No, hasn't there been a lot of debates about Bitcoin vs Gold already in the past few years? I'm pretty sure you could already look up a lot of arguments when comparing the two from multiple perspectives. A debate would indeed put crypto and gold into the news for a bit, but that's it. I'm pretty sure those who know of Bitcoin already know of its pros and cons after all.

Plus, investors look at the money or profit side and just seeing what you could've gained from Bitcoin in the past decade, that speaks volumes for itself. It's still quite dependent though since we haven't seen what Bitcoin could do when its supply is maxed out, and we can only wait and see until then.

Pretty sure that such rules should've warned you beforehand, and not one that should be directly identified from their t & c I think. It IS related to how your bets should be done, so there should either be a notification when you visit the gambling window or a glowing pain in the eye warning sign that says x amount of money should be bet each round.

Rather unfortunate still though. I still find it really odd for some reason that the rules for the specific gambling games they have weren't blandly stated before playing each game (which should've imo). Might be for the best to look for another casino to play in ngl.

It isn't that odd, most people who actually have Bitcoin are those that are pretty rich, and those that would even willingly spend Bitcoin towards hotels and the like would also be the rich. There's only the minority out there that would actually spend Bitcoin on paying or buying for some stuff, I myself rarely do it. Plus, I don't think small businesses could handle the volatility of the coin, and probably even see implementing such a system towards their hotel a waste of money (no matter how small or big it is).

Heh, when a price correction turns into manipulation and in turn influences other traders. Man I don't really give a damn if it was manipulation or a correction even, a dip is a dip, and heck I'd always see that as an opportunity to buy more coins to hodl. Next manipulation? Hmmm, probably when it dips again maybe? I mean every dip seems to be a manipulation so I guess that should work.
Cause it went down, does that count?

I mean, at this point, majority of the balance in exchanges are for traders doing daily trading. Majority of Hodlers? I'm pretty sure they would've realized now that they might as well just put it in a hardware wallet instead of leaving it in an exchange, which has been emphasized for oh so long.
No, it's not the responsibility of the exchange. Heck, Bitcoin is basically an asset/coin that you yourself manage. Leaving it to the exchange means that you trust them enough to leave it to them, so even if it was lost, it's not their fault but rather yours. Crypto is called your own personal bank for a reason, it's because everything, from security, to storage, to means of buying/selling/transferring it is all on you.

But wouldn't transactions like this, if ever transacted via crypto, would still in the end require them to use KYC (If they ever use centralized exchanges anyway)? That would still connect their accounts towards their bank accounts, still leading to the IRS discovering that they spent money towards crypto. Now whether where that crypto goes is none of their business, since their only job is to identify how much money from your bank went to that crypto business.

You'd start to stop using banks if you want to actually avoid the policy, and any money that you would transfer to exit banks should not come from banks themselves just to avoid it. Offline/Personal dealings might be the answer, that or someone above could help you manage it.

Or its just a pain in the ass to regulate, so they just push it out of their country like that. Pretty easy solution imo. As for illegal ones, as long as they crackdown on the ones that were shown in public, those illegal ones that weren't discovered are able to freely do it as long as there's a hole in the government. They could even collect the profits in their own pockets that way, plus no problems in trying to manage the public about gambling control and whatnot.

It's not only that even, but that's also THREE years of losing the time to play and train under the pressure of tournaments and the like. I'd reckon the moment he comes back, it's either a flop or just the normal skill level he has. If it was a flop, heck that would just add up to the reputation loss he had for those 3 years. As for the financial penalty, heck, with his current financial status PLUS the money he earned from sponsoring the gambling firm (he was chosen as the spokesperson back then iiirc), he has more than enough. I'd also reckon that the firm would support him for his losses if ever, albeit temporarily (if he does own part of the firm)

Selling high and buying low doesn't only mean that you only need to do that, the most difficult part imo is identifying when that "low" and when that "high" is. Though in general, every dip is actually an opportunity, just that it's one thing to buy on a dip, it's another to actually maximize the profits you could get. I mostly avoid try to actually getting it and instead opt to what I could guarantee just so I could avoid losing what I was supposed to have already won.

Ey, Buy low and sell high is basically day trading, and a faster way to earn instead of HODL. OP might need it immediately you never know. HODL takes way too much time to actually profit from, especially right now taking into consideration that the BTC market just recently hit ATH.

Well not really, even without considering the seasons, one could still profit off of trading big time if done properly and with a proper amount of investment. Trading still considers luck (and a huge amount imo), just that there are other factors involved which is why it's quite different from gambling.

