Message verified.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

This is Lutpin confirming a 0.150 BTC loan to yahoo62278 (u=355846).
Today is 05/19/2016 and the txid is: 5d059ecd6d4792e2d0448860c3d3fd31978426cea644ae96517b9f98abe06ee4
0.165 btc are to be repaid on or before 06/03/2016 to the address
1LutpinR5wPfGiQn6KHwCx8brWUtEQLBen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.53
Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto

wsBcBAABCgAGBQJXPi1BAAoJEA7Kduu367QNCTIIALk2/35Jut/NQYF7zyPRnbAb
L0GE7nkHf1yaEQdzJHscDSP6xgQU9hVZmu+MBdkIrkDiKNopMwLG9jvgPW6OiosM
KYD0x8THezN+agZ8g3fyT+ZtpqNXAYsoUYKVNdawvTNlpz3WeVIEExfUS5ClE1yg
rlCKEYfJKfxJLWg9D+uDjILYzc9BZfjuTo85aCYkKFAwc8UomGlm0ekofFu31mVK
gZ7egvoFM0VIhskmjfONCqUp6cQIoVqP0i92Qm+NcCXPdSw0qro4Qk7JgT/2Pc3Q
HsOg+gBLq8AYxuNR6U829XOFZUIvs261k/9bIiNSOp2fpZLWBletbukW/sg/2To=
=vSNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I can do that, if you sign a message with the terms of the loan.

Crypto-Games.net might be something for you.
Several altcoins supported (eth for example), and besides dice, there's also slots, blackjack and a lottery.

So the funding would not represent the face value for 3/4 of the coins, which seems kinda awkward to me.
That also screws up the total fundings of 12.5BTC. You could sell them unfunded in that case, IMO.

Sounds more like a hater to me.

According to them a little earlier in this thread, all coins are supposed to be (going to be) funded:

(That's another 0.125 on top of the coin prize.)

Don't forget to delete that address from your signature in that case (or just change it to the new one).
And of course from your profile aswell.

If you find any more open auctions with that address, a warning post for those might be reasonable aswell.
I've skimmed the last few sites of his posts and haven't found any, but maybe there's some long term auction open or... (I don't browse the auction board regularly).

(Derailing the thread a little bit, sorry for that, but since it seems to be the topic at hand).
Yes, agreed.
Going back in my post history, I've warned users at several points about this site/similar sites.
They still seem to pop up every now and then when vanity addresses are being discussed.

I wouldn't want to see another 0.26 being stolen from him.
Just saw this auction, noticed the payment address in OP, and recalled the other thread from yesterday about exactly that address.

Just to check back before the winner sends you any funds:
According to my latest information[1], it's not safe to send you funds into that particular address, right?

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1476782

Depending on how the gold plated ones turn out, and on their price, I'd be interested in #25.

You're wrong there, just because something isn't exactly banned doesn't mean it's being supported by the forum.
We could display all the reasons here once again, but that has been done over and over already, so there's little to no sense in doing so.
Also, I fear you might not even care for it.

That's already a pretty big campaign, most campaigns we've recently seen are alot smaller.
I'd suggest settling for a smaller campaign, and giving the edge to quality over quantity.

About your question, it's hard to say, there are just too many other factors besides the size deciding how much a campaign costs.
I can however make a few examples.
Secondstrade (a pay per post campaign, not the best example, but the one closest to your size) pays out around 1BTC every week, however, that's a campaign with very low rates and many spam-posters.
If you were to run a fixed campaign (I will take rollins rates here for example), that 1BTC could easily get 20BTC+, even higher, if we would use the rates of other fixed campaigns.
And that's just pure payouts, not included here are costs for the signature design, the manager, the escrow (if used), etc.

As you can see, costs can vary a great deal, that's why I think it's better to decide a budget first, and then find a campaign style fitting for it, rather than searching a size/style, and then trying to press it into your budget.

Last round, the forum advertising spots went for 1.05BTC the cheapest. A month would need you to win a spot in 4 advertising rounds, estimating at 4.2BTC.
Due to the wide range of signature campaigns, that can be either cheaper than running a month of a signature campaign, or it can't be.
About the effectivity, theymos usually posts some stats together with the auctions.
However, whether or not that is "better" than signature advertising, I can't tell you.

---

Yes, there are ways signature campaigns use for this.
Either a minimum quota of posts that have to be made in that section, or an additional payment for posts in that section, or...
Anyway, you can focus your signature advertising to attract a certain type of poster.

It was this account that requested the loan, if you purchased that account with the open loan, the duty of cleaning out that debt goes on to you.
Either do it yourself, or work it out with the previous owner, but either way, get clean with it!

That might work for the lender, not for me.
In net, that leaves the lender with a 0.1BTC loss (which might be ok for them),
with something like that open, I can't justify removing my feedback.

Contact me after you paid what you owe, fully paid it, and we might work something out.

No need to batter Mitchell with PMs about this.
He usually updates the thread after a pastebin has been posted, or more precise after a pastebin reviewed by shorena has been posted.

Since you won't stop to send me PMs about this thread, I'm going to say it here once and for all:
Regardless of all other things, my main problem is the 0.12BTC lending debt tied to this account.
As long as you don't come clean with that, my trust will stay just the way it is.
And I really don't care if the lender would settle for a 0.06/0.02 repayment, ofc he would, that's more than he got right now, which is nothing.
Also, that "remove the neg  and I will repay" shit doesn't work on me. First you repay what is owed, then we can talk about trust.

And has an open scam accusation against them. Not what I would call one of the "trustworthy gambling sites".

Maybe. i can try, not sure if you'll get it though.

He isn't. He's banned from posting on this forum (and therfore banned from sending PMs aswell).

He's a user of this forum and has to follow the rules. Rules that apply to anyone just alike.
If others don't have problems, that's probably because they haven't violated the rules.
OP however did.

Spamming.

That's different. Some campaigns run just for a few weeks or a month, others are open since 2014/2015 and still running.
It depends on what you're looking for, quick/short term exposure on a big scale or rather some long term/lasting advertisement.

That can be less or more. The very basics would be selecting the users to enroll, keeping a track on the participants and counting their posts.
Other additional parts might be making the payments/escrowing the funds and a few more.

For new campaigns and new businesses, it's usually best to escrow the funds for the campaign. In that case, your campaign manager and escrow take care of the payments.
If you're not up for escrowing, the campaign manager submits you the payment information (based on their calcuation, usually the addresses and the amounts going with them) and it's your task to pay them on time.

You can post them around here or if you want to, you can also shoot me a quick PM with some more in-depth questions.

amalref hasn't been here for over 2 months, but you can ask your questions straight away,
I'm sure amongst those following the thread will be some to answer them.