but you are not one of them i guess..
i think many have bought it in group, so they won't lose so much |
|
|
|
just yiimp fees, nothing like sp in the miner itself
else, 1.8.1 is still the last, but a one with sp perf will come in the next 15 days
so the donators will be screwed  |
|
|
|
XCN is worth mining again :-D it reach 358 yesterday but today still at nice 320
it's the best out there if you can add only one rig to it 210x1440/(3500MH/yourhash=180MH with 6 x 1070)x 320 satoshi value = 0.05+ per day with a rig of 1070 working at 30MH each |
|
|
|
1070 get 300 mh, but fury only 254
look at the topic
yeah with private, but i'm actually sitting at 255/130w with the open source |
|
|
|
today
LBRY at private miner: $12.0
dual ЕТH+SIA: $12.3
dual ETH+LBRY: $10.5
XMR: $7.6
i'm making $18+ per day on lbry with 7 x 1070, without the private miner it's your the net or the gross? |
|
|
|
I dont understand why people think Eth mining is not profitable. Unless you have very high electricity costs.
With 2 480s, I mine $4 a day worth of Eth. My electricity cost is $0.1/kwh. I pay about $0.5 dollar per day.
Even if you were paying $0.5/kwh you would STILL be making a profit of $1.50 per day.
And I am pretty sure nobody is paying $0.5 per kwh of electricity.
Most people do not have the RX 480, they have the 280X or the 390, they are more inefficient than the 480. Only by 50%, still profits to be made. "only by 50%" that's a big difference if you want to ask, still remaining at the previous generation is a suicide, if you don't have basically "1 cent" energy |
|
|
|
|
interested in this
Name: Amph
Post count: 25612
Rank: Legendary Member
BTCitcoin address: 1ARz5VBamv9oCoS2qTDgJXDE46JzWkBaYm
Profile UID: 99297
|
|
|
|
Get the funds together and Wolf0 and I might look into it.
Fuck yeah! At last someone competent to get the job done. lets get the fund ready since wolf is into it lets get it done and make zcash great with a miner from wolf  but wolfo will not do the gpu miner nvidia right? so we need another dev |
|
|
|
|
to be honest i prefer one rig setup than 3-4 way, with the latter would be a pain in the ass to move it, too heavy and cumbersome
|
|
|
|
My current stable result with PowerColor Red Dragon RX480 8gb
Core/mem 1275/2200@0.95v both
eth 30.2 / sc 450
gpu-z power draw 110 watt
is that the best result? i remember a 600+ on sia and still 27-28 on eth? |
|
|
|
Is there a profitability calculator for LBRY?
Haven't been able to find one.
no but the math is telling me that the reward per day should be indeed higher, this is one of those coin that has its reward always below what it should be with 1.8GH for example i should do at present diff, around 156 lbry per day instead i'm doing 130-140 at best All I asked is if there is a way to solo mine .I'm running 2 7990's and 3 390x's in my rig I didn't say anything bad about Supernoa's pool I would just rather solo mine if I can sense i'm hitting at least 2 blocks an hr
This is very simple. All you need is more lbrys per day. If it is more than pool mining, then no hesitation to go for solo mining. Do your own tests. Is there any way to actually solo mine at this point? you need a serious hashpower to do a solo at this point, if there was a windows wallet maybe you can try...but there isn't |
|
|
|
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
0.1 BTC is ok for guys with 18+ GPUs, but it's a lot of little miners with 2-4-6 GPU rig In my eyes it will be better to make private miner with 1-2% dev fee So everyones can pay according their hashrates. And it will be no any problem with a coin rate etc. (if like - just use - and pay) P.S. it can be a say 20% less hash free miner to hold a GNU spirit (but i'm not 100% sure, case i'm never saw food market, working under GNU) you can't add 18 gpu to this, or the diff will skyrocket current hash around 3000MH, one 1070 = 30MH, 18 of those would be 540 added already, then add another couple of gpu from other members and you will kill the profit |
|
|
|
|
perhaps it seems the best on paper, but the consumption is not only about electricity cost, you need to factor bigger psu and better cooling when you deal with gpu that consume a lot
which is not something i like
|
|
|
|
LBRY difficulty has risen from 1.8 THASH to 2.6THASH...
yes but the reward is higher, yiimp is on a bad streak for sure, coinmine i'm receiving always the same revenue |
|
|
|
|
reminds me when this coin will be released? also i remember that it was something like cryptonight or hodl algo, so gpu will not be that great at mining it
|
|
|
|
|
you are wrong a 1070 can do 31.5MH at 90w not 145w, which is better than your 470, the only drawback is the initial cost, but considering that it can mine at better rate other algo, it's worth it
|
|
|
|
amd also isn't that good at it, not profitable for them over sia, for what i can tell on the thread
The point was they were 'better' at it with worse hardware. A 480 is outperforming a 1070. That's the baseline. does ccminer opensource 1.8.1 has donate mining fee?
if it is open one can simply remove the fee.. Thanks again for your very confused/confusing answer.. to say that, just stay mute No, there is no mining fees on published one... what is confusing exactly? i just said that if it open source you can simply remove the fee if you know how to check the code, not that hard... You were being a douche. If a developer wants a dev fee for payment for their work, you're advocating simply removing it because 'it's open source'. Basically telling them to go fuck themselves. Jesus dude your dumbass level is over like 9000. SP have you considered removing the flat fee with your miner and dropping it to 2%? Not sure how you ended up at at 3.3% instead of 2% in the first place. no you didn't understand shit, as usual read above what was my point for that response Point is still the same... I read that post before replying, you're just trying to justifying being a douche... It shouldn't matter if it's open source or not. it's not the same, it matter if it is open because fee could simply be removed more easily than private, you can not understand this can you? |
|
|
|
amd also isn't that good at it, not profitable for them over sia, for what i can tell on the thread
The point was they were 'better' at it with worse hardware. A 480 is outperforming a 1070. That's the baseline. does ccminer opensource 1.8.1 has donate mining fee?
if it is open one can simply remove the fee.. Thanks again for your very confused/confusing answer.. to say that, just stay mute No, there is no mining fees on published one... what is confusing exactly? i just said that if it open source you can simply remove the fee if you know how to check the code, not that hard... You were being a douche. If a developer wants a dev fee for payment for their work, you're advocating simply removing it because 'it's open source'. Basically telling them to go fuck themselves. Jesus dude your dumbass level is over like 9000. SP have you considered removing the flat fee with your miner and dropping it to 2%? Not sure how you ended up at at 3.3% instead of 2% in the first place. no you didn't understand shit, as usual read above what was my point for that response |
|
|
|
yep, i understund what you meant after searching for a while for the right grammar (past/present/conditional)
:p
That give : "If it was open source, the fees could be removed"
so not the (original) 1.8.1 which don't have fees... to answer to the question. sp one seems to be also "1.8.1" on the pool side
my point was that it does not make sense for a open source code to have fee, so the guy that was asking about it, should have known this maybe he forget that your version is not private... |
|
|
|
does ccminer opensource 1.8.1 has donate mining fee?
if it is open one can simply remove the fee.. Thanks again for your very confused/confusing answer.. to say that, just stay mute No, there is no mining fees on published one... what is confusing exactly? i just said that if it open source you can simply remove the fee if you know how to check the code, not that hard... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