Yep, and I know. It's like sports or eSports teams, they have a group of people backing them that has investors and is connected to multiple industries. It'd be rather rare for a sole individual to actually enter poker tournaments with just him since there's a huge amount of document processing and whatnot I assume, just like how it is with some regulated pro tournaments.

I guess it's because that fight was worth more, compared to this one in their eyes? Hence why Manny agreed, since his price is definitely lower compared to the one with Crawford. I'd agree with the others, a Pacquiao vs Crawford fight seems to be much more interesting and worth much more, but as you said, the organizers for the other side failed in the negotiations hence why it was most likely canceled.

Still, a relatively safe option for the side of Pacquiao. It definitely won't bring as much hype as the Crawford one, but it almost guarantees that Pacquiao has a higher chance of winning than Mikey.

I guess we have around $45k or so as the support, seeing as we went up to $54k after that drop to $47 something last night. Seems to be the standard start-up of a straight line movement that the market usually does before it goes up or goes down fully. Still, news of some magnitude may influence it much earlier and something may just actually happen. Looks like there were news of Elon (or rather rumors) that he sold his Bitcoin, turns out he didn't. Tesla did however sold some of they're bitcoin.

No limits, this is a public forum, not an all males private crypto forum. I see no need for the question to be asked even, nor would people from the community actively isolate female gamblers in one corner just because they're "females". Just make sure that it isn't a shill for a certain scam group or something, make it clean and detailed, and pretty much don't engage in personal arguments with others. Pretty much just use your common sense when you want to have a meaningful discussion with others, and you'd be fine.

I'd welcome it even, every dip is an opportunity after all. I'm starting to buy BTC again after I sold in the last pump, and I've been waiting for dips like this since forever for quite some time now. Besides, if we ever hit that low, it doesn't mean that it'd go down permanently. I reckon it's just a correction and heck, it didn't even go down by much, it just went up again.
It is at $54k right now. Hell I'm pretty sure BTC going below $50k shouldn't be considered the entry to bear market. It's still considerably high considering the price 3,4 months back.

Not surprising. When paypal released their crypto services for US only, a lot of people were pretty hyped with it, even more so for people from other countries where the service was unavailable. And judging by the fact that Paypal is a well-known service that most people use, it isn't that unrealistic that crypto enthusiasts from other countries would also like for Paypal to actively spread it through the globe. Plus, digital payments have been the rage ever since the pandemic, not surprising that the population, as well as the government finally realized how useful it is.

I just hope some media doesn't correlate this to the teams having bad habits such as gambling when in the first place, it isn't a bad one. Bad players just make it look bad. Good job from Sportsbet though, hope that they manage this advertisement well so that cryptocasinos could open up to a bigger population, especially since a lot of people like to watch Football. I just hope other countries actually look at this very good example just so that other gambling companies could open up to their local teams as well.

That's compared to the fees that they had, not with the fees compared to other altcoins. Doge LITE and a few others have way lower fees compared to these two, and a few casinos also accept said altcoins, so why bother choosing those two when you can choose the one with the lowest fees right? The only reason ETH would ever be used to gamble is that the Berlin Upgrade manages to lower the fees to the levels of what those altcoins experience. As for BTC, well, just wait for the network to actually calm down, then send it though it still has quite a hefty fee imo.

Minimal on adults? I doubt that. Adults or a teenager or a kid, no matter the age, as long as someone doesn't know how to properly manage their finance shouldn't be allowed to bet. Hence why my earlier opinions were about how the age was minimal. It's almost common sense that kids wouldn't really be allowed, since they're brains are still underdeveloped and the concept of finance management isn't something they themselves would know, but I suppose it isn't impossible for that to happen, just that in the end, they wouldn't use it to gamble since the circumstances for them to actually understand it should already reveal that they have problems with finance.

Nah, even if it were to go down to close to $40k, people who were expectant of it going down to buy when it dips would just bring it back up immediately. I suppose the market has given up on trying to go past the ATH, but that doesn't mean that it would go down to low levels. It'll just be a rather straight line market from now on, probably for a few months again before it acts up once more. Now it going down below $40k by then or going up somehow still remains to be seen imo. Probably someone intentionally dumping the market together with the correction, hence why the strong correction as of recent, but a dump like that would only last at most a few days I presume.

The opposite could be the same so do remember that. I wouldn't judge really if it was a good or bad decision since really, the situation would only become "good or bad" depending on how well you trade in the crypto market. I'd reckon you'd need a bit of time to start up and check out on how to enter since crypto is a high-risk high-reward kind of market. I'd honestly still tell you to actually split it and go back to stocks, since it is still a way to make your money earn more money, albeit safer than the crypto market. Not to mention that stocks value of a few companies would definitely increase depending on how the situation with the pandemic turns out.