'm still interested.

He accepted all members who applied.

I didn't "apply" because the campaign was closed and I don't believe in advertising for free.  Nonetheless, if OP decides he wants more Senior members, I'm potentially available starting Monday.   I'll send a PM as someone just above you suggested.
3622  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: June 11, 2014, 10:27:42 PM
nembie want to ask
66 freeroll starts every how many hours? Huh

It pops up after the previous one finishes.  Because that time can vary depending on how people play, there's some variation.  You just gotta keep an eye out if you wanna play the freeroll.

yes I understand, now 66 freeroll in 2-3 times a day just emerging

Usually it goes off quite a bit more times than that.  I haven't had the opporunity to play in several weeks (been too busy) but they usually finish in about 1.5 hours and then another one starts.  That's closer to 15 per day.
3623  Economy / Services / Re: WE PAY FOR SIGNATURE EVEN MORE. UP TO 0.0016 BTCs PER POST. WEEKLY PAYOUTS. on: June 11, 2014, 10:26:24 PM
I've been paid each week without issue nuff said

That's cute.

I guess you've said enough but for the folks who didn't get paid, or didn't get paid the correct amount, or tried to join and were never confirmed and therefore advertised for free then your 'nuff said' is about as meaningful as a math book to a horse.

Furthermore, the fact that you continue to work with this OP despite his faults dealing with others who have your same job means he can perpetuate the irresponsibilty.  Next time you might find yourself in the class of folks who were not paid and what will your reply be to the 'nuff said' dude who posts and says 'i didn't have any problem'?
3624  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: If bitcoin ever goes mainstream on: June 11, 2014, 06:28:06 PM
I think your predictions are a little on the extreme side.  While I suppose that a strong btc economy could destroy companies like paypal and weaken companies like visa/mastercard, it's hard to imagine all currencies everywhere folding in the face of the One True Currency.  bitcoin provides some measure of anonymity and a huge measure of convenience for a lot of types of transactions but fiat currencies backed by armies and armies are still going to be seen as a "gold standard" (pardon the pun) for the foreseeable future, imho.
3625  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Mandatory transaction fees on: June 11, 2014, 06:23:47 PM
Last time I played with bitcoin it was possible to send btc without paying a fee.
Why does the new qt client refuse to send a transaction without tacking a fee on?
Or am I missing how I can send a buck or three to someone without using command line and spending a day on google learning how to do it and not paying fees.

Don't forget that you can compile the software yourself and remove any mandatory fees the client wants you to use.  You can also manually generate a transaction with any number of libraries/wallets etc.   The main thing that you risk (which I think you know) is that your transaction never gets confirmed.  However, if you're not ready to use a command line or read things, you might be out of luck.
3626  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for data analyst, 50 BTC reward for a day on: June 11, 2014, 06:20:55 PM
My data is 1-10 of digital arrangement, is controlled by computer. I will provide data to you, then you are analyzed. No matter where you come from, as long as you have the ability to earn a day 50 BTC. Or want to have a Russian hackers in some sites can also take data
 Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley

This is too funny.  "Then you are analyzed!"

I think I want to have Russian hackers in some sites, send them over and we'll have tea.
3627  Economy / Services / Re: XBTec ASICs. We pay for signature. Weekly payouts on: June 11, 2014, 06:15:22 PM
Looks like the list came out and no Senior/Hero members have joined.  If OP changes his mind and wants to try the larger ads associated with Senior members, let me know I'm still interested.
3628  Economy / Services / Re: Up to 0.01 BTC weekly for YOUR SIGNATURE on: June 11, 2014, 06:05:21 PM
Payment received.  I'm square with bitmixer.  A good company, a good sig partner.
3629  Economy / Services / Re: Up to 0.01 BTC weekly for YOUR SIGNATURE on: June 11, 2014, 04:27:38 AM
hey bitmixer,

My old deal ended, wanting to come back to bitmixer campaign for now.  I replaced your sig and went to the signup.  I entered my uid and I see "active" but also "FAIL".  Since I'm trying to rejoin, I think it's expected that I didn't have your signature in the last seven days.

Fails:
May 28   Signature not found
May 29   Signature not found
May 30   Signature not found
May 31   Signature not found
June 1   Signature not found
June 2   Signature not found
June 3   Signature not found

What should I do about this?  I'll leave your ad in my sig space for 48 hours while I wait to hear back from you guys.  After that I'll have to remove it because I have a no free advertizing in my sig space policy that I have to maintain.

Looking forward to hearing from ya.


