hello,  sérieusement vous pensez vraiment qu'un ETF va être validé par la SEC en cette fin octobre, car la SEC parlait quand même vachement de régulation avant tout ce tapage sur les ETF (gary gensler avait fait un tweet concernant les cryptos il y a peu où il disait qu'il fallait réguler et qu'après on pourrait jouer); c'est pas possible qu'ils soient une fois de plus reportés à 2022? si tel est le cas que pensez vous de la réaction du marché face à un éventuel report ou même encore a un refus?  Merci!! Ben c'est fait pourtant, l'ETF de Proshares a été validé par la SEC et il sera disponible sur les marchés dès lundi normalement. https://www.newsbtc.com/news/bitcoin/bitcoin-etf-receives-approval-from-sec/C'est une tres grosse news mais il faut garder la tête froide, l'annonce du lancement des contrats futures sur CBOE et CME avait fait pumper le prix à mort avant de crasher après leur lancement effectif. Il y avait également eu le même buzz autour de Bakkt. |
|
|
|
|
Les 60k sont testés. Comme d'habitude c'est monté d'un coup, il faut donc s'attendre à ce que ça baisse de la même façon lorsque ça repartira vers le Sud. Malgré l'adoption du Salvador le cours reste toujours tres volatile avec des accélérations (et des ralentissements) toujours aussi brutaux et saccadés.
|
|
|
|
The object of this topic is to make public record of the loan of 0.0011 BTC I'm requesting from user: Saint-loup My proposition is that I engage myself to repay on a delay of one month Ah, tiens! 3J33YE4mgwvJerQJkP1RGYvWcGkj78bjeB Tu t'engages à rembourser d'ici combien de temps? Ouvre un thread pour que le deal soit public. Un mois ? j'y vais ? Thank you SL My proposition is that I engage myself to repay on a delay of one month So before the 14th of November 2021 I have sent 0.0011BTC to 3J33YE4mgwvJerQJkP1RGYvWcGkj78bjeBhttps://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/3357a24e7d3d0e779b42adc5d9cb815d38a9ae048d010c1a10a4fc671f7250aa No collateral has been committed by Danydee. https://archive.is/ezBuo |
|
|
|
Greetings, as a long term freebitco.in user I noticed yesterday that it doesn't have the option to claim Reward Points bonuses anymore. Can anyone else confirm this? Will they be back? I really enjoyed those bonuses because by claiming above 12 times per day every hour you paid of the bonus AND add another 100rp on top every next hourly claim! I collected the surplus unitil I could activate BTC Bonuses to get better claims. Taking away the RP bonuses will really hurt my claimed amounts by A LOT!  Pic of the bonuses I can claim today (14.10.2021):  With the Wheel of Fortune free spins too many people were certainly able to reach the 100 000 Reward Points threshold without gambling anything, then it wasn't sustainable anymore for the faucet. Increasing this threshold or decreasing the number of RPs given for free could have been another solution but they obviously chose another alternative. |
|
|
|
|
Essai de poll pour avoir le feeling de la communauté pour l'organisation d'un concours de prediction pour l'election de Miss France de cette année comme cela a été fait par d'autres les années précédentes.
