That's because there is a 5btc award for getting the site sold. I started the thread because the admin asked me to do it.
It's still essentially creating one sole thing as a result: SPAM. What's the upside of having 3+ different sale threads open about one and the same product/site? The information necessary is all available in this thread (aswell as in all others I've seen), besides the higher exposure for the sale, the multi-thread spamming has no added value at all. |
|
|
|
Are users with higher post counts allowed to comment in this thread?
I'm new to this forum, is there such a kind of rule in this forum? I don't think so....... Users with higher post counts are happily welcomed to this thread. let your experience to help someone newbie. Are users with a love for sarcastic comments allowed to visit this thread and have a good, nice laugh at Gleb? |
|
|
|
Maybe not vouching for every shit over and over again would be a solution for this problem?
OP, when receiving a vouch copy you have no obligation to the seller, but rather to the forum members that read it. If the e-book you received a vouch copy of includes an illegal method you'd need to be impartial and out the one that posted it instead of trying to dodge the hard part in an attempt to post a positive review. Your review was irresponsible at best.
I highly agree with that. |
|
|
|
This ponzi scheme was endorsed by bitcointalk.org
allowing a topic on the forum doesn't mean they endorse anything just so you know Even more so its "not not allowing". Theymos does not click approve on any topic and is probably unaware of 95% of threads. But that would mean someone else is to blame for the loss OP had to face, maybe even OP himself? Guys, you can't expect people on the internet to take the responsibility for their actions themselves (or can you?). |
|
|
|
|
Seems you're so excited about the sale, you've asked 3 different users to create auction/sale threads about it,
which really isn't necessary, as one thread would be more than sufficient.
|
|
|
|
Also, note that a byte is different from a character. Because SMF stores "special" characters in a particularly space-inefficient way, each Russian character uses about 6 bytes, and each line break also uses 6 bytes.
Which would bring me back to something I've suggested earlier. Another thing I've noticed is, that you're pretty "wasteful" in terms of lines with your BBCode, trying to compress would be another possible solution.
Although I don't think you would be abled to 'safe enough space' that way, in order to compress everything into a single post. |
|
|
|
Got another one: Javier007
I am not a tech guy but what is the point for this request, please explain it to me i would like to understand thi
I am not a tech guy but what is the point for this request, please explain it to me i would like to understand this 
Card counting is not illegal, but casinos will kick you out if you get good enough.
Card counting is not illegal, but casinos will kick you out if you get good enough.
How experienced are you at backend engines? do you know PHp and Mysql or any framework, like Ruby on Rails? i will admit i could impprove my design skills.
How experienced are you at backend engines? do you know PHp and Mysql or any framework, like Ruby on Rails? i will admit i could impprove my design skills.
Nope, but spend them online sometimes once every now and then.
Nope, but spend them online sometimes once every now and then.
Seeing honeyhtet being reported for the same reason some posts above, are they now copying copy/paste posts?  |
|
|
|
Just a quick reference for my report of the user Javier007, who seems to be copying posts/spamming.
I am not a tech guy but what is the point for this request, please explain it to me i would like to understand thi
I am not a tech guy but what is the point for this request, please explain it to me i would like to understand this
Card counting is not illegal, but casinos will kick you out if you get good enough.
Card counting is not illegal, but casinos will kick you out if you get good enough.
How experienced are you at backend engines? do you know PHp and Mysql or any framework, like Ruby on Rails? i will admit i could impprove my design skills.
How experienced are you at backend engines? do you know PHp and Mysql or any framework, like Ruby on Rails? i will admit i could impprove my design skills.
List goes on, but you can see the pattern. |
|
|
|
seems to work fine here... no stray BBcode tags when I previewed it.
Try posting it, pre viewing works fine here aswell, but once you post the whole thing, you get an INVALID BBCODE error. Same goes for you, can you post the whole thing in that case, please? |
|
|
|
|
I'm missing a piece here, ok, so there is friendlychemist1 on skype, who was in contact with you and who you got scammed by,
and then there's FriendlyChemist over here at bitcointalk,
now please show me the connection between those two, has FriendlyChemist sent you a PM with that username? Did he post it somewhere in public, claiming to be in control of that specific skype account?
