THE EARTH IS AN OBLATE SPHEROID, A.K.A. A GLOBE, YOU GODDAMN FLATTARDS!!!
This stupid thread should be locked or, even better, deleted!!!!
 Shut it down. |
|
|
|
If the Earth were pancake-like, then at any point, except at the central axis of this pancake, the earth's gravity would be directed at an angle to the plane of the "pancake" and, as it approached the edge, would tend to parallel its surface. The Greek scientist Eratosthenes long ago noticed that the lengths of shadows from distant objects of the same height differ at the same time from one another. So he ransacked that the Earth is a ball and even calculated its circumference with an amazing accuracy for that time.
I would not even argue. It's all nonsense about flat land, so it's not worth the time to argue. It's interesting to read what fans think. Your opinion isn't worth shit dude, show me some proof the Earth is a globe. |
|
|
|
If the Earth were pancake-like, then at any point, except at the central axis of this pancake, the earth's gravity would be directed at an angle to the plane of the "pancake" and, as it approached the edge, would tend to parallel its surface. The Greek scientist Eratosthenes long ago noticed that the lengths of shadows from distant objects of the same height differ at the same time from one another. So he ransacked that the Earth is a ball and even calculated its circumference with an amazing accuracy for that time.
1. There is no gravity it's a lie, density and buoyancy (in part) explain why objects fall. Gravity is a bogus theory with no proof. 2. Eratosthenes experiment claims the Sun's rays hit the Earth in parallel, this is bullshit proven by the following picture.  Crepuscular rays Eratosthenes experiment |
|
|
|
The Earth is Flat and Motionless.  Then why do the bottom of the buildings appear to be lower than the horizon? Because of curvature that's why. Nope. If that would be the case you should also see the curve on x axis, and you clearly do not. Refraction and magnification - there is no curvature: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-Q-FuXJSTQ Having pictures of an area where the horizon appears flat doesn't prove that the Earth is flat any more than standing under a shelter proves that it's not raining. It's just an area of land which appears flat because, believe it or not, the Earth is pretty damn big and you can only see for a few miles at most. If you want to believe that the Earth is flat, go and send up a camera tens of miles into space to check for specifically you as thousands of people have done before, but don't just claim that the Earth is flat when it's 100 metres up and can't see the whole Earth yet. All of our best and most relevant scientific knowledge suggests that the Earth is closer to a sphere than any other shape (or an ovoid).  Balloon @ 121,000' V2 Rocket 1946 |
|
|
|
Simple answer, dense objects fall and light objects rise.
Why ? Because there's an electrical circuit between the domes positively charged oxide surface and the grounds negative charge, this defines up and down. While at the macroscopic scale it can be seen as pressure pushing down on an object that causes it to fall. |
|
|
|
*quack* ... Lmfao. Anyone who thinks the earth isn't flat, http://www.iflscience.com/space/what-would-happen-if-earth-was-flat/. It is impossible for a object the size of a planet to be not "round", gravity will cause it to form back into the form of a ball, hence why objects in space are all Rounded. Anyone who denies that I have to believe is mentally ill, such as notbatman. Even bridges we built today take into consideration the curvature of the earth, same for buildings etc or they would break apart First off there is no gravity, it's a lie crafted to support the false heliocentric model. Simple answer, dense objects fall and light objects rise. Secondly there is no outer space, it's another lie. We're inside an enclosed system with a dome and the Sun, Moon, stars, etc.., are all small objects inside the dome. Beyond the dome is water NOT empty space. The Earth is a flat motionless plane and your statement that engineers make allowances for curvature is absolute bullshit. I suggest that the gullibility of anybody who belives we're on the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum after being presented with the truth, is evidence of at least mental weakness if not full blown psychosis. |
|
|
|
So I made my first XMR transaction ever and it was to shapeshift.io for some quick BTC. Exhilarated at how smooth the transaction went I quckly switched back to my web browser to await confirmation... and waiting...oh what's this??!? "Don't forget to input your Payment Id, or you will lose your money". So do I go in the corner and cry now?  edit: OK I found this on reddit, *fingers crossed*. https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/496mbo/the_new_shapeshift_includes_payment_id_for_monero/u/crazyflashpie: I sent 77 Monero last night and forgot to include they payment ID. Then the time window ran out on shapeshift. is my Monero gone forever?
u/ShapeShift_io: Please submit a ticket and detail what happened! Even if you forgot the payment ID we will take care of you as long as we can track it down. Regards, ShapeShift Team
u/crazyflashpie: My XMR were returned quickly~ Thank You!
edit2: I'm not sure what's worse, getting all my DASH jammed up in the mixer and needing detailed help from the devs or just not reading shit in this case and sending all my XMR off into oblivion. edit3: Well support cleared that up as soon as they came online, thanks support guys! Roger Ver > Fiat Banker |
|
|
|
The Earth is Flat and Motionless!