|
|
|
|
Un début de reprise de l'épidémie serait observé... Je sens que la fin du mois d'octobre va se tendre sérieusement... et que ça sera juste les hors d'oeuvres avant les mois de novembre et décembre. Si il n'y a pas un retour des gestes barrières ou des mesures de confinement, on est à la veille de quelques surprises je pense. BILAN QUOTIDIEN
Bien que modérée, la remontée des cas de Covid-19 semble enclenchée. Ce mardi, Santé Publique France a décompté 5880 nouveaux cas en 24h, soit 5% de plus que mardi dernier. |
|
|
|
L'application est devenue obligatoire !?? Que veux-tu dire par là? Tu as simplement l'obligation de présenter un QR Code valide lisible par l'application TAC Verif, ton QR Code tu peux le télécharger sur le site de la sécu mais pour la vaccination on te l'imprime directement sur place généralement. Donc non il n'y a pas besoin d'utiliser l'appli, ni même de la télécharger, il suffit de garder une photo de ton QR code dans ton telephone ou un papier où il est imprimé dessus. C'est une fois tu as dit ça, quand on ne "Quote" pas généralement, le message fait référence à quoi ? Tu as quoi? c'est ton petit verre de 11 heure, et tu déchaîne ? ! Un peu comme asche? quand il rentre du travail  Pardon de n'avoir pas compris ce que tu voulais dire... mais en relisant je ne comprends toujours pas. Et je ne dois pas être le seul puisque personne d'autre ne t'a répondu visiblement. Donc que voulais-tu dire exactement? (C'est la première chose que je t'ai demandé dans mon post d'ailleurs) |
|
|
|
C'est officiel, l'eglise catholique a fait plus de victimes en France que les terrorsites barbus. 330 000. gamins c'est pas rien. https://wng.org/sift/bombshell-french-report-spotlights-sexual-abuse-1633463409je suis content que mes parents ne m'aient pas envoye au cathechisme etant gamin. Les plus cyniques diront, qu'aucun des gamins n'a ete tues, donc les barbus sont toujours les mechants de l'histoire. Oui il semble qu'il y avait réellement un système installé au sein de l'église avec des consignes pour couvrir les affaires afin de ne pas abimer l'image de l'église. Les coupables au lieu d'être défroqués, c'est le cas de le dire, étaient semble-t-il discrètement mutés dans d'autres diocèses voir hors du pays pour les cas les plus épineux. Il serait cependant intéressant de connaître un jour le nombre d'auteurs qui ont été victimes eux-mêmes. Cette transmission du malin tel un rite de souffrance satanique séculaire à l'intérieur des églises fait froid dans le dos. |
|
|
|
I don't think you've come anywhere near proving that tygeade is "spread[ing] fakenews and bullshits". I'm sorry but I disagree with you, saying it's clear that 99% of the time the favorite team will end up with worse odds here, is factually a big fake news and BS. It sounds like some kind of warning to prevent people from betting here, which is not acceptable. It is still clear to me that 99% of the time favorite team will end up with worse odds here
[...]
I have done this several times and these were the results I got:
That's pretty amazing thanks for sharing and I must congratulate you doubly for saving those screenshots! I wish I'd saved more of my amazing hits (including getting 0000 on freeroll before which to me is 2nd most amazing roll to hit;) ). I have thought about saving up but in the end I think it's better to have many chances in many lottery rounds, rather than save up for 1 big lottery round and still not win. Anyway, that is another gamble in the end I guess  I hitted 0 once hoped for a bonus [img]https://i.postimg.cc/k4S18GwY/received-1175350092946564.webp[/img] [img]https://i.postimg.cc/nV7YG6x5/Screenshot-20211011-172010.jpg[/img] I've also reached 0 one time but I've been a little bit disappointed to not get any surprise. I won exactly the same prize as if it has been another random number below 9886. I think it would be more funny to not win anything but to get some jokes on the screen when you hit the 0 lol  |
|
|
|
(and you forgot to mention the bonus earned for the faucet BTW).
