-snip-
Ironically, he now doesn't have any evidence, the post was deleted by a mod (for some unknown reason)!
Its offtopic to the auction. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Does badbear specialise in trust? I thought it was Theymos that did that?
Everyone manages their own list. Since the default depth is level 2, BadBear's list has reach for all that do not modify their list. E.g. I am on level 2, so unless you set your depth to 3 it does not matter for you who is on my list or who is excluded via my list. Also, unless given negative trust by a trusted user, that is more trusted than another user who gives the person poisitive trust, the user will then be in the untrusted list.
Again, the score does not matter. Trust or not trusted is decided by those that have the power to do so. |
|
|
|
Well this seems interesting as most(maybe all) users that have negative feedback are removed from DT
They aren't automatically removed, it is done manually by the person with the negative trusted user on their trust list. For this user to be removed, Badbear must remove him from their trust list. Who manges then the DT as i see that master-p is removed but his alt not? theymos manages the user "DefaultTrust", those on level one (e.g. BadBear, escrow.ms, tomatocage and doog) manage those on level two. |
|
|
|
-snip-
he will remain on Default Trust Level 2 until he is given an overall score of -1 or less (which means he gets removed from 2-3 Level 1's trust lists) or is removed from BadBear's trust list
-snip-
No negative ratings can remove a user from the Default Trust Network, BadBear has to do it manually or has to be "overruled" by two others from level 1. I see it as: Trust:  : -2 / +9 That is because you are using a custom trust list. The rating listed in the OP is what you will see if the default settings are used. Yes, forgot to add that, thanks. IronMarvel is an alt of master-P according to Quickseller. theymos also confirmed that there is IP evidence that says IronMarvel is an alt of master-P Theymos also asked explicitly to not use it as sole evidence. -snip-
Well this seems interesting as most(maybe all) users that have negative feedback are removed from DT
I have not modify my default trust list ever but it's not just me that i see red.
Well, usually the negative ratings only stick if they are valid, thus it makes sense to remove them from DT. |
|
|
|
I checked this user profile trust summary https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=289011 and saw that IronMarvel is counted in Trusted feedback even though IronMarvel has negative feedback -2: -2 / +2The question is how is it possible? Let me know if I should move this topic to Meta.I'd say this thread is fine where it is. As I understand it: • Anyone with positive trust rating is in your trusted feed back section No, only those you trust are in the trusted section. Who you trust can be modified, by default its those on default trust, e.g. me. And
• Anyone that has been given positive trust from a member in your trusted feedback, they also get a trusted feedback "spot" in your section.
Im not entirely sure I understand it, but it sounds wrong. So, if you left positive feedback on a user, or they have positive feedback from a person in your "trust network": they will show up as being in your "trust network", possibly even if they don't have positive trust themselves (as one of the trusted members has given them positive trust).
EDIT: In your example, it will be "Blazed" who has more than 300 trust points, outweighing the negative trust with the positive trust.
I see it as: Trust: : -2 / +9 A user can have negative trust and be trusted at the same time. The rating and whether someone is considered trusted are two different things. IronMarvel is an alt of master-P according to Quickseller. They are on BadBears trust list which puts them on Default Trust level 2. If you want to remove them from your personal trust list, go here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trustand put them in your list with "~" in front of the name. This will explicitly make them untrusted no matter what anyone else in the network thinks. |
|
|
|
Sofern du nicht mehr als 100 Adressen insgesamt erstellt hast, sind deine Bitcoins nicht verloren. Du kannst den Bitcoinclient auf deine normale HDD ziehen und dann die Wallet nochmal in den Ordner kopieren, den Client starten, die Console öffnen, den Privatekey dumpen (dumpprivkey <Adresse>) ggf. deine Walletpassphrase eingeben, dir *als Beispiel* die Mycelium-App ziehen und dann da den Privatekey importieren. Dann hast du erstmal deine BTC wieder und kannst diese entwieder irgendwann mit der App an eine andere Adresse verschicken oder den Privatekey in deine neue Wallet importieren. Hallo Christian, und danke für deinen Rat! Es ist ganz schön kompliziert.  1. Wallet kopiert und gestartet. Er laedt die Blocks, ich glaube das wird ein Paar Tage dauern, da ich seit 2 Jahren nicht rangegangen bin. 2. In der Console Privatekey dumpen. Frage: - Soll ich warten bis der Wallet geladen ist? Ist einfacher zu warten, aber exportieren kannst du die keys jederzeit. - Unter Mac habe ich wahrscheinlich andere Befehle.
Nö, die konsole ist Teil von bitcoin core und somit für alle gleich. - Ist die <Adresse>, meine Bitcoinadresse?
Ja. Die andere Methode mit Walletpassphrase ist noch schlimmer, weil ich kein Walletpassphrase habe.
