Ma, da! Ne znam što ljude čini tako naivnima i lakovjernima? Mislim, jasno mi je da to neki čine iz pohlepe, ali koliko moraš biti glup da daješ novac strancu koji prodaje nekakvu priču o brzoj i lakoj zaradi? Kao da nismo imali već dovoljno takvih slučajeva u prošlosti... I to nije počelo sa kriptom, ljudi su se 'palili' na razne ponzi i mlm sheme već desetljećima. Od pisama u kojiima si trebao poslati jedan dolar na nekakve adrese pa do 'nigerijskog princa' koji je tražio novac mailom...

The achillescoin.com domain was previously used for a scam/dead coin called 'Achilles [ACH]'.
A newbie member WinTroy posted this ANN back in 2018.

What attacks are you talking about? Exposing scammers on this forum is considered by most legitimate members not an attack, but rather an effort to protect this community from bad people.
Let us know if you have any arguments to refute the evidence presented. I'm sure all DT members will take your arguments into consideration.

As part of their fair-usage policy, some adblockers pretermit certain ads. You can usually turn off this option in the settings of many adblockers, including AdBlock Plus, which calls it 'Acceptable Ads'. Also, you might try some of the other popular adblockers if this does not work.

In light of what others have said already, I think you need to clarify your question. What do you mean by 'the basic theory to play within a multiplayer'?

Many different versions of classic dice games can be found at casinos, but the basic concept remains the same: players bet on the outcome of a pair of dice. Unlike physical casino, online casinos use a provably fair random number generator instead of dice. It is also possible to play multiplayer versions, in which players compete against each other, but the specific concept of each game will vary.

I don't think it's a phishing site or a fake casino website. Upon clicking the links on that website, you will be directed to this url:

So this is just cleverly designed referral site for Roobet with a similar domain name. I wonder if it is allowed by Roobet's referral program T&C..

However, I do agree that important websites should never be accessed via search engines, links on third-party sites, or email. It is always safer to enter the site's URL directly into the browser's address bar, or to navigate to it using saved bookmarks.

Even more concerning, there are no terms and conditions nor FAQ at this casino. According to the owner, they are not needed because everything is straightforward, but my experience strongly suggests otherwise. As I see it, the terms and conditions are an important part of any casino because they represent a contract between the player and the casino, which ensures both parties' protection and compliance. Casinos, regardless of whether they are regulated or not, must adhere to some rules and guidelines. And expecting players to just blindly deposit their money in a platform like this is absurd.

I haven't visited the website in a long time. Blackjack.fun's new design is attractive, and the dark blue background fits well with the rest of the website's UI elements.
The site is easy to navigate and a little bit fun, too. There may be a need for additional filters or sorting features for the games available. For example, sorting by popularity, house edge, or some other attribute would be useful.

In addition to what Wikipedia indicates, I have come to the same conclusion based on my own analysis as well. 1xBET and 1xBIT have much more in common than just similar names and the same gambling software.
I'm still waiting for 1xbit_official to explain their true affiliation with 1xBET (1X Corp N.V.). The only explanation they've offered is that 1xBET gambling license does not include the 1xbit.com domain, which proves absolutely nothing.


@1xbit_official, can you explain, for example, why 1xbet.com and 1xbit.com websites share identical verification meta tags in their source code?

---

edit: fixed broken images

No, it's not a bad translation but a bad copy-paste. I'm not sure why OP tried to rewrite parts of the original article even though he copied most of the content anyway.

The exact quote from the article the OP was referencing reads:
"Cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, have heretofore been in a legal gray area in Ukraine, the seventh-most-populous country in Europe. Nonetheless, blockchain data firm Chainalysis ranked Ukrainians the top adopters of cryptocurrency in the world in September 2020."

"If the bill indeed is signed into law, banks will be free to take on crypto company accounts, while citizens who own it will have legal protections in case of theft."

Apparently, the OP performed some kind of word spinning over the article that completely altered its meaning.