Fair enough - I did forget about the faucet boost from betting. However, I would argue that the golden ticket boost far outweighs the bonuses from the faucet, so it doesn't make a noticeable impact on calculations (makes it so that it favours you slightly less). But if you had taken another match, for example Czech Republic vs Wales, you wouldn't get this result. The average odds on sportsbooks for Czech Republic, the favorite, were @1.77 while the final odds at freebitcoin had been @1.60. Then with a 50x time weight multiplier it gives @1.90 +0.064 in bonuses according to your calculations (and you forgot to mention the bonus earned for the faucet BTW). I was looking more towards very heavy favourites, since tygeade mentioned odds of 1.40 (favourite) and 9.00 (underdog). I personally don't consider 1.80 odds in soccer to be much of a favourite though I can see how some people might interpret it that way. Let's look at a few more examples, and assume that you'll get 50% more profit than what FreeBitcoin displays (ends up being a ~40x time multiplier equivalent, which I would still argue is not a "small weight multiplier"). We'll only consider the favourite for the past, and I'll look at the last 6 expired events so that I'm not cherrypicking: NFL - Week 5 - Kansas City Chiefs vs Buffalo BillsKansas: 1.31 -> 1.46 (FreeBitcoin) vs 1.70 (OddsPortal average) World Cup Qualifiers - CONMEBOL - Argentina vs UruguayArgentina: 1.38 -> 1.57 (FreeBitcoin) vs 1.62 (OddsPortal average) World Cup Qualifiers - CONMEBOL - Colombia vs BrazilBrazil: 1.33 -> 1.5 (FreeBitcoin) vs 1.99 (OddsPortal average) NFL - Week 5 - Arizona Cardinals vs San Francisco 49ersCardinals: 1.23 -> 1.35 (FreeBitcoin) vs 1.38 (OddsPortal average) NFL - Week 5 - Los Angeles Chargers vs Cleveland BrownsChargers: 1.38 -> 1.57 (FreeBitcoin) vs 1.75 (OddsPortal average) NFL - Week 5 - Las Vegas Raiders vs Chicago BearsRaiders: 1.28 -> 1.42 (FreeBitcoin) vs 1.42 (OddsPortal average) Also note that for NFL, FreeBitcoin grades as a loss if the game is tied after OT while other books void; even if the odds are the same, FreeBitcoin is a worse deal. Ignoring that, FreeBitcoin is the worst option for 5/6 events on favourites, and equal for 1/6 events on favourites. That doesn't play very well into your argument that "most of the times odds for the favorites are above those you can find elsewhere even with a small weight multiplier". The average OddsPortal odds likely won't be the best odds that you're able to find either - they're average by definition. You didn't take into account the bonuses in those examples or you have lowered your time weight multiplier since your previous example. But if you take a 50x multiplier as in your first example and incorporate the bonuses, you'll find that 3 of those 6 odds are more profitable on Freebitcoin than on other bookmakers(for Argentina, Cardinals and Raiders). This is half of this series. And I don't think a 50x multiplier is a very big multiplier since it usually takes several days to go down to this level. In addition, bonuses are always paid, even if the bet loses at the end. I would like to echo DarkStar_ on the betting. And I've been here a while watching the games for a very long time. It has never, ever been better to bet on the favorites on this site, or even the close favs. That's just because of the P2P system, where in the betting world, majority of people and volume always side the favorites.
Your calculations must be wrong then. |
|
|
|
It is still clear to me that 99% of the time favorite team will end up with worse odds here because it is (whatever the real name for this method is) based on player vs player betting. So let's assume Real Madrid vs Getafe plays one day, in other method you may see 1.40 vs 9.00 odds right? I am just making up the numbers here, and let's assume you come and check here for the same thing, you "usually" see 1.27 odds for Real Madrid BUT you see 15.00 odds for Getafe, once again numbers are made up.
Do not focus on the numbers because I just wrote anything there, I just wanted to explain the mindset, so if you ever believe underdogs will win, then this place has probably the biggest possible return for that ever, do it early and you will get one of the highest ever. However the favorites usually do not get that much of a return here to be fair.