Hi bitmixer,

So now if I lookup my member id on bitmixer.com/signature.html it shows "active" and no "fails" and my last payment on 22 April.  Does this means I'll be receiving my next payment soon (as in, within 24 hours)?  If not, then there's something that I'm missing.  Let me know.

Still waiting on payment.  signature.html page shows no issues.  Can you check on this for me please?
Did you PM the OP?

PM sent, still no payment.  I suppose I'll hear from him soon.  I'll reply to this thread to let you all know how it goes.
3630  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: June 10, 2014, 10:10:30 PM

Thanks!
3631  Economy / Services / Re: Up to 0.01 BTC weekly for YOUR SIGNATURE on: June 10, 2014, 09:59:34 PM
hey bitmixer,

My old deal ended, wanting to come back to bitmixer campaign for now.  I replaced your sig and went to the signup.  I entered my uid and I see "active" but also "FAIL".  Since I'm trying to rejoin, I think it's expected that I didn't have your signature in the last seven days.

Fails:
May 28   Signature not found
May 29   Signature not found
May 30   Signature not found
May 31   Signature not found
June 1   Signature not found
June 2   Signature not found
June 3   Signature not found

What should I do about this?  I'll leave your ad in my sig space for 48 hours while I wait to hear back from you guys.  After that I'll have to remove it because I have a no free advertizing in my sig space policy that I have to maintain.

Looking forward to hearing from ya.


Hi bitmixer,

So now if I lookup my member id on bitmixer.com/signature.html it shows "active" and no "fails" and my last payment on 22 April.  Does this means I'll be receiving my next payment soon (as in, within 24 hours)?  If not, then there's something that I'm missing.  Let me know.

Still waiting on payment.  signature.html page shows no issues.  Can you check on this for me please?
3632  Economy / Services / Re: XBTec ASICs. We pay for signature. Weekly payouts on: June 10, 2014, 03:31:31 AM
Address: 1KFquKPNfq43opWK5Ej78me87bq1AzM3o2
Post count: 166

Some people don't read the entire thread before posting (I'll admit to having perpetrated this sin).  Some people don't even read the post directly above them Sad
I read it, but who knows, my post count may be enough to beat out some of the others with 50 posts.

Just an attempt, can't blame me for trying.

Fair enough, blame removed.  You are absolved Smiley
3633  Economy / Services / Re: Genesis-mining.com || Signature Campaign || Up to 0.15 BTC per 50 posts! on: June 10, 2014, 03:22:57 AM
I thought about joining here but I don't understand the pay rates and I'm disturbed that the OP doesn't seem to be replying very quickly to the questions.  Just my opinion.
3634  Economy / Services / Re: WE PAY FOR SIGNATURE EVEN MORE. UP TO 0.0016 BTCs PER POST. WEEKLY PAYOUTS. on: June 10, 2014, 03:21:34 AM
Reading this thread's history, I'm surprised that anyone keeps the signature of updown.

Not sure what others issues is, as I got paid on June 5th and I just joined on the campaign on June 1st.

The majority of people got paid, it's just a handful that had issues which I'm not sure of(didn't get confirmed, didn't follow up with the OP, paid incorrect member level, etc)

Don't let a couple of users sway your opinion.  Base it on hard facts, and directly contacting the source.  My original post wasn't confirmed for a few days, so I posted here in this thread and shot OP a direct message.  Once he confirmed me, I'd felt at ease.

Sorry to hear other's cases, but I fully expect to get paid my full amount on July 5th.

Well I wish you luck, but I can say that I posted trying to join, sent a PM as well.  Got ignored for 2 days then removed the signature.  In my opinion that's not the kind of person I want to work for.  If more people showed solidarity and dropped this campaign when others got mistreated (even if you got paid) then campaigns would know they have to behave in order to have people keep their sig.  Just my 2 cents.
3635  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: June 10, 2014, 03:17:04 AM
Type "#last bigbtc" into chatbox to find out

Nice tip!

Is there some list of seals chat commands?  I tried to ask the betbot about my trust and it got angry at me.  Since then I've been scared to say anything with a #.
3636  Economy / Services / Re: XBTec ASICs. We pay for signature. Weekly payouts on: June 10, 2014, 03:15:29 AM
Address: 1KFquKPNfq43opWK5Ej78me87bq1AzM3o2
Post count: 166

Some people don't read the entire thread before posting (I'll admit to having perpetrated this sin).  Some people don't even read the post directly above them Sad
3637  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: June 09, 2014, 11:09:10 PM
FWIW, the probability of rolling a "4" 1 million times in a row is infinitely greater than 0.  Something with a probability of 0 is impossible.  Something with a probability greater than 0 is not impossible, no matter how small.  IMHO, conflating impossible with improbable really muddies the waters in these kinds of discussions, so I'm trying to avoid that.
Well, if we're going to get technical... you can't divide by zero, so you can't say that it's infinitely greater than zero Wink

Good point, that's a subtle mistake, but you're right.  In my mind, I was thinking about the fact that division by zero is undefined, but I made a mistake by suggesting that that implies a nonfinite relation between the result of division by zero and some number.  In fact, you simply can't compare NaN with a number.  Nevertheless, I think this strengthens my real point which was that you can't get any closer to impossible by making a small probability even smaller.  Likewise, multiplying a finite number so many times that it becomes inconceivably large doesn't get you any closer to infinitely large.