No, the OP never contacted me via PM and I noticed this topic only after you mentioned me.

My negative trust ratings are only left in cases where financial gain is involved, and when there is valid evidence of scamming behavior on the forum. Based on a closer inspection of these three accounts found by YOSHIE and AhmadM, I'm pretty sure they're connected. According to Ninjastic.space, there are multiple entries to various bounty campaigns with an interval of just a few minutes between them, which would be practically impossible if it were just a case of accidentally copying an authentication post from a random member.

First time I've seen such a thing on Bitcointalk.  

There are several articles and documents on the official fda.gov website which include the contact information mentioned by the OP, so I assume the information is valid. Nevertheless, this doesn't mean the real dr. Wolfgang Kainz is the author of this post; therefore, it will be interesting to see what response (if any) NotATether and LoyceV get. It is very difficult to imagine how the FDA can possibly be involved with "tracing cyber criminals involved in cryptocurrency theft".

According to Transfermarkt, Adeyemi is currently valued at € 20 million, which isn't that much, but his value could be much higher by the time RB Salzburg is ready to sell him. RB Salzburg has no reason to sell him for a low price at the present time because his contract runs until 2024, and if he continues to develop well in the future years, his price might double or even triple. 
Besides FC Bayern, Barcelona and Liverpool are also reportedly interested in Adeyemi, according to Bild.

According to elsalvadorinfo.net, the minimum wage in El Salvador ranges between $ 243 ($1 per hour) for agriculture and $ 365 a month ($1.5 per hour) for the commerce, industrial, and service sectors. The cost of living for single person ranges can go as low as $ 300 and higher than $ 1,300 per month, depending on the person's lifestyle and living location. In comparison to other Central American countries, this places El Salvador's cost of living somewhere in the middle.
Now I'm not exactly sure how much the real estate costs are (they probably vary a lot), but according to some sources, a two-bedroom house outside the capital can cost as little as $ 20,000. This is certainly a thought worth considering.

Some people believe gambling is a quick way of making money or other cool stuff. For example you win a lot right now and you can use this money to buy a new car, or maybe even a house. But at the end of the day, nothing comes out of it, that is, you lose even more and it takes you long to win back your money and that car you may never have.

That's why the gambling problem is something nobody wants to talk about but it is actually really common. If you want to stop gambling then it is highly advised to seek for help before it gets too late. Also to work out the cause and not the effect. This is a more effective and safe way to stop gambling.

So the next time you want to gamble a little, remember the possibility of losing your money and not gaining anything at all. That's why I agree it is a good practice to only play for fun not for money.

I doubt it. The SEC vs Coinbase case is now likely to dominate all attention.

edit: But I agree, some mainstream media use every opportunity to write scaremongering pieces about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general, when they should be highlighting bitcoin's potential and positive impact on the world.

So this is the main reason for yesterday's dump?


source: https://twitter.com/coinbase/status/1435448395091615747

It's interesting that the market reacted hours before the news had even been published. Was it a coincidence? Or were there some insider traders at work?

Nema manjeg ranga od Hero/Legendary u Stake.com kampanji.

U pravu si što se tiće računice, 25 postova u Stake kampanji donosi $56,25 tjedno za Legendary, odnosno $43,75 za Hero Member-a, što je nešto ispod prosjeka u odnosu na druge kampanje. Jedina prednost koju vidim je što u Stake kampanji možete nastaviti spamati pisati i nakon 25 postova tjedno i biti ćete plaćeni za njih (doduše, samo $0,60/$0,50 po postu +20% bonusa za Gambling sekcije) do maksimalnog iznosa od $100($125)/tjedno.


edit: Sada vidim da je i Daniel91 odgovorio slično.

Why do so many people compare blockchain to a bank? Blockchain is not like a bank, it doesn't hold your "safety deposit boxes". It doesn't even record the amount of coins someone has at a particular address. Blockchain is a distributed digital ledger. You can think of it as a database that records all the transactions that took place on the network.

So we have a real mystery here!