No. It's not. Proof? I've been at a high enough altitude to see the curvature of the Earth with my own eyes. ( stupidity deleted ) Go to a high altitude. See curvature of the Earth with your own eyes. Go away troll. No you fuck off, the horizon is flat and rises to eye level regardless of altitude.  |
|
|
|
@notbatman:
You could more easily make your case for a flat earth by stating that all camera lenses are subject to optical distortion (i.e. pincushion distortion), and could display straight lines as being curved - the same is true for the human eye to some extent.
That being said, the flat earth claims we're under a glass dome of sorts, and that beyond the dome is water. Far fetched, but it does make for fun stories.
The dome is electrically polarized nickel-iron steel with a gold colour reflective oxide coating.  |
|
|
|
The Earth is Flat and Motionless!
No. It's not. Proof? I've been at a high enough altitude to see the curvature of the Earth with my own eyes.  In regards to your comment here's a video on the U2 spy plane: "The Curvature Zone" - Does the U2 Disprove the Flat Earth?-- https://youtu.be/e5KsNni5hEc |
|
|
|
The Earth is Flat and Motionless!
No. It's not. Proof? |
|
|
|
The Earth is Flat and Motionless!   |
|
|
|
The Earth is Flat and Motionless. |
|
|
|
I haven't seen any good explanations for the coriolis effect, if the earth is a flat and motionless disk...and since it must be compensated for by hunters, snipers and anyone traveling from point A to B, it most certainly exists.
You can take a trip due west, then due south, then due east and you will end up at your starting point, forming a triangle pattern of travel path. If earth is flat, you would end up south of your starting point with a C shaped travel path.
One thing, however, is that the recent WMAP experiments that have created visual representations of "cosmic background radiation" show that the earth is centered within the known universe, and that the radiation emanates outward from earth. The idea that earth is insignificant or that our universe has no particular structure aside from random instances of celestial bodies is proven wrong. The CMB experiments were performed over a decade with 3 successive launches, each one delivering the same results.
I am open to new ideas in the pursuit of truth, therefore, I am willing to consider that the physical geometry of our Earth is not as is commonly explained...although I approach the matter with no desire to support an ideological perspective.
The Coriolis effect is explained by the 23h 56m aether drift cycle I just explained and the triangle experiment is absolutely impractical. |
|
|
|
Just because there are multitudes of testimonials, doesn't make them right. There has to be power behind the testimonials in order to have certainty. FE power hasn't even reached the stage of theory, yet. Standard globe earth power has gone way beyond theory into proof and photography.  What proof? The pictures are fake! No they are not fake. If they were fake, we wouldn't be able to see them. Both FE and GE pictures are real... real pictures. Say it long enough, you'll start to believe it. If pictures happened to be all that there was to it, there might be question. But there is lots more that pictures. And some GE pictures don't lie.  This is a CGI image stitched together from multiple photographs, it is however an authentic image of what really is. The globe Earth is NOT authentic, the world is flat and motionless like the above image. And then you throw in your favorite experiment and the Sagnac effect proves that the Earth rotates, so much for motionless. Beautiful picture btw.  The aether drift (the measured effect you're referring to) at 10% of the predicted magnitude of Earth's rotation as detected by the Michelson & Morley experiment has a rotational period of 23 hours 56 minutes, this coincides with the rotation of the stars. An Earth day is 24 hours and if the Earth was in fact rotating the M&M experiment wouldn't have produced a null result (10% is too small for a positive result). To top it all off the rotation of the stars (the source of the aether drift) is independently corroborated by Airy's Failure experiment who like M&M produced a null result while observing stars through a water filled telescope to change the speed of light. The Sagnac effect proves the aether and with that proof the M&M experiment proves the Earth is motionless. With Airy's Failure we have two "null results" that the Earth is motionless, case closed. |
|
|
|
|
Just FYI "space aliens" are part of the transhumanist agenda and deception ,they're kids made by evil doctors same as transvestites. They make freaky alien sex slaves from the pizza children.
|
|
|
|
Just because there are multitudes of testimonials, doesn't make them right. There has to be power behind the testimonials in order to have certainty. FE power hasn't even reached the stage of theory, yet. Standard globe earth power has gone way beyond theory into proof and photography. What proof? The pictures are fake! No they are not fake. If they were fake, we wouldn't be able to see them. Both FE and GE pictures are real... real pictures. Say it long enough, you'll start to believe it. If pictures happened to be all that there was to it, there might be question. But there is lots more that pictures. And some GE pictures don't lie. This is a CGI image stitched together from multiple photographs, it is however an authentic image of what really is. The globe Earth is NOT authentic, the world is flat and motionless like the above image. |
|
|
|
ah, why do people continue to talk about the earth was flat, round, why talk about the most important thing is that we can spend money to have fun, Even if the earth was flat so we go every place in the corners of this earth, Even if the earth is round so we stayed enjoy lunch and dinner with our lovers
 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
