-snip-
the quintessential truth that despite his too-desperate attempts to prove his manhood with silly graphics and empty posturing, Mr. Nasty will never be able to get the girls like I can.
You might not want to know that history.  Wow, I should read upthread. That very well may be the single most twisted misapplication of the legal system which I have ever seen! Worse, I include statements by lawyers in that assessment.
He sneaks in a very distasteful lie on every other page hoping that somebody won't notice and debunk it. Is there any way I could shortcut all this “work to help others” stuff by purchasing a DT account from Quickseller?[1]
Of course you can, he is after all known for selling DT accounts to scammers. And I'm the dishonest one?  Actually, nevermind that. The truth about Quickscammer is as follows: "Obviously, QS pulled a questionable move with the self-escrow. Despite him being the target of much hate he continues to help the community.". At this point you might need a moment or two to absorb this. "continues to help the community"... by selling DT accounts to known scammers. A friend of a friend reliable unidentified source said that.
[1] I would expect one of the cartel members to use this, which is obviously not actual intent to purchase an account of any kind, as an excuse to tag you. Watch out. |
|
|
|
|
Given that most sections are essentially broken, the trust system is being completely played by backroom collusions and whatnot, the forum is a few little steps away of being the Bitcoin-Wild-West-Talk[1]. Account farming? Fine. Spamming? Fine. Scamming? Fine. Just make sure you don't offend anyone with your posts or you will be called a lying, racist, shady, trust-whatever-farming user that should be jailed. Liberalists at their finest. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[1] Therefore, nobody should be surprised that this affects your local board as the situation is similar in plenty of boards.
|
|
|
|
A friend of a friend reliable unidentified source said that an unidentified individual close to you/Lauda said that you’re the same person.
A friend of a friend reliable unidentified source said that if you were to shamelessly spread lies about OgNasty, you'd very likely get neg. rated (or excluded) by him. However, if Quickseller does this to others then it's fine.  On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet,
But as you know, I've denied being Lauda--explicitly. So if you're convinced that I'm Lauda then Lauda has denied it. Or do you absolutely need this to be addressed from the account whose user id is Lauda? It kinda makes me think you don't even believe your own bullshit. On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public. In the US court system, the accused will first either plead guilty or not guilty before they are tried, and get to see evidence against them, and I do not see any other reason why I would be obligated to allow him to see evidence against him before he makes his position on this clear. This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this. Lauda, you are one of the most trusted users on this forum. I myself would trust you with my life’s savings. I will also trust your sage advice.
Thanks. Stay vigilant. Please advise. Help me, Lauda. I am beginning to lose confidence in myself.
Step 1) Start tagging account traders. Step 2) Start tagging abusers (i.e. abusive account farmers). Step 3) Voila. You've severely impacted Quickscammer's business and thus are on his list of evil users. |
|
|
|
Start by changing your trust list to the following: ~HostFat
gmaxwell
~OgNasty
qwk
Vod
~Tomatocage
DiamondCardz
KWH
ibminer
~defcon23
Mitchell
~cyclops
Blazed
hilariousandco
~shorena
~jonald_fyookball
~CryptoImperator
~chronicsky
~Quickseller
Zepher
actmyname
The Pharmacist
Lutpin
Gunthar
SaltySpitoon
I'll take a look at the case in the meantime, although acting on this might take a while. You will notice my review is over either by me posting/updating this post (in case something isn't right), or by direct action (if I feel this has sufficient evidence). Also, watch out. Scammers are always out to get ya. |
|
|
|
How long does it take to receive a Gunbot license once payment is confirmed?
If you purchase from Gunthar or me, it's very quickly. If you purchase from some other website (automated shops), then whenever the seller gets on. |
|
|
|
'Nastyfans' is neither here nor there. It's just like a shell company. It could easily be made to appear to make a profit. There's nothing there but smoke and mirrors. A husk.
OgNasty hides behind this obfuscation because he lost his investors hundred of bitcoins. He should publish accounts in bitcoin terms and make his investors whole accordingly.
He doesn't seem to scam yet in matters where he can't muddy the waters such as straightforward escrows and holding theymos' (that other expert financier) dick er i mean the forum funds.
You've been already silenced, nothing to see here. It must have been me who told you this, right? /s |
|
|
|
Well, Sending someone a merit is someone's personal choice. You can't force someone to give it nor that someone can force you to give a merit. Infact i can give you one right now yet i choose not to.
That does change the situation? Obviously not. There is no point in hitting lauda or that atriz for a freedom that the system gives to its user. If you are really butt hurt then I suggest to instead improve. Fight back in a more professional way
Regards,
But why do people are people that are selling them getting tagged with negative trust then?  Here is a kind of double standard taking place. Selling is not allowed. There is no double standard. I thought that selling of merit was only disallowed for sources. Good point. I don't think that was clarified. Therefore, you can safely assume that it applies to everyone (buying merit is just outright dishonest, and very similar to buying trust). |
|
|
|
Non-withstanding the above, what you say is not even true. The most recent dump of the global trust list has 96 people explicitly excluding lauda from their trust lists, and 48 explicitly including lauda on their trust list. That is twice as many people excluding him as are including him. Further, there are 45 people who have excluded lauda from their trust list who have a UID equal to or less than mine (45 accounts that are old enough to be legendary have explicitly excluded lauda), while I estimate 24 accounts have explicitly added lauda to their trust list with a UID less than mine. I would also point out that there are a large number of accounts with lauda on their trust list that are very low the trust list dump. Let me guess, you're counting blackmailers such as this one: defcon23-/>Lauda
Totally-not-biased. NoxX-/>Lauda
NoxX-/>Zepher
Cases like these make it trivially obvious that the stats are easily manipulated (re: DeepOnion trust farming shills). Panthers52-/>Vod
Panthers52-/>Lauda
The dump is rather funny, either people who got busted for X, you and your alts (+-some minor disputes). |
|
|
|
Well, Sending someone a merit is someone's personal choice. You can't force someone to give it nor that someone can force you to give a merit. Infact i can give you one right now yet i choose not to.
