I'm going to continue to buy as the price goes up.
And what will you do if it doesn't? I will still buy. Even if it goes down for a year? two years? a decade?
|
|
|
I'm going to continue to buy as the price goes up.
And what will you do if it doesn't?
|
|
|
Regardless of what you guys think, it's worked out well for me.
Much better than holding dollars would have. The volatility doesn't scare me, it is a growing pain.
This simply isn't true. I remember that was the word when we were at the low single digits: If it only goes to triple digits it will be much more stable.
|
|
|
I guess I'm the only one using Bitcoin as a store of value.
Oh well, more for me.
No you are speculating on a higher price. That's what all the "store of value" types do.
|
|
|
Bitcoin has become what it deserved: A running joke...
|
|
|
We better hope there's some good news in the near future, because the sky is indeed falling right now and one bad news coming out of Mt. Gox would absolutely send the price back to single digits.
There isn't any real "good news" to come at this point. The best that can happen is that Gox operates as expected.
|
|
|
I think the most important part of why the thread was so filled with rants is that ppl were trying to influence others to take one particular action.
It worked very much like the btc-e trollbox. OH I almost forgot: SELL SELL SELL!
|
|
|
going down already? ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
I think the point here is: The world now knows about bitcoin, pretty much all of it. But it knows it for what it is: A trading game with scummy figures playing captain of the industry and an attached army of zealots with the attitude of MLM participants.
In short: We're out of suckers.
I agree that we're "out of suckers" as it were but I disagree that the whole world knows about Bitcoin. Outside of my fellow news/tech junkies, only a couple people I know have heard of it. Then of course there's also the fact that the majority of the world doesn't have Internet access ( source). For our purposes that's everybody. When the bubble popped my dad told me on the phone he did read about "those bitcoins" and "how huge they have become" in the newspaper. On that day I saw two teenagers on the street following the bitcoin price on their androids. ("216 Euro!!!") They all learned what Bitcoin is all about: Buy and sell bitcoins.
|
|
|
I think the point here is: The world now knows about bitcoin, pretty much all of it. But it knows it for what it is: A trading game with scummy figures playing captain of the industry and an attached army of zealots with the attitude of MLM participants.
In short: We're out of suckers.
Bitcoin just hasn't found it's niche yet. It will eventually solve the funding issue for open source software, free music communities (free as in permission to reuse), and other crowd-sourced creation endeavors. It will start off as a niche, but in a hundred years it will just be how the economy works.It has. This is it. Ground Zero. It's Max Kaisers and Bruce Wagners forever.
|
|
|
I think the point here is: The world now knows about bitcoin, pretty much all of it. But it knows it for what it is: A trading game with scummy figures playing captain of the industry and an attached army of zealots with the attitude of MLM participants.
In short: We're out of suckers.
|
|
|
Yeah, bitcoin is well on its way to mainstream acceptance...In fact, I was going to buy gas, groceries, rent, car payment, any basic neccesity of life, drugs, porn, and trinkets with my BTC today! I guess, I'll just hold onto them though, because the price can only go up,uP,UP! ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Dont fool yourself, this price is only justified by rampant speculation, not because metart or whoever decided to accept BTC. Just paid for a new web hosting account with bitcoins yesterday. I wasn't even looking for somewhere that accepted them, just happens that the host did. Or does that fit into "drugs, porn, trinkets" somehow? That's one of the few thing they actually make sense to use them for.
|
|
|
You asked me to explain the argument to you, I tried the best I could. You are confusing price with value.
No I am not confusing the two. Yes you do. ... intrinsic perceived value ...
Your perception is intrinsically distorted. nuff said.
|
|
|
You are confusing price with value.
|
|
|
The price is stable in the 70-80 range period will be even better.
|
|
|
Bump. Lets see how this "Price is `stable` in the 80-90 range" period plays out. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Whether you believe bitcoin is currency or not Typical shill opening. What does that even mean? The opening was an acknowledgement that some view bitcoin as a currency and some do not. Regardless of that viewpoint the post was about the Forbes article and what appears to be a flawed logical argument. It may be that the conclusion of the article is true but the arguments seem flawed The argument isn't flawed, your thinking is. You are repeating yourself. Are you stuck in your thought pattern? It would be more helpful if you actually presented your viewpoint and arguments rather than just tell me I'm wrong. I am interested in your take on the article Money is related to value, this is called backing. Historically that meant vouchers for a hand of grain which was stored by the local sovereign, backed by a standing army. In modern terms that means you can pay your taxes with it which are used to provide infrastructure, black helicopters and and food stamps. It is backed by the police and military and you are guaranteed to be able to pay all your debts with it, not just taxes. You now probably say now: But that's socialism! Wrong. Modern society is built on structure and what you call socialism provides that structure for you, what you call capitalism enables you access to this structure. Now if the Bitcoin network would do something else than crunching hashes, something which is actually useful like sequencing DNA that would be something different.
|
|
|
Whether you believe bitcoin is currency or not Typical shill opening. What does that even mean? The opening was an acknowledgement that some view bitcoin as a currency and some do not. Regardless of that viewpoint the post was about the Forbes article and what appears to be a flawed logical argument. It may be that the conclusion of the article is true but the arguments seem flawed The argument isn't flawed, your thinking is. You are repeating yourself. Are you stuck in your thought pattern?
|
|
|
The reason I think old miners will vote for less reward is that the voting is intended to be valid for everybody, in a similar way difficulty is calculated. The thought is that old miners will most likely already have a decent stash of coins and will more likely be interested in preserving or increasing the value of the stash than accumulating more.
Hmm I don't think this will work. We'd have some kind of prisoners' dilemma situation between the old miners here. Old Miner Joe would be tempted to not forgo his reward "for the common good" when all other old miners are supposed to, just because it's written down on the Golden Plaque of Ye Olde Miners' Guild or something. I think you still misunderstand me. Miners won't be able to determine their own individual reward. The way it is supposed to work is for miners to write the desired reward into the block and the actual reward would be the moving average of the last n blocks. So nobody would forgo their own reward in a sense that the current vote will be valid for everybody who finds a block.
|
|
|
Whether you believe bitcoin is currency or not Typical shill opening.
|
|
|
|