Don't spread fakenews and bullshits here bro, I don't know where you have got those numbers, but they are totally wrong. If you take into account all the bonuses you get when you place a bet here, most of the times odds for the favorites are above those you can find elsewhere even with a small weight multiplier. You should try to bet here before spreading hoaxes like that. I don't know why you're being so aggressive about something that can be easily proven to be false. Looking at the expired bets, the first one I saw where I knew there was an obvious favourite is Espanyol vs Real Madrid. FreeBitcoin had these odds (with an time weight multiplier of 0x):  We'll focus on the favourite (Real Madrid), which has odds of 1.16 without a time multiplier. Let's assume you placed a bet with a 50x weight multiplier, which I think is definitely at least a "small" weight multiplier. It means your profit would be increased by 50% effectively, giving you odds of 1.24. Let's consider bonuses now. If you held 500k FUN tokens (worth roughly $10k USD at current pricing) for 360 days, you would have 1% cashback on your bet. You also get other perks, being 1 lottery ticket and 1 reward point per 500 sats wagered and a free golden ticket for every 500k satoshis wagered. A reward point is worth 1 satoshi, and a lottery ticket costs 1 satoshi, which we will value at 1 satoshi even though the EV from the ticket is going to be less than 1 satoshi. A golden ticket costs 25k satoshis, but is definitely worth way less [1] considering the EV. However, to benefit you the most, I'll also count it as 25k satoshi value. Let's say we bet 1 BTC on Real Madrid, and assume that odds aren't changed. Upon winning the bet, we would profit 0.24 BTC. From just placing the bet, we would get 0.01 BTC in cashback, 200000 reward points (0.002 BTC), 200000 lottery tickets (0.002 BTC) and 200 golden tickets (0.05 BTC with a huge asterisk). Effectively, this becomes a 1 BTC - (0.01 BTC + 0.002 BTC + 0.002 BTC + 0.05 BTC) = 0.936 BTC bet to win 0.24 BTC, for odds of 1.26. When the Espanyol vs Real Madrid market closed on traditional books, you could easily find odds of at least 1.60 if not higher (Pinnacle was offering 1.68, and is known to be a book that does not limit winners). By placing a bet on FreeBitcoin with the maximum benefits, valuing lottery/golden tickets at their purchases price and not the EV, and with a generous 50x time multiplier (since you mentioned a "small" weight multiplier), your odds would be at least 0.34 lower than a traditional sportsbook for this specific outcome in this specific market. In other words, your profit would be more than halved. I'm not going to go into this much detail for other markets, but just by browsing through the history, you can see a lot of markets where betting the favourite on FreeBitcoin ended up being significantly worse off than betting the favourite on another site. On the other side, had you bet on Espanyol with a 50x time multiplier, your odds would be at least 8.50, which is significantly higher than the ~5.80 you could find on other sportsbooks excluding bonuses. TLDR: Sometimes FreeBitcoin is way worse, way better or about the same when you compare betting odds for events. It's false to say that most of the time betting favourites on FreeBitcoin is a better deal, especially with a small time multiplier.
[1]Last golden ticket draw had a prize of just 3.96 BTC, with 2,895,004 tickets in play. This gives each ticket an EV of 0.00000137 BTC (137 satoshis), a huge difference from the 25k satoshi price. But if you had taken another match, for example Czech Republic vs Wales, you wouldn't get this result. The average odds on sportsbooks for Czech Republic, the favorite, were @1.77 while the final odds at freebitcoin had been @1.60. Then with a 50x time weight multiplier it gives @1.90 +0.064 in bonuses according to your calculations (and you forgot to mention the bonus earned for the faucet BTW). |
|
|
|
No I don't think this market is full of frauds and shady things, at least not more than into other markets from the crypto world anyway. But it's always more reliable to use old and big platforms because they are less likely to scam people than the smaller ones.
That's right mate, gambling is not bad, the people behind it who are running casinos are. They try to lure new gamblers and make them addict by giving away various bonuses to them, then when those players start enjoying, they start the rigging game which takes every drop of money out of the pockets of the gamblers and puts it in the treasuries of casino. This isn't about any specific casino, but some of them are really shady. Playing on some reputed ones can help gamblers not to get stuck in a situation as above. Yes I agree with you, gambling on the most reputed casinos is the better protection against scams IMHO but gambling on provably fair games is also a good solution to prevent scams from rigged games even if it doesn't protect against exit scams. Provably fair can't really help a gambler TBH if he doesn't really know how to check it. I had my friend gambling at a site he got to know in a message from some unknown source. He asked me that how's this site for gambling? I said I don't recognise this site, saw it for the first time. Did you invest there? He said, yes, I put over $200 to bet on some games. Later, when he tried to withdraw, the site blocked his account and he never got his money back. Even licensed websites with provably fair feature can scam if the desire of casino owners is not so good. That's a sad story, but people have to keep in mind that provably fair scheme only prevents gambling games to be rigged, it can't protect against bad actors stealing users funds. If the platform where you gamble is not a reputed one you should always deposit small amounts and withdrawing them the more quickly you can because as soon as you send your funds somewhere you have to trust this entity. |
|
|
|
The minimum stake is 0.20$ at the live casino game from Evolution AFAIK, but you can lower this threshold if you choose to bet in Japanese Yens. It can help to test it and to learn how to play with small bets. On Stake there is also a video game from BGaming available in Fun play mode, then you can learn how to play at this game for free if you want.
