well i don't care what you think, if you are mad because you were worthless and can not catch any shit out there, it's your problem
the fact that you still think it has to do with volume, prove that you were not able to do anything with instamining
so see you with your next shitty reply, good bye
|
|
|
suprnova fron is down is the pool working at least? Yeah this coin is anti CPU-ASIC.
Basically if you got a Celeron/Sempron it will hash at the same speed as a 8 Core Intel i7 CPU.
mining with i7 3770 with 0.01 to 0.02 kh, is this normal? seems normal, my x3220 (Q6600) is hitting 0.01 kh too damn i got two old cpu's hanging around an e8400 and a phenom old gen of some sort..gotta put these babies to work ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) i'm at 0.03 with 6 core utilized and a 4790k, with 8 core will probably be 0.04
|
|
|
it's your problem if you were not that fast and can not catch the coin fast enough to make profit, there was a setup to have(like folder of %appdata% already open etc...) to catch the first block before everyone else, besides a good connection
but for me it always worked, there was no profit to calculate it was all private, you seems to not understand this, because it has nothing to do with how many crypto you downloaded, it has to do with being fast before everyone else, so that screen prove nothing
and i think yes you wasn't that good at it either otherwise you would know
it was working like this
you instamine before everyone else(not always possible) but basically 90% of the time there were blocks for you, i was fast enough to catch at least 5-10 block on each shitcoin, this was already a guaranteed of 0.2 btc(shitcoin were evaluated much more before)
then you start immediately to sell it on the official thread, and it was always a win situation, because back then there were plenty of newbies who were throwing money at crypto, tnx to doge influx
some times you need to wait the exchange and dump at the first pump, then you repeat with a new coin etc... it has ALWAYS worked for me, there were no risk at all and all gain
sry but i made like 10-20 btc on this using 2 gpu, yes you heard right 2 gpu only with virtually zero risk, so the one that don't know what is talking about, it's without a doubt not me
|
|
|
whattomine was useless back then, the gems were the new launched coin each week, never heard of leafcoin?you must be new here then... i made 2 btc there in 2 minute of instamining
like i've said, i instamined the shit out of this place in 2013-2014, so i know what i'm talking about
then instamining was not working anymore because they learned and made 0 block reward for the first 100 block plus diff retarget kimoto gravity/temporal and all that crap, so everyone was using the rental with big hash to early mine as much as possible and speculate on exchange
still there was big early profit with some coin and random pumping/hype like for roxcoin(this was part of those coins that were pumped one time after they hit exchange, big enough to make a very good profit, then it dies), made 0.7 early, by early mining it when the reward was high
Oh yeah, the good old golden times for crypto miners when a couple of coins launched each day. Spamming F5, downloading the wallet while also pointing all your rigs to the address of the wallet that's not even downloaded yet, starting it, closing the typical first launch bug error, restarting and watching as you flashmine the first X amount of blocks is a great experience. And it was sometimes stupidly profitable. Bensam can't seem to understand that you didn't need to invest anything - other than time. Most of the time you only had to mine for minutes, maybe hours. That's hardly an investment in exchange for dozens of blocks. Most of the time you would have had to mine for days to earn the same amount of coins once pools launched and the difficulty ramped up - and you could earn that in a matter of minutes if you were one of the first. I have all the wallets that I have ever downloaded and used which is now over 250 - and I mined some coins to most of them. yeah this is what i was talking about, you just need few minuts for each coin, some times even few second, it was hilarious and fun and the risk were always zero, because if you missed one, there was another the next day with the same potential, but this was more true early in 2014, not so much in the summer well sad for, but for me instamining was the best in 2014, it always worked like i've said, i know it's not common and not many were able to take advantage of this
but i did not lost a single penny, there were coin that were giving me 1 btc in 10 seconds(panda coin instamine, i still remember when i found 50 block in solo mine, before everyone else), and i'm not even joking
and no i'm not saying there is volume in private, i'm saying there is profit(much higher than you think) in private trading, which is different