Edit:
Never mind, the payment address is one connected with the FriendlyChemist account.
|
|
|
|
I may be wrong, but please check:
Line 441 ends a good table.
Line 469 contains TR and then other table parts, but no table has started.
You're right, but that didn't fix the post either. You can try yourself, maybe you find a working solution. @OP: If you try to post the whole thing, and then edit it afterwards, you will see that it get's cut off after the following text: "ΥΠΟΛΟΓΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΗ]" Another thing I've noticed is, that you're pretty "wasteful" in terms of lines with your BBCode, trying to compress would be another possible solution. |
|
|
|
Or make two posts. right?
Yep, that would be another option, moving parts of the post from OP into the first reply to the topic, if you can't just drop them. (Still while asuming the size is the only problem here.) |
|
|
|
you know what might be the issue here?
My first idea would be that the post simply is too long, breaking bbcode limits in terms of size. I've experienced this in several threads (mostly those with huge tables, i.e. Mitchells collection or the known alts thread). Have you tried splitting the post into parts and looking for mistakes in those parts each (I've skimmed it briefly, didn't find any). If all parts are working, I'd say it's safe to asume the size is the problem, hence my suggestion would be cutting down on some unneeded parts. |
|
|
|
There's already a service for this: bitcoinvanitygen.com
This means that you'll really need more trust and also lower price than the existing service.
The service has NO trust at all, in fact, it's been often discussed (and IIRC even proven) that the service is indeed nothing but scam. I don't know why people bring them up again and again (I've often warned others about that site after the next guy 'suggested' using them...) Using any 3rd party for creating a wallet is a security risk people already know and not many are willing to take.
While you can run a program (publicly available) to generate vanity address, most will do that in the privacy of their own computer.
With split-key creation, this risk can be minimized, making it (practically) safe to use addresses generated that way (by a 3rd party, however not fully). While you can run a program (publicly available) to generate vanity address, most will do that in the privacy of their own computer.
Those that got the hardware necessary, but in some cases, with long prefixes, issuing this job to another person can be the better option for you. |
|
|
|
yeah right, but why sould give me red mark, i not scam.
You've stolen others work in order to participate in a contest, you've tried to cheat in a signature campaign (or failed to understand how they work, so let's skip this point), you tried to buy positive trust for $5. Those two points (let's again not take up on the signature campaign issue) make me not trust you as a person (regardless of which account you hide behind). |
|
|
|
|
The keyword is split key vanity address generation.
Essentially, you never get access to the full private key for the vanity address you generate, hence the trust issue gets avoided.
(As long, as you don't force the other party to pay ( or pay partially) upfront.)
|
|
|
|
I'm not going to scam anyone. I've waited 5 months for you to remove it! If I wanted to scam I'd make a new account!
So what exactly is it you want here, besides big size no-collateral loans? |
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is the right section for posting jokes, also you've missed April 1st by some days,
but hey, I had to smile, so I'm gonna say Good job, OP.
|
|
|
|
OP is an ALT of kevinjulio who has multiple neg's and accusations of scam. Was looking into the (btc-)addresses, had a similar hunch. I would not cheat for the sake of 2btc , it will haunt me for life if I did her .
You would cheat for way less, like signature campaign earnings, right?
Edit:connected via btc addresses aswell. 16DGW being used by kevinjulio ( http://archive.is/xCIo0) and Celendion ( http://archive.is/5BkTU) both. |
|
|
|
Chances are a few taxes won't have to be paid and you keep the remainder anyway.
If you've read OP, you would know that's not (entirely) true.
Terms
- Any BTC that is left over (because the package wasn't checked, the BTC value went up, etc) will be evenly distributed between the participants.
- If we are somehow short of BTC, I'll cover it up front. The amount of BTC will be evenly distributed between participants. Your package won't be sent if you don't pay your part of the debt. If you don't pay at all, your Bitcoin Penny™ will be auctioned off to cover the cost and any leftovers are kept.
If you (for example) check one of the last group buys Mitchell organised, you'll see that's exactly what he did. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