I played this game at Sportsbet long time ago and the minimum bet was $1.25 and it still costs me around the same (100 INR) per bet to play. It's casual why they minimum bet lesser in Japanese yen as it's a Japanese game.  It was all good and I also made a big profit when it hit on a dice I selected, which got 200x on it and I won. AFAIK Sic Bo is not a japanese gambling game but a chinese one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic_boI can't check how much is the minimum stake on Sportsbet because my country can't access to this game from this platform while I've no problem on Stake. I don't think the minimum stake is lower in japanese yens because it's an asian game, I think it's just a matter of rounding number and price of money. The minimum stake in JPY is 20 on Stake. |
|
|
|
I don't know why Mirae is looking for another dice game platform but I know it's not good to let all your funds on the same platform. Moreover I don't think pretty small gambling site like wolf.bet could be considered as reliable and reputed as bigger and older casinos like Stake for example.
True. I just checked it out and there is the auto mode that OP is trying to look for.  It can even extend to unlimited bets if he wants to. I just don't know if it will be "flash" mode like what he is trying to say. 10k bets in a flash is something I haven't seen with most of the betting sites that I tried before. There's always the waiting period to finish all the bets one by one until it reached the amount you input. Yes you're right but I think the House Edge is one of the smallest of all dice games and the RTP one of the biggest then. Because AFAIK the House Edge is only 1% while the game is provably fair and you get instant rakebacks in your account and weekly and monthly bonuses based on the amount you had wagered on Stake. |
|
|
|
No I don't think this market is full of frauds and shady things, at least not more than into other markets from the crypto world anyway. But it's always more reliable to use old and big platforms because they are less likely to scam people than the smaller ones.
That's right mate, gambling is not bad, the people behind it who are running casinos are. They try to lure new gamblers and make them addict by giving away various bonuses to them, then when those players start enjoying, they start the rigging game which takes every drop of money out of the pockets of the gamblers and puts it in the treasuries of casino. This isn't about any specific casino, but some of them are really shady. Playing on some reputed ones can help gamblers not to get stuck in a situation as above. Yes I agree with you, gambling on the most reputed casinos is the better protection against scams IMHO but gambling on provably fair games is also a good solution to prevent scams from rigged games even if it doesn't protect against exit scams. |
|
|
|
Has advance settings for Dice any positive influence on the dice game for the gamblers? If your answer is no of what benefits then are looking for gambling site that has advance settings for Dice bets. I do dice on Stake.com and others gambling site that doesn't have advance settings but I don't really see any difference in my opinion and experience so far.
When people encounter a good streak, they usually think they will encounter a bad streak after it. And it's the same thing in the opposite way, then they use the autobetting mode to bet on the next X long streak instead of betting on just the next roll. Depending on someones decisions or perception because some does have different impression on such situation whether you do go completely in manual or in auto mode. When it comes to dice settings then this is something where most people believe that they could really make some advantage but once the reality slap out into their faces then this is where they do have bad impressions about it or would know on how reality works. But why would people think they will get some advantages by using auto betting mode if it's not because they want to bet on long series instead of betting on only one round? Just like on what you do saw on martingale.Its a series of long bets and you do see on how those losses becomes a profit after a certain win which it do really poke out your greed and you do see it as an interesting. There are people who dont simply like long sessions in their dice gaming but instead make out some bets in one go with specific odds been set.Some doesnt like long wait and just bet directly in one go and if they won then they do continue and if they lose then completely stop or would make out some deposits again. You didn't reply to my question. Why would people think they will get some advantages by using auto betting mode according to you if it's not because they want to bet on long series instead of betting on only one round? I don't think most of people use martingales in auto betting mode because it's highly dangerous, you can lose all your bankroll very quickly if you encounter a bad losing streak. |
|
|
|
there are many gambling sites here and indeed our knowledge is needed so that we can choose a good site that is safe and good. that is why a gambler needs good experience and knowledge so as not to be deceived by sites that make losses or sites that are fraudulent. it will harm us especially for people who are not too familiar with the world of gambling. there are many sites that offer to win easily and quickly in gambling, of course it attracts the attention of gamblers especially for people who have just joined. so we have to be more careful in choosing it.
