Better late than never. The classifying cryptocurrecy transactions as income tax is one of the most dumb misconceptions in cryptocurrency trading. They should based a similar structure on what taxes they are putting on stock exchange transactions. A flat rate of 19% compared to a 45% tax rate per transaction is better and we might see some more trading action coming from a developed country. Which means a better or higher price movement overall in the market. But let us not expect that this good news will have an instant effect in the market.

I guess that already explains why. People who have already bought Bitcoin will of course not say anything bad against their own investments, it is like talking trash to your own property. And with them being an institutional investors they know that they have some kind of influence even on the words they are blabbering in their mouths, and they are obviously using it in order to increase the price of Bitcoin. If 80% believes that the only way of Bitcoin is up then it is a big word for the small investors enough for them to be convince.

The first question to answer is Bitcoin even illegal in U.S.A in the first place? Because last time I checked the State of Arizona has passed a bill allowing their residents to pay their taxes not only with Bitcoin but other cryptocurrecies. Remember what isn't classified as illegal is legal, just like cocaine before which you can even transport it in planes. The same as China and India, China is the biggest country where a lot of people think Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is illegal which is really annoying as they are not doing their research and news related to China will most likely be FUD. India as well, Bitcoin as a payment method is not allowed but other things such as trading and mining is allowed in their country, you can even exchange it to their fiat without breaking any law.

I don't think there is because there is no money to be made in that kind of service. You are looking for a social media type of exchange which is hard enough as Facebook and Twitter is already doing its thing also if you are looking for an exchange they won't have any kind of commission as the transaction would be person to person. So if you are thinking that this kind of service will exist even in the future then think again as clearly no one will be willing to make one if they know generating money will be hard.

I hope that this three bills will pass on both house because if they don't it would just be left as a bill only. And judging by how it goes where the bill was proposed by the cabinet I think that it has a small chance of having no revisions on both houses, it will also depend on where this politicians have allegiances too. If this country wants to move forward with cryptocurrencies they must set aside on their differences on work together to create these bills as laws. If they are successful it would add weight in influencing other European countries to have some sort of regulation regarding cryptocurrencies.

If you can keep both then keep both of them as long as you can, but if you need to choose only one then quite trading. But I doubt that you won't be able to manage trading with a job I mean their are many ways to trade and not all of it requires your full time on it. Trading style such as position trading is still applicable even on a volatile market such as the cryptocurrency market. Money won't be a problem as long as you have a job and time can be always manage and you can maximize it with the right trading style.

Well it does look like a cloud mining site for people interested in games. It is not the first time I've seen this. Cloud Mining sites shrouded to look like a game can also target the market who are also into some kind of faucet. And why did you even post it in the gambling section of the forum? This kind of game does not involve any kind of bet, it only involves buying of "mining power" to earn "passive income" and of course the money will absolutely come from the pockets of other members.

Isn't that what technology do? Aside from improving lives they also improve the development of a country overall. So I would have to say yes that they can definitely move us forward but I would have to disagree with your idea towards one world currency, there is absolutely no benefit and use to it. There is even no problem that can be solve if we invent a one world currency it will only create problems instead of solutions. One of the big problems here is of course the control of the supply of that currency, we all know how power hungry this big countries are and controlling most of the supply will mean a control in the overall economy which is really bad.

Why would he be bitter? His salary might bigger than what you earn in a whole year. The CEO of Paypal might be giving some negative opinion to Bitcoin as it is technically their competition as a payment method and with the news that Ebay might soon replace Paypal as an official partner in their website the CEO's job is actually on the line if he supported BTC in any kind of way even on words so he might need to be careful on the words coming out his mouth. If I am a CEO I wouldn't say good things to the competition either.

A bear trap is is different from a correction loismanny88, and right now it doesn't look like a trap because we are staying in this minor trend for awhile unlike a bear trap where BTC will most obviously bounce back. Bitcoin have hit all their new supports which obviously make Bitcoin vulnerable again going down even further than what we are currently seeing, it may even fall down below 8,000$. I would say this would be normal judging on how quickly Bitcoin rise up. Bitcoin's recovery will now depend on bulls want to take control again.