Ich habe Qt aplikation.
Dann einfach direkt dumpprivkey 1adresse eingeben. Wichtig!! Den privaten Schlüüsel darf niemand außer dir sehen, sonst können die BTC weg sein. |
|
|
|
-snip- EDIT: and btw, this is the sequence:  and this is x = y - 2^n:  Given the numbers we are dealing with you should probably use a log scale. |
|
|
|
|
I confirmed the PM as seen above, the page was loaded while I watched so there is no way that it was changed by inspect element. The PM is also common for btcfast. Considering everything its very likely that there is an imposter (btccfast) that is watching the thread and adding people over skype in the hopes that they dont double check the username.
I will leave a neutral rating on btcfast's profile, maybe it can help that others will be more careful in the future.
|
|
|
|
I have no problem, even though I'd rather share the screen via Skype or TeamViewer. Tell me a username of a reliable person
Well EcuaMobi would've been great but seems he's gone offline, along with the other highly trusted guys, Vod , Shorena, Blazed(the ones that I do talk to some times heh). Trying Mitchell, lets see Im here now. If you want me to take a look. can you do a new account on Skype please? Let me see what they require. I will send you PM shortly. VM is already booting. |
|
|
|
Merged your changes with my previous changes as I've updated: - Include a ChangeTip link in the donation section
- Removed PayPal coffee link in the donation section
- Added a small text in the donation section about the fact that donations will be shared
- I'll copy the donation section in the advertisement section when nobody has bought it
Yay, no more paypal! Love it. |
|
|
|
I have good reason to believe that what was stated in the OP is true.
State your "reason" publicly if you are not afraid to put your reputation on the line and end up looking like a fool. There can not be such reasons period. We work with people who prefer to work anonymously for bitcoin - isn't it what bitcoin is all about - FREEDOM? What Islamic State? Come up with something that at least sounds more believable! We already reported this post to moderators, we hope people should not be allowed to create disposable accounts to damage others reputation with these ridiculous and baseless accusations. So selective freedom? The thread will not be removed. Anyone here is free to make a fool out of themselves by posting absurd theories. If anything your temper is tarnishing your reputation. There is next to no believable evidence that the accusations by the OP are true. The interesting question is why it makes you react the way you do. Edit: got a spell checker |
|
|
|
No TX ID, not a single confirmed post. Did I miss something?
The .onion link posted (blockchainbdgpzk.onion) is simply to the TOR mirror of blockchain.info (see TOR section), so this TX 'b80fb2ed29b34c672d2c5cbc28a7e43192c6a9d0267f34324317209b0c679c72' is viewable on the clearnet also. This shows 0.06 BTC being sent to the address of Badjacks99, as shown on this image and posted here: Bitcoin address: 138JRWPx31YiGUs33iovowuWYHBtBuRP99
Along with the proof in the post above, I think it's fair to say this campaign pays. What confused me was that the link to this TX was labeled as "all are paid" (not exact words) while the TX only paid a single person up front. The onion links are fine, as you say I can just use the TX ID and search via clearnet or use Tor. So they got paid individually, thanks. Moved to A -> http://pastebin.com/tfYWr2X8I also moved the other HR campaign as they seem paid as well (found several confirmation posts). |
|
|
|
I have no problem, even though I'd rather share the screen via Skype or TeamViewer. Tell me a username of a reliable person
Well EcuaMobi would've been great but seems he's gone offline, along with the other highly trusted guys, Vod , Shorena, Blazed(the ones that I do talk to some times heh). Trying Mitchell, lets see Im here now. If you want me to take a look. |
|
|
|
This is mine 1PMMjnnha1eUSa9bzyN93EApYLyN1qCRmv
|
|
|
|
|
Screenshot with skype handle?
|
|
|
|
The link goes elsewhere. I only found this: All eligible users have been paid according to submitted spreadsheet.
No TX ID, not a single confirmed post. Did I miss something? |
|
|
|
I made this only because at the end of the day all members will start making calculations so as to which campaign is paying more irrespective of their payout behavior.
You have state this by yourself, anyone are free to do this on their own and doesnt need to add another table on the OP about this one since it will just messed the OP up. It doesnt actually really worth calculating since most of the campaign are full and not everyone going to reach the maximum post for the approximately payoutThis. The list is not usefull for the majority of users. Also, why per month? I like getting paid each week. Someone else might have a difference preference, etc. Sorting a list by an arbitrary number of max posts and the BTC you get will increase maintenance and only improve it for a few users. Since its not possible to sort by different things as long as we are limited to the forum, I think the current sorting is fine. Hi betcoin.tm is closed to new partecipants  but I think is one of the best for members rank. Ill take a look and post an update soon. updated -> http://pastebin.com/eHZQihye |
|
|
|
thank you payment received. Same here, thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
