no it isn't you are just tossing around random conjecture that you think are worth something based on connections that you do on purpose to make your argument sound more legit, when it's not legit at all, please stop this thing about satoshi, i don't think anyone care who was satoshi anymore, satoshi himself don't want to be the leader and i respect his decision to be anonymous

they have starcraft 2 or starcraft broodwar also? i'm looking for something with these game, or maybe doom or other new fps, not always dota and LoL, getting boring after a while to bet only with those two games
brb i had a quick look and they support all the big starcraft 2 tournement, but the betting is fixed to a win of only 50% of what you risk, not sure if i would like this, and no doom sadly

try to remember that litecoin was worth 0.05 back in the past, going 200% now is not that fabulous, would only be a good price correction, litecoin was very undervalued for many months when ethereum and dash took the throne, you have now that those two coins are dumped and money move again to the next big train, which look like will be litecoin, i can see a 0.05 again like in the past better to buy now if you want a good profit

if bitcoin die, what would be the price of other alt in bitcoin? i think all the alt would lose value and die as well or becoming not that good as they are now, all the money are in bitcoin, which make all the other coins valuable, when bitcoin was going to fok with BU, the money were moving from bitcoin to dash and ETH, the strongest, this scenario can repeat itself every time bitcoin is in trouble, but it could also be that the money will move to something else, if bitcoin go down too much, like gold or stocks market

not sure man but $1000 invested in 1000 different alt, mean that you need at least one that reach 1000x or 10 that reach 100x or 100 that reach 10x, to me seems unlikely, one someone find a good alt that alt reach at best 10x and it happen one or two times per year, i think it's a bad strategy and he will lsoe money

but if satoshi changed it to 1mb there must be a reason right? we should follow what satoshi did and remain with 1mb for now, until better proposal are accepted like segwit, going back to 32MB is not a solution dude, it would make bitcoin suffer ddos and spam attack, because bitcoin don't need 32MB of block, i'm looking more forward to extention block than segwit, i like that new idea just need more testing

the government can ban bitcoin because they think bitcoin is making people avoiding tax, or making people use it for deepweeb CP, like in russia, or any other illegal things, but no government really banned bitcoin for now, ah well maybe bangladesh, but they can't ban people that use bitcoin, when they ban bitcoin they say, that if you use bitcoin they put you in jail, this scare people and make bitcoin less usable in that country

i would go with the fork that would come if bitcoin die, basically bitcoin can't die, because if it die like you said, they make it an altcoin based on bitcoin, with new market and value and everything begin from zero again, but if this is not possible because there is no interest anymore and this is the only reason why an altcoin may die, i could go with HLM new spreadcoin project, i love that project look very promising to me

NO evidence can be better than satoshi signing his address, if he can't anymore, there no way you can prove that john nash is satoshi, this https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2gzoxa/john_nash_is_satoshi_nakamoto/ all other way to say he is or he is not satoshi are pure speculation, and also satoshi stopped posting here in 2010, his last post was in 2010, that guy die in 2015, too much time between the last post and his death, i don't believe that he was satoshi

no i'm with you i can't think they need segwit, when they have the block time of 2.5 minutes, which everyone know that mean you have 4x the block size of bitcoin, but litecoin have no where near the same amount of tyransaction per day let alone 4x lol, are they , maybe pushing it to help bitcoin do the same decision? could be, there are plenty of manipulators here from all sides

it depend by many factorr some coins can be hold for a long time if you see the dev active and proposing new idea, other coins better to hold them for few weeks or one month and dump if nothing change, because i don't want to be a bagholder of shit coins, in the last category we have those coins that die quickly and is better to dump when they hit an exchange, it's a very risky and gamble world this one of crypto

5000 satoshi at least, i'm not selling for lower than that, mining is bareli profitable with 4000 satoshi, so 5000 is a right threshold imho


yeah but pos is very low, 0.002 per day is nothing at all but maybe the value will be very high? who know

sell and buy cheaper is a good strategy now that you ahve this situation, if you wait 0.055 you need to wait also for higher price to sell right? very unlikely now, bitcoin is going up and all alt going down


yeah it look like it, and the price speak for itself, ethereum is going down and down, i can't see anymore any 0.1 like this thread was predicting, but still 0.04 is a very high respectable value for a coin that also have the biggest marketcap after bitcoin

i'm sure that when the debate will end about the block limit and scaling, bitcoin will go much higher and $1500 would look like a joke or new bottom, $2k and more is the value that will come if everything go well, no more bad news are coming right? well nothing can stop bitcoin now from growing, and check it, japan government already approved bitcoin as a legal currency, this is huge and will boost the value greatly

i see your point mate, and LN and other shit are not bitcoin to me too, blockstream also it's centralized crap, what iw ant is that everything is done with bitcoin alone, not any other party, in the bitcoin discussion, there are other proposal to the block solution, which don't go away from decentralization too much, it's called extension blocks

yes bitcoin has the value backed by the miners and their consumption, bitcoin has a minimum value which is equal to the consumption of miners i think, and the real value which is the one that a users is willing to give to it when buying, we can also say thta the blockchain have a value, because it's a new technology, and like anything revolutionary it hold a good value

ethereum is not centralized, but buterin dumped a big amount in the past and this make it like it seems centralized, because a single person holsding that much it's bad for the coin, and ethereum supply is like bitcoin, there is a limit but it's much higher, making it less rare, afaik only doge has infinite supply, all other coins can be mined until the reward end

what killed this coins, back in around 6 months ago, was that the mining was private with more speed for some miners that had an optimized miners, now we have access tot hat speed, and this made the coin more recognizable imho, and also now this coin is on bittrex, in the past this coin was only on yobit, which is known to be a bad exchange already

yeah profit of etheruem is better, one 480 rig can do 0.01 per day, which is very good, for instance the antminer s9 is crap in comparison and consumption is also very bad, it's always better to mine if you want to accumulate, because mining is profitable for now, the only bad thing is that with mining you generate in a slow way your coins with trading is faster but more risky

why you say that fee are not enough to pay for the pow network? fee is the final point of any pow network that don't have infinite supply like doge, doge could in theory get rid of fee, if they did not already, other standard coins need high fee, which can be made higher if the coins become big among the comunity, and accepted everywhere, and the only good example is bitcoin
there were some deflationary coins in the past but they didn't work good, because the first investors had more coins that the one that come late, and they dump everything on the new investors, same for miners, i don't like the first come first serve idea behind deflationary coins