As expected BTC go down from its first realistic attempt to reach 10,000$. Reaching 9,700$ before correcting is a good thing to see as I wouldn't be comfortable if BTC decides to  reach 10,000$ first or greater before it corrects. RSI is on a Hidden Bullish Divergence but I wouldn't be surprised if it still goes down way below 8,800$ before it starts going back to 10,000$.

Oh it hit more than 9,700$ and now its going into a minor correction but can potentially be a big one when it does not start climbing back up soon. This could be seen as people have started liquidating their long positions and they might think that this is also a good time to short BTC again. I am not optimistic as what other traders are seeing so far, many have seen that by going up 9,450$ we have broken the down trend channel but as of right now we are back at it again.

The problem I see here is that the default board where everyone can post would be a breeding ground for merit. Obviously it won't solve anything as if they know that a certain board in the forum has more merits to receive then it won't matter to them that they cannot post on other boards. Their main goal is to get merit in order for them to rank up. Limiting where they can post on the forum will not be a problem to them just as long they can post on that default board where they can get merits.

If it only affects two countries then I don't think there would be any bad effect at all. And this what we call "war" against in Syria only affects one place which is Syria. Syrians are not sending any troops in U.S. Soil as there enemy is also within their country and I don't even know why Trump wants to wage war against a country they are not directly affected. If a lot of countries are affected where multiple places are hit with the war then I don't see any people holding their Bitcoin as food and water is needed and liquidating their assets is needed for them to satisfy high demands, therefore prices of Bitcoin will go down.

Even though what you are claiming is true that there is no connection between your gambling site and pocket-dice the similarities are still making people insecure, your site looks like the dead scam gambling site which makes other people think you are affiliated to it. If I were you I would make some changes in my own website in order to avoid confusion and stop members from connecting you to pocket-dice. This I think is  needed step in order for your site to progress in the forum.

The new sMerit being generated by Merit sources will be the only ones existing in the coming months ones all other non-merit sources has exhausted all of their sMerits to giveaway. But even if that happens half of those sMerits received will be sendable to other members, so as half of those again and again. As long as we are active giving merits to quality post and not hoarding it for ourselves it will be sufficient to the forum, the admins are also actively adding more merit sources to the forum.

As for the people making merits as a business, I don't think that tagging them is necessary because it is a harsh penalty for them. If this is possible I am thinking of permanently putting them on a block list in the merit system so they they are not able to send or receive any merits as a form of punishment. They could also be suspended for their actions if the admins think of this as a necessary solution.

BTC finally broke the 9,200$ resistance and has establish a support in that area. Bitcoin needs to stay above it in order to continue being bullish. The problem I see now is that Bitcoin is currently forming an ascending wedge which is a bearish reversal and it might complete between the 9,350$ - 9,500$ level, But if Bitcoin goes above 9,500$ then the formation would be invalid. RSI is definitely overbought in short term periods so this is adding some weight in the bearish reversal. Keep your eyes active on the prices as Bull might sell their long positions.

I believe this became a possibility because of the online courses being offered by some online program of a school, which now I don't remember. Obviously cryptocurrency as a subject will be included as a elective class as a lot of students are interested in it , it is inevitable to have one. Just like how Korea have their own college for Pro Gaming athletes/students as a whole program. Universities right now are identifying what is being talk about and what is greatly affecting people's lives and Bitcoin and Blockchain Technology is one of them.

It is not whether you feel obligated or not, having a tax liability is a obligation itself to your country and to your fellow citizens. It may sound bad depending on how your country manages your fund but even so tax is the lifeblood of a nation and without their main source of income your country might suffer economically speaking. For most countries they are paying a fixed rate when it comes to capital gains tax which means whether you are rich or poor you are still paying the same cut as what the other men is paying, this shows that not all taxes gives burden to the citizen as taxes are not created to give burden in the first place.

It seems like the original post of the potential phishing site has been remove by a moderator but due to the quotation several members have done the links are still existing in at least 2 pages of the thread. This kind of posts where the member does not think first makes other members fall victim. The sad thing about this is if members fall victim to the phishing site they will blame it on Bitsler which is wrong thing to do.