The new websites need to bring the gambling addicts to their platforms and the best way is to promote the service on the Twitch channels. Sponsored money is not real money and usually, streamers can only withdraw a small percentage of the winnings, so it is not ethical to show fake max wins to gamblers and expectation they will choose your casino. Many gamblers are aware of the situation after countless discussions and this becomes annoying tbh. For some gamblers but you know that there would be always a noob who do really easily believe into something which they do saw that they could be rich if they do play on that particular site. This is where common sense is really useful because even you are just noob but having that kind of awareness in mind then you would really able to save your ass up. This market had lots of frauds and shady things been done that's why you should be sensible towards your actions. No I don't think this market is full of frauds and shady things, at least not more than into other markets from the crypto world anyway. But it's always more reliable to use old and big platforms because they are less likely to scam people than the smaller ones. |
|
|
|
I read in some places that lightlord is sick and that's why he can't enter the forum. If he is really sick, I wish him a speedy recovery. He hasn't logged into the forum since Sept 26. It's a serious illness that he probably didn't even have a chance to simply enter the forum and make a statement. This is a sad situation for people who have not received payment for about 10 weeks. I hope he gets over his illness soon and makes the payments.
This can explain the delay in weekly paiement for signature campaign participants [Bitvest,777Coin] but no one has confirmed that the illnes of LightLord is the reason for the hotwallet to remain empty for a long time. However, LightLord hasn't logged into the forum since September 26 while signature campaign participants have a payment delay since about 10 weeks. This should somehow rise some Flags, but far to call it as a confirmd scam. I see more complaints about delayed withdrawals in their campaign ANN threads. It's a little bit scary how community is waiting for a single person to come back and solve everything, i thought the casinos are running with full team and not managed by a single person . Yes, it's really alarming, especially for those campaign participants who have yet to get their payment. I think that it's already a significant red flag, especially for signature campaign participants and gamblers, because money is involved here and there hasn't been a solution for a week. I propose looking for another worthwhile platform that has no payment troubles and will provide you with assurance and a reputable platform. The thread starter was online two days ago and did not reply to any of the comments, this goes to show clearly how this thread was made to throw bitvest and a new account accusing a well-known gambling site of scam is quite unfortunate and should not be taken serious.
Even if the OP is a newbie, we have no right to invalidate this unless it is proven that the statement is incorrect; nonetheless, everyone has learned that there are also issues in the campaign itself, thus this gambling platform is very dangerous right now. You seem to be more concerned by the payment of their signature campaign than the ability for gamblers to withdraw and get back their own funds, that's a little bit weird but I guess you're not a gambler but just a signature campaign poster. Then I suggest you to open a thread about the campaigns from gambling sites, it could be interesting to speak about those campaigns somewhere. |
|
|
|
I haven't noticed anyone talking about this game here on the forum! You can find this game in many places, it's not like some new game, but still looks like this game is under the radar... sort of speaking! I think this game is crazy as it can be! This is one of the games I would play "live" if I have the chance! I wonder what others think about this game? Do you play it? I never had a chance to talk with anyone who loves this game, so I decided to bring it up here... I admit, after playing it once again with some crazy bets! I've tried playing sic bo live by evolution and at first it looked confusing because there were too many numbers. in the end just play high and low only . it seems like it almost similar to roulette. There are many choices of bets that can be made and can also choose specific numbers can be another alternative for gamblers who like to play games like roulette. The minimum stake is 0.20$ at the live casino game from Evolution AFAIK, but you can lower this threshold if you choose to bet in Japanese Yens. It can help to test it and to learn how to play with small bets. On Stake there is also a video game from BGaming available in Fun play mode, then you can learn how to play at this game for free if you want. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