And it didn't always work, like I've said. Just like bag holding on shitcoins. There wasn't always people around to buy your shit or even want it, which is why I never mined coins that didn't make it to exchanges. That's highly, extraordinarily volitile. If it somehow worked for you, you were suuuuuuper lucky and should consider yourself so, but it doesn't work that way for everyone else. Not everyone gets to win the lottery. Also anyone who says they've never lost a penny while speculating is full of shit. Profit is pointless if there is no volume. You can trade one penny for two pennies and you're definitely turning a profit... matter of a fact, you're doubling your investment! But it's still two pennies and pointless when you put it into any meaningful context. Just like there are some coins you can mine with no difficulty, but they tank when you put more then one GPU on them. Volume is virtually synonymous with difficulty in the way they work. the only thing that i lost was some energy feeding my single/dual gpu, but only when the coin that they launched had problem, like wallet not working/no synch etc... and so a re-launch was needed, so you waste energy for nothing... not a big loss, i've calculated that it was at worst 250 euro for the whole thing, while it lasted
|
|
|
well i never said that a big farm does not need volume that is obvious, i just said that it was possible to do profit privately without big volume, some times
and this was always true for small miners
|
|
|
whattomine was useless back then, the gems were the new launched coin each week, never heard of leafcoin?you must be new here then... i made 2 btc there in 2 minute of instamining
like i've said, i instamined the shit out of this place in 2013-2014, so i know what i'm talking about
then instamining was not working anymore because they learned and made 0 block reward for the first 100 block plus diff retarget kimoto gravity/temporal and all that crap, so everyone was using the rental with big hash to early mine as much as possible and speculate on exchange
still there was big early profit with some coin and random pumping/hype like for roxcoin(this was part of those coins that were pumped one time after they hit exchange, big enough to make a very good profit, then it dies), made 0.7 early, by early mining it when the reward was high
|
|
|
what is the algo, suprnova say pure lyra2, a variant of lyra2? or just placeholder info? or this is simply lyra2?
anyway where are the specs for this?
|
|
|
well sad for, but for me instamining was the best in 2014, it always worked like i've said, i know it's not common and not many were able to take advantage of this
but i did not lost a single penny, there were coin that were giving me 1 btc in 10 seconds(panda coin instamine, i still remember when i found 50 block in solo mine, before everyone else), and i'm not even joking
and no i'm not saying there is volume in private, i'm saying there is profit(much higher than you think) in private trading, which is different
|
|
|
i was thinking the same at you until i actually measured it with my wattmeter, and the wattage were almost the same, so the tool is definitely working
wattmeter it's not needed anymore, there are very precise tool nowadays, like the nvidia one and the corsair link, tollerance is only +-5% max
if you don't believe me just try it your self, use the nvidia tool, and then do the ultimate proof with the wattmeter
Ok will check it out ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Can you still post your settings please? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Oh and drivers. I am using the latest 372.9 Btw are your cards also starting with 1900 mem instead of 2000Mhz? This really annoys me. yeah 3800, i'm not mining etheruem, i don't like that i need to OC the mem so much, it may be a bad thing in the long term last time i was able to do 100w 29MH, i posted it here few weeks ago ok i tested it now ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs22.postimg.org%2Fhobnm2hep%2Ftest.png&t=663&c=CH3Jx0m3hs9r2g) this is with the gpu attached to the monitor(not with the mining rig but the gaming one), 1440p so there is some instability, because i'm using the pc also for browsing and video, that's why you see 24MH as a lowest, but the average is definitely 29MH+
|
|
|
i was thinking the same at you until i actually measured it with my wattmeter, and the wattage were almost the same, so the tool is definitely working
wattmeter it's not needed anymore, there are very precise tool nowadays, like the nvidia one and the corsair link, tollerance is only +-5% max
if you don't believe me just try it yourself, use the nvidia tool, and then do the ultimate proof with the wattmeter
|
|
|
Getting strange results(wattage) with Gigabyte G1 1070(samsung mem):
ETH: 29.7@115W - core using lowest curve possible@1165, Mem +700@2250, 55%TDP, 0.793V LBC: 292@160W - core +200@2012, Mem -500@1650, 75%TDP, 0.931V Measured at the wall.
Also memory is always 100Mhz lower than it should be according to settings. Starts at 1900Mhz. Is that normal?