That does change the situation? Obviously not. There is no point in hitting lauda or that atriz for a freedom that the system gives to its user. If you are really butt hurt then I suggest to instead improve. Fight back in a more professional way
Regards,
But why do people are people that are selling them getting tagged with negative trust then? Here is a kind of double standard taking place. Selling is not allowed. There is no double standard. |
|
|
|
I used to trade with Dank on occasion, even though he defaulted on a loan.
It's time. Free Dank! ~BCX~ Can we substitute OP for Dank? I'm sure most wouldn't mind.  |
|
|
|
What is getting to me recently is the defense used by Lauda when being called out are generally off-putting to me and usually lack substance. "I cannot confirm nor deny", name calling, "go away scammer", etc., which may be a reason why QS gets more traction from others than maybe he deserves, because it makes it look like Lauda is dodging or hiding stuff.
This is actually quite appropriate defense when said "criticism" is of the following type: All of those accounts deserved their negative trust. Creating a new account to spread the lie that I'm a pedophile is not criticism. If you actually intent to spend time properly addressing any concern-trolling-aka-smear-attempt, then they are easily going to drain your energy[1]. Either you are out, or you are drained to the point where you are barely able to do anything. Either way, the other side wins.
[1] This is a classic tactic from the book of fraudsters, very often used by Bcash scammers to smear Core developers with whatever (the same has happened in this thread, just directed at me). I expect you to know this, but I've stated it anyways. ...it is actually a little exciting to see DT1 members using their rights and being active in the trust area..
Excluding me based on my statements on the Bcash scam and tags on bcash scammers (which I asked theymos about before actually neg. rating several people), is indeed a *exciting use of their right*. |
|
|
|
You gotta admit you see their point.
There is no point. I can leave merit to whomever I want[1], wherever I want and in whatever amount I want. If you don't like it, then ask theymos to change the rules.
[1] This works when you don't have an army of alts (see Quickseller et. al.). Wow. Just wow. Leaving negative trust for others and admitting to engaging in the exact same behavior. I am embarrassed for anyone that still respects Lauda at this point. I spy with my little eye:  1:1 What you and naypalm did, the difference being that he transferred more points.
Oh wait, he maxed it out at 50! 
Fixed the sneaky out-of-context smear attempt. No wonder she left.  There has been no love in that shack for a very long time. |
|
|
|
I don't see any complaints for others DT members including Ognasty around this forum like I see for Lauda.
If you are friends with account farmers (see OP) and don't tag them, they won't complain about it. I have to say, I always got pretty scared to post in Meta, Reputation and Scam threads because of Lauda's abuses.
More butthurt smear attempts. Yawn. The lying troll got an acceptable rating. It is very much acceptable to tag someone with a chronic history of lying, especially new accounts (see statement on Bcash liars). You said you can give merit anytime for anyone you wish, but you tagged hoop for the same reason. Blazed wanted a proof of abuse, here it is.
I am Lauda and hoop is hoop. Has nothing to do with abuse. |
|
|
|
You can continue to keep spreading lies to try and damage my reputation, but it doesn't have the effect you think it will. You just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.". You are the one who has been doing what you accuse me of ever since your ill-attempted dispute with Lutpin. There's a reason for which people leave you[1].
[1] ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
Yeah I get that, my post was to do with the general principle, prompted by Zepher
Zepher left TMAN positive trust for valid, rather large, deals. TMAN has a dispute with OgNasty. You connect the dots. No-abuse-at-all. /s
It's just how the system always has worked, but it has never been abused (I think) at this scale. If you get kicked, all your ratings are no longer visible by default (thus nullified in a way). |
|
|
|
Presumably they were trustworthy and valued at some point in time, before the wind changed?
OP is an account trader and farmer. Ergo, why he started this thread and all threads ever about me (or similar). From his perspective, it is in his best interest that all those ratings get nullified. |
|
|
|
But why did you get excluded from DT list?
1 word: Abuse. The rest is trivial semantics. What a clusterfuck. I'll review your ratings over the weekend and if I'm still in DT by then - I'll try to repost as many as I can.
Just make sure you don't leave any positive ratings to TMAN, or it is going to be very likely that you will no longer be in DT. |
|
|
|
Begging for merit even once will earn you negative trust.
Why's that? How does begging for points fulfill this Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer. in any way? 1. a confidence game or other fraudulent scheme, especially for making a quick profit; swindle. verb (used with object), scammed, scamming. 2. to cheat or defraud with a scam.
Begging/buying/whatever credibility which you do not deserve/have not earned = fraudulent scheme. Quickseller is an expert in this subject. |
|
|
|
If that is the reason then you shouldn't care if the tag are not showing in their profile tab.
Intelligent, you do not seem to be. It is exactly the opposite. |
|
|
|
What if someone buys this on sites like Fiverr.com for merits ?
Equals to buying merit -> negative trust.
I'm watching this thread, no strong opinion on this. I think it might be in the scope of valid use of the system as it involves writing constructive content. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