Quote
But yes, I know what you're saying, and I almost corrected Micro myself before you replied.  However, there's an equal muddying of the waters when you say that there's 'a possibility' when the layman doesn't really understand just how incredibly small that possibility is.  In their mind 'a possibility' means that it is, in fact, likely.. that all it would take is a supercomputer.  Something about people not quite fully grasping the really, really small and really, really large things.  I'm not immune to that either - I can't wrap my head around the size of the universe (as far as we understand it), nor around things like poisons that need only a pinhead's worth to kill you.

Thus, "for all practical purposes, you can consider that to be on the level of 'impossible'."

I should have specified that I wasn't looking for the layman's version.

Quote
As for the rest - yep, you got it.

Note that I should place an asterisk beside my suggestion that you can't tell a program to only generate addresses that match a certain criteria, as some people have tried to attack a similar problem (Bitcoin mining) using SAT solvers.  However, I'm not convinced their approach is actually fundamentally different and when I looked at it last, it would give an imperceivable advantage on a small stage of the process - while implementation in an ASIC would be nightmarish at best, so it has no practical purpose there.  I can't readily imagine a situation in which it would be of help in vanity address generation either, but my math only goes so far Smiley

Thanks for the follow up.  If you know of a good thread with the techinical details, drop me a link.  I think MICRO's link to the main page of the bitcoin wiki is only so helpful Smiley
3638  Economy / Services / Re: We pay for signature. Weekly payouts on: June 09, 2014, 11:00:12 PM
PD               0.0006
Updown       0.00085
FXO             0.0009

I think not really that low , but if XBTec increase their rates to 0.0009, it'll be the best offer for Full Member and many people will join this campaign :0

PD's rate is a bit lower, but they have the most people willing to join because of the reputation of Stunna.

If OP is willing to use escrow, he could get many people even at current rate (33% higher than PD for full members).
but stunna (PD) has planned to increase rate on 17 of may and also start weekly payouts.

It's reaching the 17th of June... surely he would increase it this time?  But I think that he wouldn't really have to, he IS the only open and most trusted campaign out there.  Might also join this campaign, but I highly recommend you accept escrow.  I can also help you escrow the funds if you wish, OP. Smiley

bitcoinformation already has a little over 1btc in escrow from the OP.  Read upthread.
3639  Economy / Services / Re: Up to 0.01 BTC weekly for YOUR SIGNATURE on: June 09, 2014, 10:42:59 PM
hey bitmixer,

My old deal ended, wanting to come back to bitmixer campaign for now.  I replaced your sig and went to the signup.  I entered my uid and I see "active" but also "FAIL".  Since I'm trying to rejoin, I think it's expected that I didn't have your signature in the last seven days.

Fails:
May 28   Signature not found
May 29   Signature not found
May 30   Signature not found
May 31   Signature not found
June 1   Signature not found
June 2   Signature not found
June 3   Signature not found

What should I do about this?  I'll leave your ad in my sig space for 48 hours while I wait to hear back from you guys.  After that I'll have to remove it because I have a no free advertizing in my sig space policy that I have to maintain.

Looking forward to hearing from ya.


Hi bitmixer,

So now if I lookup my member id on bitmixer.com/signature.html it shows "active" and no "fails" and my last payment on 22 April.  Does this means I'll be receiving my next payment soon (as in, within 24 hours)?  If not, then there's something that I'm missing.  Let me know.
3640  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: June 09, 2014, 10:36:25 PM
Just trust me it is IMPOSSIBLE to get same address as somebody else. Its just impossible even if u have world most powerful computer.

Lol, maybe you're just abusing the phrase but 'just trust me' is exactly the kind of answer I'm repulsed by in this context.  I'm trying to educate myself about some abstruse facts and mere "I'm right" claims aren't convincing at all.

Furthermore, you still seem to be missing the difference between the definition of IMPOSSIBLE and IMPROBABLE.  I've got nothing against you personally but it doesn't seem like you're the best source to go to for the maths on this one.

Cheers.
Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!