Hi, I have the same card but i'm at 24MHs can you help me to get around 29 ? Thx in advance Use latest msi afterburner beta with the details I have posted. To edit voltage-frequency curve press `ctrl+f` in the afterburner. @Amph Could you please explain how did you get to 30Mhash@80W? Did you measure that at the wall? Cant decide between lbry and ETH... ETH has high memory OC, but lower wattage. Lbry lower OC, but higher wattage ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) sry it was 90w, not 80w, 80w is not possible it was not my setup, it was a setup of another user here, he reached something like 31.5MH at 90w 55% tdp, +100 on core and +1000 on the mem Which miner , driver and OS you are reaching this score with , mate ? it's not me it was another user, i'm at 100w last time i tried it, also i'm not able to put mem at 1000, without artifact, it depend o your 1070 model sry it was 90w, not 80w, 80w is not possible
it was not my setup, it was a setup of another user here, he reached something like 31.5MH at 90w
55% tdp, +100 on core and +1000 on the mem
Then my guess is he just multiplied 160 * 55% = 88W. I am reading at least 115W with reduced core and *only* +700 on mem. Thanks for info ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) no he used nvidia smi tool to monitor the wattage
|
|
|
i was losing nothing with instamine back then, i made a shit load of bitcoin, in no time , with leaf, pandacoin, jackpotcoin, noblecoin, and all the other shit together
so yes it was working for me with few gpu, and no, it was working for the big farmer either, it was all about who instamined more, and no i'm not inexperienced at all
the trick was also to sell privately, and not waiting for the exchamge, in that case volume mean nothing, only speculation/hype about the coin matter
|
|
|
Getting strange results(wattage) with Gigabyte G1 1070(samsung mem):
ETH: 29.7@115W - core using lowest curve possible@1165, Mem +700@2250, 55%TDP, 0.793V LBC: 292@160W - core +200@2012, Mem -500@1650, 75%TDP, 0.931V Measured at the wall.
Also memory is always 100Mhz lower than it should be according to settings. Starts at 1900Mhz. Is that normal?
Hi, I have the same card but i'm at 24MHs can you help me to get around 29 ? Thx in advance Use latest msi afterburner beta with the details I have posted. To edit voltage-frequency curve press `ctrl+f` in the afterburner. @Amph Could you please explain how did you get to 30Mhash@80W? Did you measure that at the wall? Cant decide between lbry and ETH... ETH has high memory OC, but lower wattage. Lbry lower OC, but higher wattage ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) sry it was 90w, not 80w, 80w is not possible it was not my setup, it was a setup of another user here, he reached something like 31.5MH at 90w 55% tdp, +100 on core and +1000 on the mem
|
|
|
you can buy it here if you want, in the marketplace, in my country(italy) it's available and cheap enough, only 66 euro
|
|
|
that what i was talking about, also it's not like this was the first time i did this
i did this so many times that it was not even funny anymore, back in 2014, and always worked, honestly i don't care about the volume if i can get big profit out of a coin, that die the day after the launch
also not all coin need to be big, you have etheruem/lbry that gives you constant profit, and shit coin, that might gives you high profit early and then be uselesses, this is was always true here, and veltor was one of this
|
|
|
it was good to mine at the beginning to accumulate and speculate, the price went 10k, at the beginning the reward was much higher, was 7 time higher
also volume oon exchange mean shit, you can easily sell privately here, i did it many tme in the past, but obviously you don't know this
|
|
|
Anybody mining Thor's Riddle algo for Veltor ? Are we able to mine it? thx
I see it's sib algo.
it's not really sib, i tried with sib and it was not working, there was a version of epsylon that was able to mine it, maybe you can with 1.8.3 The original ccminer had sib replaced by Veltor algo. They both contain streebog into their chain, but are indeed different. Recent tpruvot cccminer supports both. ..and which coin uses that algo , I;m curious... VELTOR coin uses Veltor algo and SIB uses sib algo... I think.. VELTOR coin link. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1583655.0too bad it's not profitable at all, actually the profit is very bad, it was good to mine at the beginning, because the reward was higher
|
|
|
that's interesting, if faster than genoil
|
|
|
Hi guys, I'm interested about this miner, but it look very complicated thread ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) So... you can only get the one with the lowest speed, i don't know if the 30MH is already available on github, since pallas has the 35MH version
|
|
|
|